I want to create my own Camel Component. Based on the Component http4. I want only insert server and port by default. So i can write:
from("myhttp://test1.php")
.to("myhttp://test2.php")
And my Component change the URI to "http:// myhost:8080/test1.php" and "http:// myhost:8080/test2.php" but I can't create my own scheme Name. I test #UriEndpoint(scheme = "myhttp") in the class
public class myhttpEndpoint extends org.apache.camel.component.http4.HttpEndpoint {
}
Can you help me?
What I do:
public class myhttpComponent extends org.apache.camel.component.http4.HttpComponent {
#Override
protected Endpoint createEndpoint(String uri, String remaining, Map<String, Object> parameters) throws Exception {
...
...
HttpEndpoint endpoint = new myhttpEndpoint(endpointUriString, this, clientBuilder, localConnectionManager, configurer);
...
...
}
}
#UriEndpoint(scheme = "myhttp")
public class myhttpEndpoint extends org.apache.camel.component.http4.HttpEndpoint {
public myhttpEndpoint(String endpointUriString,
cacheComponent cacheComponent, HttpClientBuilder clientBuilder,
HttpClientConnectionManager localConnectionManager,
HttpClientConfigurer configurer) throws URISyntaxException {
super(endpointUriString, cacheComponent, clientBuilder, localConnectionManager, configurer);
}
The #UriEndpoint annotation is actually optional when creating a custom Camel component and I think it's only used if you want configuration documentation to be automatically generated. More info: http://camel.apache.org/endpoint-annotations.html
To tie your component class to the component name "myhttp", you need to add a file under the META-INF folder in your project. More details: http://camel.apache.org/writing-components.html
Related
I am using Grizzly to serve my REST service which can have multiple "modules". I'd like to be able to use the same base URL for the service and for static content so I can access all these urls:
http://host:port/index.html
http://host:port/module1/index.html
http://host:port/module1/resource
http://host:port/module2/index.html
http://host:port/module2/resource
The code I'm trying to set this up with looks like this:
private HttpServer createServer(String host, int port, ResourceConfig config)
{
HttpServer server = GrizzlyHttpServerFactory.createHttpServer(URI.create("http://" + host + ":" + port + "/"), config, false);
HttpHandler httpHandler = new CLStaticHttpHandler(HttpServer.class.getClassLoader(), "docs/");
server.getServerConfiguration().addHttpHandler(httpHandler, "/");
return server;
}
With this code, I am only able to see the html pages and I get a "Resource identified by path does not exist" response when I try to get my resources.
When I comment out the code to add the HttpHandler, then I am able to access my resources (but don't have the docs of course).
What do I need to do to access both my resources and my static content?
I ended up writing a service to handle static resources myself. I decided to serve my files from the file system, but this approach would also work for serving them from a jar - you'd just have to get the file as a resource instead of creating the File directly.
#Path("/")
public class StaticService
{
#GET
#Path("/{docPath:.*}.{ext}")
public Response getHtml(#PathParam("docPath") String docPath, #PathParam("ext") String ext, #HeaderParam("accept") String accept)
{
File file = new File(cleanDocPath(docPath) + "." + ext);
return Response.ok(file).build();
}
#GET
#Path("{docPath:.*}")
public Response getFolder(#PathParam("docPath") String docPath)
{
File file = null;
if ("".equals(docPath) || "/".equals(docPath))
{
file = new File("index.html");
}
else
{
file = new File(cleanDocPath(docPath) + "/index.html");
}
return Response.ok(file).build();
}
private String cleanDocPath(String docPath)
{
if (docPath.startsWith("/"))
{
return docPath.substring(1);
}
else
{
return docPath;
}
}
}
One thing you can do is run Grizzly as a servlet container. That way you can run Jersey as servlet filter, and add a default servlet to handle the static content. For example
public class Main {
public static HttpServer createServer() {
WebappContext context = new WebappContext("GrizzlyContext", "");
createJerseyFilter(context);
createDefaultServlet(context);
HttpServer server = GrizzlyHttpServerFactory
.createHttpServer(URI.create("http://localhost:8080/"));
context.deploy(server);
return server;
}
private static void createJerseyFilter(WebappContext context) {
ResourceConfig rc = new ResourceConfig().packages("com.grizzly.test");
// This causes Jersey to forward 404s to default servlet
// which will catch all the static content requests.
