Develop Reference

itext5 sign image over context

When I sign a document and I use an image in the signature appearance, I get this result:
However, I want the result to be like this:
This is my code:
PdfSignatureAppearance appearance = stamper.getSignatureAppearance();
appearance.setReason(info.getReason());
appearance.setLocation(info.getLocation());
appearance.setVisibleSignature(t.getRectangle(), 1, "SIGN");
appearance.setSignatureGraphic(image);
appearance.setCertificationLevel(PdfSignatureAppearance.NOT_CERTIFIED);
appearance.setRenderingMode(PdfSignatureAppearance.RenderingMode.GRAPHIC);
MakeSignature.signDetached(appearance, digest, signature,chain, null, null, null, 0, MakeSignature.CryptoStandard.CADES);

The visual representation of a digital signature in a PDF document is a widget annotation. A widget annotation is a specific type of annotation.
In PDF, you have the actual content of a page. This content is stored in a content stream. A page is defined in a page dictionary. There's a /Contents entry in this page dictionary that refers to one of more content streams. Together these content streams contain the syntax that describes the content of a page.
Annotations are not part of any of those streams. Annotations are referred to from the page dictionary using the /Annots entry. In your case, there is an /Annots entry that refers to a widget annotation with the appearance of your signature.
All annotations are rendered on top of the actual page content.
To make a long story short: you have a PDF with some page content and the appearance of an annotation is added on top of that page content. This is normal. This is as described in ISO-32000-1. You are now asking for a PDF viewer to render annotations under the page content. This is not possible according to the PDF specification.
The short answer to your question is: you are asking something that can't be done. The closest you'll get to a solution is to make the image transparent (but that's another question).

While Bruno's answer is correct - there is no way to make the signature annotation appearance to be beneath the content -, in some cases you can make it appear to be.
Blend mode use
Bruno already mentioned that one approach might be to make the image transparent. Regular (alpha channel style) transparency has one major disadvantage, though: the original content or the image (probably both) will appear somewhat pale. But there is a related technique in PDF for puting foreground and backdrop together in a special way: blend modes.
In particular if your pdf content is mostly black and white, using the blend mode Darken or Multiply will create a result looking like the desired image.
Signature graphic in content
If your pdf has not been signed yet, you can actually add the signature image to the page background itself, e.g. using the UnderContent of the PdfStamper. (If the page has an opaque background, e.g. due to white filled rectangle as background, this will become a bit more difficult but still manageable.)
Page content in signature appearance
Alternatively you can draw a copy of the page content over the image in the signature annotation appearance. This also works for previously signed PDFs but is also sensitive to opaque page contents.

How to add a row in a itext PdfPTable dynamically?

I have to create a pdf using itext which will contain a button, when clicked should add a row in an existing PdfPTable. I wrote some code to create a PushbuttonField. While trying to set action I can only find PdfAction.javaScript. I am not able to figure out how to add a row in a table. I tried searching online but all I could find is PdfAction.javaScript
Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

When you create a PDF file, you draw text, lines and shapes to a canvas. That is also what happens when you add a PdfPTable to a Document. If you look at the syntax of the PDF page, you won't recognize a table. You'll find text (the content of the cells), lines (the borders), and shapes (the backgrounds), but you won't find a table. If the table is distributed over different pages, the "table" on one page won't know that it is related to the "table" on the other page.
Sure, you can add semantic structure to the document by introducing marked content, and by creating a structure tree, but that mechanism which we call Tagged PDF can't be used to make the PDF "editable" the same way a Word document is editable. Tagged PDF is (among others) used to allow assistive technology to present the content to the visually impaired (e.g. in the context of PDF/UA). The presence of structure doesn't change the fact that all text, all lines, and all shapes are added at absolute positions.
This is very different from HTML where the position on a page of a <table>, <tr>, <th>, or <td> is calculated at the moment the page is rendered. In HTML this position can even change when you resize the browser window.
There is no such thing in PDF (except if you use XFA (*), a technology that is deprecated since ISO 32000-2). All content on a page has a fixed position, hardcoded into the page's content stream. Changing the size of the PDF viewer window won't change anything to the position of the page content.
Because of all of this, your question is invalid. It is impossible to create a button in PDF that adds a row to a table, because:
In many cases there is no table: there is just a bunch of text, lines, and shapes at absolute positions,
Even if there is the notion of a table (using Tagged PDF): the visual represenation of that table is fixed at creation time, it can't be changed at consumption time.
You want to use an ordinary PDF viewer as if it were a PDF editor. That is impossible for all the reasons listed above.
(*) XFA was deprecated for different reasons. One of the most important reasons it is the lack of support for XFA. There aren't many viewers that support XFA. If you would post a follow-up question asking *"How can I create an XFA document?", the answer would be: "Don't do this!" Creating XFA is extremely complex, and once you've succeeded in creating an XFA form, you'll discover that many of your customers won't be able to consume the file because their viewer doesn't support the format.

