After creating an UDP connection and connecting from the client to the server, it stops working randomly. Why is this happening?
This doesn't usually happen when running the client and the server on the same computer using "localhost" as the IP, but when using different computers on the same network it happens.
When I try and connect using different computers at first it works but after some time it just stops; the connection is "terminated".
Also, ignore the game.player stuff, it is just a player of mine.
This is my code:
Client:
public class GameClient extends Thread {
private InetAddress ipAddress;
private DatagramSocket socket;
private Main game;
public GameClient(Main main, String ipAddress) {
this.game = main;
try {
this.socket = new DatagramSocket();
this.ipAddress = InetAddress.getByName(ipAddress);
} catch (SocketException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} catch (UnknownHostException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
public void run() {
while (true) {
byte[] data = new byte[1024];
DatagramPacket packet = new DatagramPacket(data, data.length);
try {
socket.receive(packet);
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
String message = new String(packet.getData());
message = message.trim();
if (message.startsWith("00")) {
System.out.println("Player connected. Got server response...");
String msg = "01" + game.player.getPos();
sendData(msg.getBytes());
}
if (message.startsWith("01")) {
message = message.substring(2);
List<String> coords = Arrays.asList(message.split(","));
game.updateMP(coords);
String msg = "01" + game.player.getPos();
sendData(msg.getBytes());
}
}
}
public void sendData(byte[] data) {
DatagramPacket packet = new DatagramPacket(data, data.length, ipAddress,
1331);
try {
socket.send(packet);
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
My server class:
public class GameServer extends Thread {
private DatagramSocket socket;
private Main game;
public GameServer(Main main) {
this.game = main;
try {
this.socket = new DatagramSocket(1331);
} catch (SocketException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
public void run() {
while (true) {
byte[] data = new byte[1024];
DatagramPacket packet = new DatagramPacket(data, data.length);
try {
socket.receive(packet);
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
String message = new String(packet.getData());
message = message.trim();
if (message.startsWith("00")) {
message = message.substring(2);
game.playerConnected = true;
sendData("00".getBytes(), packet.getAddress(), packet.getPort());
}
if (message.startsWith("01")) {
message = message.substring(2);
List<String> coords = Arrays.asList(message.split(","));
game.updateMP(coords);
String msg = "01" + game.player.getPos();
sendData(msg.getBytes(), packet.getAddress(), packet.getPort());
}
}
}
public void sendData(byte[] data, InetAddress ipAddress, int port) {
DatagramPacket packet = new DatagramPacket(data, data.length, ipAddress,
port);
System.out.println(ipAddress + ", " + port);
try {
socket.send(packet);
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
And my "Main" class:
(just a part of it):
if (JOptionPane.showConfirmDialog(null, "Do you want to run the server?") == 0) {
socketServer = new GameServer(this);
socketServer.start();
socketType = 0;
} else {
socketClient = new GameClient(this, JOptionPane.showInputDialog(null, "IP:"));
socketClient.start();
socketClient.sendData("00".getBytes());
socketType = 1;
}
Looks like you have a packet flow without any delays. My suspicion is, that this mass of packets just overflows the network, thus breaking the "connection" (UDP is connectionless).
Let's break the packet flow down:
Server thread is created (constructor), binding to port 1331 (UDP).
Server thread starts, first step: listen on socket (blocking).
Client thread is created, binds to a random (free) port.
Client thread is started, first step: listen on socket (blocking).
Main thread calls sendData("00") on client, which works fine of course.
Server thread receives the "00" packet, sets playerConnected to true and sends "00" back (to inform the client of successful connection to the game). Then server listens again on the socket.
Client thread receives the "00" packet, and sends a "01..." packet. Client listens again on socket.
Server thread receives the "01" packet, updates its game object and sends a "01" packet back to the client (with no delay).
Client thread receives the "01" packet, updates its game object and sends a "01" packet back (with no delay)
The last two steps repeat indefinitely, with no delay.
On the same computer it works better, because the loopback interface is virtual and can handle much more packets per second, so the overflow happens later than on a real network.
Updating a position of a player in a network game is an issue as old as network games. There are many articles on that topic. Search e.g. for "client side position prediction" or sth. like "online game compensate latency", read the Quake2 source code (https://github.com/id-Software/Quake-2/blob/master/client/cl_pred.c) etc.
Beside of that: avoid using Strings, avoid creating tons of new byte arrays, for performance. In Java you will be punished by the Garbage Collector.
Related
So in my code below i have a singlethreaded server and a multithreaded client. The reason for this is because i want the client to send packets and receive packets simultaneously. However when i start the server and run multiple clients the server can process multiple clients simultaneously even tough the server is not multithreaded? Can you explain this?
