Related
This question already has answers here:
Java Pass Method as Parameter
(17 answers)
Closed 8 years ago.
In Java, how can one pass a function as an argument of another function?
Java 8 and above
Using Java 8+ lambda expressions, if you have a class or interface with only a single abstract method (sometimes called a SAM type), for example:
public interface MyInterface {
String doSomething(int param1, String param2);
}
then anywhere where MyInterface is used, you can substitute a lambda expression:
class MyClass {
public MyInterface myInterface = (p1, p2) -> { return p2 + p1; };
}
For example, you can create a new thread very quickly:
new Thread(() -> someMethod()).start();
And use the method reference syntax to make it even cleaner:
new Thread(this::someMethod).start();
Without lambda expressions, these last two examples would look like:
new Thread(new Runnable() { someMethod(); }).start();
Before Java 8
A common pattern would be to 'wrap' it within an interface, like Callable, for example, then you pass in a Callable:
public T myMethod(Callable<T> func) {
return func.call();
}
This pattern is known as the Command Pattern.
Keep in mind you would be best off creating an interface for your particular usage. If you chose to go with callable, then you'd replace T above with whatever type of return value you expect, such as String.
In response to your comment below you could say:
public int methodToPass() {
// do something
}
public void dansMethod(int i, Callable<Integer> myFunc) {
// do something
}
then call it, perhaps using an anonymous inner class:
dansMethod(100, new Callable<Integer>() {
public Integer call() {
return methodToPass();
}
});
Keep in mind this is not a 'trick'. It's just java's basic conceptual equivalent to function pointers.
You could use Java reflection to do this. The method would be represented as an instance of java.lang.reflect.Method.
import java.lang.reflect.Method;
public class Demo {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception{
Class[] parameterTypes = new Class[1];
parameterTypes[0] = String.class;
Method method1 = Demo.class.getMethod("method1", parameterTypes);
Demo demo = new Demo();
demo.method2(demo, method1, "Hello World");
}
public void method1(String message) {
System.out.println(message);
}
public void method2(Object object, Method method, String message) throws Exception {
Object[] parameters = new Object[1];
parameters[0] = message;
method.invoke(object, parameters);
}
}
Lambda Expressions
To add on to jk.'s excellent answer, you can now pass a method more easily using Lambda Expressions (in Java 8). First, some background. A functional interface is an interface that has one and only one abstract method, although it can contain any number of default methods (new in Java 8) and static methods. A lambda expression can quickly implement the abstract method, without all the unnecessary syntax needed if you don't use a lambda expression.
Without lambda expressions:
obj.aMethod(new AFunctionalInterface() {
#Override
public boolean anotherMethod(int i)
{
return i == 982
}
});
With lambda expressions:
obj.aMethod(i -> i == 982);
Here is an excerpt from the Java tutorial on Lambda Expressions:
Syntax of Lambda Expressions
A lambda expression consists of the following:
A comma-separated list of formal parameters enclosed in parentheses. The CheckPerson.test method contains one parameter, p,
which represents an instance of the Person class.Note: You
can omit the data type of the parameters in a lambda expression. In
addition, you can omit the parentheses if there is only one parameter.
For example, the following lambda expression is also valid:
p -> p.getGender() == Person.Sex.MALE
&& p.getAge() >= 18
&& p.getAge() <= 25
The arrow token, ->
A body, which consists of a single expression or a statement block. This example uses the following expression:
p.getGender() == Person.Sex.MALE
&& p.getAge() >= 18
&& p.getAge() <= 25
If you specify a single expression, then the Java runtime evaluates the expression and then returns its value. Alternatively,
you can use a return statement:
p -> {
return p.getGender() == Person.Sex.MALE
&& p.getAge() >= 18
&& p.getAge() <= 25;
}
A return statement is not an expression; in a lambda expression, you must enclose statements in braces ({}). However, you do not have
to enclose a void method invocation in braces. For example, the
following is a valid lambda expression:
email -> System.out.println(email)
Note that a lambda expression looks a lot like a method declaration;
you can consider lambda expressions as anonymous methods—methods
without a name.
Here is how you can "pass a method" using a lambda expression:
Note: this uses a new standard functional interface, java.util.function.IntConsumer.
class A {
public static void methodToPass(int i) {
// do stuff
}
}
import java.util.function.IntConsumer;
class B {
public void dansMethod(int i, IntConsumer aMethod) {
/* you can now call the passed method by saying aMethod.accept(i), and it
will be the equivalent of saying A.methodToPass(i) */
}
}
class C {
B b = new B();
public C() {
b.dansMethod(100, j -> A.methodToPass(j)); //Lambda Expression here
}
}
The above example can be shortened even more using the :: operator.
public C() {
b.dansMethod(100, A::methodToPass);
}
Thanks to Java 8 you don't need to do the steps below to pass a function to a method, that's what lambdas are for, see Oracle's Lambda Expression tutorial. The rest of this post describes what we used to have to do in the bad old days in order to implement this functionality.
