Develop Reference

If Spring can successfully intercept intra class function calls in a #Configuration class, why does it not support it in a regular bean?

I have recently noticed that Spring successfully intercepts intra class function calls in a #Configuration class but not in a regular bean.
A call like this
#Repository
public class CustomerDAO {
#Transactional(value=TxType.REQUIRED)
public void saveCustomer() {
// some DB stuff here...
saveCustomer2();
}
#Transactional(value=TxType.REQUIRES_NEW)
public void saveCustomer2() {
// more DB stuff here
}
}
fails to start a new transaction because while the code of saveCustomer() executes in the CustomerDAO proxy, the code of saveCustomer2() gets executed in the unwrapped CustomerDAO class, as I can see by looking at 'this' in the debugger, and so Spring has no chance to intercept the call to saveCustomer2.
However, in the following example, when transactionManager() calls createDataSource() it is correctly intercepted and calls createDataSource() of the proxy, not of the unwrapped class, as evidenced by looking at 'this' in the debugger.
#Configuration
public class PersistenceJPAConfig {
#Bean
public DriverManagerDataSource createDataSource() {
DriverManagerDataSource dataSource = new DriverManagerDataSource();
//dataSource.set ... DB stuff here
return dataSource;
}
#Bean
public PlatformTransactionManager transactionManager( ){
DataSourceTransactionManager transactionManager = new DataSourceTransactionManager(createDataSource());
return transactionManager;
}
}
So my question is, why can Spring correctly intercept the intra class function calls in the second example, but not in the first. Is it using different types of dynamic proxies?
Edit:
From the answers here and other sources I now understand the following:
#Transactional is implemented using Spring AOP, where the proxy pattern is carried out by wrapping/composition of the user class. The AOP proxy is generic enough so that many Aspects can be chained together, and may be a CGLib proxy or a Java Dynamic Proxy.
In the #Configuration class, Spring also uses CGLib to create an enhanced class which inherits from the user #Configuration class, and overrides the user's #Bean functions with ones that do some extra work before calling the user's/super function such as check if this is the first invocation of the function or not. Is this class a proxy? It depends on the definition. You may say that it is a proxy which uses inheritance from the real object instead of wrapping it using composition.
To sum up, from the answers given here I understand these are two entirely different mechanisms. Why these design choices were made is another, open question.

