Develop Reference

How do I make 2d- Flashlight effect in Processing 3

For reference the effect I'm going for is this:
I'm working in Processing 3, NOT p5.js.
I've looked around processing forums, but i can't find anything that works in the current version or doesn't use PGraphics and a mask which from what I've read can be expensive to use.
My current ideas and implementations have resulted to drawing shapes around the player and filling the gaps in with a circles with no fill that has a large stroke weight.
Does anyone know of any methods to easily and inexpensively draw a black background over everything except a small circular area?
If this is the wrong place to ask this question just send me on my way I guess, but please be nice. Thank you:)

You could create an image (or PGraphics) that consists of mostly black, with a transparent circle in it. This is called image masking or alpha compositing. Doing a Google image search for "alpha composite" returns a bunch of the images I'm talking about.
Anyway, after you have the image, it's just a matter of drawing it on top of your scene wherever the player is. You might also use the PImage#mask() function. More info can be found in the reference.

Physics-based/Polynomial Animation with Box2d (Java)

I'm creating a 2d game using the Java version of Box2d.
I know that the engine is generally paired with a separate library to handle animation, but I'm looking for something simple, with a more rustic feel, so I'm considering handling the animation from scratch.
The animation I am trying to create is something for the collision of two objects.
I'm using openGl to handle the graphics, and I pretty much have everything set up with the fps and rendering, it's just a matter of tweaking the frames to make it look smooth.
I tried bliting images of some things that I drew myself and it looked atrocious. I think the main problem is that the animation frame images are not linked to the physics forces and so they don't blend well.
What I want to try next is a sort 'spark effect' using a small number of pixels that sort of resemble 'dust' exploding off of the colliding images. If you've ever played dxball, you may recall a similar effect when the ball collided with the paddle at high speed.
As you can see in the above image, the principles are fairly simple. I figure by creating a set of small bodies with fixtures, I can use the box2d engine to produce this effect. I already have code that grabs the point of collision for all bodies, and am familiar enough with parabolic functions that I pretty sure I can create the force direction.
I'm just not sure if there is a better way of doing this, or how to apply a polynomial function to a body like in the image.
Does anybody know how to achieve this functionality with box2d? Any built in methods or documentation that would be helpful?
As a point of reference, the following snippet of code demonstrates the drawing of a small, red box on all of the collision points.
for(Vec2 point : listener.worldmanifold.points){
glPushMatrix();
newpos = point.mul(30);
glTranslatef(newpos.x, newpos.y, 0);
glColor3f(1,0,0);
glRectf(-2, -2, 2, 2);
glPopMatrix();
}

Render to half-sized framebuffer, then scale it up to achieve pixelated look

I am about to create a little 2D desktop game with libGdx and I want it to have that retro pixelated look you know from games like "Flappy Bird". To achieve that effect, I thought of the following:
Create a game window (e.g. 640x480)
Create a framebuffer half that size (i.e. 320x200)
Render everything to the framebuffer
Get the texture from the framebuffer
Draw the texture to the screen with SpriteBatch, scaling it 2 times up and using TextureFilter.Nearest.
I know I could scale each sprite individually with SpriteBatch.draw() but I thought, rendering everything at its original resolution and just scale up the final composition might be easier.
So would the above technique be an appropriate way of getting that pixelated look?

What you have in mind sounds like a perfectly fine approach. The downside is that it does involve an additional data copy, but on the other hand your original rendering is for only 1/4 of the pixels, which saves you quite a bit of rendering overhead.
In plain OpenGL, you could use glBlitFramebuffer() for step 5. This requires OpenGL 3.0 or higher. It's essentially the same operation as drawing a textured quad, but it's a single call, and the underlying implementation could potentially be more efficient.

Using a semi transparent texture to "mask" out a part of the background

I am attempting to create a "hole in the fog" effect. I have a background grid image, overlapped onto that I have a "fog" texture that I use to show that certain areas are not in view. I am attempting to cut a chunk out of "fog" that will show the area that is currently in view. I am trying to "mask" a part of the fog off the screen.
I made some images to help explain what I am after:
Background:
"Mask Image" (The full transparency has to be on the inside and not the outer rim for what I am going to use it for):
Fog (Sorry, hard to see.. Mostly Transparent):
What I want as a final Product:
I have tried:
Stencil-Buffer: I got this fully working except for one fact... I wasn't able to figure out how to retain the fading transparency of the "mask" image.
glBlendFunc: I have tried many different version of the parameters and many other methods with it (glColorMask, glBlendEquation, glBlendFuncSeparate) I started by using some parameter that I found on this website: here. I used the "glBlendFunc(GL_ZERO, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA);" as this seemed to be what I was looking for but... This is what ended up happening as a result: (Its hard to tell what is happening here but... There is fog covering the grid in the background. Though, the mask is just ending up as an fully opaque black blob when its supposed to be a transparent part in the fog.
Some previous code:
glEnable(GL_BLEND); // This is not really called here... It is called on the init function of the program as it is needed all the way through the rendering cycle.
renderFogTexture(delta, 0.55f); // This renders the fog texture over the background the 0.55f is the transparency of the image.
glBlendFunc(GL_ZERO, GL11.GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA); // This is the one I tried from one of the many website I have been to today.
renderFogCircles(delta); // This just draws one (or more) of the mask images to remove the fog in key places.
(I would have posted more code but after I tried many things I started removing some old code as it was getting very cluttered (I "backed them up" in block comments))