Typically you declare your method as taking some interface with a single method, then you pass in an object that implements that interface. An example is in commons-collections, where you have interfaces for Closure, Transformer, and Predicate, and methods that you pass implementations of those into. Guava is the new improved commons-collections, you can find equivalent interfaces there.
So for instance, commons-collections has org.apache.commons.collections.CollectionUtils, which has lots of static methods that take objects passed in, to pick one at random, there's one called exists with this signature:
static boolean exists(java.util.Collection collection, Predicate predicate)
It takes an object that implements the interface Predicate, which means it has to have a method on it that takes some Object and returns a boolean.
So I can call it like this:
CollectionUtils.exists(someCollection, new Predicate() {
public boolean evaluate(Object object) {
return ("a".equals(object.toString());
}
});
and it returns true or false depending on whether someCollection contains an object that the predicate returns true for.
Anyway, this is just an example, and commons-collections is outdated. I just forget the equivalent in Guava.
Java supports closures just fine. It just doesn't support functions, so the syntax you're used to for closures is much more awkward and bulky: you have to wrap everything up in a class with a method. For example,
public Runnable foo(final int x) {
return new Runnable() {
public void run() {
System.out.println(x);
}
};
}
Will return a Runnable object whose run() method "closes over" the x passed in, just like in any language that supports first-class functions and closures.
I used the command pattern that #jk. mentioned, adding a return type:
public interface Callable<I, O> {
public O call(I input);
}
I know this is a rather old post but I have another slightly simpler solution.
You could create another class within and make it abstract. Next make an Abstract method name it whatever you like. In the original class make a method that takes the new class as a parameter, in this method call the abstract method. It will look something like this.
public class Demo {
public Demo(/.../){
}
public void view(Action a){
a.preform();
}
/**
* The Action Class is for making the Demo
* View Custom Code
*/
public abstract class Action {
public Action(/.../){
}
abstract void preform();
}
}
Now you can do something like this to call a method from within the class.
/...
Demo d = new Demo;
Action a = new Action() {
#Override
void preform() {
//Custom Method Code Goes Here
}
};
/.../
d.view(a)
Like I said I know its old but this way I think is a little easier. Hope it helps.
Java does not (yet) support closures. But there are other languages like Scala and Groovy which run in the JVM and do support closures.
I was reading this tutorial on Java 8 where the writer showed the code:
interface Formula {
double calculate(int a);
default double sqrt(int a) {
return Math.sqrt(a);
}
}
And then said
Default methods cannot be accessed from within lambda expressions. The
following code does not compile:
Formula formula = (a) -> sqrt( a * 100);
But he did not explain why it is not possible. I ran the code, and it gave an error,
incompatible types: Formula is not a functional interface`
So why is it not possible or what is the meaning of the error? The interface fulfills the requirement of a functional interface having one abstract method.
It's more or less a question of scope. From the JLS
Unlike code appearing in anonymous class declarations, the meaning of
names and the this and super keywords appearing in a lambda body,
along with the accessibility of referenced declarations, are the same
as in the surrounding context (except that lambda parameters introduce
new names).
In your attempted example
Formula formula = (a) -> sqrt( a * 100);
the scope does not contain a declaration for the name sqrt.
This is also hinted at in the JLS
Practically speaking, it is unusual for a lambda expression to need to
talk about itself (either to call itself recursively or to invoke its
other methods), while it is more common to want to use names to refer
to things in the enclosing class that would otherwise be shadowed
(this, toString()). If it is necessary for a lambda expression to
refer to itself (as if via this), a method reference or an anonymous
inner class should be used instead.
I think it could have been implemented. They chose not to allow it.
Lambda expressions work in a completely different way from anonymous classes in that this represents the same thing that it would in the scope surrounding the expression.
For example, this compiles
class Main {
public static void main(String[] args) {
new Main().foo();
}
void foo() {
System.out.println(this);
Runnable r = () -> {
System.out.println(this);
};
r.run();
}
}
and it prints something like
Main#f6f4d33
Main#f6f4d33
In other words this is a Main, rather than the object created by the lambda expression.
