Muitiplexed socket communication in Java - java

I am writing a server program that can accept communication from multiple (but fixed) number of clients. I want to keep the program single-threaded. To do so, I am using non-blocking socket to iterate over each client, but each client's channel uses blocking mode. Here's my server code:
class server {
public static void main(String args[])
throws Exception {
ServerSocketChannel channel = ServerSocketChannel.open();
channel.configureBlocking(false);
channel.socket().bind(new java.net.InetSocketAddress("localhost", 8005));
System.out.println("Server attivo porta 8005");
Selector selector = Selector.open();
channel.register(selector, SelectionKey.OP_ACCEPT);
for(;;) {
selector.select();
Set keys = selector.selectedKeys();
Iterator i = keys.iterator();
while(i.hasNext()) {
SelectionKey key = (SelectionKey) i.next();
i.remove();
if (key.isAcceptable()) {
SocketChannel client = channel.accept();
client.configureBlocking(true);
ObjectInputStream ois = new ObjectInputStream(
client.socket().getInputStream());
String s = (String)ois.readObject();
System.out.println(s);
}
}
}
}
}
The client uses simple blocking I/O, as shown here:
class client {
public static void main(String args[]) throws Exception {
SocketChannel channel = SocketChannel.open();
channel.configureBlocking(true);
channel.connect(new java.net.InetSocketAddress("localhost", 8005));
ObjectOutputStream oos = new ObjectOutputStream
(channel.socket().getOutputStream());
for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
oos.writeObject(new String("Hello " + i));
System.out.println(i);
}
}
}
The problem is that although the client wants to write 100 times, the server is reading the message just once. Neither the server nor the client is giving any exception, but I am only getting the output "Hello 0" from the server. Is there any problem in what I am doing here? If so, what alternatives do I have?
Thanks.
Update: Closing the ObjectInputStream within the server's loop gives a BrokenPipeException by the client (the server behaves in the same way).

The issue is that you're just checking for new connections with key.isAcceptable(). You also need to check for reads with key.isReadble(). You should only be doing connection setup from key.isAcceptable().
See Java ServerSocketChannel SocketChannel (Callback)

The problem is that the server is not waiting for the client to send all it's data. In client server programs, what you need to do is to establish a clear protocol between both so that they are in sync when data is transmitted/received. This is usually done by signaling an end of transmission by either side by sending a designated symbol or closing the connection when they are done

Related

Java NIO closing one channel resulting the other channel not responding

I just found that the problem might due to multi-threading problem. After the read() method I sent the request to several worker threads to process the data. When the thread pool size is 1, the problem doesn't occur. However, when the thread pool size is bigger than 1, this problem occurs.
I initialized my threadpool before the while(true) loop, and execute my worker thread after the read() method.
I'm using Java NIO in a middleware that connects a memtier client and a memcached server. The system works fine with only one clients connected, however, when there are more clients connected, when one client finishes and closes its channel, the other client won't be able to read or write to its channel any more.
My implementation looks like the following:
public void run() {
try{
// Connect to client
selector = Selector.open();
ServerSocketChannel server = ServerSocketChannel.open();
server.configureBlocking(false);
InetSocketAddress address = new InetSocketAddress(8000);
server.socket().bind(address);
server.register(selector,SelectionKey.OP_ACCEPT);
// Connect to Server
Socket socket = new Socket("localhost",8090);
// Select keys
while (true) {
selector.select();
Iterator<SelectionKey> iterator = selector.selectedKeys().iterator();
while(iterator.hasNext()) {
SelectionKey key = iterator.next();
iterator.remove();
// check if key is valid
if(!key.isValid()) {
continue;
}
if(key.isAcceptable()) {
accept(key);
}else if(key.isReadable()) {
read(key);
}
}
}
}
}
My accept() and read() looks like this:
private void accept(SelectionKey key) {
ServerSocketChannel server = (ServerSocketChannel) key.channel();
SocketChannel socketChannel = server.accept();
socketChannel.configureBlocking(false);
socketChannel.register(selector, SelectionKey.OP_READ);
}
private void read(SelectionKey key) {
SocketChannel channel = (SocketChannel) key.channel();
buffer.clear();
int n = -1;
n = channel.read(buffer);
if(n == -1) {
key.cancel();
channel.close();
}else{
//read to buffer
}
}
I have tried many ways but still cannot find out the problem. Thank you very much!