How to add a non-printable image in xsl / apache-fop

I'm trying to generate an xsl to be printed in a pre-printed sheet which works fine.
Now i want to give the user a better previsualization (in the pdf screen version) adding a background image which emulates the "pre-printed" stuf on the sheet to give the user a "context" of what is he printing.
The question is: Is there any way I can set a background image in xsl (using apache fop) visible only in pdf but not in the printed version of it?
Thank you all for reading or givin any advice.

Although as the comments state, you can't have content in the PDF that does not come out in a physical printed copy, here is one possible work around for you. Depending on how your users are ultimately going to be using FOP for PDF rendering and how your a driving the work flow, it's possible to pass a parameter into an xslt file before the transofrmation phase is run, so potentially, you could do a dual rendering of the same PDF, one that is presented to the user where the background image is enabled, and one that gets printed, you could just set a variable similar to how they do in this Example, and call it something like $isPreview, and just use a simple if or choose statement to check for 'Y' or 'N'.
Since you are sending to a printer, you may even want to take advantage of FOP's ability to generate to Postscript rather than PDF, I've used this feature quite extensively for print documents using FOP while also producing a PDF copy for electronic delivery via email or hosted services, and I've yet to find any discrepancy between the PDF rendering and what is printed after sending a rendered postscript file, so it should work well for you as well.
As I said, this is not truly a solution to your problem as you've presented it, but as a work around, it could get you the desired results if your clever about how you implement it.

I don;t think the statement that it is not possible is true, I am just not sure how to create such a PDF with FOP. Certainly you can add an image field. One would use a button field and place the image in the button. Then you would set the properties of that button to not print (printable false).
PDF support images in fields: https://answers.acrobatusers.com/adding-image-field-form-q41825.aspx
RenderX supports PDF Form fields but I do not see where they support an image inside the button, only text: http://www.renderx.com/reference.html#PDF%20Forms. But they do support setting a field to "printable".

Read PDF text and/or all content

I have a scenario where I need a Java app to be able to extract content from a PDF file in one of 2 modes: TEXT_ONLY or ALL. In text mode, only visible text ("visible" as if a human being was reading the PDF) is read out into strings. In all mode, all content (text, images, etc.) is read out of the file.
For instance, if a PDF file was to have 1 page in it, and that page had 3 paragraphs of contiguous text, and was word-wrapping 2 images, then TEXT_ONLY would extract all 3 paragraphs, and ALL would extract all 3 paragraphs and both images:
while(page.hasMoreText())
textList.add(page.nextTextChunk());
if(allMode)
while(page.hasMoreImages())
imageList.add(page.nextImage());
I know Apache Tika uses PDFBox under the hood, but am worried that this kind of functionality is shaded/prohibited by Tika (in which case, I probably need to do this directly from PDFBox).
So I ask: is this possible, and if so, which library is more appropriate for me to use? Am I going about this entirely the wrong way? Any pitfalls/caveats I am not considering here?