So you cannot use sqrt in your lambda expression because the type of the this reference is not Formula, or a subtype, and it does not have a sqrt method.
Formula is a functional interface though, and the code
Formula f = a -> a;
compiles and runs for me without any problem.
Although you cannot use a lambda expression for this, you can do it using an anonymous class, like this:
Formula f = new Formula() {
#Override
public double calculate(int a) {
return sqrt(a * 100);
}
};
That's not exactly true. Default methods can be used in lambda expressions.
interface Value {
int get();
default int getDouble() {
return get() * 2;
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
List<Value> list = Arrays.asList(
() -> 1,
() -> 2
);
int maxDoubled = list.stream()
.mapToInt(val -> val.getDouble())
.max()
.orElse(0);
System.out.println(maxDoubled);
}
prints 4 as expected and uses a default method inside a lambda expression (.mapToInt(val -> val.getDouble()))
What the author of your article tries to do here
Formula formula = (a) -> sqrt( a * 100);
is to define a Formula, which works as functional interface, directly via a lambda expression.
That works fine, in above example code, Value value = () -> 5 or with Formula as interface for example
Formula formula = (a) -> 2 * a * a + 1;
But
Formula formula = (a) -> sqrt( a * 100);
fails because it's trying to access the (this.)sqrt method but it can't.
Lambdas as per spec inherit their scope from their surroundings, meaning that this inside a lambda refers to the same thing as directly outside of it. And there is no sqrt method outside.
My personal explanation for this: Inside the lambda expression, it's not really clear to what concrete functional interface the lambda is going to be "converted". Compare
interface NotRunnable {
void notRun();
}
private final Runnable r = () -> {
System.out.println("Hello");
};
private final NotRunnable r2 = r::run;
The very same lambda expression can be "cast" to multiple types. I think of it as if a lambda doesn't have a type. It's a special typeless function that can be used for any Interface with the right parameters. But that restriction means that you can't use methods of the future type because you can't know it.
This adds little to the discussion, but I found it interesting anyways.
Another way to see the problem would be to think about it from the standpoint of a self-referencing lambda.
For example:
Formula formula = (a) -> formula.sqrt(a * 100);
It would seem that this ought to make sense, since by the time the lambda gets to be executed the formula reference must have already being initialized (i.e. there is not way to do formula.apply() until formula has been properly initialized, in whose case, from the body of the lambda, the body of apply, it should be possible to reference the same variable).
However this does not work either. Interestingly, it used to be possible at the beginning. You can see that Maurice Naftalin had it documented in his Lambda FAQ Web Site. But for some reason the support for this feature was ultimately removed.
Some of the suggestions given in other answers to this question have been already mentioned there in the very discussion in the lambda mailing list.
Default methods can be accessed only with object references, if you want to access default method you'd have an object reference of Functional Interface, in lambda expression method body you won't have so can't access it.
You are getting an error incompatible types: Formula is not a functional interface because you have not provided #FunctionalInterface annotation, if you have provided you'll get 'method undefined' error, compiler will force you to create a method in the class.
#FunctionalInterface must have only one abstract method your Interface has that but it is missing the annotation.
But static methods have no such restriction, since we can access it with out object reference like below.
#FunctionalInterface
public interface Formula {
double calculate(int a);
static double sqrt(int a) {
return Math.sqrt(a);
}
}
public class Lambda {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Formula formula = (a) -> Formula.sqrt(a);
System.out.println(formula.calculate(100));
}
}
I'm trying to create a method that allows me to make use of what I believe is called lambdas, to execute a method over a series of connections.
Here's my code that I've come up with after some research, but it doesn't work:
performGlobalAction(()->{
// doSomething();
});
You'll also need to see the method I would assume:
private <T> void performGlobalAction(Callable<T> action) {
for(int i = 0; i < connectionList.size(); i++) {
connectionList.get(i).performAction(action);
}
}
This provides the following error:
The method performAction(Callable<T>) in the type Connection is not
applicable for the arguments (() -> {})
The goal of this method is to allow myself to construct a method "on the go" without creating a void for it.
Is this possible? It seems like I've used plenty of statements that have done this before. It seems like this is actually exactly how lambdas statements work.
The call method of the Callable interface returns a value of type T. Your lambda is simply shorthand for the call method, and likewise should return a T value.
Any interface that meets the requirements of a FunctionalInterface can be substituted by a lambda expression. Such an interface will have a single abstract method, one with no default implementation. For your question, the interface is Callable, and the abstract method is call. The lambda expression then acts as the body of that abstract method in an anonymous implementation of that interface.