Is it using different types of dynamic proxies?
Almost exactly
Let's figure out what's the difference between #Configuration classes and AOP proxies answering the following questions:
Why self-invoked #Transactional method has no transactional semantics even though Spring is capable of intercepting self-invoked methods?
How #Configuration and AOP are related?
Why self-invoked #Transactional method has no transactional semantics?
Short answer:
This is how AOP made.
Long answer:
Declarative transaction management relies on AOP (for the majority of Spring applications on Spring AOP)
The Spring Framework’s declarative transaction management is made possible with Spring aspect-oriented programming (AOP)
It is proxy-based (§5.8.1. Understanding AOP Proxies)
Spring AOP is proxy-based.
From the same paragraph SimplePojo.java:
public class SimplePojo implements Pojo {
public void foo() {
// this next method invocation is a direct call on the 'this' reference
this.bar();
}
public void bar() {
// some logic...
}
}
And a snippet proxying it:
public class Main {
public static void main(String[] args) {
ProxyFactory factory = new ProxyFactory(new SimplePojo());
factory.addInterface(Pojo.class);
factory.addAdvice(new RetryAdvice());
Pojo pojo = (Pojo) factory.getProxy();
// this is a method call on the proxy!
pojo.foo();
}
}
The key thing to understand here is that the client code inside the main(..) method of the Main class has a reference to the proxy.
This means that method calls on that object reference are calls on the proxy.
As a result, the proxy can delegate to all of the interceptors (advice) that are relevant to that particular method call.
However, once the call has finally reached the target object (the SimplePojo, reference in this case), any method calls that it may make on itself, such as this.bar() or this.foo(), are going to be invoked against the this reference, and not the proxy.
This has important implications. It means that self-invocation is not going to result in the advice associated with a method invocation getting a chance to execute.
(Key parts are emphasized.)
You may think that aop works as follows:
Imagine we have a Foo class which we want to proxy:
Foo.java:
public class Foo {
public int getInt() {
return 42;
}
}
There is nothing special. Just getInt method returning 42
An interceptor:
Interceptor.java:
public interface Interceptor {
Object invoke(InterceptingFoo interceptingFoo);
}
LogInterceptor.java (for demonstration):
public class LogInterceptor implements Interceptor {
#Override
public Object invoke(InterceptingFoo interceptingFoo) {
System.out.println("log. before");
try {
return interceptingFoo.getInt();
} finally {
System.out.println("log. after");
}
}
}
InvokeTargetInterceptor.java:
public class InvokeTargetInterceptor implements Interceptor {
#Override
public Object invoke(InterceptingFoo interceptingFoo) {
try {
System.out.println("Invoking target");
Object targetRetVal = interceptingFoo.method.invoke(interceptingFoo.target);
System.out.println("Target returned " + targetRetVal);
return targetRetVal;
} catch (Throwable t) {
throw new RuntimeException(t);
} finally {
System.out.println("Invoked target");
}
}
}
Finally InterceptingFoo.java:
public class InterceptingFoo extends Foo {
public Foo target;
public List<Interceptor> interceptors = new ArrayList<>();
public int index = 0;
public Method method;
#Override
public int getInt() {
try {
Interceptor interceptor = interceptors.get(index++);
return (Integer) interceptor.invoke(this);
} finally {
index--;
}
}
}
Wiring everything together:
public static void main(String[] args) throws Throwable {
Foo target = new Foo();
InterceptingFoo interceptingFoo = new InterceptingFoo();
interceptingFoo.method = Foo.class.getDeclaredMethod("getInt");
interceptingFoo.target = target;
interceptingFoo.interceptors.add(new LogInterceptor());
interceptingFoo.interceptors.add(new InvokeTargetInterceptor());
interceptingFoo.getInt();
interceptingFoo.getInt();
}
Will print:
log. before
Invoking target
Target returned 42
Invoked target
log. after
log. before
Invoking target
Target returned 42
Invoked target
log. after
Now let's take a look at ReflectiveMethodInvocation.
Here is a part of its proceed method:
Object interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice = this.interceptorsAndDynamicMethodMatchers.get(++this.currentInterceptorIndex);
++this.currentInterceptorIndex should look familiar now
Here is the target
And there are interceptors
the method
the index
You may try introducing several aspects into your application and see the stack growing at the proceed method when advised method is invoked
Finally everything ends up at MethodProxy.
From its invoke method javadoc:
Invoke the original method, on a different object of the same type.
And as I mentioned previously documentation:
once the call has finally reached the target object any method calls that it may make on itself are going to be invoked against the this reference, and not the proxy
I hope now, more or less, it's clear why.
How #Configuration and AOP are related?
The answer is they are not related.
So Spring here is free to do whatever it wants. Here it is not tied to the proxy AOP semantics.
It enhances such classes using ConfigurationClassEnhancer.
Take a look at:
CALLBACKS
BeanMethodInterceptor
BeanFactoryAwareMethodInterceptor
Returning to the question
If Spring can successfully intercept intra class function calls in a #Configuration class, why does it not support it in a regular bean?
I hope from technical point of view it is clear why.
Now my thoughts from non-technical side:
I think it is not done because Spring AOP is here long enough...
Since Spring Framework 5 the Spring WebFlux framework has been introduced.
Currently Spring Team is working hard towards enhancing reactive programming model
See some notable recent blog posts:
Reactive Transactions with Spring
Spring Data R2DBC 1.0 M2 and Spring Boot starter released
Going Reactive with Spring, Coroutines and Kotlin Flow
More and more features towards less-proxying approach of building Spring applications are introduced. (see this commit for example)
So I think that even though it might be possible to do what you've described it is far from Spring Team's #1 priority for now

Because AOP proxies and #Configuration class serve a different purpose, and are implemented in a significantly different ways (even though both involve using proxies).
Basically, AOP uses composition while #Configuration uses inheritance.
AOP proxies
The way these work is basically that they create proxies that do the relevant advice logic before/after delegating the call to the original (proxied) object. The container registers this proxy instead of the proxied object itself, so all dependencies are set to this proxy and all calls from one bean to another go through this proxy. However, the proxied object itself has no pointer to the proxy (it doesn't know it's proxied, only the proxy has a pointer to the target object). So any calls within that object to other methods don't go through the proxy.
(I'm only adding this here for contrast with #Configuration, since you seem to have correct understanding of this part.)
#Configuration
Now while the objects that you usually apply the AOP proxy to are a standard part of your application, the #Configuration class is different - for one, you probably never intend to create any instances of that class directly yourself. This class truly is just a way to write configuration of the bean container, has no meaning outside Spring and you know that it will be used by Spring in a special way and that it has some special semantics outside of just plain Java code - e.g. that #Bean-annotated methods actually define Spring beans.
Because of this, Spring can do much more radical things to this class without worrying that it will break something in your code (remember, you know that you only provide this class for Spring, and you aren't going to ever create or use its instance directly).
What it actually does is it creates a proxy that's subclass of the #Configuration class. This way, it can intercept invocation of every (non-final non-private) method of the #Configuration class, even within the same object (because the methods are effectively all overriden by the proxy, and Java has all the methods virtual). The proxy does exactly this to redirect any method calls that it recognizes to be (semantically) references to Spring beans to the actual bean instances instead of invoking the superclass method.