To expound some aspects of why #markStephens points you towards some resources giving some background on PDF.
In text mode, only visible text ("visible" as if a human being was reading the PDF) is read out into strings.
Your definition "visible" as if a human being was reading the PDF is not yet very well-defined:
Is text 1 pt in size visible? When zooming in, a human can read it; in standard magnification not, though. Which size would be the limit?
Is text in RGB (128, 129, 128) in a background of (128, 128, 128) visible? How different have the colors to be?
Is text displayed in some white noise pattern on a background of some other white noise pattern visible? How different have patterns to be?
Is text only partially on-screen visible? If yes, is one visible pixel enough? And what about some character 'I' in a giant size where the visible page area fits into the dot on the letter?
What about text covered by some annotation which can easily be moved, probably even by some automatically executed JavaScript code in the file?
What about text in some optional content group only visible when printing?
*...
I would expect most available PDF text parsing libraries to ignore all these circumstances and extract the text, at most respecting a crop box. In case of images with added, invisible OCR'ed text the extraction of that text in general is desired.
For instance, if a PDF file was to have 1 page in it, and that page had 3 paragraphs of contiguous text, and was word-wrapping 2 images, then TEXT_ONLY would extract all 3 paragraphs, and ALL would extract all 3 paragraphs and both images:
PDF (in general) does not know about paragraphs, just some groups of glyphs positioned somewhere on the page. Recognizing paragraphs is a task which cannot be guaranteed to work properly as there are heuristics at work. If, furthermore, you have multicolumn text with an irregular separation, maybe even some image in between (making it hard to decide whether there are two columns divided by the image or whether there is one column with an integrated image), you can count on recognition of the text flow let alone text elements like paragraphs, sections, etc. to fail miserably.
If your PDFs are either properly tagged or all generated by a tool chain for which patterns in the created PDF content streams betray text structures, you may be more lucky. In case of the latter, though, your solution would have to be custom-made for that tool chain.
but am worried that this kind of functionality is shaded/prohibited by Tika (in which case, I probably need to do this directly from pdfBox).
There you point towards another point of interest: PDFs can be marked that text extraction is forbidden while they otherwise can be displayed by anyone. While technically PDFs marked like that can be handled just like documents without that mark with just one decoding step (essentially they are encrypted with a publicly known password), doing so is clearly acting against the declared intention of the author and violating his copyright.
So I ask: is this possible, and if so, which library is more appropriate for me to use? Am I going about this entirely the wrong way? Any pitfalls/caveats I am not considering here?
As long as you expect 100% accuracy for generic input, you should reconsider your architecture.
If the PDFs are all you have and a solution as effective is possible is OK, on the other hand, there are multiple possible libraries for you, iText, and PDFBox to name but two while there are more. Which is best for you depends on more factors, e.g. on whether you need some generic solution or all PDFs are created by a tool chain as above.
In any case you'll have to do some programming yourself, though, to fine-tune them for your use case.

Read Text and Image Locations (x.y coordinates) using PDFBox

I am doing a java program to read encrypted PDF files and extract the contents of the file page by page including the text, images and their positions(x,y coordinates) in the file. Now I'm using PDFBox for this purpose and I'm getting the text and images. But I couldn't get the text position and image position. Also there are some problems reading some encrypted PDF files.

Take a look at org.apache.pdfbox.examples.util.PrintTextLocations. I've used it quite a bit and it's very helpful to make analyses on the layout of elements and bounding boxes in PDF documents. It also revealed items printed in white ink, or outside the printable area (presumably document watermarks, or "forgotten" items pushed out of sight by the author).
Usage example:
java -cp app/target/pdfbox-app-1.5.0.jar org.apache.pdfbox.examples.util.PrintTextLocations ~/tmp/mydoc.pdf >~/tmp/out-text-locations.txt
You'll get something like that:
Processing page: 0
String[53.9,59.856995 fs=-6.0 xscale=6.0 height=-3.666 space=1.3320001 width=4.6679993]A
String[58.568,59.856995 fs=-6.0 xscale=6.0 height=-3.666 space=1.3320001 width=2.6640015]f
String[61.232002,59.856995 fs=-6.0 xscale=6.0 height=-3.666 space=1.3320001 width=1.6679993]e
...
Which you can easily parse and use to plot element's position, bounding-box, and the "flow" (trajectory through all the elements), etc. for each page. As I'm sure you are already aware of, you'll find that PDF can be almost impossible to convert to text. It is really just a graphic description format (i.e. for the printer or the screen), not a markup language. You could easily make a PDF that prints "Hello world", but that jumps randomly through the character positions (and that uses different glyphs than any ISO char encoding, if you so choose), making the PDF very hard to convert to text. There is no notion of "word" or "paragraph". A two-column document, for example, can be a nightmare to parse into text.
For the second part of your question, I had good results using xpdf version 3.02, after fixing Xref.cc (make XRef::okToPrint(),XRef::okToChange(),XRef::okToCopy() and XRef::okToAddNotes() all return gTrue). That's to handle locked documents, not encrypted ones (there are other utils out there for that).