I'm dealing with the development of a Java EE project that involves several tools such as jBPM, Hibernate, Resteasy, ect.
In order to manage dependencies, I'm using Maven: my pom.xml is available here.
Now, I'd like to use inside that project QueryDSL 3.4.3 that depends on Google Guava 14.0.1: unfortunately, something imports as dependency Google Collections 1.0 that generates a conflict with Google Guava 14.0.1.
Is it possible to understand where Google Collections is from?
Is there a way to resolve this issue safety? (Now, I'm just removing Google Collections's jar from the deployment folder)
Update
By using the command mvn dependency:tree, I found that Google Collections 1.0 comes from:
<dependency>
<groupId>org.jboss.shrinkwrap.resolver</groupId>
<artifactId>shrinkwrap-resolver-impl-maven</artifactId>
</dependency>
Now, I've just to understand if it will work well also by excluding google-collections.
See also: http://grepcode.com/.../shrinkwrap-resolver-impl-maven/2.1.1/
As said, Google Collection dependency comes from shrinkwrap-resolver-impl-maven.
I resolved that issue by editing the pom.xml as follows:
<!-- ShrinkWrap Maven Resolver for Arquillian Tests -->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.jboss.shrinkwrap.resolver</groupId>
<artifactId>shrinkwrap-resolver-impl-maven</artifactId>
<scope>test</scope>
<exclusions>
<exclusion>
<groupId>com.google.collections</groupId>
<artifactId>google-collections</artifactId>
</exclusion>
</exclusions>
</dependency>
Then:
<!-- Arquillian profiles -->
<profiles>
<!-- Arquillian test profile managed by JBoss AS 7 -->
<profile>
<id>arquillian-jbossas-managed</id>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.jboss.as</groupId>
<artifactId>jboss-as-arquillian-container-managed</artifactId>
<scope>test</scope>
<exclusions>
<exclusion>
<artifactId>google-collections</artifactId>
<groupId>com.google.collections</groupId>
</exclusion>
</exclusions>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
</profile>
</profiles>
Now, it works fine.
Related
Today when I tried to install my maven project, I get an error due JDT dependencies and here is the report information:
Cannot resolve No versions available for org.osgi.service:org.osgi.service.prefs:jar:[1.1.0,1.2.0) within specified range.
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project redundantcheck:
Could not resolve dependencies for project edu.fudan.selab:redundantcheck:jar:1.0-SNAPSHOT:
Failed to collect dependencies at org.eclipse.jdt:org.eclipse.jdt.core:jar:3.20.0 ->
org.eclipse.platform:org.eclipse.core.resources:jar:3.12.0 ->
org.eclipse.platform:org.eclipse.core.expressions:jar:3.5.100 ->
org.eclipse.platform:org.eclipse.core.runtime:jar:3.12.0 ->
org.eclipse.platform:org.eclipse.equinox.preferences:jar:3.10.0 ->
org.osgi.service:org.osgi.service.prefs:jar:[1.1.0,1.2.0): No versions available for
org.osgi.service:org.osgi.service.prefs:jar:[1.1.0,1.2.0) within specified range -> [Help 1]
I tried to add 1.1.0 org.osgi.service:org.osgi.service.prefs to the project, but still can't solve this problem. To avoid dependency update, I specied almost every version of the dependencies, but still encounter this error today. Here is my pom.xml:
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.eclipse.jdt</groupId>
<artifactId>org.eclipse.jdt.core</artifactId>
<version>3.20.0</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.eclipse.platform</groupId>
<artifactId>org.eclipse.core.commands</artifactId>
<version>3.9.800</version>
</dependency>
<!-- https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.eclipse.platform/org.eclipse.core.contenttype -->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.eclipse.platform</groupId>
<artifactId>org.eclipse.core.contenttype</artifactId>
<version>3.7.900</version>
</dependency>
<!-- https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.eclipse.platform/org.eclipse.core.filesystem -->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.eclipse.platform</groupId>
<artifactId>org.eclipse.core.filesystem</artifactId>
<version>1.7.700</version>
</dependency>
<!-- https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.eclipse.platform/org.eclipse.core.jobs -->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.eclipse.platform</groupId>
<artifactId>org.eclipse.core.jobs</artifactId>
<version>3.10.1100</version>
</dependency>
<!-- https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.eclipse.platform/org.eclipse.core.resources -->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.eclipse.platform</groupId>
<artifactId>org.eclipse.core.resources</artifactId>
<version>3.14.0</version>
</dependency>