rc.property(ServletProperties.FILTER_FORWARD_ON_404, true);
FilterRegistration reg = context.addFilter("JerseyApp", new ServletContainer(rc));
reg.addMappingForUrlPatterns(EnumSet.allOf(DispatcherType.class), "/*");
}
private static void createDefaultServlet(WebappContext context) {
ArraySet<File> baseDir = new ArraySet<>(File.class);
baseDir.add(new File("."));
ServletRegistration defaultServletReg
= context.addServlet("DefaultServlet", new DefaultServlet(baseDir) {});
defaultServletReg.addMapping("/*");
}
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
HttpServer server = createServer();
System.in.read();
server.stop();
}
}
You will need to add the Jersey Grizzly servlet dependency
<dependency>
<groupId>org.glassfish.jersey.containers</groupId>
<artifactId>jersey-container-grizzly2-servlet</artifactId>
<version>${jersey2.version}</version>
</dependency>
The only problem with this approach is that the default servlet is meant to serve files from the file system, not from the classpath, as you are currently trying to do. You can see in the createDefaultServlet method I just set the base directory to the current working directory. So that's where all your files would need to be. You can change it to "docs" so all your files would be in the docs folder, which would be in the current working directory.
If you want to read files from the classpath, you may need to implement your own servlet. You can look at the source code for DefaultServlet and try to modify it to serve from the classpath. You can also check out Dropwizard's AssetServlet, which already does serve content from the classpath.
Or you can just say forget it, and just serve from the file system :-)
I am trying to use dropwizard-sundial and am having trouble with a resource. I'm not sure if it's a classpath issue or if I am failing to register resources properly.
This is my application class' run method:
public void run(DataLoaderApplicationConfiguration configuration, Environment environment) throws Exception {
logger.info("Started DataLoader Application");
final String template = configuration.getTemplate();
environment.healthChecks().register("TemplateHealth", new TemplateHealthCheck(template));
// JOBS
environment.jersey().packages("com.tradier.dataloader.jobs");
}
I get the following error at runtime:
INFO [2015-04-07 15:00:19,737] com.xeiam.sundial.plugins.AnnotationJobTriggerPlugin: Loading annotated jobs from com.tradier.dataloader.jobs.
[WARNING]
java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601)
at org.codehaus.mojo.exec.ExecJavaMojo$1.run(ExecJavaMojo.java:293)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Unexpected problem: No resource for com/tradier/dataloader/jobs
at org.quartz.classloading.CascadingClassLoadHelper.getJobClasses(CascadingClassLoadHelper.java:217)
at com.xeiam.sundial.plugins.AnnotationJobTriggerPlugin.start(AnnotationJobTriggerPlugin.java:72)
at org.quartz.QuartzScheduler.startPlugins(QuartzScheduler.java:1102)
at org.quartz.QuartzScheduler.start(QuartzScheduler.java:211)
at com.xeiam.sundial.SundialJobScheduler.startScheduler(SundialJobScheduler.java:102)
Check out a working example at https://github.com/timmolter/XDropWizard. It uses annotated jobs. You need to add the package name conatining the annotated jobs in your config.yaml file like this:
sundial:
thread-pool-size: 5
shutdown-on-unload: true
wait-on-shutdown: false
start-delay-seconds: 0
start-scheduler-on-load: true
global-lock-on-load: false
annotated-jobs-package-name: org.knowm.xdropwizard.jobs
If you still are getting an exception, leave a report at: https://github.com/timmolter/dropwizard-sundial/issues.
#Jeyashree Narayanan, the jobs package should not be configured in the application class as you have shown, it can be easily done in the yml file. Here is the explanation in simple steps:
Step 1: Configuration in yml file and the Configuration class
sundial:
thread-pool-size: 10
shutdown-on-unload: true
start-delay-seconds: 0
start-scheduler-on-load: true
global-lock-on-load: false
annotated-jobs-package-name: com.tradier.dataloader.jobs
tasks: [startjob, stopjob]
Configuration Class:
#JsonIgnoreProperties(ignoreUnknown = true)
public class DropwizardSundialConfiguration extends Configuration {
#Valid
#NotNull
public SundialConfiguration sundialConfiguration = new SundialConfiguration();
#JsonProperty("sundial")
public SundialConfiguration getSundialConfiguration() {
return sundialConfiguration;
}
}
Step 2: Add and configure the dropwizard-sundial bundle in the application class.
public class DropwizardSundialApplication extends Application<DropwizardSundialConfiguration> {
private static final Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(DropwizardSundialApplication.class);
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
new DropwizardSundialApplication().run("server", args[0]);
}
#Override
public void initialize(Bootstrap<DropwizardSundialConfiguration> b) {
b.addBundle(new SundialBundle<DropwizardSundialConfiguration>() {
#Override
public SundialConfiguration getSundialConfiguration(DropwizardSundialConfiguration configuration) {
return configuration.getSundialConfiguration();
}
});
}
}
Step 3: Add the required job classes.
