Difference between JARs and EJB JARs from a usage perspective - java

When I use Tomcat,
the common utilities are packaged as JARs in tomcat/lib
because every WAR has its own class loader,
and classes and libs under the WEB-INF/lib directoy of the WAR is not visible to other ones.
When I use Jboss,
the common utilities can packaged not only as JARs in jboss/lib but also as EJB JARs (invoked as services)
When I have some classes as common services, I can put them in JARs as well as EJB JARs.
I have no idea about the difference between JARs and EJB JARs from a usage perspective.
Can anyone guide me to the right path?

The difference is clear when you see the difference between the contents of a JAR vs a EJB JAR. Apart from the source files (compiled) and the manifest that a JAR file has, you'd also need the following (back in the pre-annotation days):
The XML deployment descriptor
The beans
The remote and home interfaces
Dependencies
This tells the container which are the EJBs and their home/remote interfaces so when a request asks for a bean, the container will know which one to invoke. Without these files, there is no way of you telling the containers (except annotations wherever applicable), that this the bean implementing an interface.
More information can be found at this url

Related

JAR not loading in Grails web app when running on Linux JBOSS server [duplicate]

I am trying to add some dependencies jar files. But these files when put in lib/endorsed or in WEB_INF/lib.jar results in startup error for jboss instances. I suppose this is happening because flat classloader structure of JBoss. If somebody has implemented the classloader settings in jboss-web.xml
<class-loading>
<loader-repository>com.example:archive=unique-archive-name</loader-repository>
</class-loading>
Can somebody give me a real life example ?
Also where should I place these jar files - lib/endorsed of jboss, or lib folder in deploy folder or in WEB_INF/lib
Duffymo's directive on not putting jars in endorsed is ignored at your peril.
In some additional detail:
Placing libraries in your WEB-INF/lib is a best practice for portability and consistency as it adheres to a standard provision for creating self-sufficient and distributable web archives, but you need to pay close attention to the class-loading declaration you're putting in your jboss-web.xml.
Assume a simple scenario without the class-loading declaration and a fictional example.jar:
If you place example.jar in WEB-INF/lib and it does not also exist in jboss//lib, then example.jar will only be visible to that specific WAR.
If you place example.jar in WEB-INF/lib and it does also exist in jboss//lib, the instance in WEB-INF/lib will essentially be ignored and the WAR will use the JBoss server instance's unified class loader to load the example classes from jboss//lib/example.jar. (The same would apply to any other WARs or EARs in the same server instance, assuming no class-loading overrides.)
The class-loading declaration is necessary in cases (such as) where you have two different versions of example.jar:
- jboss//lib: example1.0.jar
- WEB-INF/lib: example2.0.jar
In this case, JBoss will create a unique and isolated classloader for your WAR which will avoid jboss//lib/example1.0.jar in favour of WEB-INF/lib/example2.0.jar in the context of your WAR.
In summary, if you're only running one WAR in the jboss server instance and/or you have no conflicting JAR issues, ditch the class-loading declaration and put your JARs in jboss//lib. It makes the WAR file more lightweight, overall deployment may be simpler and you will not consume additional memory with extra class versions during hot-deploys.
They belong in the WEB-INF/lib directory of your WAR file. Don't put things in the endorsed folder.

Packaging a Java EE Application

I have an Enterprise project (EAR) with one EJB and several web modules, these web modules have lots of classes in common, they are exactly the same for each project, so if I modify one of them I'll have to manually copy the code to the other projects as well. I don't want to put them in my EJB module because they use a lot of front-end related resources.
Is there a way to share these classes between the web projects?
Obs: They also use classes and resources from the EJB module.
Make another module with all commun classes and package it as a Jar. Then add the jar as a dependency to the other project.
Maven should be a good tool for this project.
There is no way to have shared classes outside of a .war which are capable of having web-specific resources injected.
I would refactor the common classes into a separate .jar. You could make them EJBs, or just regular classes. Either way, you won't be able to inject web-specific resources; the classes in .wars will have to pass such things as method parameters. In the case of EJBs, you can't directly pass non-serializable objects like HttpServletRequests; I don't know if that will create a significant impediment.
An EJB .jar can be placed anywhere in the .ear, but if you choose to make a non-EJB .jar, it can be placed in the lib directory of your .ear file. It's also a good place for EJB interfaces, if you aren't writing no-interface EJBs. From the Java EE specification's "Application Assembly and Deployment" chapter:
A .ear file may contain a directory that contains libraries packaged in JAR files. The library-directory element of the .ear file’s deployment descriptor contains the name of this directory. If a library-directory element isn’t specified, or if the .ear file does not contain a deployment descriptor, the directory named lib is used. An empty library-directory element may be used to specify that there is no library directory.
All files in this directory (but not subdirectories) with a .jar extension must be made available to all components packaged in the EAR file, including application clients. These libraries may reference other libraries, either bundled with the application or installed separately, using any of the techniques described herein.

