I have an insert clause and 2 columns which are named my_id and stream_id, I would like it so that each pair of (my_id,stream_id) is unique. For example my_id is a users personal unique id and it is always the same and stream_id correspond to different posts. For example if my_id is 4 and a stream_id is 8 then you can insert however since that is now in the database you can not do another insert on that same stream_id of 8. Here is my jdbc code
int stream_id= Integer.parseInt(requestData.get("stream_id"));
int my_id= Integer.parseInt(requestData.get("my_id"));
String insertTableSQL = "INSERT INTO reputation"
+ "(stream_id,my_id) VALUES"
+ "(?,?)";
dbConnection = DB.getConnection();
preparedStatement = dbConnection.prepareStatement(insertTableSQL, Statement.RETURN_GENERATED_KEYS);
preparedStatement.setInt(1, stream_id);
preparedStatement.setInt(2, my_id);
preparedStatement.executeUpdate();
Just to clarify I simply want to make sure that I have unique pairs in the database if I have a my_id of 5 and a stream_id of 9 then I should reject another pair of 5 and 9. The int variables already have those values I just do not know how to check if I have those pairs in the database; if I don't then continue with the insertion otherwise stop the inserts.
You should add a unique key in a database. If you want to handle at application site perhaps you could use Hibernate or JPA or JDO.
Related
I'm having some issues with my ResultSet using JDBC.
Here's my relation:
create table person (
person_id number(5) generated always as identity
minvalue 1
maxvalue 99999
increment by 1 start with 1
cycle
cache 10,
firstname varchar(10) not null,
lastname varchar(10) not null,
);
I'm trying to insert a (firstname, lastname) into the tuple and then get the person_id that comes out of it. Here's my JDBC code:
//connection is taken care of beforehand and is named con
prep = con.prepareStatement("insert into person (firstname, lastname) values (?, ?)", Statement.RETURN_GENERATED_KEYS);
prep.setString(1, firstname);
prep.setString(2, lastname);
prep.execute();
ResultSet generated = prep.getGeneratedKeys();
if (generated.next()) {
String key = generated.getString("0");
System.out.println(key);
}
This works all fine. But my problem is that the key should be an integer, not a String. Every time I run this, I get a ResultSet that contains a string of "AAA3vaAAGAAAFwbAAG", or something along those lines. I want to get the person_id so I can use it later in my Java program.
Is there something I'm doing wrong in regards to searching through the ResultSet or the execution of the statement itself?
tl;dr
int id = generated.getInt( 1 ) ;
Details
Your Question seems confused.
There are two forms of each get… method on ResultSet.
Pass a column number (an int)
Pass a column name (a String)
You seem to have combined the two into this:
String key = generated.getString( "0" ) ;
I doubt that you have a column named with a single digit zero. Besides being a poor choice of name, standard SQL forbids starting an identifier with a digit.
So that line makes no sense. Perhaps you meant the first column by using a zero 0 and mistakenly wrapped it in quotes, thereby transforming your intended int into an actual String.
Even that intention would be wrong. The ResultSet::getString documentation incorrectly describes the int as an “columnIndex”. Usually “index” means a zero-based counting offset. But actually ResultSet::getString( int ) requires you pass an ordinal number with counting starting at one. So getString( 0 ) is never valid.
So if you want to retrieve the value of your result set’s first column as text, do this:
String key = generated.getString( 1 ) ; // Retrieve first column of result set as text.
Yet again, this would be wrong in the context of your code. You are apparently attempting to retrieve the primary key values being generated during the INSERT. Your primary key column person_id is defined as number(5) which is not a textual type. So retrieving as a String is not appropriate.
NUMBER(5) is not standard SQL. If you happen to be using Oracle database, the doc says that would be an integer type with a precision of five, meaning numbers with up to five digits. So retrieve that as a integer type in Java by calling ResultSet::getInt.
int id = generated.getInt( 1 ) ; // Retrieve the new row’s ID from the first column of the result set of generated key values returned by the `INSERT` prepared statement.
My comments above are for databases in general. But for Oracle specifically, see the Answer by Mark Rotteveel explaining that Oracle database does not return the generated sequence number when calling getGeneratedKeys. Instead it returns ROWID pseudo-column.
Your problem is that Oracle by default returns the ROWID of the inserted record, and not the generated identifier. From Oracle JDBC Developer's Guide: Retrieval of Auto-Generated Keys:
If key columns are not explicitly indicated, then Oracle JDBC drivers
cannot identify which columns need to be retrieved. When a column name
or column index array is used, Oracle JDBC drivers can identify which
columns contain auto-generated keys that you want to retrieve.