read a bit spring source code. I try to answer it.
the point is how spring deal with the #Configurationand #bean.
in the ConfigurationClassPostProcessor which is a BeanFactoryPostProcessor, it will enhance all ConfigurationClasses and creat a Enhancer as a subClass.
this Enhancer register two CALLBACKS(BeanMethodInterceptor,BeanFactoryAwareMethodInterceptor).
you call PersistenceJPAConfig method will go through the CALLBACKS. in BeanMethodInterceptor,it will get bean from spring container.
it may be not clearly. you can see the source code in ConfigurationClassEnhancer.java BeanMethodInterceptor.ConfigurationClassPostProcessor.java enhanceConfigurationClasses

You can't call #Transactional method in same class
It's a limitation of Spring AOP (dynamic objects and cglib).
If you configure Spring to use AspectJ to handle the transactions, your code will work.
The simple and probably best alternative is to refactor your code. For example one class that handles users and one that process each user. Then default transaction handling with Spring AOP will work.
Also #Transactional should be on Service layer and not on #Repository
transactions belong on the Service layer. It's the one that knows about units of work and use cases. It's the right answer if you have several DAOs injected into a Service that need to work together in a single transaction.
So you need to rethink your transaction approach, so your methods can be reuse in a flow including several other DAO operations that are roll-able

Spring uses proxying for method invocation and when you use this... it bypasses that proxy. For #Bean annotations Spring uses reflection to find them.

Proxy pattern used by spring

I am learning spring :)
I have following doubts,
Does spring creates proxy object for every bean even if I have not used annotations for example #Transactional which I think need proxy.
I read following in spring documentation
Note that calls to static #Bean methods will never get intercepted by the container, not even within #Configuration classes (see above). This is due to technical limitations: CGLIB subclassing can only override non-static methods. As a consequence, a direct call to another #Bean method will have standard Java semantics, resulting in an independent instance being returned straight from the factory method itself.
a. Spring does not return proxy object in following example because of static method which is cannot override. So it will return original object here. Am I right?
#Configuration
public class Config {
#Bean
public static Student student() {
return new Student();
}
}
b. What is meaning of "Note that calls to static #Bean methods will never get intercepted by the container, not even within #Configuration classes"

a. Yes, you are correct. You will get the original object.
b. student() method is inside the class Config which is annotated with #Configuration annotation. All the methods which are annotated with #Bean inside #Configuration class are intercepted by spring by creating proxies. So as your method is static and though it is inside Config class, it will not be intercepted by Spring and no proxies will be created.

Is it possible to autowire method arguments at runtime in Spring

Is it possible to inject new instances of prototype scoped beans to Controller's method arguments at runtime using annotations in Spring? So whenever the method is called, Spring would inject the qualifying bean as its argument, familiarly as it injects #ModelAttribute. As far as I know, #Autowired fields are injected only once when context is created. Obtaining the bean from context's factory method isn't an option, as that would expose framework to its component, thus violating the hollywood principle.
I have almost completed reading Spring in Action book and have been reading Spring Reference a lot, but haven't found any info regarding this question.

You have a couple of options.
Define a prototype bean and inject that wrapped in an ObjectFactory
#Autowired
private ObjectFactory<PrototypeBean> factory;
You can then retrieve it in your handler method. For example
#RequestMapping("/path")
public String handlerMethod() {
PrototypeBean instance = factory.getObject();
instance.someMethod();
return "view";
}
Every time you call factory.getObject(), you'll get a new instance.
As for doing this directly, no, Spring MVC does not have a built-in feature for having beans injected while invoking handler methods, with #Autowired or otherwise.
However, the HandlerMethodArgumentResolver API allows you to define an implementation for any type of parameter you want. You can define a new annotation and use it to annotate the appropriate handler method parameter(s). The implementation would look for the annotation and resolve an instance from an injected ApplicationContext. You could do this by name, by type, however you want.