<!-- https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.eclipse.platform/org.eclipse.core.runtime -->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.eclipse.platform</groupId>
<artifactId>org.eclipse.core.runtime</artifactId>
<version>3.20.100</version>
</dependency>
<!-- https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.eclipse.platform/org.eclipse.equinox.common -->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.eclipse.platform</groupId>
<artifactId>org.eclipse.equinox.common</artifactId>
<version>3.14.100</version>
</dependency>
<!-- https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.eclipse.platform/org.eclipse.osgi -->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.eclipse.platform</groupId>
<artifactId>org.eclipse.osgi</artifactId>
<version>3.16.200</version>
</dependency>
<!-- https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.eclipse.platform/org.eclipse.text -->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.eclipse.platform</groupId>
<artifactId>org.eclipse.text</artifactId>
<version>3.11.0</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.slf4j</groupId>
<artifactId>slf4j-api</artifactId>
<version>1.6.1</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>junit</groupId>
<artifactId>junit</artifactId>
<version>4.12</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.alibaba</groupId>
<artifactId>fastjson</artifactId>
<version>1.2.75</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.eclipse.platform</groupId>
<artifactId>org.eclipse.core.expressions</artifactId>
<version>3.8.0</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.eclipse.platform</groupId>
<artifactId>org.eclipse.equinox.app</artifactId>
<version>1.6.0</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.eclipse.platform</groupId>
<artifactId>org.eclipse.equinox.preferences</artifactId>
<version>3.9.0</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.eclipse.platform</groupId>
<artifactId>org.eclipse.equinox.registry</artifactId>
<version>3.11.0</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
Is there anyway to solve this problem?
EDIT: The issue is known by the project team and tracked as eclipse-equinox/equinox.bundles#54 on GitHub.
The dependency:
<groupId>org.eclipse.platform</groupId>
<artifactId>org.eclipse.equinox.preferences</artifactId>
<version>3.10.0</version>
Which is one of your transitive dependency, references this dependency in its dependencies list:
<dependency>
<groupId>org.osgi.service</groupId>
<artifactId>org.osgi.service.prefs</artifactId>
<version>[1.1.0,1.2.0)</version>
</dependency>
Source: org.eclipse.equinox.preferences-3.10.0.pom on maven central.
It is a mistake. As Maven tells you, this does not exist:
Cannot resolve No versions available for org.osgi.service:org.osgi.service.prefs:jar:[1.1.0,1.2.0) within specified range.
It should have been:
<dependency>
<groupId>org.osgi</groupId>
<artifactId>org.osgi.service.prefs</artifactId>
<version>[1.1.0,1.2.0)</version>
</dependency>
Which exists (note the different groupId).
Because you are not fixing the dependencies you are consuming in your project, and because the dependencies are using version ranges, suddenly you got a new version.
By the way as beingnurd has noted, there is now the newer version 3.10.1 of org.eclipse.equinox.preferences where this wrong dependency is fixed (see org.eclipse.equinox.preferences-3.10.1.pom).
If you continue to use always the newest dependency of the compatible range, the problem will be solved for you.
Now if we take a step back:
You are trying to use following JDT version:
<dependency>
<groupId>org.eclipse.jdt</groupId>
<artifactId>org.eclipse.jdt.core</artifactId>
<version>3.20.0</version>
</dependency>
This corresponds to the Eclipse Version 2019-12 (also called 4.14 internally).
Your problem is that the eclipse projects (org.eclipse.jdt.core and all the dependencies) are using version ranges.
If you look at the org.eclipse.jdt.core dependencies declarations:
org.eclipse.platform:org.eclipse.core.resources:[3.12.0,4.0.0)
org.eclipse.platform:org.eclipse.core.runtime:[3.13.0,4.0.0)
org.eclipse.platform:org.eclipse.core.filesystem:[1.7.0,2.0.0)
org.eclipse.platform:org.eclipse.text:[3.6.0,4.0.0)
If you don't do anything, Maven always takes the latest:
Today (June 2022) this would be:
org.eclipse.core.resources: 3.16.100
org.eclipse.core.runtime: 3.24.100
org.eclipse.core.filesystem: 1.9.300
org.eclipse.text: 3.12.0
When the library was published (December 2019) this was:
org.eclipse.core.resources: 3.13.600
org.eclipse.core.runtime: 3.17.0
org.eclipse.core.filesystem: 1.7.600
org.eclipse.text: 3.10.0
And of course this is recursive, you need to do this for all the dependencies.