However, when the Statement.RETURN_GENERATED_KEYS integer flag is
used, Oracle JDBC drivers cannot identify these columns. When the
integer flag is used to indicate that auto-generated keys are to be
returned, the ROWID pseudo column is returned as key. The ROWID
can be then fetched from the ResultSet object and can be used to
retrieve other columns.
So, if you use Statement.RETURN_GENERATED_KEYS, you'll get the ROWID, and you can then use that ROWID to select the inserted row to obtain the other values (including the generated identifier).
If you want to specifically retrieve the generated id, for Oracle you'll need to explicitly ask for that column as follows:
String[] columns = { "PERSON_ID" }
prep = con.prepareStatement(
"insert into person (firstname, lastname) values (?, ?)", columns);
prep.setString(1, firstname);
prep.setString(2, lastname);
prep.executeUpdate();
ResultSet generated = prep.getGeneratedKeys();
if (generated.next()) {
int key = generated.getInt("PERSON_ID");
System.out.println(key);
}
This question already has answers here:
How to get the insert ID in JDBC?
(14 answers)
Closed 5 years ago.
I have a table, say Users with an auto-incremented primary key of type BIGINT.
In Java, I'm looking to
insert a row to Users
return the key of that row inserted.
I tried the following without much expectations since the key field of Users is Long and executeBatch() is returning an integer array.
String query2 = "INSERT INTO Users (name, status) VALUES (?, ?); "
+ "SELECT LAST_INSERT_ID();";
// ... code deleted for clarity
int [] tmp = pStat.executeBatch();
The array returned out of this code is empty.
How to do this in MySQL?
I've seen Get the new record primary key ID from mysql insert query? and some other relevant discussions.
You need to pass Statement.RETURN_GENERATED_KEYS as one of the arguments while creating preparedstatement, have a look at javadoc here:
autoGeneratedKeys - a flag indicating whether auto-generated keys
should be returned; one of Statement.RETURN_GENERATED_KEYS or
Statement.NO_GENERATED_KEYS
Code would look like this:
PreparedStatement pStat = connection.prepareStatement(SQL_INSERT,
Statement.RETURN_GENERATED_KEYS);
Once the statement gets executed, you can get the keys via getGeneratedKeys() method (javadoc here):
ResultSet rsKeys = statement.getGeneratedKeys();
//Iterate the resultset using next
My database is PostgreSQL. The language is Java.
Table name is phrase with column name name.
At any time many users are inserting many rows to this table.
And we need to make sure that a certain field is unique.
And if such a field was found during loading, I want to return the row ID.
I could for example make a field the unique primary key, and when a row id inserted, catch the exception and look up the existing row.
But I think that is a bad idea.
I could just look for that row first and then insert.
But how can we avoid that the concurrent transactions get in each other's way?
And when downloading, is it better to do a batch download, and how do I do that in PostgreSQL? I do not even know.
You could create a UNIQUE constraint and INSERT ... ON CONFLICT:
CREATE TABLE mytable (
id integer PRIMARY KEY,
name text NOT NULL
CONSTRAINT name_unique UNIQUE
);
INSERT INTO mytable (id, name)
VALUES (1, 'me');
Now to run a batch INSERT that returns the id of each affecte row, run
INSERT INTO mytable (id, name)
VALUES (2, 'me'),
(3, 'new')
ON CONFLICT (name)
DO UPDATE SET name = EXCLUDED.name
RETURNING id;
The strange UPDATE that does not actually change the row is necessary if you want the id back.
Instead of catching the exception, you can use the INSERT ... ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING clause available in PostgreSQL. By checking the number of affected rows (returncode of PreparedStatement.executeUpdate), you can detect if there was a conflict.
E.g.
PreparedStatement pstmt = conn.prepareStatement("insert into x values (?,?) on conflict do nothing");
pstmt.setInt(1, myId);
pstmt.setInt(2, myValue);
int rc = pstmt.executeUpdate();
if (rc == 0) {
// fetch the existing row...
}
This is my delete class that gets id as an input.
I succeeded to delete the row(for example row contained id '3' from my database) and now I want to update all the id-s.
for example: my rows were:
1 a5
2 f3
(3 t1 was deleted)
4 r2
so now the result should be updated:
1 a5
2 f3
3 r2
String delete = "DELETE from authors WHERE id = ?";
Class.forName("com.mysql.jdbc.Driver");
Connection con = DriverManager.getConnection(url, "root", "easttg");
PreparedStatement ps = con.prepareStatement(delete);
//updating the id
String sql = "Select id from authors";
PreparedStatement ps2 = con.prepareStatement(sql, Statement.RETURN_GENERATED_KEYS);
ps.setInt(1, id);
ps.executeUpdate();
con.close();
To update some row, you must use an update statement. Not a select statement:
update authors set id = ? where id = ?
