Spring JPA method name validator - java

Spring JpaRepository can generate SQL query from interface method name:
#Repository
#Transactional
public interface SomeEntityRepository extends JpaRepository<SomeEntity, Long> {
List<SomeEntity> findAllByEntityId(Long id);
List<SomeEntity> findAllByEntityIdAndDateOfCreationBetweenAnd/*...*/(Long id, /*...*/);
}
As you can see - it can be complicated. So it's possible that method name won't be correct and compiler errors occurs.
Question:
Is it possible to check/validate method name before using it in real project (which require some compile time, trial and error)?
Or maybe it is possible to convert such method name to SQL before usage - to see if this method name is valid and if it do all operation right?
Of course the obvious method is to make smaller project for test only. But I feel that it must be better way.
Thanks for any suggestions.

You can write a test using a test database and Spring test runner. There are multiple ways to do that, so I'll just give a rough sketch to get you started:
Instead of your real DataSource Spring bean, create a test DataSource bean using an in-memory (eg. H2) database
Create a Spring test context, that will:
discover your entities
set up the DB schema (eg. using hibernate.hbm2ddl.auto=create)
optionally pre-fill the DB with some data (eg. using hibernate.hbm2ddl.import_files)
enable and discover your Spring Data repositories
Use #RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class) to run your tests with JUnit.
Use #ContextConfiguration to point to your test Spring context
Use #Transactional to make the tests transactional and have any changes done in test methods rolled back automatically
#Autowire the EntityManager and the Spring Data repositories and use them in tests.
See Spring docs on Integration Testing.

A bit late to this, but....
If you want to test the name of the method without compiling the interface you can find a class called PartTree in org.springframework.data.repository.query.parser in the spring-data-commons:1.12.6 jar.
new PartTree(stringVersionOfMethodName,classOfEntityRepoIsFor)
It will throw an exception if it can't parse the name properly.
For maven I'm using spring-boot-starter-parent of 1.4.3.RELEASE and including the spring-boot-starter-data-jpa depedency

Related

Integration testing without Spring context

Should I always start Spring context during integration tests? (I mean using #SpringBootTest annotation)
Currently I'm writing integration test that involves a few classes and in order to make it faster I create object graph by hand (i.e. I don't start Spring IoC container). So currently my integration test (written in Spock) looks like this:
class UserConverterIT extends Specification {
UserConverter converter = new UserConverter(new UserDtoFactory(new UserGroupPolicy()))
def 'should ...'() {
when:
converter.convert(...)
then:
...
}
}
Alternatively I could add #SpringBootTest annotation, put #Autowire above UserConverter field and all dependecies would be injected automatically. However, the first approach is much faster. Is there something wrong in this approach?
As you said the #Autowired annotation would inject all dependencies and load the whole context automatically. Your approach is also working but its really fragile!
How can you guarantee that in your tests you never need some beans which you didn't manually new them?
Also there is another important thing. When you let the spring to inject the dependencies, if there is a problem on declaring the beans, problem would show on test phase, but in your approach they won't identify.
Also you might sometimes #Autowired an interface which told spring to get the implementation on runtime. For example you have a parent module which has an interface that implements in the child module. When you want to write a test case in parent you don't have access to child implementation to make new of that.

Does Spring provide stub implementation of JpaRepositories?