Letting Maven choose always the latest is problematic:
It prevents you creating reproducible build, because the dependencies picked by maven depends from what is available on maven central on that day.
You need to solve conflicts.
You are potentially the first trying out a combination.
This is why I always use a set of projects that were released together. By the way this is also how the Eclipse project itself is doing it (by using P2 update sites and target platform).
I am publishing Maven BOM files to fix the versions: ECentral project
This is how you can do it:
<repositories>
<repository>
<id>ecentral</id>
<url>https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jmini/ecentral/HEAD/repo</url>
</repository>
</repositories>
<dependencyManagement>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>fr.jmini.ecentral</groupId>
<artifactId>eclipse-platform-dependencies</artifactId>
<version>4.14</version>
<type>pom</type>
<scope>import</scope>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
</dependencyManagement>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.eclipse.jdt</groupId>
<artifactId>org.eclipse.jdt.core</artifactId>
<!-- no version needed here, because it is defined in the BOM -->
</dependency>
</dependencies>
Because I ran into this problem today too, but via plugin sub-dependency, my temporary solution is to download the regular org.osgi:org.osgi.service.prefs:jar:1.1.2 and install it in the local repository as org.osgi.service:org.osgi.service.prefs:jar:1.1.2.
You can exclude the dependency like this :
<dependency>
<groupId>org.eclipse.jdt</groupId>
<artifactId>org.eclipse.jdt.core</artifactId>
<version>3.24.0</version>
<exclusions>
<exclusion>
<groupId>org.osgi.service</groupId>
<artifactId>org.osgi.service.prefs</artifactId>
</exclusion>
</exclusions>
so the reason for this failure is dependency
<groupId>org.osgi.service</groupId> <artifactId>org.osgi.service.prefs</artifactId>
but the group org.osgi.service doesn't exists, instead it is only org.osgi
so dependency should look
<groupId>org.osgi</groupId>
<artifactId>org.osgi.service.prefs</artifactId>
I have got the same problem today in our SpringBoot project 1.5.25 with org.hibernate:hibernate-tools:jar:5.0.6.Final
The error message as follow:
# Failed to collect dependencies at org.hibernate:hibernate-tools:jar:5.0.6.Final ->
# org.eclipse.jdt:org.eclipse.jdt.core:jar:3.12.2 ->
# org.eclipse.platform:org.eclipse.core.resources:jar:3.11.1 ->
# org.eclipse.platform:org.eclipse.core.expressions:jar:3.5.100 ->
# org.eclipse.platform:org.eclipse.core.runtime:jar:3.12.0 ->
# org.eclipse.platform:org.eclipse.equinox.preferences:jar:3.10.0 ->
# org.osgi.service:org.osgi.service.prefs:jar:[1.1.0,1.2.0): No versions available for org.osgi.service:org.osgi.service.prefs:jar:[1.1.0,1.2.0) within specified range -> [Help 1]
I use the private nexus, to resolve this problem, i added a proxy maven2 (maven-ecentral) repo pointed to https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jmini/ecentral/HEAD/repo , thanks #Jmini
then added the follow lignes in the pom.xml
<dependencyManagement>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>fr.jmini.ecentral</groupId>
<artifactId>eclipse-platform-dependencies</artifactId>
<version>4.14</version>
<type>pom</type>
<scope>import</scope>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
</dependencyManagement>
<repositories>
<repository>
<id>ecentral</id>
<url>https://nexus.xxxx.xxx/repository/maven-ecentral/</url>
</repository>
</repositories>
Reload your project with IDEA, it should work.
Another solution is using exclusions
<dependency>
<groupId>org.hibernate</groupId>
<artifactId>hibernate-tools</artifactId>
<version>${hibernate-tools.version}</version>
<!-- exclure the old org.eclipse.platform -->
<exclusions>
<exclusion>
<groupId>org.eclipse.platform</groupId>
<artifactId>org.eclipse.equinox.preferences</artifactId>
</exclusion>
</exclusions>
</dependency>
<!-- the 3.10.1 org.eclipse.platform fixed the pb -->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.eclipse.platform</groupId>
<artifactId>org.eclipse.equinox.preferences</artifactId>
<version>3.10.1</version>
</dependency>
Even I have been facing this problem since today, it was working fine till yesterday.