Is JAVA NIO wasting CPU cycles by looping continuously?

Code for an echo server using a single threaded java I/O
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
// create socket
int port = 4444;
ServerSocket serverSocket = new ServerSocket(port);
System.err.println("Started server on port " + port);
try {
// repeatedly wait for connections, and process
while (true) {
// a "blocking" call which waits until a connection is requested
Socket clientSocket = serverSocket.accept();
System.err.println("Accepted connection from client");
// open up IO streams
BufferedReader in = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(clientSocket.getInputStream()));
PrintStream out = new PrintStream(clientSocket.getOutputStream());
// waits for data and reads it in until connection dies
// readLine() blocks until the server receives a new line from client
String s;
while ((s = in.readLine()) != null) {
out.print(s);
}
// close IO streams, then socket
System.err.println("Closing connection with client");
out.close();
in.close();
clientSocket.close();
}
} finally {
serverSocket.close();
}
}
code for the same using NIO
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
ServerSocketChannel server = ServerSocketChannel.open();
server.socket().bind(new InetSocketAddress(PORT_NUMBER));
server.socket().setReuseAddress(true);
server.configureBlocking(false);
Selector selector = Selector.open();
server.register(selector, SelectionKey.OP_ACCEPT);
ByteBuffer buffer = ByteBuffer.allocate(BUFFER_SIZE);
while (true) {
int channelCount = selector.select();
if (channelCount > 0) {
Set<SelectionKey> keys = selector.selectedKeys();
Iterator<SelectionKey> iterator = keys.iterator();
while (iterator.hasNext()) {
SelectionKey key = iterator.next();
iterator.remove();
if (key.isAcceptable()) {
SocketChannel client = server.accept();
client.configureBlocking(false);
client.register(selector, SelectionKey.OP_READ, client.socket().getPort());
} else if (key.isReadable()) {
SocketChannel client = (SocketChannel) key.channel();
System.out.println("port: " + key.attachment());
if (client.read(buffer) < 0) {
key.cancel();
client.close();
} else {
buffer.flip(); // read from the buffer
/*
* byte[] received = new byte[buffer.remaining()];
* buffer.get(received); buffer.clear(); // write into the buffer
* buffer.put(received); buffer.flip(); // read from the buffer
*/
client.write(buffer);
buffer.clear(); // write into the buffer
}
}
}
}
}
}
Here using normal I/O the main thread comes and wait at the socket.accept() call. But NIO doesn't do that since socketChannel.accept() is not a blocking call.
So wont the NIO program be continuously running the loop ? And result in waste of CPU cycles ? Can I write the program in a better way. Sorry I am very new to JAVA NIO and asynchronous programming.
In normal IO the thread is blocked on serverSocket.accept().
With NIO the thread is blocked on selector.select().
From the JavaDoc of Selector#select():
This method performs a blocking selection operation.
Why is this called "non blocking IO"?
Actually, your first example (with normal IO) has two blocking calls: server.accept() and in.readLine().
Now consider the case with a badly behaving client: it opens a connection to the server, but never sends any data. With normal IO the server thread waits in in.readLine() for data to arrive and cannot serve any other client until the first client closes its connection.
With NIO the picture is different: if a client opens a connection, the server thread wakes up, server.accept()s the connection and registers the SocketChannel with the same selector. Then the server thread waits on the selector once more through selector.select(). Now there are two possibilities to wake up the server thread: either another client connecting, or the first client sending some data.
So the term "non blocking IO" does not mean that the server thread is never blocked - it means that a non-behaving client cannot block the server thread forever.