Inject HttpServletRequest into Controller

As I know per default are controllers in Spring MVC singletons. HttpServletRequest passed offen to the controller handler method. And its ok, while HttpServletRequest is request-scoped, but I see often HttpServletRequest gets #Autowired into the controller field, like this:
#Controller("CMSProductComponentController")
#RequestMapping(CMSProductComponentController.CONTROLLER_PATH)
public class CMSProductComponentController {
#Autowired
private HttpServletRequest request;
}
Could be this a problem? And more general question: What happens if inject a reqeust-scoped component into a singleton?

No, for HttpServletRequest it will not be a problem and it shouldn't for other request scoped beans. Basically, Spring will generate a proxy HttpServletRequest that wraps some kind of ObjectFactory (RequestObjectFactory for HttpServletRequest) (YMMV) that knows how to retrieve the actual instance. When you use any of the methods of this proxy, they will delegate to that instance.
What's more, this is done lazily, so it won't fail at initialization. It will however fail if you try to use the bean when there is no request available (or if you haven't registered the RequestScope).
The following is in response to the comments and to clarify in general.
Regarding the proxy-mode attribute of #Scope or the XML equivalent, the default is ScopedProxyMode.NO. However, as the javadoc states
This proxy-mode is not typically useful when used with a non-singleton
scoped instance, which should favor the use of the INTERFACES or
TARGET_CLASS proxy-modes instead if it is to be used as a dependency.
With request scoped beans, this proxy-mode value will not work. You'll need to use INTERFACES OR TARGET_CLASS depending on the configuration you want.
With scope set to request (use the constant WebApplicationContext.SCOPE_REQUEST), Spring will use RequestScope which
Relies on a thread-bound RequestAttributes instance, which can be
exported through RequestContextListener, RequestContextFilter or
DispatcherServlet.
Let's take this simple example
#Component
#Scope(proxyMode = ScopedProxyMode.INTERFACES, value = WebApplicationContext.SCOPE_REQUEST)
public class RequestScopedBean {
public void method() {}
}
...
#Autowired
private RequestScopedBean bean;
Spring will generate two bean definitions: one for your injected bean, a singleton, and one for the request scoped bean to be generated on each request.
From those bean definitions, Spring will initialize the singleton as a proxy with the types of your target class. In this example, that is RequestScopedBean. The proxy will contain the state it needs to produce or return the actual bean when it is needed, ie. when a method is called on the proxy. For example, when
bean.method();
is called.
This state is basically a reference to the underlying BeanFactory and the name of the request-scoped bean definition. It will use these two to generate a new bean and then call method() on that instance.
The documentation states
The Spring IoC container manages not only the instantiation of your
objects (beans), but also the wiring up of collaborators (or
dependencies). If you want to inject (for example) an HTTP request
scoped bean into another bean, you must inject an AOP proxy in place
of the scoped bean. That is, you need to inject a proxy object that
exposes the same public interface as the scoped object but that can
also retrieve the real, target object from the relevant scope (for
example, an HTTP request) and delegate method calls onto the real
object.
All eagerly loaded request scoped beans, if implemented correctly, will be proxies. Similarly, request scoped beans that aren't eagerly loaded will either be proxies themselves or be loaded through a proxy. This will fail if there is no HttpSerlvetRequest bound to the current thread. Basically, a proxy is necessary somewhere in the bean dependency chain for request scoped beans.

What happens if inject a reqeust-scoped component into a singleton?
Try it and you'll get a BeanCreationException¹ during application context initialization. The error message clearly explains why this doesn't happen with HttpServletRequest:
Scope 'request' is not active for the current thread; consider defining a scoped proxy for this bean if you intend to refer to it from a singleton;
So obviously HttpServletRequest is a scoped proxy. If you want to use beans of smaller scopes in singletons they have to be proxies. The documentation elaborates about smaller scoped dependencies in Scoped beans as dependencies.
[1]: unless you didn't change the default behaviour for proxyMode, which is NO or try to inject it with #Lazy. The latter might result into a valid application context but might lead to request scoped beans acting like singletons (e.g. if a request scoped bean is injected into a singleton).

Why is PostConstruct not called?