Finally what I found was that pom of org.eclipse.equinox.preferences:3.10.0 group id mentioned as org.osgi.service, but the artifact is located in repo1.maven.org at org/osgi, there is no service folder in it.
I changed dependency group id to org.osgi in the pom of org.eclipse.equinox.preferences and then it worked.
--EDIT--
I can see a new version of 3.10.1 added in repo which has the group id corrected to org.osgi instead of org.osgi.service
I ran into this problem with a maven plugin (net.revelc.code.formatter). We use it from another maven plugin that generates code. Since it is just a formatter for generated code, my solution was to drop the usage of the formatter plugin. Obviously I couldn't use the above solutions, because I don't want to fork the formatter code.
I am using Maven to set up dependency in my app.
I am using Spring Boot v2.1.12.RELEASE which brings in Spring Core v5.1.13.
But there also a library Spring Integration v5.1.9 (which is latest) and brings Spring Core v5.1.11.RELEASE
As you can see that I want Spring Integration to not resolve to v5.1.11 of Spring Core as it has some vulnerabilities.
Is there any way to specify in POM for Spring Integration to resolve to 5.1.13 of Spring Core (instead of 5.1.11) ?
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-web</artifactId>
<version>2.1.12.RELEASE</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.integration</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-integration-core</artifactId>
<version>5.1.9</version>
</dependency>
P.S I do not want to upgrade to the latest release of Spring Boot.
Use maven exclusion tag to exclude the transitive dependency, make sure the excluded library is directly added to pom or it's pulled in by some other dependency.
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.integration</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-integration-core</artifactId>
<version>5.1.9</version>
<exclusions>
<exclusion>
<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-core</artifactId>
<version>5.1.11.RELEASE</version>
</exclusion>
</exclusions>
</dependency>
DISCLAIMER: This is just a work around solution for your immediate need, use it only when no other options are possible as managing spring managed dependencies ourself is not maintainable in long run.
I used the recommendation in the post Dependency Management to overcome my challenge.
So I excluded the spring-core dependency from spring integration and also added the spring core library using below code
<dependencyManagement>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-core</artifactId>
<version>5.1.13.RELEASE</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
</dependencyManagement>
Java 9 deprecated six modules that contain Java EE APIs and they are going to be removed soon:
java.activation with javax.activation package
java.corba with javax.activity, javax.rmi, javax.rmi.CORBA, and org.omg.* packages
java.transaction with javax.transaction package
java.xml.bind with all javax.xml.bind.* packages
java.xml.ws with javax.jws, javax.jws.soap, javax.xml.soap, and all javax.xml.ws.* packages
java.xml.ws.annotation with javax.annotation package
Which maintained third-party artifacts provide those APIs? It doesn't matter how well they provide those APIs or which other features they have to offer - all that matters is, are they a drop-in replacement for these modules/packages?
To make it easier to collect knoweldge, I answered with what I know so far and made the answer a community wiki. I hope people will extend it instead of writing their own answers.
Before you vote to close:
Yes, there are already some questions on individual modules and an answer to this question would of course duplicate that information. But AFAIK there is no single point to learn about all of these, which I think has a lot of value.
Questions asking for library recommendations are usually considered off-topic, because "they tend to attract opinionated answers and spam", but I don't think that applies here. The set of valid libraries is clearly delineated: They have to implement a specific standard. Beyond that nothing else matters, so I don't see much risk for opinion and spam.
Instead of using the deprecated Java EE modules, use the following artifacts.
JAF (java.activation)
JavaBeans Activation Framework (now Jakarta Activation) is a standalone technology (available on Maven Central):
<dependency>
<groupId>com.sun.activation</groupId>
<artifactId>jakarta.activation</artifactId>
<version>1.2.2</version>
</dependency>
(Source)
CORBA (java.corba)
From JEP 320:
There will not be a standalone version of CORBA unless third parties take over maintenance of the CORBA APIs, ORB implementation, CosNaming provider, etc. Third party maintenance is possible because the Java SE Platform endorses independent implementations of CORBA. In contrast, the API for RMI-IIOP is defined and implemented solely within Java SE. There will not be a standalone version of RMI-IIOP unless a dedicated JSR is started to maintain it, or stewardship of the API is taken over by the Eclipse Foundation (the transition of stewardship of Java EE from the JCP to the Eclipse Foundation includes GlassFish and its implementation of CORBA and RMI-IIOP).