multi-client program without multi-threading

Is there any way to write a multi-client program using sockets in Java without multi-threading?
I heard about socket mapping but how does it work?
I know multi-threading, but for now I should not use it.
Well I just threw this together. This is just an example to programming with java.nio. I think this code is fairly straight forward. It binds a ServerSocket to ports 3000-3009. Whenever a client sends data it will echo it back to them. Itcan handle as many connections as possible. You should implement more error handling of course but it will be harder to read then for reference. Handling data in this way is a bit more difficult than using thread per client approach, if you want it's possible to have a hybrid type server where inactive connections go into non blocking mode and when you start receiving data you can jump back into blocking mode with a cached thread pool.
To test it out just open a shell and use telnet localhost 3000
Selector selector = Selector.open();
for(int port=3000;port<3010;port++){
ServerSocketChannel server = ServerSocketChannel.open();
server.configureBlocking(false);
server.socket().bind(new InetSocketAddress(port));
server.register(selector, SelectionKey.OP_ACCEPT);
System.out.println("Bound to " + server);
}
ByteBuffer buffer = ByteBuffer.allocate(0x4000);
while(selector.isOpen()){
selector.select();
Iterator<SelectionKey> keys = selector.selectedKeys().iterator();
while(keys.hasNext()){
SelectionKey key = keys.next();
if(!key.isValid()) continue;
if(key.isReadable()){
buffer.clear();
SocketChannel socket = (SocketChannel)key.channel();
if(socket.read(buffer) == -1){ //-1 is end of stream
System.out.println("Client Disconnected " + socket);
socket.close();
continue;
}else{
buffer.flip();
socket.write(buffer); //echo data back to client
}
}else if(key.isAcceptable()){
ServerSocketChannel serverChannel = (ServerSocketChannel)key.channel();
SocketChannel socket = serverChannel.accept();
socket.configureBlocking(false);
socket.register(selector, SelectionKey.OP_READ);
System.out.println("Client Connected " + socket);
}
}
selector.selectedKeys().clear();
}

How to disconnect a client from NIO server socket

I am developing a server that is connected with many clients. I need to know when a client is disconnecting from server. So each client is sending a specific character to the server. If the character is not received after two seconds then I should disconnect the server from the client (releasing allocated resource for this client).
This is the main code of my server:
public EchoServer(int port) throws IOException {
this.port = port;
hostAddress = InetAddress.getByName("127.0.0.1");
selector = initSelector();
loop();
}
private Selector initSelector() throws IOException {
Selector socketSelector = SelectorProvider.provider().openSelector();
ServerSocketChannel serverChannel = ServerSocketChannel.open();
serverChannel.configureBlocking(false);
InetSocketAddress isa = new InetSocketAddress(hostAddress, port);
serverChannel.socket().bind(isa);
serverChannel.register(socketSelector, SelectionKey.OP_ACCEPT);
return socketSelector;
}
private void loop() {
for (;true;) {
try {
selector.select();
Iterator<SelectionKey> selectedKeys = selector.selectedKeys()
.iterator();
while (selectedKeys.hasNext()) {
SelectionKey key = selectedKeys.next();
selectedKeys.remove();
if (!key.isValid()) {
continue;
}
// Check what event is available and deal with it
if (key.isAcceptable()) {
accept(key);
} else if (key.isReadable()) {
read(key);
} else if (key.isWritable()) {
write(key);
}
}
Thread.sleep(1000);
timestamp++;
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
System.exit(1);
}
}
}
The first question is that, whether the way that I used in order to recognizing online clients (sending specific message every second) is a good approach or not?
If it is good, how can I detect with SelectionKey is related to witch client and then how can I disconnect the key from server?
The first question is that, whether the way that I used in order to recognizing online clients (sending specific message every second) is a good approach or not?
Not in the case of an echo server. In many cases such as this, all you need is to recognize end of stream and connection failure appropriately.
how can I detect with SelectionKey is related to which client
The SelectionKey has a channel, the channel has a socket, and the Socket has a remote IP address:port. That's all you need.
and then how can I disconnect the key from server?
Close the channel when you get -1 from the read() method, or any IOException when reading or writing.
whether the way that I used in order to recognizing online clients (sending specific message every second) is a good approach or not?
Yes, it is called a heartbeat.
how can I detect with SelectionKey is related to witch client and then how can I disconnect the key from server?
You can attach an object which has all the information need regarding a channel. You include this when you register the channel.