Here is a sample Cron job class:
#CronTrigger(cron = "0 19 13 * * ?")
public class CronJob extends Job {
private static final Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(CronJob.class);
#Override
public void doRun() throws JobInterruptException {
logger.info("Hello from Cron Job");
}
}
I have also written a blog post and a working application which is available on GitHub with these steps. Please check: http://softwaredevelopercentral.blogspot.com/2019/05/dropwizard-sundial-scheduler-tutorial.html
It appears to be a classpath issue.
From https://github.com/timmolter/Sundial/blob/develop/src/main/java/com/xeiam/sundial/SundialJobScheduler.java#L102:
public static void startScheduler(int threadPoolSize, String annotatedJobsPackageName) {
try {
createScheduler(threadPoolSize, annotatedJobsPackageName);
getScheduler().start(); // ---> Line 102
} catch (SchedulerException e) {
logger.error("COULD NOT START SUNDIAL SCHEDULER!!!", e);
throw new SchedulerStartupException(e);
}
I'm also using Sundial in my dropwizard project, I have all my jobs defined in jobs.xml, Sundial config defined in the .yaml file, and start it as follows:
SundialJobScheduler.startScheduler();
SundialManager sm = new SundialManager(config.getSundialConfiguration(),environment);
environment.lifecycle().manage(sm);
I'm trying to create a simple webapp without any XML configuration using Spring 3.1 and an embedded Jetty 8 server.
However, I'm struggling to get Jetty to recognise my implementaton of the Spring WebApplicationInitializer interface.
Project structure:
src
+- main
+- java
| +- JettyServer.java
| +- Initializer.java
|
+- webapp
+- web.xml (objective is to remove this - see below).
The Initializer class above is a simple implementation of WebApplicationInitializer:
import javax.servlet.ServletContext;
import javax.servlet.ServletException;
import org.springframework.web.WebApplicationInitializer;
public class Initializer implements WebApplicationInitializer {
#Override
public void onStartup(ServletContext servletContext) throws ServletException {
System.out.println("onStartup");
}
}
Likewise JettyServer is a simple implementation of an embedded Jetty server:
import org.eclipse.jetty.annotations.AnnotationConfiguration;
import org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server;
import org.eclipse.jetty.webapp.Configuration;
import org.eclipse.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext;
public class JettyServer {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
Server server = new Server(8080);
WebAppContext webAppContext = new WebAppContext();
webAppContext.setResourceBase("src/main/webapp");
webAppContext.setContextPath("/");
webAppContext.setConfigurations(new Configuration[] { new AnnotationConfiguration() });
webAppContext.setParentLoaderPriority(true);
server.setHandler(webAppContext);
server.start();
server.join();
}
}
My understanding is that on startup Jetty will use AnnotationConfiguration to scan for
annotated implementations of ServletContainerInitializer; it should find Initializer and wire it in...
However, when I start the Jetty server (from within Eclipse) I see the following on the command-line:
2012-11-04 16:59:04.552:INFO:oejs.Server:jetty-8.1.7.v20120910
2012-11-04 16:59:05.046:INFO:/:No Spring WebApplicationInitializer types detected on classpath
2012-11-04 16:59:05.046:INFO:oejsh.ContextHandler:started o.e.j.w.WebAppContext{/,file:/Users/duncan/Coding/spring-mvc-embedded-jetty-test/src/main/webapp/}
2012-11-04 16:59:05.117:INFO:oejs.AbstractConnector:Started SelectChannelConnector#0.0.0.0:8080
The important bit is this:
No Spring WebApplicationInitializer types detected on classpath
Note that src/main/java is defined as a source folder in Eclipse, so should be on the classpath. Also note that the Dynamic Web Module Facet is set to 3.0.
I'm sure there's a simple explanation, but I'm struggling to see the wood for the trees! I suspect the key is with the following line:
...
webAppContext.setResourceBase("src/main/webapp");
...
This makes sense with a 2.5 servlet using web.xml (see below), but what should it be when using AnnotationConfiguration?