JTA (java.transaction)
Stand alone version:
<dependency>
<groupId>jakarta.transaction</groupId>
<artifactId>jakarta.transaction-api</artifactId>
<version>1.3.3</version>
</dependency>
(Source)
JAXB (java.xml.bind)
Since Java EE was rebranded to Jakarta EE, JAXB is now provided by new artifacts:
<!-- API -->
<dependency>
<groupId>jakarta.xml.bind</groupId>
<artifactId>jakarta.xml.bind-api</artifactId>
<version>2.3.3</version>
</dependency>
<!-- Runtime -->
<dependency>
<groupId>com.sun.xml.bind</groupId>
<artifactId>jaxb-impl</artifactId>
<version>2.3.3</version>
<scope>runtime</scope>
</dependency>
<!-- Alternative runtime -->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.glassfish.jaxb</groupId>
<artifactId>jaxb-runtime</artifactId>
<version>2.3.3</version>
<scope>runtime</scope>
</dependency>
JAXB Reference Implementation page.
The alternative runtime was brought up by Abhijit Sarkar.
schemagen and xjc can be downloaded from there too as part of a standalone JAXB distribution.
See also linked answer.
JAX-WS (java.xml.ws)
Reference implementation:
<!-- API -->
<dependency>
<groupId>jakarta.xml.ws</groupId>
<artifactId>jakarta.xml.ws-api</artifactId>
<version>2.3.3</version>
</dependency>
<!-- Runtime -->
<dependency>
<groupId>com.sun.xml.ws</groupId>
<artifactId>jaxws-rt</artifactId>
<version>2.3.3</version>
</dependency>
Standalone distribution download (contains wsgen and wsimport).
Common Annotations (java.xml.ws.annotation)
Java Commons Annotations (available on Maven Central):
<dependency>
<groupId>jakarta.annotation</groupId>
<artifactId>jakarta.annotation-api</artifactId>
<version>1.3.5</version>
</dependency>
(Source)
JAXB (java.xml.bind) for JDK9
Working perfectly in my desktop applications on jdk9/10 EA
<properties>
<jaxb-api.version>2.3.0</jaxb-api.version>
</properties>
<!-- JAXB 2.3.0 for jdk9+ -->
<dependency>
<groupId>javax.xml.bind</groupId>
<artifactId>jaxb-api</artifactId>
<version>${jaxb-api.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.glassfish.jaxb</groupId>
<artifactId>jaxb-runtime</artifactId>
<version>${jaxb-api.version}</version>
</dependency>
<!-- JAXB needs javax.activation module (jdk9) -->
<dependency>
<groupId>javax.activation</groupId>
<artifactId>javax.activation-api</artifactId>
<version>1.2.0</version>
</dependency>
I needed to replace JAX-WS (java.xml.ws) and JAXB (java.xml.bind) for my Spring Boot 2 based application and ended up with these JARs (Gradle build):
// replacements for deprecated JDK module java.xml.ws
runtimeOnly 'javax.xml.ws:jaxws-api:2.3.0' // javax.xml.ws.* classes
runtimeOnly 'javax.jws:jsr181-api:1.0-MR1' // for javax.jws.* classes
// replacement for deprecated JDK module java.xml.bind
runtimeOnly 'javax.xml.bind:jaxb-api'
runtimeOnly 'org.glassfish.jaxb:jaxb-runtime:2.3.0.1'
runtimeOnly 'org.glassfish:javax.json:1.1.2'
runtimeOnly 'org.eclipse:yasson:1.0.1'
(You may need compile or other scope, runtimeOnly was enough for us.)
I noticed that https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.sun.xml.bind/jaxb-core is described as "Old" and using this answer went for org.glassfish based stuff that brought in org.eclipse.yasson as well.
Now it's really messy situation, it works, but how should anyone be sure it's the best replacement, right?
It seems that jaxws-ri depends transitively from commonj.sdo:commonj.sdo:jar:2.1.1.v201112051852 which apparently can be found from repository http://download.eclipse.org/rt/eclipselink/maven.repo
I'm using jdk 11 + ant + ivy in my spring mvc project.
I was getting error "package javax.jws does not exist" so I added javax.jws-api-1.1.jar to classpath and it worked!