I am trying to unit test my Service classes that looks similiar to this:
#Service
public class SomeQueryService {
private final SomeRepository repository;
public SomeQueryService(SomeRepository repository) {
this.repository = repository;
}
public void doSomething() {
// code doing some magic
}
}
SomeRepository is simple repository interface extending JpaRepository interface.
What I want to do is unit test this service to verify whether it is working properly.
I do not want to use mockito to mock repository behaviour instead, I want to have some in-memory implementation (on list or map) that will imitate database behaviour.
Does Spring provide such fake implementations?
I want to avoid making Stub Implementation of such repository by myself as I will be using such tests in many other places.
RealLifeDeveloper has created an MIT-licensed helper-class to do just what you want: implement the repository-interface with a plain-old-java-object that just wraps a Collection, and called it "InMemoryJpaRepository". You will still have to implement some logic yourself1, though it should be easy if your queries are not too complicated.
An article explaining how to do this with example: https://reallifedeveloper.com/creating-in-memory-versions-of-spring-data-jpa-repositories-for-testing/
The repository (which includes other stuff, too) is on github: https://github.com/reallifedeveloper/rld-build-tool
The specific helper-files for creating the inmemory-db are found at https://github.com/reallifedeveloper/rld-build-tools/tree/master/src/main/java/com/reallifedeveloper/tools/test/database/inmemory if you dont want the whole repo.
1 The rule "Don't put logic in tests" exists for a reason and is clearly violated here. However, the well-known and widely-used alternatives mentioned by the other answers, H2-testing and extensive mocking, have their drawbacks too.
The type of testing you are referring to is called "Integration Testing" or "End to end testing" since it tests the whole application or a big chunk of it compared to unit tests that test only one method.
https://www.guru99.com/unit-test-vs-integration-test.html
You should not unit test your repositories, since they are already well tested by the spring team.
Solution:
You can create a test that starts the whole spring container using Spring Boot:
Just create a class in your test folder and annotate it with:
#RunWith(SpringRunner.class)
#SpringBootTest
public class MyTestClass {
#Test
public void test() {
}
}
You can then configure an embedded database using H2 so that your test does not use the production database, just follow the Spring Boot Database Initialization doc.
https://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/current/reference/html/howto-database-initialization.html
PS. You can also create a specific profile using the following annotation on your test class:
#ActiveProfiles("test")
No Spring Data does not provide a fake implementation of that interface.
You'll have to create it on your own or use a mocking framework like Mockito.

What is the equivalent of #DataJpaTest if I just want to test JdbcTemplate code?

Spring Boot 1.4 offers some fantastic testing improvements. One is the #DataJpaTest annotation where it wires up just the parts needed for JPA testing. What would the equivalent look like for just wiring up the parts needed for JdbcTemplate tests?
I'm fine constructing my own composite annotation that mimics the #DataJpaTest one.
Good question. Ironically enough, that one was raised during the testing talk yesterday at SpringOne Platform. Let's see what it takes to implement such dedicated test annotation.
TL;DR check the code on github
First of all you need to create the annotation. This annotation reuses some bits from the spring-boot-test-autoconfigure module. You may want to auto-configure an in-memory database (like DataJpaTest does). You also want to make sure that caching is configured and disabled by default (in case you have #EnableCaching on your Spring Boot application). You also want that all your tests are #Transactional by default so you should add that.
Next, you want that slicing effectively kicks in. All you need at this point is a DataSource, a JdbcTemplate, database migrations (flyway/liquibase) and a transaction manager to process #Transactional. To avoid the other auto-configurations to kick in you should add the following:
#OverrideAutoConfiguration(enabled = false)
Then, you want to explicitly enable the auto-configurations above. In order to do so, you add #ImportAutoConfiguration and you add the following content in META-INF/spring.factories
# AutoConfigureDataJpa auto-configuration imports
com.example.test.autoconfigure.jdbc.DataJdbcTest=\
org.springframework.boot.autoconfigure.flyway.FlywayAutoConfiguration,\
org.springframework.boot.autoconfigure.jdbc.DataSourceAutoConfiguration,\
org.springframework.boot.autoconfigure.jdbc.DataSourceTransactionManagerAutoConfiguration,\
org.springframework.boot.autoconfigure.jdbc.JdbcTemplateAutoConfiguration,\
org.springframework.boot.autoconfigure.liquibase.LiquibaseAutoConfiguration,\
org.springframework.boot.autoconfigure.transaction.TransactionAutoConfiguration
The key in spring.factories should match the FQN of your annotation. Whenever Spring Boot finds #ImportAutoConfiguration with no extra attributes, it will look for a key matching the annotation type in spring.factories.
Next up you want to be able to include additional components (component scan) with a filter. In order to do that, you can add #TypeExcludeFilters(DataJdbcTypeExcludeFilter.class) where DataJdbcTypeExcludeFilter is pretty much the same thing as DataJpaTypeExcludeFilter (so we might want to extract a common class for that).
Once you've done that, you only need to add your annotation and your JdbcTemplate is auto-configured for you
#RunWith(SpringRunner.class)
#DataJdbcTest
public class DataJdbcSampleTests {
#Autowired
private JdbcTemplate jdbcTemplate;
...
}
I think the option will be #JdbcTest, you could found further info on doc.