NB: Everything fires up correctly if I change the Configurations to the following:
...
webAppContext.setConfigurations(new Configuration[] { new WebXmlConfiguration() });
...
In this case it finds the web.xml under src/main/webapp and uses it to wire the servlet using DispatcherServlet and AnnotationConfigWebApplicationContext in the usual way (completely bypassing the WebApplicationInitializer implementation above).
This feels very much like a classpath problem, but I'm struggling to understand quite how Jetty associates itself with implementations of WebApplicationInitializer - any suggestions would be most appreciated!
For info, I'm using the following:
Spring 3.1.1
Jetty 8.1.7
STS 3.1.0
The problem is that Jetty's AnnotationConfiguration class does not scan non-jar resources on the classpath (except under WEB-INF/classes).
It finds my WebApplicationInitializer's if I register a subclass of AnnotationConfiguration which overrides configure(WebAppContext) to scan the host classpath in addition to the container and web-inf locations.
Most of the sub-class is (sadly) copy-paste from the parent. It includes:
an extra parse call (parseHostClassPath) at the end of the configure method;
the parseHostClassPath method which is largely copy-paste from
AnnotationConfiguration's parseWebInfClasses;
the getHostClassPathResource method which grabs the first non-jar URL
from the classloader (which, for me at least, is the file url to my
classpath in eclipse).
I am using slightly different versions of Jetty (8.1.7.v20120910) and Spring (3.1.2_RELEASE), but I imagine the same solution will work.
Edit: I created a working sample project in github with some modifications (the code below works fine from Eclipse but not when running in a shaded jar) - https://github.com/steveliles/jetty-embedded-spring-mvc-noxml
In the OP's JettyServer class the necessary change would replace line 15 with:
webAppContext.setConfigurations (new Configuration []
{
new AnnotationConfiguration()
{
#Override
public void configure(WebAppContext context) throws Exception
{
boolean metadataComplete = context.getMetaData().isMetaDataComplete();
context.addDecorator(new AnnotationDecorator(context));
AnnotationParser parser = null;
if (!metadataComplete)
{
if (context.getServletContext().getEffectiveMajorVersion() >= 3 || context.isConfigurationDiscovered())
{
parser = createAnnotationParser();
parser.registerAnnotationHandler("javax.servlet.annotation.WebServlet", new WebServletAnnotationHandler(context));
parser.registerAnnotationHandler("javax.servlet.annotation.WebFilter", new WebFilterAnnotationHandler(context));
parser.registerAnnotationHandler("javax.servlet.annotation.WebListener", new WebListenerAnnotationHandler(context));
}
}
List<ServletContainerInitializer> nonExcludedInitializers = getNonExcludedInitializers(context);
parser = registerServletContainerInitializerAnnotationHandlers(context, parser, nonExcludedInitializers);
if (parser != null)
{
parseContainerPath(context, parser);
parseWebInfClasses(context, parser);
parseWebInfLib (context, parser);
parseHostClassPath(context, parser);
}
}
private void parseHostClassPath(final WebAppContext context, AnnotationParser parser) throws Exception
{
clearAnnotationList(parser.getAnnotationHandlers());
Resource resource = getHostClassPathResource(getClass().getClassLoader());
if (resource == null)
return;
parser.parse(resource, new ClassNameResolver()
{
public boolean isExcluded (String name)
{
if (context.isSystemClass(name)) return true;
if (context.isServerClass(name)) return false;
return false;
}
public boolean shouldOverride (String name)
{
//looking at webapp classpath, found already-parsed class of same name - did it come from system or duplicate in webapp?
if (context.isParentLoaderPriority())
return false;
return true;
}
});
//TODO - where to set the annotations discovered from WEB-INF/classes?
List<DiscoveredAnnotation> annotations = new ArrayList<DiscoveredAnnotation>();
gatherAnnotations(annotations, parser.getAnnotationHandlers());
context.getMetaData().addDiscoveredAnnotations (annotations);
}
private Resource getHostClassPathResource(ClassLoader loader) throws IOException
{
if (loader instanceof URLClassLoader)
{
URL[] urls = ((URLClassLoader)loader).getURLs();
for (URL url : urls)
if (url.getProtocol().startsWith("file"))
return Resource.newResource(url);
}
return null;
}
},
});
Update: Jetty 8.1.8 introduces internal changes that are incompatible with the code above. For 8.1.8 the following seems to work:
webAppContext.setConfigurations (new Configuration []
{
// This is necessary because Jetty out-of-the-box does not scan
// the classpath of your project in Eclipse, so it doesn't find
// your WebAppInitializer.