Let's take as an example a method doStuff(Callable<Integer> stuff). To satisfy this interface, you could give an anonymous class:
doStuff(new Callable<Integer>(){
public Integer call(){
return 5;
}
});
Or you could use a lambda:
doStuff( () -> {
return 5;
} );
Or even more succinctly:
doStuff( () -> 5 );
If your method doesn't have a return type, perhaps Runnable would be a better fit.
See also: Lambda Expressions (Oracle) - 'Use Standard Functional Interfaces with Lambda Expressions'
This question already has answers here:
Java Pass Method as Parameter
(17 answers)
Closed 8 years ago.
In Java, how can one pass a function as an argument of another function?
Java 8 and above
Using Java 8+ lambda expressions, if you have a class or interface with only a single abstract method (sometimes called a SAM type), for example:
public interface MyInterface {
String doSomething(int param1, String param2);
}
then anywhere where MyInterface is used, you can substitute a lambda expression:
class MyClass {
public MyInterface myInterface = (p1, p2) -> { return p2 + p1; };
}
For example, you can create a new thread very quickly:
new Thread(() -> someMethod()).start();
And use the method reference syntax to make it even cleaner:
new Thread(this::someMethod).start();
Without lambda expressions, these last two examples would look like:
new Thread(new Runnable() { someMethod(); }).start();
Before Java 8
A common pattern would be to 'wrap' it within an interface, like Callable, for example, then you pass in a Callable:
public T myMethod(Callable<T> func) {
return func.call();
}
This pattern is known as the Command Pattern.
Keep in mind you would be best off creating an interface for your particular usage. If you chose to go with callable, then you'd replace T above with whatever type of return value you expect, such as String.
In response to your comment below you could say:
public int methodToPass() {
// do something
}
public void dansMethod(int i, Callable<Integer> myFunc) {
// do something
}
then call it, perhaps using an anonymous inner class:
dansMethod(100, new Callable<Integer>() {
public Integer call() {
return methodToPass();
}
});
Keep in mind this is not a 'trick'. It's just java's basic conceptual equivalent to function pointers.
You could use Java reflection to do this. The method would be represented as an instance of java.lang.reflect.Method.
import java.lang.reflect.Method;
public class Demo {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception{
Class[] parameterTypes = new Class[1];
parameterTypes[0] = String.class;
Method method1 = Demo.class.getMethod("method1", parameterTypes);
Demo demo = new Demo();
demo.method2(demo, method1, "Hello World");
}
public void method1(String message) {
System.out.println(message);
}
public void method2(Object object, Method method, String message) throws Exception {
Object[] parameters = new Object[1];
parameters[0] = message;
method.invoke(object, parameters);
}
}
Lambda Expressions
To add on to jk.'s excellent answer, you can now pass a method more easily using Lambda Expressions (in Java 8). First, some background. A functional interface is an interface that has one and only one abstract method, although it can contain any number of default methods (new in Java 8) and static methods. A lambda expression can quickly implement the abstract method, without all the unnecessary syntax needed if you don't use a lambda expression.
Without lambda expressions:
obj.aMethod(new AFunctionalInterface() {
#Override
public boolean anotherMethod(int i)
{
return i == 982
}
});
With lambda expressions:
obj.aMethod(i -> i == 982);
Here is an excerpt from the Java tutorial on Lambda Expressions:
Syntax of Lambda Expressions
A lambda expression consists of the following:
A comma-separated list of formal parameters enclosed in parentheses. The CheckPerson.test method contains one parameter, p,
which represents an instance of the Person class.Note: You
can omit the data type of the parameters in a lambda expression. In
addition, you can omit the parentheses if there is only one parameter.
For example, the following lambda expression is also valid:
p -> p.getGender() == Person.Sex.MALE
&& p.getAge() >= 18
&& p.getAge() <= 25
The arrow token, ->
A body, which consists of a single expression or a statement block. This example uses the following expression:
p.getGender() == Person.Sex.MALE
&& p.getAge() >= 18
&& p.getAge() <= 25
If you specify a single expression, then the Java runtime evaluates the expression and then returns its value. Alternatively,
you can use a return statement:
p -> {
return p.getGender() == Person.Sex.MALE
&& p.getAge() >= 18
&& p.getAge() <= 25;
}
A return statement is not an expression; in a lambda expression, you must enclose statements in braces ({}). However, you do not have
to enclose a void method invocation in braces. For example, the
following is a valid lambda expression:
email -> System.out.println(email)
Note that a lambda expression looks a lot like a method declaration;
you can consider lambda expressions as anonymous methods—methods
without a name.
