While running the below query to get the latest message with the latest data using the createdOn column
i get the below error
select count(m) from MessageWorkFlowStatus mwfs1 where mwfs1.createdOn =(select max(createdOn) from MessageWorkFlowStatus mwfs2 where mwfs1.status= 'NEW' or mwfs1.status='IN PROGRESS')
The encapsulated expression is not a valid expression
Please let me know if i can run Query this way
First of all, count(m) is not correct. It should either be count(*) or count(mwfs1). Secondly, in your inner query, you are using status column from the outer query table (mswfs1) which is logically wrong. It should instead be mwfs2.status = 'NEW' or mwfs2.status = 'IN PROGRESS'.
I think your query should be:
select count(mwfs1)
from MessageWorkFlowStatus mwfs1
where mwfs1.createdOn = (
select max(createdOn)
from MessageWorkFlowStatus mwfs2
where mwfs2.status= 'NEW' or mwfs2.status='IN PROGRESS')
Related
I am using jpa native query , but its not returning values from salias it returns values from S
Query query = em.createNativeQuery("Select S.\"MESSAGE\",S.\"DESTINATION\",S.\"SENT_DATE\",S.\"CLIENT_TRACKING_ID\",S.\"MESSAGE_COST\",S.\"sTId\",salias.\"STATUS\",salias.timeDate from \"sent_sms_view\" S left join ( Select Distinct on (\"SMS_ID\") R.\"SMS_ID\",R.\"STATUS\",R.timeDate from \"sms_receipt_view\" R Order By R.\"SMS_ID\",R.timeDate Desc)As salias on S.\"SYSTEM_TRACKING_ID\"=salias.\"SMS_ID\" where S.Id_systemUser=:systemUser and S.\"CLIENT_TRACKING_ID\"=:cTId");
query.setParameter("cTId", cTId);
query.setParameter("systemUser", systemUser);
if (query.getResultList().size() > 0){
List<Object> resultat = query.getResultList();
This is the Postgres query and it works fine
Select S."MESSAGE",S."DESTINATION",S."SENT_DATE",S."CLIENT_TRACKING_ID",S."MESSAGE_COST",S."sTId" ,salias."STATUS",salias.timeDate
from "sent_sms_view" S
left join ( Select Distinct on ("SMS_ID") R."SMS_ID",R."STATUS",R.timeDate from "sms_receipt_view" R Order By R."SMS_ID",R.timeDate Desc)As salias
on S."SYSTEM_TRACKING_ID"=salias."SMS_ID"
where S.Id_systemUser='101' and S."CLIENT_TRACKING_ID" ='abda';
Can anyone tell me what i am doing wrong.
I'm only guessing what you might be trying to do, since you haven't told us, but here's how I'm guessing it should probably look like:
SELECT S."MESSAGE", S."DESTINATION", S."SENT_DATE", S."CLIENT_TRACKING_ID", S."MESSAGE_COST", S."sTId", salias."STATUS", salias.timeDate
FROM "sent_sms_view" S
INNER JOIN "sms_receipt_view" AS salias on (S."SYSTEM_TRACKING_ID" = salias."SMS_ID")
WHERE S.Id_systemUser=:systemUser AND S."CLIENT_TRACKING_ID"=:cTId
However I don't see why you would have numerical IDs, such as Id_systemUser stored as strings. In fact that variable name indicates horrible database design. CamelCasing combined with underscores is something you must categorically avoid.
And you must never call query.getResultList() twice if you're looking for the same results. Simply store the List to a local variable and then use it.
I am using OrientDb 2.1-rc4 as a document database. I have a MyClass class that gets updated very frequently by a multithreded application. To improve performance I removed the link from the State class to MyClass, and added a link and index from MyClass to State. In order to get all instances of MyClass I need to get a list of State rids and then query the index. This query gets my State rids.
SELECT DISTINCT(roles.views.states.#rid)
FROM #12:1
returns
[["#14:0","#14:1"]]
This query finds the correct rids in the index.
SELECT FROM index:MyClass.state
where key in [#14:0,#14:1]
When I put the two queries together.
SELECT FROM index:MWorkUnit.state
where key in (SELECT DISTINCT(roles.views.states.#rid) FROM #12:1)
I get the following error.
java.lang.ClassCastException: com.orientechnologies.orient.core.sql.query.OSQLSynchQuery cannot be cast to java.util.List
How do I get OrientDB to treat my subquery as an rid list?
