We want to use both SWT and JavaFX in an Eclipse plugin within our RCP application. Unfortunately, we're experiencing problems integrating SWT with JavaFX under Java 11. The build environment uses e(fx)clipse 3.5. We're developing against the Community edition of Azul Systems' "Zulu" JDK 11, bundled with Azul's version of OpenJFX.
Formerly, we developed under Java 8. At that point, our build used a compile-time class path referring to jfxswt.jar, which lived in the jre/lib directory of the JDK. We didn't use any special class path settings at run-time.
We are now trying to move to Java 11. There, this JAR has become javafx-swt.jar and lives in the lib directory of the JDK. It no longer seems to be enough to set the class path to refer to this JAR at compile time: it seems to be necessary to do so at run time too. If we don't do this, we get an error (java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javafx/embed/swt/FXCanvas).
As a test, we experimentally embedded javafx-swt.jar within the JAR implementing our Eclipse plugin. We then referred to it in that plugin's .classpath file, and the code worked as expected. Unfortunately, we can't embed the JAR this way for legal and other reasons.
A note on Java modules: javafx.swt does not show up in the output when we issue the --list-module command. We tried running the application using parameters -p /path/to/JDK/lib/javafx-swt.jar --add-modules javafx.swt, but this doesn't seem to solve the problem.
My question: Is there a way to set up the class or module path to allow our Eclipse plugin to find this library in the JRE? Any solution would have to work with whatever JRE the code happens to be run against (I think it is all right to assume lib/javafx-swt.jar will live in that JRE).
Would it help to use a separately-downloaded version of OpenJFX rather than the copy of OpenJFX in our JDK?
Very many thanks ☺
Just curious about the directory layout for the JDK . So there are two separate java.exe files - one is in:
C:\Program Files (x86)\Java\jdk1.7.0_45\bin
and one is in:
C:\Program Files (x86)\Java\jdk1.7.0_45\jre\bin
Why does there need to be two files ? The motivation for this question arises from some challenge I'm having installing a program(SQL Developer).
There's a difference between installing the jdk vs. the jre.
The jdk package is the developer package and includes tools such as the compiler (javac).
The jre package is the core runtime package, and includes the JVM / runtime environment / whatever you need to run software written in JVM languages.
Here a link to the official Oracle documentation.
The binaries in jdk/bin and jdk/jre/bin are identical. According to the documentation, the PATH should point to jdk/bin.
Here is a link to JDK 7 and JRE 7 Installation Guide
If you want to run Java programs, but not develop them, download the JRE. If you want to develop Java applications, download the Java Development Kit, or JDK. The JDK includes the JRE, so you do not have to download both separately.
Is there any web site that I could see the source code for the Java standard library? Most so the two classes java.lang.* and java.net.* ??
Please install Java JDK (Java Developer Kit), which is not the same as Java JRE (Java Runtime Environment).
The Java JDK contains the Java source code.
And you'd better to use an IDE (Integrated Development Environment) such as Eclipse or NetBeans to develop Java programs.
You can look for the java code via the IDE tool.
Of course. You could find it in the JDK, but also online. I also use the online version, because I find it faster as to open the folder with the JDK, brows through all the files and so on. Just google "java source object".
http://www.docjar.com/html/api/java/lang/Object.java.html
You need the JDK (JAVA SDK) installed and source of class library is at (on Windows):
C:\<Program Files>\Java\<JDK>\src.zip
Like
C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.7.0\src.zip
Java source code is available in JDK distribution. If you have installed JDK on your machine, in JDK directory you'll find src.zip. For example, in my windows machine source code is available at: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_12.
Alternatively, you can find Java source code online at: Java Source Code
Thanks,
Mrityunjoy
There is Java tool (it is called Mallet)
http://mallet.cs.umass.edu/download.php
which I want to use in my .NET project.
To convert this tool to .NET library at first I've tried to build it in single .jar file using Apache Ant. I've done everything corresponding to instructions at link above.
Download Developer Release from Mercurial repository.
Download Apache Ant, install JDK, set JAVA_HOME var to use Apache Ant.
Using Ant I've built single mallet.jar file.
And then I would to convert mallet.jar to .NET library using IKVMC.