new AnnotationConfiguration()
{
#Override
public void configure(WebAppContext context) throws Exception {
boolean metadataComplete = context.getMetaData().isMetaDataComplete();
context.addDecorator(new AnnotationDecorator(context));
//Even if metadata is complete, we still need to scan for ServletContainerInitializers - if there are any
AnnotationParser parser = null;
if (!metadataComplete)
{
//If metadata isn't complete, if this is a servlet 3 webapp or isConfigDiscovered is true, we need to search for annotations
if (context.getServletContext().getEffectiveMajorVersion() >= 3 || context.isConfigurationDiscovered())
{
_discoverableAnnotationHandlers.add(new WebServletAnnotationHandler(context));
_discoverableAnnotationHandlers.add(new WebFilterAnnotationHandler(context));
_discoverableAnnotationHandlers.add(new WebListenerAnnotationHandler(context));
}
}
//Regardless of metadata, if there are any ServletContainerInitializers with #HandlesTypes, then we need to scan all the
//classes so we can call their onStartup() methods correctly
createServletContainerInitializerAnnotationHandlers(context, getNonExcludedInitializers(context));
if (!_discoverableAnnotationHandlers.isEmpty() || _classInheritanceHandler != null || !_containerInitializerAnnotationHandlers.isEmpty())
{
parser = createAnnotationParser();
parse(context, parser);
for (DiscoverableAnnotationHandler h:_discoverableAnnotationHandlers)
context.getMetaData().addDiscoveredAnnotations(((AbstractDiscoverableAnnotationHandler)h).getAnnotationList());
}
}
private void parse(final WebAppContext context, AnnotationParser parser) throws Exception
{
List<Resource> _resources = getResources(getClass().getClassLoader());
for (Resource _resource : _resources)
{
if (_resource == null)
return;
parser.clearHandlers();
for (DiscoverableAnnotationHandler h:_discoverableAnnotationHandlers)
{
if (h instanceof AbstractDiscoverableAnnotationHandler)
((AbstractDiscoverableAnnotationHandler)h).setResource(null); //
}
parser.registerHandlers(_discoverableAnnotationHandlers);
parser.registerHandler(_classInheritanceHandler);
parser.registerHandlers(_containerInitializerAnnotationHandlers);
parser.parse(_resource,
new ClassNameResolver()
{
public boolean isExcluded (String name)
{
if (context.isSystemClass(name)) return true;
if (context.isServerClass(name)) return false;
return false;
}
public boolean shouldOverride (String name)
{
//looking at webapp classpath, found already-parsed class of same name - did it come from system or duplicate in webapp?
if (context.isParentLoaderPriority())
return false;
return true;
}
});
}
}
private List<Resource> getResources(ClassLoader aLoader) throws IOException
{
if (aLoader instanceof URLClassLoader)
{
List<Resource> _result = new ArrayList<Resource>();
URL[] _urls = ((URLClassLoader)aLoader).getURLs();
for (URL _url : _urls)
_result.add(Resource.newResource(_url));
return _result;
}
return Collections.emptyList();
}
}
});
I was able to resolve in an easier but more limited way by just providing explicitly to the AnnotationConfiguration the implementation class (MyWebApplicationInitializerImpl in this example) that I want to be loaded like this:
webAppContext.setConfigurations(new Configuration[] {
new WebXmlConfiguration(),
new AnnotationConfiguration() {
#Override
public void preConfigure(WebAppContext context) throws Exception {
MultiMap<String> map = new MultiMap<String>();
map.add(WebApplicationInitializer.class.getName(), MyWebApplicationInitializerImpl.class.getName());
context.setAttribute(CLASS_INHERITANCE_MAP, map);
_classInheritanceHandler = new ClassInheritanceHandler(map);
}
}
});
Jetty 9.0.1 contains an enhancement which allows for scanning of annotations of non-jar resources (ie classes) on the container classpath. See comment #5 on the following issue for how to use it:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=404176#c5
Jan
The code below did the trick in my maven project:
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
Server server = new Server();
ServerConnector scc = new ServerConnector(server);
scc.setPort(Integer.parseInt(System.getProperty("jetty.port", "8080")));
server.setConnectors(new Connector[] { scc });
WebAppContext context = new WebAppContext();
context.setServer(server);
context.setContextPath("/");
context.setWar("src/main/webapp");
context.getMetaData().addContainerResource(new FileResource(new File("./target/classes").toURI()));
context.setConfigurations(new Configuration[]{
new WebXmlConfiguration(),
new AnnotationConfiguration()
});
server.setHandler(context);
try {
System.out.println(">>> STARTING EMBEDDED JETTY SERVER, PRESS ANY KEY TO STOP");
System.out.println(String.format(">>> open http://localhost:%s/", scc.getPort()));
server.start();
while (System.in.available() == 0) {
Thread.sleep(5000);
}
server.stop();
server.join();
} catch (Throwable t) {
t.printStackTrace();
System.exit(100);
}
}
Based on my testing and this thread http://forum.springsource.org/showthread.php?127152-WebApplicationInitializer-not-loaded-with-embedded-Jetty I don't think it works at the moment. If you look in AnnotationConfiguration.configure:
parseContainerPath(context, parser);
// snip comment
parseWebInfClasses(context, parser);
parseWebInfLib (context, parser);
it seems coupled to a war-like deployment rather than embedded.