Just download the jar from https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/javax/jws/javax.jws-api/1.1/javax.jws-api-1.1.jar
And add it to your classpath in your build.xml
Alternatively add it to your pom.xml:
<dependency>
<groupId>javax.jws</groupId>
<artifactId>javax.jws-api</artifactId>
<version>1.1</version>
</dependency>
Just a minor variation (improvement) on the above answers --- exemplified here for JAXB only. One can add the dependencies with the runtime scope and only if this is effectively needed (i.e. when building for running in a JRE with version >= 9 --- here v11 is exemplified):
<profile>
<id>when-on-jdk-11</id>
<activation>
<jdk>11</jdk>
</activation>
<properties>
<!-- missing artefacts version properties -->
<jaxb-api.version>2.3.1</jaxb-api.version>
<jaxb-impl.version>2.3.2</jaxb-impl.version> <!-- one might let it the same with the jaxb-api.version -->
</properties>
<dependencies>
<!-- runtime dependencies to avoid JAXB related CNF exceptions when running on Java 11 (e.g.: ClassNotFoundException: javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlType) -->
<dependency>
<groupId>javax.xml.bind</groupId>
<artifactId>jaxb-api</artifactId>
<version>${jaxb-api.version}</version>
<scope>runtime</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.glassfish.jaxb</groupId>
<artifactId>jaxb-runtime</artifactId>
<version>${jaxb-impl.version}</version>
<scope>runtime</scope>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
</profile>
If you have this issue in Talend (7.x for example), you can add in the Default POM.xml of the project:
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>javax.xml.soap</groupId>
<artifactId>javax.xml.soap-api</artifactId>
<version>1.4.0</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
Tested with :
AdoptJDK 8.0.275.1-hotspot : OK
AdoptJDK 11.0.9.101-hotspot : OK
AdoptJDK 15.0.1.9-hotspot : KO (but It is another issue: Incompatible conditional operand types Exception and TDieException)
Zulu-8.50.0.1017: OK
Zulu-11.43.1015 : OK
I have experimented with most of the suggestions described above using JDK 11.0.3 and have been not been successful. The only solution that I eventually found to work is the following. Perhaps there are other options that also work but it appears that the selection of version is critical. For example, changing com.sun.xml.ws:rt to 2.3.2 causes module javax.jws to no long be available.
<dependency>
<groupId>org.glassfish.jaxb</groupId>
<artifactId>jaxb-runtime</artifactId>
<version>2.4.0-b180830.0438</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.sun.xml.ws</groupId>
<artifactId>rt</artifactId>
<version>2.3.1</version>
</dependency>
If you have the same problem add the below dependency to pom.xml
<dependency>
<groupId>com.sun.xml.ws</groupId>
<artifactId>jaxws-rt</artifactId>
<version>2.3.3</version>
</dependency>
Then use JAVA 8 as an alternate JRE. For further details refer to this video, which worked for me.
I found the easiest path to get around the JAXB parts of these issues was to use dependency management in my root pom or in my bom:
<project ...>
<dependencyManagement>
<dependencies>
<!-- ... -->
<!-- Gone from jvm in java11 -->
<dependency>
<groupId>com.sun.xml.bind</groupId>
<artifactId>jaxb-ri</artifactId>
<version>2.4.0-b180830.0438</version>
<scope>import</scope>
<type>pom</type>
</dependency>
<!-- ... -->
</dependencies>
</dependencyManagement>
</project>
And in the modules that fail compilation on jdk11:
<!-- ... -->
<dependencies>
<!-- Gone from jvm in java11 -->
<dependency>
<groupId>javax.xml.bind</groupId>
<artifactId>jaxb-api</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.sun.xml.bind</groupId>
<artifactId>jaxb-impl</artifactId>
<scope>runtime</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.glassfish.jaxb</groupId>
<artifactId>jaxb-runtime</artifactId>
<scope>runtime</scope>
</dependency>
<!-- ... -->
</dependencies>
<!-- ... -->
Also, updating the version of org.jvnet.jaxb2.maven2:maven-jaxb2-plugin to 0.14.0 solved all the jaxb generation issues for me.
It's indeed a real pain still going through this as of 2022!
I tried many above suggestions, but only could only get it to work with below dependencies.