Edit:
This query works when not using the index.
SELECT FROM MWorkUnit
where state IN (SELECT expand(roles.views.states).#rid FROM #12:1)
This seems a bug on query against indexes: sub queries are not correctly evaluated. Please could you open a new issue or that?
This workaround should work:
SELECT FROM index:MWorkUnit.state
LET $list = (SELECT DISTINCT(roles.views.states.#rid) FROM #12:1)
where key in $list
I recently encountered the following problem with buiding queries in jooq (version 3.1.0):
I want to build delete statement with order and limit constraints. So, my aim is to build something like this:
DELETE FROM table ORDER BY field DESC LIMIT 1 (this is MySql syntax)
But i haven't found nesessary methods in result delete query object:
DSLContext context = createContext();
DeleteWhereStep delete = context.delete(createTable(table));
DeleteConditionStep whereStep = delete.where(condition);
whereStep.orderBy(...)//and no such method here
There are all nesessary methods in select statements and none for delete.
Is it possible to set order and limit for delete request in jooq?
As of jOOQ 3.2, these sorts of extensions are currently not implemented yet. Chances are, that #203 could be implemented in jOOQ 3.3, though.
In the mean time, you have two options:
Resort to plain SQL
i.e. write something like:
context.execute("DELETE FROM {0} ORDER BY {1} DESC LIMIT 1",
createTable(table),
field);
Manually transform your SQL statement into something equivalent
I suspect that the ORDER BY .. LIMIT extension to the MySQL DELETE statement is just sugar for:
DELETE FROM table t
WHERE t.id IN (
SELECT id FROM table
ORDER BY field LIMIT 1
)
Or with jOOQ:
context.delete(TABLE)
.where(TABLE.ID.in(
select(TABLE.ID)
.from(TABLE)
.orderBy(TABLE.FIELD)
.limit(1)
))
I've a requirement where I need to pull out data from database.
The query is-
SELECT e.Data AS EntityBlob, f.Data AS FpmlBlob
FROM [Trades.InventoryRecord] ir, EntityBlob e, FpmlBlob f
WHERE %s AND uid = e.uid AND uid = f.uid
Here %s is the predicate after where clause which user will input from an html form.
User input will be in this form :
1. TradeDate = '2013-04-05' AND IsLatest = 'TRUE'
2. StreamId= 'IA0015'
3. The query may have IN clause also
Now when this query is rendered I get exception ambigous column streamId or ambigous column IsLatest, as these columns exists in more than one table with same name. So to remove this ambiguity I need to modify the query as - ir.IsLatest or ir.StreamId
To do so by java code, I need to first parse the predicate after where clause, extract column names and insert table name alias- 'ir' before each column name so that the query becomes -
SELECT e.Data AS EntityBlob, f.Data AS FpmlBlob
FROM [Trades.InventoryRecord] ir, EntityBlob e, FpmlBlob f
WHERE ir.TradeDate = '2013-04-05' AND ir.IsLatest = 'TRUE' AND uid = e.uid AND uid = f.uid
what is the best way to parse this predicate, or if there is any other way I can achieve the same result?
My answer to this question is to not parse the user input - there is far too much that can go wrong. It would be a lot better to have a UI with drop downs and buttons for selecting equality, inequality, ranges, in statements, etc. It may seem like more work, but protecting yourself from a SQL injection attack is even more. And even if you are not concerned about malicious SQL injection, then the user still has to get every thing exactly right, or the statement fails.
I need to us a sql query in java that has an IN clause in it. I have seen suggestions for doing this when the IN clause is a predetermined set, such as numbers which won't work in this case because the set will be dynamic. Here is what I am trying to do:
select c.cust_name
from cust_acct c, has h
where c.cust_id=h.cust_id
and h.sh_add in (select a.sh_add from address a where sh_st='VA')
I do not get any faults. That is, the code runs I just get no results for this particular query
Have you checked that you are getting the right intermediate results from select a.sh_add from address a where sh_st='VA'?
You could just rewrite the query as:
select c.cust_name
from cust_acct c
inner join has h
on c.cust_id=h.cust_id
inner join address a
on h.sh_add = a.sh_add
where a.sh_st = 'VA'