Here is how you can "pass a method" using a lambda expression:
Note: this uses a new standard functional interface, java.util.function.IntConsumer.
class A {
public static void methodToPass(int i) {
// do stuff
}
}
import java.util.function.IntConsumer;
class B {
public void dansMethod(int i, IntConsumer aMethod) {
/* you can now call the passed method by saying aMethod.accept(i), and it
will be the equivalent of saying A.methodToPass(i) */
}
}
class C {
B b = new B();
public C() {
b.dansMethod(100, j -> A.methodToPass(j)); //Lambda Expression here
}
}
The above example can be shortened even more using the :: operator.
public C() {
b.dansMethod(100, A::methodToPass);
}
Thanks to Java 8 you don't need to do the steps below to pass a function to a method, that's what lambdas are for, see Oracle's Lambda Expression tutorial. The rest of this post describes what we used to have to do in the bad old days in order to implement this functionality.
Typically you declare your method as taking some interface with a single method, then you pass in an object that implements that interface. An example is in commons-collections, where you have interfaces for Closure, Transformer, and Predicate, and methods that you pass implementations of those into. Guava is the new improved commons-collections, you can find equivalent interfaces there.
So for instance, commons-collections has org.apache.commons.collections.CollectionUtils, which has lots of static methods that take objects passed in, to pick one at random, there's one called exists with this signature:
static boolean exists(java.util.Collection collection, Predicate predicate)
It takes an object that implements the interface Predicate, which means it has to have a method on it that takes some Object and returns a boolean.
So I can call it like this:
CollectionUtils.exists(someCollection, new Predicate() {
public boolean evaluate(Object object) {
return ("a".equals(object.toString());
}
});
and it returns true or false depending on whether someCollection contains an object that the predicate returns true for.
Anyway, this is just an example, and commons-collections is outdated. I just forget the equivalent in Guava.
Java supports closures just fine. It just doesn't support functions, so the syntax you're used to for closures is much more awkward and bulky: you have to wrap everything up in a class with a method. For example,
public Runnable foo(final int x) {
return new Runnable() {
public void run() {
System.out.println(x);
}
};
}
Will return a Runnable object whose run() method "closes over" the x passed in, just like in any language that supports first-class functions and closures.
I used the command pattern that #jk. mentioned, adding a return type:
public interface Callable<I, O> {
public O call(I input);
}
I know this is a rather old post but I have another slightly simpler solution.
You could create another class within and make it abstract. Next make an Abstract method name it whatever you like. In the original class make a method that takes the new class as a parameter, in this method call the abstract method. It will look something like this.
public class Demo {
public Demo(/.../){
}
public void view(Action a){
a.preform();
}
/**
* The Action Class is for making the Demo
* View Custom Code
*/
public abstract class Action {
public Action(/.../){
}
abstract void preform();
}
}
Now you can do something like this to call a method from within the class.
/...
Demo d = new Demo;
Action a = new Action() {
#Override
void preform() {
//Custom Method Code Goes Here
}
};
/.../
d.view(a)
Like I said I know its old but this way I think is a little easier. Hope it helps.
Java does not (yet) support closures. But there are other languages like Scala and Groovy which run in the JVM and do support closures.
I have a method that's about ten lines of code. I want to create more methods that do exactly the same thing, except for a small calculation that's going to change one line of code. This is a perfect application for passing in a function pointer to replace that one line, but Java doesn't have function pointers. What's my best alternative?
Anonymous inner class
Say you want to have a function passed in with a String param that returns an int.
First you have to define an interface with the function as its only member, if you can't reuse an existing one.
interface StringFunction {
int func(String param);
}
A method that takes the pointer would just accept StringFunction instance like so:
public void takingMethod(StringFunction sf) {
int i = sf.func("my string");
// do whatever ...
}
And would be called like so:
ref.takingMethod(new StringFunction() {
public int func(String param) {
// body
}
});
EDIT: In Java 8, you could call it with a lambda expression:
ref.takingMethod(param -> bodyExpression);
For each "function pointer", I'd create a small functor class that implements your calculation.
Define an interface that all the classes will implement, and pass instances of those objects into your larger function. This is a combination of the "command pattern", and "strategy pattern".
#sblundy's example is good.
When there is a predefined number of different calculations you can do in that one line, using an enum is a quick, yet clear way to implement a strategy pattern.
public enum Operation {
PLUS {
public double calc(double a, double b) {
return a + b;
}
},
TIMES {
public double calc(double a, double b) {
return a * b;
}
}
...
public abstract double calc(double a, double b);
}
Obviously, the strategy method declaration, as well as exactly one instance of each implementation are all defined in a single class/file.
