I've got loads of the following to implement.
validateParameter(field_name, field_type, field_validationMessage, visibleBoolean);
Instead of having 50-60 of these in a row, is there some form of nested hashmap/4d array I can use to build it up and loop through them?
Whats the best approach for doing something like that?
Thanks!
EDIT: Was 4 items.
What you could do is create a new Class that holds three values. (The type, the boolean, and name, or the fourth value (you didn't list it)). Then, when creating the HashMap, all you have to do is call the method to get your three values. It may seem like more work, but all you would have to do is create a simple loop to go through all of the values you need. Since I don't know exactly what it is that you're trying to do, all I can do is provide an example of what I'm trying to do. Hope it applies to your problem.
Anyways, creating the Class to hold the three(or four) values you need.
For example,
Class Fields{
String field_name;
Integer field_type;
Boolean validationMessageVisible;
Fields(String name, Integer type, Boolean mv) {
// this.field_name = name;
this.field_type = type;
this.validationMessageVisible = mv;
}
Then put them in a HashMap somewhat like this:
HashMap map = new HashMap<String, Triple>();
map.put(LOCAL STRING FOR NAME OF FIELD, new Field(new Integer(YOUR INTEGER),new Boolean(YOUR BOOLEAN)));
NOTE: This is only going to work as long as these three or four values can all be stored together. For example if you need all of the values to be stored separately for whatever reason it may be, then this won't work. Only if they can be grouped together without it affecting the function of the program, that this will work.
This was a quick brainstorm. Not sure if it will work, but think along these lines and I believe it should work out for you.
You may have to make a few edits, but this should get you in the right direction
P.S. Sorry for it being so wordy, just tried to get as many details out as possible.
The other answer is close but you don't need a key in this case.
Just define a class to contain your three fields. Create a List or array of that class. Loop over the list or array calling the method for each combination.
The approach I'd use is to create a POJO (or some POJOs) to store the values as attributes and validate attribute by attribute.
Since many times you're going to have the same validation per attribute type (e.g. dates and numbers can be validated by range, strings can be validated to ensure they´re not null or empty, etc), you could just iterate on these attributes using reflection (or even better, using annotations).
If you need to validate on the POJO level, you can still reuse these attribute-level validators via composition, while you add more specific validations are you´re going up in the abstraction level (going up means basic attributes -> pojos -> pojos that contain other pojos -> etc).
Passing several basic types as parameters of the same method is not good because the parameters themselves don't tell much and you can easily exchange two parameters of the same type by accident in the method call.
Related
I have a Java Object, Record . It represents a single record as a result of SQL execution. Can CQEngine index collection of Record ?
My class is of the form
public class Record {
private List<String> columnNames;
private List<Object> values;
... Other getters
}
I have looked through some examples, but I have no luck there.
I want to index only specific column(s) with its name and corresponding value. Can this be achived using cqengine or is there any other alternatives to achieve the same.
Thanks.
That seems to be a strange way to model data, but you can use CQEngine with that model if you wish.
(First off, CQEngine will have no use for your column names so you can remove that field.)
To do this, you will need to define a CQEngine virtual attribute for each of the indexes in your list of values.
Each attribute will need to be declared with the data type which will be stored in that column/index, and will need to be able to cast the object at that index in your list of values, to the appropriate data type (String, Double, Integer etc.).
So let's say your Record has a column called 'price', which is of type Double, and is stored at index 5 in the list of values. You could define an attribute which reads it as follows:
public static final Attribute<Record, Double> PRICE =
attribute("PRICE", record -> ((Double) record.values.get(5));
If this sounds complicated, it's because that way of modelling data makes things a bit complicated :) It's usually easier to work with a data model which leverages the Java type system (which your model does not). As such, you will need to keep track of the data types etc. of each field programmatically yourself.
CQEngine itself will work fine with that model though, because at the end of the day CQEngine attributes don't need to read fields, the attributes are just functions which are programmed to fetch values.
There's a bunch of stuff not covered above. For example can your values be null? (if so, you should use the nullable variety of attributes as discussed in the CQEngine docs. Or, might each of your Record objects have different sets of columns? (if so, you can create attributes on-the-fly when you encounter a new column, but you should probably cache the attributes you have created somewhere).
Hope that helps,
Niall (CQEngine author)
So i've got a bot that serves as a roleplaying mamager handeling combat, skill points and the like, i'm trying to make my code a bit more general so i can have less pages since they all do the same thing they just have different initilizers but i ran into a snag i need to check if the user has a minimum in a particular stat Strength, perceptions, agility, etc
so i call
mainSPECIAL = rows[0].Strength;
Here's the rub, weathers it strength, percpetion, intelligence, luck, whatever i'm always going to be checking Rows[0].that attribute ie Rows[0].Luck for luck perks, and i already set earlier in my initilizers
var PERKSPECIALName = "Strength";
But i can't call
mainSPECIAL = rows[0].PERKSPECIALName but there should be a way to do that right? so that when it sees "rows[0].PERKSPECIALName" it looks up "PERKSPECIALName" and then fetches the value of rows[0].Strength
For this you need to use reflection:
Field f1 = rows[0].getClass().getField(PERKSPECIALName);
Integer attribute = (Integer) f1.get(rows[0]);
Where "Integer" is the type of the element your pulling from the object (the type of strength)
The field must be declared as public! I think there is a way to obtain them when they are not public but it requires more code.
