I have a collection which has a DBRef inside it (and this secondary collection has a not null field). When I am using #ResponseBody, I am getting a 415 HTTP response. If I remove this secondary collection then everything works properly.
Is there way I can say certain fields are for input and certain field are for output in Spring MVC?
I see #JsonIgnore only for outgoing response. But did not find anything for input.
Is there way I can say certain fields are for input and certain field are for output in Spring MVC?
Solution to the problem is to ensure Setter is ignored and getter is not.
#Getter
#Setter(onMethod = #__( #JsonIgnore ))
private String FullName;
In the above example FullName is calculated by FirstName and LastName and should not be set using json input
{
"FirstName":"VinayaKumar"
"LastName":"Thimmappa"
}
Related
So I made Rest Client using Spring Boot that is consuming a Rest Web Service. I am passing the required requestbody but on printing the requestbody out it is not the same as my input.
For Example: What I entered was TransactionId then it would be changed to transactionId, AB_NAME would be changed to ab_NAME.
So all these fields get assigned null values.
The ResponseEntity being formed also does the same thing. I don't know why this is happening.
The dtos I have made are in line with the input I want to send so I don't know how they are changing on their own.
EDIT: So basically the web service dto fields are not using the Java naming convention but JSON automatically assumes them to be, had to use #JsonProperty to make sure the fields remain the same. Thanks for all of your help.
See your request body properties names and your model properties name should be the same as case. Writing here one example
DTO
publi class SomeName{
private string transactionId;
private string ab_NAME;
}
Sending body format should be
{
"transactionId":"11111",
"ab_NAME":"ABCDE"
}
Thanks.
I've a simple RESTful API based on Spring MVC using a JPA connected MySQL database. Until now this API supports complete updates of an entity only. This means all fields must be provided inside of the request body.
#ResponseBody
#PutMapping(value = "{id}")
public ResponseEntity<?> update(#Valid #RequestBody Article newArticle, #PathVariable("id") long id) {
return service.updateById(id, newArticle);
}
The real problem here is the validation, how could I validate only provided fields while still require all fields during creation?
#Entity
public class Article {
#NotEmpty #Size(max = 100) String title;
#NotEmpty #Size(max = 500) String content;
// Getters and Setters
}
Example for a partial update request body {"content": "Just a test"} instead of {"title": "Title", "content": "Just a test"}.
The actual partial update is done by checking if the given field is not null:
if(newArticle.getTitle() != null) article.setTitle(newArticle.getTitle());
But the validation of course wont work! I've to deactivate the validation for the update method to run the RESTful service. I've essentially two questions:
How can I validate only a "existing" subset of properties in the
update method while still require all fields during creation?
Is there a more elegant way for update partially then checking for
null?
The complexity of partial updates and Spring JPA is that you may send half of the fields populated, and even that you will need to pull the entire entity from the data base, then just "merge" both entity and the pojo, because otherwise you will risk your data by sending null values to the database.
But merging itself is kind of tricky, because you need to operate over each field and take the decision of either send the new value to the data base or just keep the current one. And as you add fields, the validation needs to be updated, and tests get more complex. In one single statement: it doesn't scale. The idea is to always write code which is open for extension and closed for modifications. If you add more fields, then the validation block ideally doesn't need to change.
The way you deal with this in a REST model, is by operating over the entire entity each time you need. Let's say you have users, then you first pull a user:
GET /user/100
Then you have in your web page the entire fields of user id=100. Then you change its last name. You propagate the change calling the same resource URL with PUT verb:
PUT /user/100
And you send all the fields, or rather the "same entity" back with a new lastname. And you forget about validation, the validation will just work as a black box. If you add more fields, you add more #NotNull or whatever validation you need. Of course there may be situations where you need to actually write blocks of code for validation. Even in this case the validation doesn't get affected, as you will have a main for-loop for your validation, and each field will have its own validator. If you add fields, you add validators, but the main validation block remains untouchable.
I'm wondering what's the best practice when using a PUT method to update a specific property of an entity stored in DB.
Let's see for example the following json that is received on the Rest Controller:
{"id":1, "surname":"Doe"}
The entity that we have stored looks something like this:
public class Employee {
Long id;
String name;
String surname;
Date createdAt;
Date updatedAt;
}
I omitted the annotations for simplicity purposes.