Here is an example using Spring MVC and embedded Jetty that might be more useful:
http://www.jamesward.com/2012/08/13/containerless-spring-mvc
It creates the Spring servlet directly rather then relying on annotations.
To those experiencing this lately, it appears this gets around the issue:
#Component
public class Initializer implements WebApplicationInitializer {
private ServletContext servletContext;
#Autowired
public WebInitializer(ServletContext servletContext) {
this.servletContext = servletContext;
}
#PostConstruct
public void onStartup() throws ServletException {
onStartup(servletContext);
}
public void onStartup(ServletContext servletContext) throws ServletException {
System.out.println("onStartup");
}
}
To make it work on Jetty 9 set attribute AnnotationConfiguration.CLASS_INHERITANCE_MAP on WebAppContext
webAppContext.setAttribute(AnnotationConfiguration.CLASS_INHERITANCE_MAP, createClassMap());
And here is how to create this map:
private ClassInheritanceMap createClassMap() {
ClassInheritanceMap classMap = new ClassInheritanceMap();
ConcurrentHashSet<String> impl = new ConcurrentHashSet<>();
impl.add(MyWebAppInitializer.class.getName());
classMap.put(WebApplicationInitializer.class.getName(), impl);
return classMap;
}
I placed that solution on gitHub
What about just setting the context attribute that tells the scanner which things belong on the container classpath that need to be scanned?
context attribute:
org.eclipse.jetty.server.webapp.ContainerIncludeJarPattern
./servlet-api-[^/].jar$
It is designed to be used with jar names, but you could just match everything.
You'd need to use the WebInfConfiguration as well as the AnnotationConfiguration classes.
cheers
Jan
In our case these lines helped in Jetty startup code:
ClassList cl = Configuration.ClassList.setServerDefault(server);
cl.addBefore("org.eclipse.jetty.webapp.JettyWebXmlConfiguration", "org.eclipse.jetty.annotations.AnnotationConfiguration");
Jetty 9 version of "magomarcelo" answer:
context.setConfigurations(
new org.eclipse.jetty.webapp.Configuration[] { new WebXmlConfiguration(), new AnnotationConfiguration() {
#Override
public void preConfigure(WebAppContext context) throws Exception {
final ClassInheritanceMap map = new ClassInheritanceMap();
final ConcurrentHashSet<String> set = new ConcurrentHashSet<>();
set.add(MyWebAppInitializer.class.getName());
map.put(WebApplicationInitializer.class.getName(), set);
context.setAttribute(CLASS_INHERITANCE_MAP, map);
_classInheritanceHandler = new ClassInheritanceHandler(map);
}
} });
For Jetty 9, if you have webjars, the solution provided does not work straight away as those Jars need to be on the classpath and the JAR contents need to be available as resources for your webapp. So, for that to work together with webjars, the config would have to be:
context.setExtraClasspath(pathsToWebJarsCommaSeparated);
context.setAttribute(WebInfConfiguration.WEBINF_JAR_PATTERN, ".*\\.jar$");
context.setAttribute(WebInfConfiguration.CONTAINER_JAR_PATTERN, ".*\\.jar$");
context.setConfigurations(
new org.eclipse.jetty.webapp.Configuration[] {
new WebInfConfiguration(), new MetaInfConfiguration(),
new AnnotationConfiguration() {
#Override
public void preConfigure(WebAppContext context) throws Exception {
final ClassInheritanceMap map = new ClassInheritanceMap();
final ConcurrentHashSet<String> set = new ConcurrentHashSet<>();
set.add(MyWebAppInitializer.class.getName());
map.put(WebApplicationInitializer.class.getName(), set);
context.setAttribute(CLASS_INHERITANCE_MAP, map);
_classInheritanceHandler = new ClassInheritanceHandler(map);
}
} });
The order here is important (WebInfConfiguration has to come before MetaInf).