You need to create an interface that provides the function(s) that you want to pass around. eg:
/**
* A simple interface to wrap up a function of one argument.
*
* #author rcreswick
*
*/
public interface Function1<S, T> {
/**
* Evaluates this function on it's arguments.
*
* #param a The first argument.
* #return The result.
*/
public S eval(T a);
}
Then, when you need to pass a function, you can implement that interface:
List<Integer> result = CollectionUtilities.map(list,
new Function1<Integer, Integer>() {
#Override
public Integer eval(Integer a) {
return a * a;
}
});
Finally, the map function uses the passed in Function1 as follows:
public static <K,R,S,T> Map<K, R> zipWith(Function2<R,S,T> fn,
Map<K, S> m1, Map<K, T> m2, Map<K, R> results){
Set<K> keySet = new HashSet<K>();
keySet.addAll(m1.keySet());
keySet.addAll(m2.keySet());
results.clear();
for (K key : keySet) {
results.put(key, fn.eval(m1.get(key), m2.get(key)));
}
return results;
}
You can often use Runnable instead of your own interface if you don't need to pass in parameters, or you can use various other techniques to make the param count less "fixed" but it's usually a trade-off with type safety. (Or you can override the constructor for your function object to pass in the params that way.. there are lots of approaches, and some work better in certain circumstances.)
Method references using the :: operator
You can use method references in method arguments where the method accepts a functional interface. A functional interface is any interface that contains only one abstract method. (A functional interface may contain one or more default methods or static methods.)
IntBinaryOperator is a functional interface. Its abstract method, applyAsInt, accepts two ints as its parameters and returns an int. Math.max also accepts two ints and returns an int. In this example, A.method(Math::max); makes parameter.applyAsInt send its two input values to Math.max and return the result of that Math.max.
import java.util.function.IntBinaryOperator;
class A {
static void method(IntBinaryOperator parameter) {
int i = parameter.applyAsInt(7315, 89163);
System.out.println(i);
}
}
import java.lang.Math;
class B {
public static void main(String[] args) {
A.method(Math::max);
}
}
In general, you can use:
method1(Class1::method2);
instead of:
method1((arg1, arg2) -> Class1.method2(arg1, arg2));
which is short for:
method1(new Interface1() {
int method1(int arg1, int arg2) {
return Class1.method2(arg1, agr2);
}
});
For more information, see :: (double colon) operator in Java 8 and Java Language Specification §15.13.
You can also do this (which in some RARE occasions makes sense). The issue (and it is a big issue) is that you lose all the typesafety of using a class/interface and you have to deal with the case where the method does not exist.
It does have the "benefit" that you can ignore access restrictions and call private methods (not shown in the example, but you can call methods that the compiler would normally not let you call).
Again, it is a rare case that this makes sense, but on those occasions it is a nice tool to have.
import java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException;
import java.lang.reflect.Method;
class Main
{
public static void main(final String[] argv)
throws NoSuchMethodException,
IllegalAccessException,
IllegalArgumentException,
InvocationTargetException
{
final String methodName;
final Method method;
final Main main;
main = new Main();
if(argv.length == 0)
{
methodName = "foo";
}
else
{
methodName = "bar";
}
method = Main.class.getDeclaredMethod(methodName, int.class);
main.car(method, 42);
}
private void foo(final int x)
{
System.out.println("foo: " + x);
}
private void bar(final int x)
{
System.out.println("bar: " + x);
}
private void car(final Method method,
final int val)
throws IllegalAccessException,
IllegalArgumentException,
InvocationTargetException
{
method.invoke(this, val);
}
}
If you have just one line which is different you could add a parameter such as a flag and a if(flag) statement which calls one line or the other.
You may also be interested to hear about work going on for Java 7 involving closures:
What’s the current state of closures in Java?
http://gafter.blogspot.com/2006/08/closures-for-java.html
http://tech.puredanger.com/java7/#closures
New Java 8 Functional Interfaces and Method References using the :: operator.
Java 8 is able to maintain method references ( MyClass::new ) with "# Functional Interface" pointers. There are no need for same method name, only same method signature required.
Example:
#FunctionalInterface
interface CallbackHandler{
public void onClick();
}
public class MyClass{
public void doClick1(){System.out.println("doClick1");;}
public void doClick2(){System.out.println("doClick2");}
public CallbackHandler mClickListener = this::doClick;
public static void main(String[] args) {
MyClass myObjectInstance = new MyClass();
CallbackHandler pointer = myObjectInstance::doClick1;
Runnable pointer2 = myObjectInstance::doClick2;
pointer.onClick();
pointer2.run();
}
}
So, what we have here?