When converting, I've got a lot of warnings such as:
Warning IKVMC0108: not a class file "cc/mallet/util/tests/TestPriorityQueue$1.cl
ass", including it as resource
(class format error "51.0")
Despite of these warnings, mallet.dll was created. But when I try to reference to it from my .NET project, it looks "empty". It has not any classes or namespaces. I don't forget to reference to IKVM.OpenJDL.Core.
And this is unusual that I can't find any same problems in Google.
I think that problem is in warnings. And I have never worked with Ant and I don't understand all process exactly.
The class format version 51 was introduced with Java 7.
IKVM most likely doesn't support that version yet and the file name you quote (cc/mallet/util/tests/TestPriorityQueue$1.class) points at an anonymous inner class of TestPriorityQueue that certainly is needed for the library to work correctly.
My suggestion: compile Mallet using an older JDK or at least using the -source and -target switches set to 6 (to ensure that it's compile for Java 6).
FYI v8.1 (currently in RC) of IKVM supports Java 8:
http://weblog.ikvm.net/2015/08/26/IKVMNET81ReleaseCandidate0.aspx
http://sourceforge.net/p/ikvm/mailman/message/34502991/
I'm working on a Java project that uses the JNI. The JNI calls a custom library that I've written myself, let's say mylib.dll, and that depends on a 3rd party library, libsndfile-1.dll.
When I run my program it crashes with
java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: C:\...path...\mylib.dll: Can't find dependent libraries.
I've searched this site (and others) and I've tried a number of fixes:
I ran dependency walker. DW gave a couple of warnings -- that two libraries required by libsndfile, MPR.DLL and SHLWAPI.DLL, had "unresolved imports" -- but the DW FAQ said that these warnings could be safely ignored.
I fixed the method names in mylib.dll, as suggested here. The method names had somehow gotten mangled by the compiler, but I added linker flags and the dll method names now match those in my jni header file exactly.
I put all of these DLLs in the same directory -- the same directory as the .jar that calls them -- to ensure that they're on the right PATH.
No dice.
Does anyone have any idea what's going on?
I'm doing my development in Visual Studio 2010 on a MacBook pro (via Parallels). I'm doing my testing in Windows XP on a toshiba laptop.
I'm pretty sure the classpath and the shared library search path have little to do with each other. According to The JNI Book (which admittedly is old), on Windows if you do not use the java.library.path system property, the DLL needs to be in the current working directory or in a directory listed in the Windows PATH environment variable.
Update:
Looks like Oracle has removed the PDF from its website. I've updated the link above to point to an instance of the PDF living at University of Texas - Arlington.
Also, you can also read Oracle's HTML version of the JNI Specification. That lives in the Java 8 section of the Java website and so hopefully will be around for a while.
Update 2:
At least in Java 8 (I haven't checked earlier versions) you can do:
java -XshowSettings:properties -version
to find the shared library search path. Look for the value of the java.library.path property in that output.
I want to inform this interesting case, after tried all the above method, the error is still there. The weird thing is it works on a Windows 7 computer, but on Windows XP it is not. Then I use dependency walker and found on the Windows XP there is no VC++ Runtime as my dll requirement. After installing VC++ Runtime package here it works like a charm. The thing that disturbed me is it keeps telling Can't find dependent libraries, while intuitively the JNI dependent dll is there, however it finally turns out the JNI dependent dll requires another dependent dl. I hope this helps.
You need to load your JNI library.
System.loadLibrary loads the DLL from the JVM path (JDK bin path).
If you want to load an explicit file with a path, use System.load()
See also: Difference between System.load() and System.loadLibrary in Java
If you load a 32 bit version of your dll with a 64 bit JRE you could have this issue. This was my case.
Please verify your library path is right or not. Of course, you can use following code to check your library path path:
System.out.println(System.getProperty("java.library.path"));
You can appoint the java.library.path when launching a Java application:
java -Djava.library.path=path ...
Did have identical problem with on XP machine when installing javacv and opencv in combination with Eclipse. It turned out that I was missing the following files:
msvcp100.dll
msvcr100.dll
Once these were installed, the project compiled and ran OK.
When calling System.loadLibrary(), the JVM will look on the java.library.path for your native library. However, if that native library declares any dependencies on other native libraries, then the operating system will be tasked with finding those native library dependencies.