Testing Hibernate DAO using Junit

I am using a combination of Spring and Hibernate in my project and would like to test the DAO methods like Save and Delete methods.
daoFoundation is a wrapper class created over hibernateSession.
#Override
public String createSubject(Subject subject) {
String subjectId = (String) daoFoundation.save(subject);
return subjectId;
}
This is what I wrote in my JUnit Runs with SpringJunit4ClassRunner
I created the subject object in my SetupMethod.
#Test
public void createSubjectTest(){
subjectDao.createSubject(subject);
assertNotNull(hassSubjectSelection.getId());
}
Is this sufficient or do I need to write anything additional in my test class?
The easiest way is to import your Spring application context, autowire in the DAO's you want to test and then mark either your test methods or the entire class as #Transactional. This will create a Hibernate session, run your test and then automatically roll back the transaction so you don't effect your database state with your tests.
Have a look at how to run unit tests with Spring here. You can get Spring to create your entire application context using the #ContextConfiguration annotation. So if you create your database using an XML file called database-servlet.xml then you would annotate
#ContextConfiguration(locations={"classpath:/database-servlet.xml"})
public class Test()
You can use the annotation #RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class) to use functionality of the Spring TestContext Framework with your unit tests. This allows you to do things like declare expected exceptions that should be thrown, run timed tests, repeat test runs X times and a bunch of other cool stuff.
Basically to get this working, your test class should look similar to the following:
#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
#ContextConfiguration(locations={YOUR APP CONTEXT FILES HERE AS A COMMA SEPARATED LIST})
public class Test(){
#Autowired
private YourDAO yourDAO;
#Test
#Transactional
public void testSave(){
//Test save method here. Any database changes made here will be
//automatically rolled back when the test finishes.
}
Let me know if that works or not.
The best way to test your dao layer is to use the spring jdbctemplate to write data to your database the test your get and delete methods. Then in the #after delete the records you wrote. Then use hibernate to write to your database and use jdbctemplate to read them back. Then delete your test rows. Anything less and all you are really doing is testing hibernate's caching.

How to populate Java (web) application with initial data using Spring/JPA/Hibernate