I am working on a simple Java EE application.
I have class like this:
import javax.annotation.PostConstruct;
import javax.ejb.Stateless;
import javax.persistence.EntityManager;
import javax.persistence.EntityManagerFactory;
import javax.persistence.Persistence;
#Stateless
public class BlogEntryDao {
EntityManager em;
#PostConstruct
public void initialize(){
EntityManagerFactory emf = Persistence.createEntityManagerFactory("Persistence");
em = emf.createEntityManager();
}
public void addNewEntry(){
Blogentry blogentry = new Blogentry();
blogentry.setTitle("Test");
blogentry.setContent("asdfasfas");
em.persist(blogentry);
}
}
So my managed bean calls this method. Until here no problems. But since the initialize method is not called, I am getting an NPE in em.persist.
Why is the initialize method not being called? I am running this on Glassfish server.
Regards.

The Java EE bean annotations such as #PostConstruct only apply to container-managed beans. If you are simply calling new BlogEntryDao yourself, the container isn't going to intercept the creation and call the #PostConstruct method.
(Furthermore, you'd be better off using #PersistenceContext or #PersistenceUnit instead of manually fetching the EntityManagerFactory in your initialize() method, and you should be creating an EntityManager for each call to addNewEntry(), since they're short-lived. Making these changes would eliminate the need for initialize() at all.)

I had the same problem in my application.
You didn't post your bean context configuration xml file (so I'm not sure if it's the same issue) but in my case adding this line:
<context:annotation-config/>
Solved my problem.
You need either <context:annotation-config/> or <context:component-scan/> to enable #PostConstruct annotation.

Since this question comes up first on Google for "postconstruct not called", another reason a #PostConstruct method might not be called besides using the new keyword instead of putting #PostConstruct in a Spring bean is if you have a circular dependency.
If this bean were to depend on another bean that depended on this bean, your other bean might call addNewEntry() before BlogEntryDao was initialized, even though BlogEntryDao is a dependency for that other bean.
This is because Spring didn't know which bean you wanted to load first due to the circular reference. In this case, one can remove the circular reference or use #AutoWired/#Value constructor parameters instead of member values or setters, or if using xml configuration, maybe you can swap the order in which the beans are defined.

In my case #PostConstruct was not called because my initialize() method was static and was also throwing an exception. In either case the method is ignored. I hope it helps someone else who made the same mistake.
This can be found in the console:
WARNING: JSF1044: Method '<XXX>' marked with the 'javax.annotation.PostConstruct' annotation cannot be static. This method will be ignored.
WARNING: JSF1047: Method '<XXX>' marked with the 'javax.annotation.PostConstruct' annotation cannot declare any checked exceptions. This method will be ignored.

When using Spring make sure you are using the right PostConstruct annotation from the right package.
javax.annotation.PostConstruct
should be the one. Not for example:
jakarta.annotation.PostConstruct
It took me a little while to figure out why only one of my PostConstruct didn't work.

In my case #PostConstruct method was not called because I was referencing to a public instance variable of the spring service bean directly in other service beans (ie myService.myProperty). When i made a public getter method for the property (ie getMyProperty()) and used that to get the property the #PostConstruct method was called again. Also I made myProperty private to prevent any accidental direct referencing in the future.
Also note that if you don't explicitly register the class with #Bean in a #Configuration annotated class and rely soley on #Autowired instead, the #PostConstruct method may not be executed immediately on startup. Only when one of the methods of the autowired class are referenced and called by another class will that class be loaded and only at that time will the #PostConstruct method be called. In other words, by only using #Autowired you are essentially lazy loading a class. If you want to load it at startup, register it with #Bean
Heres a good SO thread about the difference between #Bean and #Autowired Difference between #Bean and #Autowired
EDIT: One last remark. When you have a webapplication and decided to annotate your class with #RequestScope then the #Postconstruct annotated method will be called each time when a new request comes in. This is because #RequestScope instructs spring to create a new instance of the class every time a new request comes in. If you want all requests to use the same instance, then you could use #Bean as mentioned above, but you could also use the annotation #Singleton above your class. This will cause the class to be loaded eagerly upon startup.

Make sure the class having #Postconstruct method lies within the same package. I moved class file to main package and it worked.

In my case I had two instances of javax.annotation.PostConstruct inside classpath. One was bundled with the war package and another was provided by tomcat. When Spring is scanning for the #PostConstruct annotation it compares these two different instances. Therefore the #PostConstruct annotated method was not picked while scanning.
Providing only one instance of javax.annotation-api library solved the issue.

Since most of the ways are already mentioned. However one can also create a bean in the config file for the class
org.springframework.context.annotation.CommonAnnotationBeanPostProcessor
;
This will enable PostConstruct and PreDestroy annotations.
<bean class="org.springframework.context.annotation.CommonAnnotationBeanPostProcessor"></bean>
Also for Predestroy one needs to call context.registerShutDownHook()