JAVA EE glassfish include WAR inside EJB

I have a JAVA EE Project, containing both EJB and WAR projects inside of it.
I want to be able to access WAR project class from the EJB project class.
I have access the other way ( I can access ejb class from war).
Is that possibble? How can this be done?
Thank's In Advance.
I assume that you have got an EAR with two modules inside, WAR and EJB JAR. As both modules are independent, they shouldn't depend on each other. What you want to do is possible via MANIFEST.MF Class-Path entry in module META-INF folder, but I strongly discourage you to do so.
You can re-factor you application to following structure:
EAR/
ejb-app.jar
war-app.jar
lib/
common-libraries.jar
Just putyour common libraries to separate JAR (regular java project), and add it to ejb-app and war-app classpath.
Alternatively you can implement EJB's in WAR project as they are supported in WAR since Java EE6.

JBoss - War library dependencies

I am trying to add some dependencies jar files. But these files when put in lib/endorsed or in WEB_INF/lib.jar results in startup error for jboss instances. I suppose this is happening because flat classloader structure of JBoss. If somebody has implemented the classloader settings in jboss-web.xml
<class-loading>
<loader-repository>com.example:archive=unique-archive-name</loader-repository>
</class-loading>
Can somebody give me a real life example ?
Also where should I place these jar files - lib/endorsed of jboss, or lib folder in deploy folder or in WEB_INF/lib
Duffymo's directive on not putting jars in endorsed is ignored at your peril.
In some additional detail:
Placing libraries in your WEB-INF/lib is a best practice for portability and consistency as it adheres to a standard provision for creating self-sufficient and distributable web archives, but you need to pay close attention to the class-loading declaration you're putting in your jboss-web.xml.
Assume a simple scenario without the class-loading declaration and a fictional example.jar:
If you place example.jar in WEB-INF/lib and it does not also exist in jboss//lib, then example.jar will only be visible to that specific WAR.
If you place example.jar in WEB-INF/lib and it does also exist in jboss//lib, the instance in WEB-INF/lib will essentially be ignored and the WAR will use the JBoss server instance's unified class loader to load the example classes from jboss//lib/example.jar. (The same would apply to any other WARs or EARs in the same server instance, assuming no class-loading overrides.)
The class-loading declaration is necessary in cases (such as) where you have two different versions of example.jar:
- jboss//lib: example1.0.jar
- WEB-INF/lib: example2.0.jar
In this case, JBoss will create a unique and isolated classloader for your WAR which will avoid jboss//lib/example1.0.jar in favour of WEB-INF/lib/example2.0.jar in the context of your WAR.
In summary, if you're only running one WAR in the jboss server instance and/or you have no conflicting JAR issues, ditch the class-loading declaration and put your JARs in jboss//lib. It makes the WAR file more lightweight, overall deployment may be simpler and you will not consume additional memory with extra class versions during hot-deploys.
They belong in the WEB-INF/lib directory of your WAR file. Don't put things in the endorsed folder.

Class in one war not able to access classes in another war of same ear

I have an ear which consists of 2 war files one containing junit classes and the other one containing actual application classes which are referenced by the junits.
Now when executing the junits i get a java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError
Is it due to the junit class files are located in different ear and hence not able to access the application class files that are located in another ear ?
OR
Whether this is due to the issue with deployment, Though i am able to run the application as well as some of the junits which are independent of application classes located in the other ear ?
According to the strict JavaEE visibility semantics, classes inside a WAR should not be visible to other components of the same EAR. JBoss relaxes this a fair bit, and tries to flatten out the classloading hierarchy to make it less irritating, but the WAR restriction still stands.
The solution I use is to put only web resources into the WAR, and to put the WAR's class files into a seperate JAR inside the EAR. That way, the webapp itself can find the classes, and so can your unit test webapp.
The correct way is to move the common classes into a dedicated JAR, and bundle that at the EAR level. So you will have a structure like this:
business-logic-jar
main-web-app-war
test-web-app-war
application-ear
You can bundle the JAR as well as any other libs you depend on in your EAR, and reference them using the manifest file of your WARs. In MANIFEST.MF it looks like:
Class-Path: business-logic-1.0.jar spring-2.5.5.jar ...
You can still bundle additional JARs inside each WAR's WEB-INF/lib folder, e.g. junit inside the test-web-app-war. If you are using Maven, read the skinny war page for a general approach.
JUnit classes don't belong in WAR or EAR files. They shouldn't be deployed.
You don't say which app server you're using, but if you use WebLogic you can put all your .class files into APP-INF/classes. They'll be visible at the EAR level then, so all WARs can see them.

Categories

Resources