Functional Interface - this is interface, annotated or not with #FunctionalInterface, which contains only one method declaration.
Method References - this is just special syntax, looks like this, objectInstance::methodName, nothing more nothing less.
Usage example - just an assignment operator and then interface method call.
YOU SHOULD USE FUNCTIONAL INTERFACES FOR LISTENERS ONLY AND ONLY FOR THAT!
Because all other such function pointers are really bad for code readability and for ability to understand. However, direct method references sometimes come handy, with foreach for example.
There are several predefined Functional Interfaces:
Runnable -> void run( );
Supplier<T> -> T get( );
Consumer<T> -> void accept(T);
Predicate<T> -> boolean test(T);
UnaryOperator<T> -> T apply(T);
BinaryOperator<T,U,R> -> R apply(T, U);
Function<T,R> -> R apply(T);
BiFunction<T,U,R> -> R apply(T, U);
//... and some more of it ...
Callable<V> -> V call() throws Exception;
Readable -> int read(CharBuffer) throws IOException;
AutoCloseable -> void close() throws Exception;
Iterable<T> -> Iterator<T> iterator();
Comparable<T> -> int compareTo(T);
Comparator<T> -> int compare(T,T);
For earlier Java versions you should try Guava Libraries, which has similar functionality, and syntax, as Adrian Petrescu has mentioned above.
For additional research look at Java 8 Cheatsheet
and thanks to The Guy with The Hat for the Java Language Specification §15.13 link.
#sblundy's answer is great, but anonymous inner classes have two small flaws, the primary being that they tend not to be reusable and the secondary is a bulky syntax.
The nice thing is that his pattern expands into full classes without any change in the main class (the one performing the calculations).
When you instantiate a new class you can pass parameters into that class which can act as constants in your equation--so if one of your inner classes look like this:
f(x,y)=x*y
but sometimes you need one that is:
f(x,y)=x*y*2
and maybe a third that is:
f(x,y)=x*y/2
rather than making two anonymous inner classes or adding a "passthrough" parameter, you can make a single ACTUAL class that you instantiate as:
InnerFunc f=new InnerFunc(1.0);// for the first
calculateUsing(f);
f=new InnerFunc(2.0);// for the second
calculateUsing(f);
f=new InnerFunc(0.5);// for the third
calculateUsing(f);
It would simply store the constant in the class and use it in the method specified in the interface.
In fact, if KNOW that your function won't be stored/reused, you could do this:
InnerFunc f=new InnerFunc(1.0);// for the first
calculateUsing(f);
f.setConstant(2.0);
calculateUsing(f);
f.setConstant(0.5);
calculateUsing(f);
But immutable classes are safer--I can't come up with a justification to make a class like this mutable.
I really only post this because I cringe whenever I hear anonymous inner class--I've seen a lot of redundant code that was "Required" because the first thing the programmer did was go anonymous when he should have used an actual class and never rethought his decision.
The Google Guava libraries, which are becoming very popular, have a generic Function and Predicate object that they have worked into many parts of their API.
One of the things I really miss when programming in Java is function callbacks. One situation where the need for these kept presenting itself was in recursively processing hierarchies where you want to perform some specific action for each item. Like walking a directory tree, or processing a data structure. The minimalist inside me hates having to define an interface and then an implementation for each specific case.
One day I found myself wondering why not? We have method pointers - the Method object. With optimizing JIT compilers, reflective invocation really doesn't carry a huge performance penalty anymore. And besides next to, say, copying a file from one location to another, the cost of the reflected method invocation pales into insignificance.
As I thought more about it, I realized that a callback in the OOP paradigm requires binding an object and a method together - enter the Callback object.
Check out my reflection based solution for Callbacks in Java. Free for any use.
Sounds like a strategy pattern to me. Check out fluffycat.com Java patterns.
oK, this thread is already old enough, so very probably my answer is not helpful for the question. But since this thread helped me to find my solution, I'll put it out here anyway.
I needed to use a variable static method with known input and known output (both double). So then, knowing the method package and name, I could work as follows:
java.lang.reflect.Method Function = Class.forName(String classPath).getMethod(String method, Class[] params);
for a function that accepts one double as a parameter.