This is doable, provided that you're not doing anything with the alpha of the framebuffer currently.
Step 1: Make sure that the alpha of the framebuffer is cleared to zero. So your glClearColor call needs to set the alpha to zero. Then call glClear as normal.
Step 2: Draw the mask image before you draw the "fog". As Tim said, once you blend with your fog, you can't undo that. So you need the mask data there first.
However, you also need to render the mask specially. You only want the mask to modify the framebuffer's alpha. You don't want it to mess with the RGB color. To do that, use this function: glColorMask(GL_FALSE, GL_FALSE, GL_FALSE, GL_TRUE). This turns off writes to the RGB part of the color; thus, only the alpha will be modified.
Your mask texture seems to have zero where it is visible and one where it isn't. However, the algorithm needs the opposite, so you should either fix your texture or use a glTexEnv mode that will effectively flip the alpha.
After this step, your framebuffer should have an alpha of 0 where we want to see the fog, and an alpha of 1 where we don't.
Also, don't forget to undo the glColorMask call after rendering the mask. You need to get those colors back.
Step 3: Render the fog. That's easy enough; to make the masking work, you need a special blend mode. Like this one:
glEnable(GL_BLEND);
glBlendEquation(GL_FUNC_ADD);
glBlendFuncSeparate(GL_ONE_MINUS_DST_ALPHA, GL_DST_ALPHA, GL_ZERO, GL_ONE);
The separation between the RGB and A blend portions is important. You don't want to change the framebuffer's alpha (just in case you want to render more than one layer of fog).
And you're done.

The approach you're currently taking will not work, as once you draw the fog over the whole screen, there's no way to 'erase' it.
If you're using fixed pipeline:
You can use multitexturing (glTexEnv) with fixed pipeline to combine the fog and circle textures in a single pass. This function is probably kind of confusing if you haven't used it before, you'll probably have to spend some time studying the man page. You'll do something like bind fog to glActiveTexture 0, and mask to glActiveTexture 1, enable multitexturing, and then combine them with glTexEnv. I don't remember exactly the right parameters for this.
If you're using shaders:
Use a multitexturing shader where you multiply the fog alpha with the circle texture (to zero out the alpha in the circle region), and then blend this combined texture into the background in a single pass. This is probably a more conceptually easy approach, but not sure if you're using shaders.
I'm not sure there's a way you can do this where you draw the fog and the mask in separate passes, as they both have their own alpha values, it will be difficult to combine them to get the right color result.

OpenGL: Create a sky box?

I'm new to OpenGL. I'm using JOGL.
I would like to create a sky for my world that I can texture with clouds or stars. I'm not sure what the best way to do this is. My first instinct is to make a really big sphere with quadric orientation GLU_INSIDE, and texture that. Is there a better way?

A skybox is a pretty good way to go. You'll want to use a cube map for this. Basically, you render a cube around the camera and map a texture onto the inside of each face of the cube. I believe OpenGL may include this in its fixed function pipeline, but in case you're taking the shader approach (fixed function is deprecated anyway), you'll want to use cube map samplers (samplerCUBE in Cg, not sure about GLSL). When drawing the cube map, you also want to remove translation from the modelview matrix but keep the rotation (this causes the skybox to "follow" the camera but allows you to look around at different parts of the sky).
The best thing to do is actually draw the cube map after drawing all opaque objects. This may seem strange because by default the sky will block other objects, but you use the following trick (if using shaders) to avoid this: when writing the final output position in the vertex shader, instead of writing out .xyzw, write .xyww. This will force the sky to the far plane which causes it to be behind everything. The advantage to this is that there is absolutely 0 overdraw!

Yes.
Making a really big sphere has two major problems. First, you may encounter problems with clipping. The sky may disappear if it is outside of your far clipping distance. Additionally, objects that enter your sky box from a distance will visually pass through a very solid wall. Second, you are wasting a lot of polygons(and a lot of pain) for a very simple effect.
Most people actually use a small cube(Hence the name "Sky box"). You need to render the cube in the pre-pass with depth testing turned off. Thus, all objects will render on top of the cube regardless of their actual distance to you. Just make sure that the length of a side is greater than twice your near clipping distance, and you should be fine.

Spheres are nice to handle as they easily avoid distortions, corners etc. , which may be visible in some situations. Another possibility is a cylinder.
For a really high quality sky you can make a sky lighting simulation, setting the sphere colors depending on the time (=> sun position!) and direction, and add some clouds as 3D objects between the sky sphere and the view position.