How java-nio is Non Blocking confused

I am new to NIO i understand the concept of Asynchronous Socket but i am confused on Non Blocking part.
I am using java NIO Selector . My Code for Server is
public class EcoNonBlockingIOServer_7 {
public static int PORT_NUMBER = 5555;
public static void main(String[] argv) throws Exception {
new EcoNonBlockingIOServer_7().go(argv);
}
public void go(String[] argv) throws Exception {
int port = PORT_NUMBER;
if (argv.length > 0) { // Override default listen port
port = Integer.parseInt(argv[0]);
}
System.out.println("Listening on port " + port);
// Allocate an unbound server socket channel
ServerSocketChannel serverChannel = ServerSocketChannel.open();
// Get the associated ServerSocket to bind it with
ServerSocket serverSocket = serverChannel.socket();
// Create a new Selector for use below
Selector selector = Selector.open();
// Set the port the server channel will listen to
serverSocket.bind(new InetSocketAddress(port));
// Set nonblocking mode for the listening socket
serverChannel.configureBlocking(false);
// Register the ServerSocketChannel with the Selector
serverChannel.register(selector, SelectionKey.OP_ACCEPT);
while (true) {
// This may block for a long time. Upon returning, the
// selected set contains keys of the ready channels.
int n = selector.select();
if (n == 0) {
continue; // nothing to do
}
// Get an iterator over the set of selected keys
Iterator it = selector.selectedKeys().iterator();
// Look at each key in the selected set
while (it.hasNext()) {
SelectionKey key = (SelectionKey) it.next();
// Is a new connection coming in?
if (key.isAcceptable()) {
ServerSocketChannel server = (ServerSocketChannel) key.channel();
SocketChannel channel = server.accept();
registerChannel(selector, channel, SelectionKey.OP_READ);
sayHello(channel);
}
// Is there data to read on this channel?
if (key.isReadable()) {
readDataFromSocket(key);
}
// Remove key from selected set; it's been handled
it.remove();
}
}
}
Now My Queries are:
If we register a channel with selector on any operation it always get blocked on selector.select() then how it is non blocking.
If we admit it uses OP_ACCEPT as key and maps channel accordingly but again In key is acceptable i am modifying this channel selector to OP_READ since it already has been accepted. Again It blocks on selector.select() for read event
*Please correct my understanding if i am wrong *
If we register a channel with selector on any operation it always get blocked on selector.select() then how it is non blocking.
select() is blocking. Every operation on a non-blocking channel itself is non-blocking, i.e. read() and write().
If we admit it uses OP_ACCEPT as key and maps channel accordingly but again In key is acceptable i am modifying this channel selector to OP_READ since it already has been accepted.
Very confused. The channel whose interest-ops == OP_ACCEPT is the listening socket. The channel you accepted from the listening socket is a connected socket, and it is this socket that you put into non-blocking mode, register with OP_ACCEPT, etc.
Again It blocks on selector.select() for read event
Correct, but it doesn't block in read() or write() or accept() or finishConnect(). Using a selector is actually called multiplexed I/O: you wait for multiple channels and multiple events at the same time in a single operation.

Categories

Resources