Server:
public class server {
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException{
new server();
}
//declare the UDP server socket
DatagramSocket datagramSocket;
int port = 3741;
public server() throws IOException {
//create UDP server with a specific port number
datagramSocket = new DatagramSocket(port);
System.out.println("[UDP server] Datagram socket started on port " + port);
//prepare the packet structure for received packets
int dataLength = 100; //must be large enough so some part of packet doesn't get lost
byte[] receiveData = new byte[dataLength];
DatagramPacket packet = new DatagramPacket(receiveData, receiveData.length);
while(true) {
datagramSocket.receive(packet);
System.out.println("client connected");
InetAddress inetAddress = packet.getAddress();
int clientPort = packet.getPort();
byte[] data = packet.getData();
//send response back to the client host
byte[] sendData = new byte[1024];
DatagramPacket datagramPacket = new DatagramPacket(data, data.length, inetAddress, clientPort);
datagramSocket.send(datagramPacket); //sending data from server to client
}
}
}
Client:
public class client {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
new client();
}
public client() throws Exception{
DatagramSocket socket = new DatagramSocket();
InetAddress ip = InetAddress.getByName("127.0.0.1");
String message = "hello from client";
DatagramPacket packetSend = new DatagramPacket(message.getBytes(), message.getBytes().length, ip, 3741);
Thread th = new Thread(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
for(int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
try {
Thread.sleep(1000);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e.printStackTrace();
}
try {
socket.send(packetSend);
} catch (IOException e) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
});
th.start();
byte[] buffer = new byte[1024];
DatagramPacket packet = new DatagramPacket(buffer, buffer.length);
//this part can't be in a thread because the loop above us will finish first before this starts
//we can put this code before the loop and start a thread this would also work
while(true) {
try {
socket.receive(packet);
} catch (IOException e) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e.printStackTrace();
}
String data = new String(packet.getData()).trim();
System.out.println(data);
}
}
}
You think "the server can process multiple clients simultaneously even tough the server is not multithreaded" cause your brain cheat you. Acutually they are processing one by one in a reliatively fast speed. It's easy to see if you use wireshark or tcpdump to capture the server side packets. You will find the interesing truth.
So my application is a very simple. If you type something through the scanner it sends it over to the server, the server sends it back to client. However, i don't understand why we have to put our code where we handle our receiving packets from the server into a thread?
The code below works fine but if i don't use use multithreading then the application doesn't work. The part where i send packets also stop working. Could you explain why this happens?
public class Client {
private static DatagramSocket socket = null;
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println("Send to server:");
Scanner scanner = new Scanner(System.in);
while (true) {
try {
// port shoudn't be the same as in TCP but the port in the datagram packet must
// be the same!
socket = new DatagramSocket();
} catch (SocketException e1) {
System.out.println("[CLIENT] Unable to initiate DatagramSocket");
}
InetAddress ip = null;
try {
ip = InetAddress.getByName("127.0.0.1");
} catch (UnknownHostException e) {
System.out.println("[CLIENT] Unable to determine server IP");
}
// must be in a while loop so we can continuously send messages to server
String message = null;
Thread thread = new Thread(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
receive();
}
});
thread.start();
while (scanner.hasNextLine()) {
message = scanner.nextLine();
byte[] buffer = message.getBytes();
DatagramPacket packet = new DatagramPacket(buffer, buffer.length, ip, 6066);
try {
socket.send(packet);
} catch (IOException e) {
System.out.println("[CLIENT] Unable to send packet to server");
}
}
}
}
private static void receive() {
// receiving from server
byte[] buffer2 = new byte[100];
DatagramPacket ps = new DatagramPacket(buffer2, buffer2.length);
while (true) {
try {
socket.receive(ps);
} catch (IOException e) {
System.out.println("[CLIENT] Unable to receive packets from server.");
}
System.out.println("[SERVER] " + new String(ps.getData()));
}
}
}
If you type something through the scanner it sends it over to the
server, the server sends it back to client.
So the main method runs on the main thread and does some job. The job that you just referenced.
Read some user input plus the following part
while (scanner.hasNextLine()) {
message = scanner.nextLine();
byte[] buffer = message.getBytes();
DatagramPacket packet = new DatagramPacket(buffer, buffer.length, ip, 6066);
try {
socket.send(packet);
} catch (IOException e) {
System.out.println("[CLIENT] Unable to send packet to server");
}
}
Title: receive packets from an UDP server
You want to receive packets but you don't want to block the user from typing something as input and sending it to the server.