What I'd like to achieve is that on the RestController I receive something like this:
#PutRequest
public Employee updateEmployee(#RequestBody Employee employee) {
repo.saveAndFlush(employee);
}
So, if I do it, then the existing fields for the name and timestamps will be set to null because the provided entity doesn't contain such fields.
I'm wondering if there's a way to run the following actions:
Load the entity with the ID provided on DB
Update the fields provided in the Json/Request Body.
Persist the updated entity -> This can be done the same way I've showed in the code.
I'm aware that it exists the #JsonIdentity and #JsonIdentifyreference(alwaysAsId=true) which I use in conjunction with resolvers to fetch the data from DB for fetching a nested entity where only the ID is provided rather the entity itself.
PATCH method is designed for that functionality.
PUT should be used when you are replacing the whole resource - that means setting null on fields that you didn't provide in request.
PATCH is used for updating a resource, you can update a single field, or all the fields, your choice.
Be aware that the actual database update may not automagically work, just because you changed the HTTP method. For Hibernate there is a #DynamicUpdate that provides the same functionality. Without #DynamicUpdate the fields set to null will be updated, but with #DynamicUpdateonly the fields that were modified will be updated.
I got a list that return from below db call.
List<employee> list = empolyeeRepository.findByEmployeeId(id);
List contains employee pojo class object. I want to remove one attribute let's say "employee bank account no" when returning from rest call.
#RequestMapping(value = "/employeeInformation/{id}", method = RequestMethod.GET, produces = MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON_VALUE)
#Timed
public List<Employee> getEmployeeInformation(#PathVariable("id") String id) throws Exception {
return empolyeeRepository.findByEmployeeId(id);
}
Is there any annotation or good practice to do that?
As it mentioned in comments above, you cant remove fields of compiled class at runtime. Assuming you have to exclude some field from generated json, there I see two options:
Create a class with fields you want to be present in resulting json, copy required values from original object to a new created. This approach is called view model and allows you to decorate some object's data, hiding sensitive data from being exposed.
Depending on implementation of your serializer there may be annotations to exclude fields. #JsonIgnore may be placed on getter method, if you are using Jackson (default in spring boot). Second aproach requires significant less code, but the first one is more flexible.
Try #JsonIgnore to ignore properties from serialization and de-serialization.
Here is the link to the docs
I am using Spring and Java and implementing REST Based services. I have a set of developers who develop for mobile,iPad and Web too. Consider I have a bean
Class User{
private String Name;
private Integer id;
private String photoURL;
private ArrayList<String> ProjectName;
private ArrayList<String> TechnologyList;
private ArrayList<String> InterestList;
//Getters and setters
}
While the Web Developers need the entire fields and mobile developers just require two fields from it whereas the iPad requires something in between mobile and web.
Since I am using jackson as a parser, is there a way where while requesting to the controller I can specify which all data I require and avoid the others. For example consider I do a GET request like
GET>http://somedomain.com/users?filter=name,id,photoUrl
Which returns me a JSON structure something like
{
"name":"My Name",
"id":32434,
"photoUrl":"/sss/photo.jpg"
}
Sameway if someone asks for some more fields, they could be filtered. Please let me know how this can be done so that my API remains generic and useable for all.
You can achieve what you want but some extra work is necessary. I can offer you two solutions.
1. Return a Map
Simply put every property that is requested into the map.
2. Use Jacksons Object Mapper directly
Jackson lets you set filters that specify which properties are serialized or ignored.
FilterProvider filter = new SimpleFilterProvider().addFilter("myFilter",
SimpleBeanPropertyFilter.filterOutAllExcept(requestedProperties));
String json = objectMapper.writer(filter).writeValueAsString(value);
You can then return the JSON string directly instead of an object.
For both solutions you would ideally write a class that does the job. But if you do that you could as well write your own message converter. You could extend the MappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter, for instance, and overwrite the writeInternal method to suit your needs. That has the big advantage that you don't need to change your controllers.
The straightforward solution is to implement custom Jackson JSON serializer that will get field names that should be serialized from thread local storage and then serialize only fields which names are presented in that context. For other hand, in controller you can grab all allowed fields names from url and store them into thread local context. Hope this helps.