Solution that worked for me and does not involve scanning, but uses WebApplicationInitializer class that you provide. Jetty version: 9.2.20
public class Main {
public static void main(String... args) throws Exception {
Properties properties = new Properties();
InputStream stream = Main.class.getResourceAsStream("/WEB-INF/application.properties");
properties.load(stream);
stream.close();
PropertyConfigurator.configure(properties);
WebAppContext webAppContext = new WebAppContext();
webAppContext.setResourceBase("resource");
webAppContext.setContextPath(properties.getProperty("base.url"));
webAppContext.setConfigurations(new Configuration[] {
new WebXmlConfiguration(),
new AnnotationConfiguration() {
#Override
public void preConfigure(WebAppContext context) {
ClassInheritanceMap map = new ClassInheritanceMap();
map.put(WebApplicationInitializer.class.getName(), new ConcurrentHashSet<String>() {{
add(WebInitializer.class.getName());
add(SecurityWebInitializer.class.getName());
}});
context.setAttribute(CLASS_INHERITANCE_MAP, map);
_classInheritanceHandler = new ClassInheritanceHandler(map);
}
}
});
Server server = new Server(Integer.parseInt(properties.getProperty("base.port")));
server.setHandler(webAppContext);
server.start();
server.join();
}
}
The source (in russian) of this code snippet is here: https://habrahabr.ru/post/255773/
did a simple maven project to demonstrate how it can be done cleanly.
public class Console {
public static void main(String[] args) {
try {
Server server = new Server(8080);
//Set a handler to handle requests.
server.setHandler(getWebAppContext());
//starts to listen at 0.0.0.0:8080
server.start();
server.join();
} catch (Exception e) {
log.error("server exited with exception", e);
}
}
private static WebAppContext getWebAppContext() {
final WebAppContext webAppContext = new WebAppContext();
//route all requests via this web-app.
webAppContext.setContextPath("/");
/*
* point to location where the jar into which this class gets packaged into resides.
* this could very well be the target directory in a maven development build.
*/
webAppContext.setResourceBase("directory_where_the_application_jar_exists");
//no web inf for us - so let the scanning know about location of our libraries / classes.
webAppContext.getMetaData().setWebInfClassesDirs(Arrays.asList(webAppContext.getBaseResource()));
//Scan for annotations (servlet 3+)
final AnnotationConfiguration configuration = new AnnotationConfiguration();
webAppContext.setConfigurations(new Configuration[]{configuration});
return webAppContext;
}
}
and that's all - the spring WebApplicationInitializer that you use will get detected without explicitly letting jetty server know about the existence of such an app initializer.
Im currently trying to setup my own implementation of a ManagedServiceFactory. Here is what I'm trying to do: I need multiple instances of some service on a per-configuration base. With DS the components worked perfectly but now I found out that these services should handle there own lifecycle (i.e. (de)registration at the service registry) depending on the availability of some external resource, which is impossible with DS.
Thus my idea was to create a ManagedServiceFactory, which then would receive configs from the ConfigurationAdmin and create instances of my class. These again would try to connect to the resource in a seperate thread and register themselves as service when they're ready to operate.