I want to setup my database with initial data programmatically. I want to populate my database for development runs, not for testing runs (it's easy). The product is built on top of Spring and JPA/Hibernate.
Developer checks out the project
Developer runs command/script to setup database with initial data
Developer starts application (server) and begins developing/testing
then:
Developer runs command/script to flush the database and set it up with new initial data because database structures or the initial data bundle were changed
What I want is to setup my environment by required parts in order to call my DAOs and insert new objects into database. I do not want to create initial data sets in raw SQL, XML, take dumps of database or whatever. I want to programmatically create objects and persist them in database as I would in normal application logic.
One way to accomplish this would be to start up my application normally and run a special servlet that does the initialization. But is that really the way to go? I would love to execute the initial data setup as Maven task and I don't know how to do that if I take the servlet approach.
There is somewhat similar question. I took a quick glance at the suggested DBUnit and Unitils. But they seem to be heavily focused in setting up testing environments, which is not what I want here. DBUnit does initial data population, but only using xml/csv fixtures, which is not what I'm after here. Then, Maven has SQL plugin, but I don't want to handle raw SQL. Maven also has Hibernate plugin, but it seems to help only in Hibernate configuration and table schema creation (not in populating db with data).
How to do this?
Partial solution 2010-03-19
Suggested alternatives are:
Using unit tests to populate the database #2423663
Using ServletContextListener to gain control on web context startup #2424943 and #2423874
Using Spring ApplicationListener and Spring's Standard and Custom Events #2423874
I implemented this using Spring's ApplicationListener:
Class:
public class ApplicationContextListener implements ApplicationListener {
public void onApplicationEvent(ApplicationEvent event) {
if (event instanceof ContextRefreshedEvent) {
...check if database is already populated, if not, populate it...
}
}
}
applicationContext.xml:
<bean id="applicationContextListener" class="my.namespaces.ApplicationContextListener" />
For some reason I couldn't get ContextStartedEvent launched, so I chose ContextRefreshedEvent which is launched in startup as well (haven't bumped into other situations, yet).
How do I flush the database? Currently, I simply remove HSQLDB artifacts and a new schema gets generated on startup by Hibernate. As the DB is then also empty.
You can write a unit test to populate the database, using JPA and plain Java. This test would be called by Maven as part of the standard build lifecycle.
As a result, you would get an fully initialized database, using Maven, JPA and Java as requested.
The usual way to do this is to use a SQL script. Then you run a specific bash file that populate the db using your .sql
If you want to be able to programmatically set your DB during the WebApp StartUp you can use a Web Context Listener. During the initialization of your webContext you can use a Servlet Context Listener to get access to your DAO (Service Layer.. whatever) create your entities and persist them as you use to do in your java code
p.s. as a reference Servlet Life Cycle
If you use Spring you should have a look at the Standard and Custom Events section of the Reference. That's a better way to implement a 'Spring Listener' that is aware of Spring's Context (in the case you need to retrieve your Services form it)
You could create JPA entities in a pure Java class and persist them. This class could be invoked by a servlet but also have a main method and be invoked on the command line, by maven (with the Exec Maven Plugin) or even wrapped as a Maven plugin.
But you're final workflow is not clear (do you want the init to be part of the application startup or done during the build?) and requires some clarification.
I would us a Singleton bean for that:
import javax.annotation.PostConstruct;
import javax.ejb.Startup;
import javax.ejb.Singleton;
#Singleton
#Startup
public class InitData {
#PostConstruct
public void load() {
// Load your data here.
}
}
Depend on your db. It is better to have script to set up db
In the aforementioned ServletContextListener or in a common startup place put all the forthcoming code
Define your data in an agreeable format - XML, JSON or even java serialization.
Check whether the initial data exists (or a flag indicating a successful initial import)
If it exists, skip. If it does not exist, get a new DAO (using WebApplicationContextUtils.getRequiredWebApplicationContext().getBean(..)) , iterate all predefined objects and persist them via the EntityManager in the database.
I'm having the same problem. I've tried using an init-method on the bean, but that runs on the raw bean w/o AOP and thus cannot use #Transactional. The same seems to go for #PostConstruct and the other bean lifecycle mechanism.
Given that, I switched to ApplicationListener w/ ContextRefreshedEvent; however, in this case, #PersistenceContext is failing to get an entity manager
javax.persistence.PersistenceException: org.hibernate.SessionException: Session is closed!
at org.hibernate.ejb.AbstractEntityManagerImpl.throwPersistenceException(AbstractEntityManagerImpl.java:630)
at org.hibernate.ejb.QueryImpl.getSingleResult(QueryImpl.java:108)
Using spring 2.0.8, jpa1, hibernate 3.0.5.
I'm tempted to create a non-spring managed entitymanagerfactory and do everything directly but fear that would interfere w/ the rest of the Spring managed entity and transaction manager.
I'm not sure if you can get away from using some SQL. This would depend if your develoeprs are staring with an empty database with no schema defined or if the tables are there but they are empty.
If you starting with empty tables then you could use a Java approach to generating the data. I'm not that familiar with Maven but I assume you can create some task that would use your DAO classes to generate the data. You could probably even write it using a JVM based scripting language like Groovy that would be able to use your DAO classes directly. You would have a similar task that would clear the data from the tables. Then your developers would just run these tasks on the command line or through their IDE as a manual step after checkout.
If you have a fresh database instance that I think you will need to execute some SQL just to create the schema. You could technically do that with executing SQL calls with hibernate but that really doesn't seem worth it.
Found this ServletContextListener example by mkyong. Quoting the article:
You want to initialize the database connection pool before the web
application is start, is there a “main()” method in whole web
application?
This sounds to me like the right place where to have code to insert initial DB data.
I tested this approach to insert some initial data for my webapp; it works.
I found some interesting code in this repository: https://github.com/resilient-data-systems/fast-stateless-api-authentication
This works pretty neat in my project:
#Component
#DependsOn({ "dataSource" })
public class SampleDataPopulator {
private final static Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(SampleDataPopulator.class);
#Inject
MyRepository myRepository
#PostConstruct
public void populateSampleData() {
MyItem item = new ResourceDatabasePopulator();
myRepository.save(item);
log.info("Populated DB with sample data");
}
}
You can put a file called data.sql in src/main/resources, it will be read and executed automatically on startup. See this tutorial.
The other answers did not work for me.

Categories

Resources