That said: IDs are just technical identifiers for rows. They shouldn't be modified generally. And the reason why purely technical IDs are used is that they never need to be modified, which is a good thing because there might be dozens of other tables having foreign keys containing this same ID. The ID might also be part of some URL used to display the row in a web site, that many people could have bookmarked. The ID is... the identity of the row. You don't change an identity. If you do it, all kinds of problems occur, exactly as if you changed your own name.
The problem is following
By executing the below queries in SQL Plus, everything is working perfect:
column firstname new_value v_firstname
select firstname from tbcustomer where customer_id = 111
select '&v_firstname', wrk.* from tbwork where customer_id = 111
But when when i tried to execute these queries from Java program, i get java.sql.SQLException: ORA-00900: invalid SQL statement on the first SQL query
Connection connection = null;
Statement stat = null;
String query = "column due_date new_value v_due_date";
try {
// Load the JDBC driver
String driverName = "oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver";
Class.forName(driverName);
connection = DriverManager.getConnection(url, username, password);
stat = connection.createStatement();
boolean res_num = stat.execute(query);
} catch (ClassNotFoundException e) {
// Could not find the database driver
} catch (SQLException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
Now the question is how to overcome this error and execute first query or do you have any other solution to define variable on the oracle session and use it in other SQL statements.
For instance third query is one of the many queries that i need to execute and all of them will have same first name field
column is a SQL*Plus command. It is not valid in SQL or PL/SQL so you cannot use it in a Java application.
Substitution variables like &v_firstname are also a SQL*Plus construct-- they are not valid in SQL or PL/SQL so you cannot use them in a Java application.
If your goal is to get the firstname from tbcustomer and all the columns from tbwork in a single query, you would need to join the two tables. Assuming that both tables have a customer_id column and that is how the two tables are supposed to be joined
SELECT cust.firstname,
work.*
FROM tbcustomer cust
JOIN tbwork work ON (cust.customer_id = work.customer_id)
WHERE cust.customer_id = 111
Assuming that you will be executing this query for multiple customer_id values, however, 111 should be a bind variable instead of a literal and your Java code should be using a PreparedStatement to prepare the SQL statement, then binding a value like 111 using the setInt method before executing the query.
If you want to break this into two database calls, you can simply do something like
PreparedStatement stmtGetFirstName = connection.prepareStatement("select firstname from tbcustomer where customer_id = ?");
stmtGetFirstName.setInt( 1, 111 );
ResultSet rsGetFirstName = stmtGetFirstName.executeQuery();
String firstName = rsGetFirstName.getString();
PreparedStatement stmtGetWork = connection.prepareStatement("select ?, work.* from tbwork where customer_id = ?");
stmtGetWork.setString( 1, firstName );
stmtGetWork.setInt( 2, 111 );
ResultSet rsGetWork = stmtGetWork.executeQuery();
If you can guarantee that all 600 million executions will occur in the same database session, you could use a database context. You would need to create the context and the package it uses in the database
SQL> create or replace context fname_ctx using scott.pkg_get_fname;
Context created.
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 create or replace package pkg_get_fname
2 is
3 procedure set_fname( p_customer_id in number );
4 function get_fname return varchar2;
5* end;
SQL> /
Package created.
SQL> create or replace package body pkg_get_fname
2 is
3 procedure set_fname( p_customer_id in number )
4 as
5 begin
-- Obviously, you'd get the data here from your table rather than hard-coding 'Bob'
6 dbms_session.set_context( 'fname_ctx', 'fname', 'Bob' );
7 end;
8
9 function get_fname
10 return varchar2
11 is
12 l_fname varchar2(100);
13 begin
14 l_fname := sys_context( 'fname_ctx', 'fname' );
15 return l_fname;
16 end;
17 end;
18 /
Package body created.
From Java, you could then call pkg_get_fname.set_fname(111) to set the context and use the function pkg_get_fname.get_fname in your query.
It seems odd, however, to be concerned about performance and to be planning to execute 600 million queries from Java against the database. That's going to involve a ton of round-trips over the network between the middle tier and the database server-- if you're really concerned about performance, you'd push that work to stored procedures in the database to eliminate the network round-trips. And the fact that you're executing them so many times makes me suspect that you're doing a lot of row-by-row processing rather than letting the database do set-based operations. That's also going to be a major source of poor performance. Plus, databases are born to join, so it's pretty unusual for a simple join like this to add appreciably to the cost of a query assuming that proper indexes are in place.