Since I had no luck implementing this yet, I tried to break everything down to the most basic parts, not even dealing with the dynamic (de)registration, just trying to get the ManagedServiceFacotry to work:
package my.project.factory;
import java.util.Dictionary;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Hashtable;
import java.util.Map;
import org.osgi.framework.BundleActivator;
import org.osgi.framework.BundleContext;
import org.osgi.framework.Constants;
import org.osgi.framework.ServiceRegistration;
import org.osgi.service.cm.ConfigurationException;
import org.osgi.service.cm.ManagedServiceFactory;
public class Factory implements BundleActivator, ManagedServiceFactory {
private ServiceRegistration myReg;
private BundleContext ctx;
private Map<String, ServiceRegistration> services;
#Override
public void start(BundleContext context) throws Exception {
System.out.println("starting factory...");
this.ctx = context;
java.util.Dictionary properties = new Hashtable<String, Object>();
properties.put(Constants.SERVICE_PID, "my.project.servicefactory");
myReg = context.registerService(ManagedServiceFactory.class, this,
properties);
System.out.println("registered as ManagedServiceFactory");
services = new HashMap<String, ServiceRegistration>();
}
#Override
public void stop(BundleContext context) throws Exception {
for(ServiceRegistration reg : services.values()) {
System.out.println("deregister " + reg);
reg.unregister();
}
if(myReg != null) {
myReg.unregister();
} else {
System.out.println("my service registration as already null " +
"(although it shouldn't)!");
}
}
#Override
public String getName() {
System.out.println("returning facotry name");
return "ServiceFactory";
}
#Override
public void updated(String pid, Dictionary properties)
throws ConfigurationException {
System.out.println("retrieved update for pid " + pid);
ServiceRegistration reg = services.get(pid);
if (reg == null) {
services.put(pid, ctx.registerService(ServiceInterface.class,
new Service(), properties));
} else {
// i should do some update here
}
}
#Override
public void deleted(String pid) {
ServiceRegistration reg = services.get(pid);
if (reg != null) {
reg.unregister();
}
}
}
Now, it should receive configurations from the ConfigurationAdmin for PID my.project.servicefactory, shouldn't it?
But it does not receive any configurations from the ConfigurationAdmin. The bundle is started, the service is registered and in the web console, I can see the config admin holds a reference to my ManagedServiceFactory. Is there a certain property which should be set? The interface specification does not suggest that. Actually my implementation is more or less the same as the example there. I've no idea what I'm doing wrong here, any pointers to the solutions are very welcome.
Also, I orginally thought to implement the ManagedServiceFactory itself as DS, which also should be possible, but I failed at the same point: no configurations are handed over by the ConfigAdmin.
update
To clarify the question: I think that this is mainly an configuration problem. As I see it, I should be able to specify two PIDs for the factory, one which identifies a configuration for the factory itself (if any), and one which would produce services trough this factory, which I thought should be the factory.pid. But the framework constants do not hold anything like this.
update 2
After searching a bit the Felix Fileinstall source code, I found out that it treats configuration files differently when there is a - in the filename or not. Having the configuration file named my.project.servicefactory.cfg it did not work, but the configs named my.project.servicefactory-foo.cfg and my.project.servicefactory-bar.cfg were properly handed over to my ManagedServiceFactory as expected, and multiple services with ServiceInterface were registered. Hurray!
update 3
As proposed by Neil, I put the declarative service part in a new question to bound the scope of this one.
I think that the problem is you have a singleton configuration record rather than a factory record. You need to call Config Admin with the createFactoryConfiguration method using my.project.servicefactory as the factoryPid.
If you are using Apache Felix FileInstall (which is a nice easy way to create config records without writing code) then you need to create a file called my.project.servicefactory-1.cfg in the load directory. You can create further configurations with the same factoryPID by calling them my.project.servicefactory-2.cfg etc.
all, I am puzzled about the struts2 action unit test
import org.apache.struts2.StrutsSpringTestCase;
import org.junit.Test;
import com.opensymphony.xwork2.ActionProxy;
public class TestLoginAction extends StrutsSpringTestCase {
#Test
public void testCheck() throws Exception {
ActionProxy proxy = null;
LoginAction test = null;
request.setParameter("username", "admin");
proxy = getActionProxy("/checkLogin");
test = (LoginAction) proxy.getAction();
String result = proxy.execute();
assertEquals("error", result);
assertEquals("admin", test.getUsername());
}
}
It throw the warnings and exceptions:
Couldn't get resource paths for class path resource [WEB-INF/jsp/]
java.io.FileNotFoundException: class path resource [WEB-INF/jsp/] cannot be resolved to URL because it does not exist
StrutsSpringTestCase is expecting the Spring configuration to be loaded from classpath:applicationContext.xml. You can override this behavior by adding this to your test action:
#Override
public String getContextLocations() {
return "path/to/your/TestLoginAction-context.xml";
}
the reason of throwing the exception has been found,
I use struts-convention to find my action classes,but
,this configuration is the base search path of jsp files,so of course the convention can't recognize the path as java class path,I will provide the two workaround here:
you can modify the configuration value "/WEB-INF/jsp" to the existing class path,such as "com.foo.bar" to make the convention resolve class path smoothly
rewrite the MockServletContext and swallow the throwing Exception
public Set getResourcePaths(String path) {
....
}
You may add a line as follows to struts.xml to work around it.
<constant name="struts.convention.result.path" value="/your/path" />