So, in my concrete situation I initialized it with
java.lang.reflect.Method Function = Class.forName("be.qan.NN.ActivationFunctions").getMethod("sigmoid", double.class);
and invoked it later in a more complex situation with
return (java.lang.Double)this.Function.invoke(null, args);
java.lang.Object[] args = new java.lang.Object[] {activity};
someOtherFunction() + 234 + (java.lang.Double)Function.invoke(null, args);
where activity is an arbitrary double value. I am thinking of maybe doing this a bit more abstract and generalizing it, as SoftwareMonkey has done, but currently I am happy enough with the way it is. Three lines of code, no classes and interfaces necessary, that's not too bad.
To do the same thing without interfaces for an array of functions:
class NameFuncPair
{
public String name; // name each func
void f(String x) {} // stub gets overridden
public NameFuncPair(String myName) { this.name = myName; }
}
public class ArrayOfFunctions
{
public static void main(String[] args)
{
final A a = new A();
final B b = new B();
NameFuncPair[] fArray = new NameFuncPair[]
{
new NameFuncPair("A") { #Override void f(String x) { a.g(x); } },
new NameFuncPair("B") { #Override void f(String x) { b.h(x); } },
};
// Go through the whole func list and run the func named "B"
for (NameFuncPair fInstance : fArray)
{
if (fInstance.name.equals("B"))
{
fInstance.f(fInstance.name + "(some args)");
}
}
}
}
class A { void g(String args) { System.out.println(args); } }
class B { void h(String args) { System.out.println(args); } }
Check out lambdaj
http://code.google.com/p/lambdaj/
and in particular its new closure feature
http://code.google.com/p/lambdaj/wiki/Closures
and you will find a very readable way to define closure or function pointer without creating meaningless interface or use ugly inner classes
Wow, why not just create a Delegate class which is not all that hard given that I already did for java and use it to pass in parameter where T is return type. I am sorry but as a C++/C# programmer in general just learning java, I need function pointers because they are very handy. If you are familiar with any class which deals with Method Information you can do it. In java libraries that would be java.lang.reflect.method.
If you always use an interface, you always have to implement it. In eventhandling there really isn't a better way around registering/unregistering from the list of handlers but for delegates where you need to pass in functions and not the value type, making a delegate class to handle it for outclasses an interface.
None of the Java 8 answers have given a full, cohesive example, so here it comes.
Declare the method that accepts the "function pointer" as follows:
void doCalculation(Function<Integer, String> calculation, int parameter) {
final String result = calculation.apply(parameter);
}
Call it by providing the function with a lambda expression:
doCalculation((i) -> i.toString(), 2);
If anyone is struggling to pass a function that takes one set of parameters to define its behavior but another set of parameters on which to execute, like Scheme's:
(define (function scalar1 scalar2)
(lambda (x) (* x scalar1 scalar2)))
see Pass Function with Parameter-Defined Behavior in Java
Since Java8, you can use lambdas, which also have libraries in the official SE 8 API.
Usage:
You need to use a interface with only one abstract method.
Make an instance of it (you may want to use the one java SE 8 already provided) like this:
Function<InputType, OutputType> functionname = (inputvariablename) {
...
return outputinstance;
}
For more information checkout the documentation: https://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/java/javaOO/lambdaexpressions.html
Prior to Java 8, nearest substitute for function-pointer-like functionality was an anonymous class. For example:
Collections.sort(list, new Comparator<CustomClass>(){
public int compare(CustomClass a, CustomClass b)
{
// Logic to compare objects of class CustomClass which returns int as per contract.
}
});
But now in Java 8 we have a very neat alternative known as lambda expression, which can be used as:
list.sort((a, b) -> { a.isBiggerThan(b) } );
where isBiggerThan is a method in CustomClass. We can also use method references here:
list.sort(MyClass::isBiggerThan);
The open source safety-mirror project generalizes some of the above mentioned solutions into a library that adds functions, delegates and events to Java.
See the README, or this stackoverflow answer, for a cheat sheet of features.
As for functions, the library introduces a Fun interface, and some sub-interfaces that (together with generics) make up a fluent API for using methods as types.
Fun.With0Params<String> myFunctionField = " hello world "::trim;`
Fun.With2Params<Boolean, Object, Object> equals = Objects::equals;`
public void foo(Fun.With1ParamAndVoid<String> printer) throws Exception {
printer.invoke("hello world);
}
public void test(){
foo(System.out::println);
}
Notice:
that you must choose the sub-interface that matches the number of parameters in the signature you are targeting. Fx, if it has one parameter, choose Fun.With1Param.
that Generics are used to define A) the return type and B) the parameters of the signature.
Also, notice that the signature of the Method Reference passed to the call to the foo() method must match the the Fun defined by method Foo. If it do not, the compiler will emit an error.