Therefore you need to do 2 jobs simultaneously. AKA multithreading
I'm creating a LWJGL Strategy Game, and I'm implementing multiplayer into it.
Right now the game is just generating a world with some different tile types.
I thought I should start implementing networking now, to make the server generate the world,and all clients joining download that world and load it (even though the game is barely a playable yet) to make it easier to implement more advanced stuff later on. Now to the problem!
I'm watching these tutorials on networking implementation, made by DesignsbyZephyr, but I'm getting this error:
java.net.BindException: Address already in use: Cannot bind
at java.net.DualStackPlainDatagramSocketImpl.socketBind(Native Method)
at java.net.DualStackPlainDatagramSocketImpl.bind0(Unknown Source)
at java.net.AbstractPlainDatagramSocketImpl.bind(Unknown Source)
at java.net.DatagramSocket.bind(Unknown Source)
at java.net.DatagramSocket.<init>(Unknown Source)
at java.net.DatagramSocket.<init>(Unknown Source)
at java.net.DatagramSocket.<init>(Unknown Source)
at com.tdd12.eotu.net.GameServer.<init>(GameServer.java:22)
at com.tdd12.eotu.Game.<init>(Game.java:39)
at com.tdd12.eotu.Game.main(Game.java:121)
Exception in thread "Thread-3" java.lang.NullPointerException
at com.tdd12.eotu.net.GameServer.run(GameServer.java:37)
When I start the game two times with the same port. That sounds pretty weird, doesn't it?
I don't know why, maybe because I'm not very experienced with network programming (as you've maybe already understood).
Here is the code I'm using:
(The code is placed in classes and packages, so they are correctly formatted. I just didn't write that here)
GameServer.java:
// The socket
private DatagramSocket socket;
// The main game
private Game game;
// The constructor
public GameServer(Game game) {
// Assign variables
this.game = game;
try {
this.socket = new DatagramSocket(9527);
} catch (SocketException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
// Run the thread
public void run() {
while(true) {
// The data to include in the packet (data to send)
byte[] data = new byte[1024];
// The packet to send
DatagramPacket packet = new DatagramPacket(data, data.length);
// Recieve data from the server
try {
socket.receive(packet);
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
// Get the message
String message = new String(packet.getData());
// Print the message
System.out.println("CLIENT [" + packet.getAddress().getHostAddress() + ":" + packet.getPort() + "] > " + new String(packet.getData()));
// If the message is equal to "ping"
if(message.trim().equalsIgnoreCase("ping")) {
// Send back a message with the text "pong"
sendData("pong".getBytes(), packet.getAddress(), packet.getPort());
}
}
}
// Send data to the server
public void sendData(byte[] data, InetAddress ipAddress, int port) {
// Create a new packet with the inputed data
DatagramPacket packet = new DatagramPacket(data, data.length, ipAddress, port);
// Send the packet to the server
try {
socket.send(packet);
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
GameClient.java:
// The IP address
private InetAddress ipAddress;
// The socket
private DatagramSocket socket;
// The main game
private Game game;
// The constructor
public GameClient(Game game, String ipAddress) {
// Assign variables
this.game = game;
try {
this.socket = new DatagramSocket();
this.ipAddress = InetAddress.getByName(ipAddress);
} catch (SocketException | UnknownHostException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
// Run the thread
public void run() {
while(true) {
// The data to include in the packet (data to send)
byte[] data = new byte[1024];
// The packet to send
DatagramPacket packet = new DatagramPacket(data, data.length);
// Recieve data from the server
try {
socket.receive(packet);
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
// Print the data
System.out.println("SERVER > " + new String(packet.getData()));
}
}
// Send data to the server
public void sendData(byte[] data) {
// Create a new packet with the inputed data
DatagramPacket packet = new DatagramPacket(data, data.length, ipAddress, 9527);
// Send the packet to the server
try {
socket.send(packet);
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
I'd greatly appreciate if someone could help me with this.
Thanks!
As Diptopol Dam said, calling the
DatagramSocket.close();
method before the application is closed fixed the problem. Thanks Diptopol Dam!
At work we are developing an android app that communicates with set top boxes(STB).
It all works fine but I'm trying to create a "mock" STB that the app can connect to so I can control the responses for testing.
I have no access to the code in the STB to know how they set up the sockets but I do have a simplified version of the client code used by the app.