Seems like you have a set of integers that you need to identify with a constant identifier. You might find an EnumMap useful. Have a look at How to use enumMap in java.
Or if you want to only use a string to identify which perk you want to reference, just use a Map.
Java doesn't have reference-to-member like some other languages, so if you don't want to change your data structure, you are looking at using lambda functions or heavier language features to increase re-use, which seems like overkill for what you're trying to do.
I have an object the represent an entity. By example i have the "user" java object that have the followings field, String name, String first name, String address, boolean deadOrAlive. But now instead of having field i want to put them into a hashmap, so my first reflex was to make it this way :
private HashMap<String, Object> fieldsHM;
This would means that i have to cast my HM value when i want to use it and i don't want to make that because i need to know the type before i use my value. I want to make something like :
Set<String> keys = fieldsHM.keySet();
for(String key : keys) {
if(fieldsHM.get(key).isBoolean()) {
// Do the appropriate things
} else {
// Do the thing for this case...
}
}
I think it's possible in java, would this be good to do it this way ?
EDIT 1: I don't want to make a hashMap because this is not what i need. What i need is a way to browse the fields of the Entity user fields by fields, and depending the type of the field do the appropriate things.
I don't want to make a hashMap because this is not what i need. What i
need is a way to browse the fields of the Entity user fields by
fields, and depending the type of the field do the appropriate things.
I guess that would be a job for Reflection, like User.class.getFields().
It will still be uncomfortable to distinguish between primitive field, but you could use their wrapper classes instead.
But whatever path you choose, I think there would be a better solution if you would state what the actual goal is.
Depending on your actual use case, it might make sense to use JSON (maybe with databind) or even a database.
You could use the heterogeneous container pattern, but I would abandon the map idea and use a proper object.
Java program takes a long list of inputs(parameters), churns a bit and spits some output.
I need a way to organize these parameters in a sane way so in the input txt file I want to write them like this:
parameter1 = 12
parameter2 = 10
strategy1.parameter1 = "goofy"
strategy2.parameter4 = 100.0
Then read this txt file, turn it into a Java object I can pass around to objects when I instantiate them.
I now pyqtgraph has ParameterTree which is handy to use; is there something similar in Java? I am sure others must have had the same need so I don't want to reinvent the wheel.
(other tree structures would also be fine, of course, I just wanted something easy to read)
One way is to turn input.txt into input.json:
{
"parameter1": 12,
"parameter2": 10,
"strategy1": {
"parameter1": "goofy"
},
"strategy2": {
"parameter4": 100.0
}
}
Then use Jackson to deserialize input.json into one of these:
A Map<String, Object> instance, which you could navigate in depth to get all your parameters
An instance of some class of your own that mimics input.json's structure, where your parameters would reside
A JsonNode instance that would be the root of the tree
(1) has the advantage that it's easy and you don't have to create any class to read the parameters, however you'd need to traverse the map, downcast the values you get from it, and you'd need to know the keys in advance (keys match json object's attribute names).
(2) has the advantage that everything would be correctly typed upon deserialization; no need to downcast anything, since every type would be a field of your own classes which represent the structure of the parameters. However, if the structure of your input.json file changed, you would need to change the structure of your classes as well.
(3) is the most flexible of all, and I believe it's the option that is closest to what you have in mind, nonetheless is the most tedious to work with, since it's too low-level. Please refer to this article for further details.
I am quite new to java currently working on a not-so-simple web browser application in which I would like to record a permanent history file with a 2D array setup with 3 columns containing "Date Viewed", "URL", "How many times this URL has been viewed before".
Currently I have a temporary solution that only saves "URL" which is also used for "Back, Foward" features using an ArrayList.
private List tempHistory = new ArrayList();
I am reading through the Java documentation but I cannot put together a solution, unless I am missing the obvious there is no 2D array as flexible a ArrayList like in Python?
From your description it doesn't sound like you need a 2D array. You just have one dimension -- but of complex data types, right?
So define a HistoryItem class or something with a Date property for date viewed, URL for URL, int for view count.
Then you just want a List<HistoryItem> history = new ArrayList<HistoryItem>().
The reason I don't think you really want a 2D array-like thing is that it could only hold one data type, and you clearly have several data types at work here, like a date and a count. But if you really want a table-like abstraction, try Guava's Table.
No, there is no built-in 2D array type in Java (unless you use primitive arrays).
You could just use a list of lists (List<List>) - however, I think it is almost always better to use a custom type that you put into the list. In your case, you'd create a class HistoryEntry (with fields for "Date viewed", URL etc.), and use List<HistoryEntry>. That way, you get all the benefits a proper type gives you (typechecking, completion in an IDE, ability to put methods into the class etc.).
How do you plan to browse the history then? If you want to search the history for each url later on then ArrayList approach might not be efficient.
I would rather prefer a Map with URL as key.
Map<Url,UrlHistory> browseHistory = new HahMap<Url,UrlHistory> ();
UrlHistory will contains all the fields you want to associate with a url like no. of times page was accessed and all.