Since the operating system has no concept of the java.library.path, it will not see any directories you place on the java.library.path. Instead, it will only search the directories on PATH environment variable of the operating system. This is totally fine if the native library dependency is an operating system native library because it will be found on the PATH. However, if the native library dependency is a native library that you or someone else created, then it will not be found on the PATH unless you place it there. This behavior is strange, unexpected, and not well documented, but it is documented in the OpenJDK issue tracker here. You can also find another StackOverflow answer reinforcing this explanation, here.
So, you have a couple of options. You could either load each native library in the correct dependency order using System.loadLibrary(), or you could modify the PATH to include the directories where your native libraries are stored.
Short answer: for "can't find dependent library" error, check your $PATH (corresponds to bullet point #3 below)
Long answer:
Pure java world: jvm uses "Classpath" to find class files
JNI world (java/native boundary): jvm uses "java.library.path" (which defaults to $PATH) to find dlls
pure native world: native code uses $PATH to load other dlls
I found a great article by some friends at keepsafe that went through the same thing I did. It worked for me, so hopefully it helps you out as well! Have a read if you're interested (The Perils of Loading Native Libraries on Android) or just use
compile 'com.getkeepsafe.relinker:relinker:1.2.3'
and replace
System.loadLibrary("myLibrary");
with
ReLinker.loadLibrary(context, "mylibrary");
installing Microsoft Visual C++ 2010 SP1 Redistributable Fixed it
I used to have exactly the same problem, and finally it was solved.
I put all the dependent DLLs into the same folder where mylib.dll was stored and make sure the JAVA Compiler could find it (if there is no mylib.dll in the compilation path, there would be an error reporting this during compiling). The important thing you need to notice is you must make sure all the dependent libs are of the same version with mylib.dll, for example if your mylib.dll is release version then you should also put the release version of all its dependent libs there.
Hope this could help others who have encountered the same problem.
I had the same issue, and I tried everything what is posted here to fix it but none worked for me.
In my case I'm using Cygwin to compile the dll. It seems that JVM tries to find the JRE DLLs in the virtual Cygwin path.
I added the the Cygwin's virtual directory path to JRE's DLLs and it works now.
I did something like:
SET PATH="/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Java/jdk1.8.0_45";%PATH%
In my situation, I was trying to run a java web service in Tomcat 7 via a connector in Eclipse. The app ran well when I deployed the war file to an instance of Tomcat 7 on my laptop. The app requires a jdbc type 2 driver for "IBM DB2 9.5". For some odd reason the connector in Eclispe could not see or use the paths in the IBM DB2 environment variables, to reach the dll files installed on my laptop as the jcc client. The error message either stated that it failed to find the db2jcct2 dll file or it failed to find the dependent libraries for that dll file. Ultimately, I deleted the connector and rebuilt it. Then it worked properly. I'm adding this solution here as documentation, because I failed to find this specific solution anywhere else.
Creating static library worked for me, compiling using g++ -static. It bundles the dependent libraries along with the build.
place the required dlls in folder and set the folder path in PATH environment variable.
make sure updated environment PATH variable is reflected.
I was facing same issue with ffmpeg library after merging two Android projects as one project.
Actually issue was arriving due to two different versions of ffmpeg library but they were loaded with same names in memory. One library was placed in JNiLibs while other was inside another library used as module. I was not able to modify the code of module as it was readonly so I renamed the one used in my own code to ffmpegCamera and loaded it in memory with same name.
System.loadLibrary("ffmpegCamera");
This resolved the issue and now both versions of libraries are loading well as separate name and process id in memory.
I faced the same problem after migrating my CI into a new machine.
I was still facing it even after applying all the above solutions.
The problem was in my new machine, there was Microsoft Visual C++ 2010 SP1 Redistributable x86 installed in it. But my new machine was having 64-bit CPU and operating system. So the fix was that i just updated and installed the 64 bit version from here .
Go to http://tess4j.sourceforge.net/usage.html and click on Visual C++ Redistributable for VS2012
Download it and run VSU_4\vcredist_x64.exe or VSU_4\vcredist_x84.exe depending upon your system configuration
Put your dll files inside the lib folder, along with your other libraries (eg \lib\win32-x86\your dll files).