<dependency>
<groupId>com.sun.xml.bind</groupId>
<artifactId>jaxb-core</artifactId>
<version>2.3.0.1</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>javax.xml.bind</groupId>
<artifactId>jaxb-api</artifactId>
<version>2.3.1</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.sun.xml.bind</groupId>
<artifactId>jaxb-impl</artifactId>
<version>2.3.1</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.javassist</groupId>
<artifactId>javassist</artifactId>
<version>3.25.0-GA</version>
</dependency>
Note: Don't be tempted to update the dependencies, just leave it that way, and it works for me.
I'm using Matlab MCR in web project so I imported these dependecies to pom.xml
<!-- Matlab client tool library -->
<!-- <dependency>
<groupId>DataConcatenation</groupId>
<artifactId>DataConcatenation</artifactId>
<version>0.0.5-SNAPSHOT</version>
</dependency> -->
<!-- <dependency>
<groupId>DataConcatenator</groupId>
<artifactId>DataConcatenator</artifactId>
<version>0.0.5-SNAPSHOT</version>
</dependency> -->
<!-- <dependency>
<groupId>DataConversion</groupId>
<artifactId>DataConversion</artifactId>
<version>0.0.5-SNAPSHOT</version>
</dependency> -->
<dependency>
<groupId>DataConverter</groupId>
<artifactId>DataConverter</artifactId>
<version>0.0.5-SNAPSHOT</version>
<exclusions>
<exclusion>
<artifactId>DataConcatenation</artifactId>
<groupId>DataConcatenation</groupId>
</exclusion>
<exclusion>
<artifactId>DataConcatenator</artifactId>
<groupId>DataConcatenator</groupId>
</exclusion>
<exclusion>
<artifactId>DataConversion</artifactId>
<groupId>DataConversion</groupId>
</exclusion>
</exclusions>
</dependency>
The first problems is that I have to exclude the other tree dependencies even if I use only DataConverter, But I need only dataConverter and this library doesn't have other dependecies.
The second and most important problem is this error:
Threw exception in ZipAndMat::createZipAndMat: java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: Native Library /usr/v81/bin/glnxa64/libnativedl.so already loaded in another classloader
I read a lot of guide and I understand that I have to put this jar into $CATALINA_HOME/shared/lib so all the class loader share the same jar.
But how can I add this dependecy to the above path? This is the first time that I have to implement this configuration. I use tomcat on my server and deploy project through war file.
Thanks
You can place the jar into $CATALINA_HOME/shared/lib, and then specify in your POM the dependency's <scope> as provided:
<dependency>
<groupId>DataConverter</groupId>
<artifactId>DataConverter</artifactId>
<version>0.0.5-SNAPSHOT</version>
<scope>provided</scope>
<exclusions>
...
</exclusions>
</dependency>
This method is often used for jars which contain JDBC drivers when running on Tomcat; the jdbc jar is placed in $CATALINA_HOME/shared/lib (so all WARs can find it), yet each project list’s the JDBC jar as a dependency with provided as the scope.
See this post for more information on provided.
I got a strange error in my pom.xml. Maven (I'm using Maven 2) is signaling Missing artifact javax.jws:jsr181:jar:1.0, even if I get the corresponding dependency in my pom.xml:
<dependency>
<groupId>javax.jws</groupId>
<artifactId>jsr181</artifactId>
<version>1.0</version>
</dependency>
What could possibly be the cause of this error?
Ok, I found the solution to the problem. I think the way to find it could be interesting, too.
When I look on mvnrepository.com, the pom file on the repository pointed on an URL on bea.com, which is not available anymore. So I had to change to the maintenance release, like Brian Agnew suggested. And of course, update some other dependencies in my pom.xml, which needed the obsolete version in their own dependencies. Maven comes with a cost...
<!-- https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/javax.jws/jsr181-api -->
<dependency>
<groupId>javax.jws</groupId>
<artifactId>jsr181-api</artifactId>
<version>1.0-MR1</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>javax.xml.ws</groupId>
<artifactId>jaxws-api</artifactId>
<version>2.1-1</version>
<exclusions>
<exclusion>
<groupId>javax.jws</groupId>
<artifactId>jsr181</artifactId>
</exclusion>
</exclusions>
</dependency>
Looking at my repository, I think you want:
<dependency>
<groupId>sun-jaxws</groupId>
<artifactId>jsr181-api</artifactId>
<version>1.0</version>
</dependency>