Here's the client code:
public class UDPClient {
public static void main(String[] args) throws SocketException, UnknownHostException {
DatagramSocket c = new DatagramSocket(12345);
c.setBroadcast(true);
c.setSoTimeout(20000);
String msearchData = "DATA";
byte[] sendData = mSearchData.getBytes();
try {
DatagramPacket sendPacket = new DatagramPacket(sendData, sendData.length, InetAddress.getByName("239.255.255.250"), 1900);
c.send(sendPacket);
System.out.println("Request packet sent");
} catch (UnknownHostException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
// wait for reply
byte[] recBuf = new byte[15000];
DatagramPacket receivePacket = new DatagramPacket(recBuf, recBuf.length);
try {
c.receive(receivePacket);
System.out.println("PACKET RECEIVED!");
System.out.println(new String(receivePacket.getData()));
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
c.close();
}
}
When I run this code on my development laptop (and I'm on a wireless network with that STB) the STB responds.
However, I have another laptop setup to pretend to be another STB on the same network(mock STB).
The "mock" STB simply refuses to pick up the broadcasts requests and I'm stuck.
Here's some code I use to act as the mock STB. I've tried various combinations of ports but nothing works.
public class MockBox {
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
DatagramSocket socket = new DatagramSocket();
socket.setBroadcast(true);
while (true) {
System.out.println(">>>Ready to receive broadcast packets!");
byte[] recvBuf = new byte[15000];
DatagramPacket packet = new DatagramPacket(recvBuf, recvBuf.length);
socket.receive(packet); // blocks
// Packet received
System.out.println(">>>Packet received from " + packet.getAddress().getHostAddress());
System.out.println(">>>Packet data: " + new String(packet.getData()));
socket.close();
}
}
}
Any help appreciated!
Disable the software firewall.
Use MulticastSocket instead of DatagramSocket. (Note: The address you specified above is a multicast address.)
Use TTL of at least 1. If that doesn't work, use 2. Repeat, but don't go above say 4 or 5 on a LAN, because at that point, you're already past reasonable. (Zero won't leave the machine. Using a value too high may cause the packet to be discarded somewhere along the route.)
I'm trying to create a simple multicast communication between my PC (Ubuntu, client) and my phone (Android, server).
Unicast/TCP connections work without any problem, the defined port (37659) opens both on PC and phone. When trying to use a MulticastSocket, no ports get opened. nmap tells me the specified port (36963) is a TCP port and that it is closed. (While the receive-method is being executed).
Am I doing something wrong? Or is the firewall blocking the multicast sockets? (I've tried about 20 different ports and none worked..., currently using port 36963)
EDIT: Also with the firewall completely down, nmap tells me the port is closed...
The server's code (phone):
private void multicastLoop() {
String res = Build.FINGERPRINT + "\n";
final InetAddress group;
final MulticastSocket socket;
final DatagramPacket response;
try {
group = InetAddress.getByName("224.0.0.115");
socket = new MulticastSocket(mport);
socket.setLoopbackMode(true);
socket.setSoTimeout(10000);
socket.joinGroup(group);
response = new DatagramPacket(res.getBytes(), res.length(), group, mport);
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
return;
}
Thread t = new Thread(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
while(isRunning) {
try {
byte[] data = new byte[1024];
DatagramPacket dm = new DatagramPacket(data, data.length);
socket.receive(dm);
Log.d("udp", "received");
if (Arrays.equals(dm.getData(), "someone there".getBytes())) {
socket.send(response);
}
} catch (SocketTimeoutException e) {
continue;
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
try {
socket.leaveGroup(group);
socket.close();
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
});
t.start();
}
The client's code (computer):
public String[] findServers() {
String hello = "someone there";
try {
InetAddress group = InetAddress.getByName(mhost);
MulticastSocket socket = new MulticastSocket(mport);
socket.setLoopbackMode(true);
socket.setSoTimeout(60000);
socket.joinGroup(group);
DatagramPacket p = new DatagramPacket(hello.getBytes(), hello.length(), group, mport);
byte[] buffer = new byte[1024];
socket.send(p);
DatagramPacket r = new DatagramPacket(buffer, buffer.length);
socket.receive(r);
socket.leaveGroup(group);
socket.close();
String srinfo = "";
byte[] data = r.getData();
for (byte b: data)
srinfo += (char) b;
System.out.println("Server found at " + r.getAddress().getHostName() + ": " + srinfo);
} catch (SocketTimeoutException e) {
return new String[] {"timeout"};
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
return null;
}
Make sure mhost is set to "224.0.0.115" not some machine name.
Make sure multicast is enabled on your router.
If the host is multi-homed, you need to join the multicast group via all local interfaces, not just the default one, which is what you're doing at present.
You could send the response back to the source address it came from, which is in the received datagram packet. That would also mean that the client doesn't need a MulticastSocket, only a DatagramSocket.