How can I immediately terminate a Thread? (Not interrupt) - java

This is not a question about how to cleanly terminate a thread, ie by calling interrupt on it and having the thread respond appropriately. I cannot modify code the thread is executing in any way.
I specifically want to immediately terminate a Thread, I don't care at all what state things are left in. I know something similar is possible using Thread.stop, however this actually throws a ThreadDeath exception, and for the Thread to terminate this exception cannot be caught. However the code I am dealing with catches this exception and is not rethrowing it.
Thread.destroy() seemed to be what I was looking for, however this method was never implemented. Is there any other way of achieving this?

I believe that there's no way in Java to just kill off a thread like you're describing. As you note in a comment, interrupt won't do what you want. If the thread is executing, it just sets a flag and it's up to the thread to notice it. if the thread is waiting or sleeping, it will throw an InterruptedException.
The only way I can imagine doing what you're describing is to kill the process in which the thread is running. (E.g., call System.exit(int).)

No there isn't a way. From Java Concurrency in Practice:
Since there is no preemptive way to stop a thread, they must instead
be persuaded to shut down on their own.
Interrupting a thread is not the cleaner way as you said. Clean ways could be:
ExecutorService.shutdown()
Future.cancel()
Poison Pills
You aren't meant to submit tasks to threads that take ages to be done. You would rather divide them into smaller tasks and send a poison pill to cancel the bigger task. If there is not a way to do that, then spawn/fork a process and kill it if you want to cancel the task.

If you don't trust the thread in question to the point that you need to kill it, you would probably be better off running it in a separate process, and kill the process instead.
Anyway, the following code might work if you are ok with the deprecated Thread methods:
while (theThread.isAlive()) {
theThread.stop();
}
Depending on how badly the thread is trying to survive…
You might want to run this code in several threads or repeat the stop() call if that's not enough. However, I managed to kill the following thread with this code:
final Thread iWontDie = new Thread(() -> {
int i = 0;
while (true) {
try {
System.out.println("I'm still alive! " + ++i);
} catch (Throwable t) {
// eat t
}
}
});
iWontDie.start();

If you are on Java 7 or earlier, you could use the overloaded stop(Throwable obj) method to throw something besides a ThreadDeath error:
Forces the thread to stop executing. If the argument obj is null, a NullPointerException is thrown (in the current thread). The thread represented by this thread is forced to stop whatever it is doing abnormally and to throw the Throwable object obj as an exception. This is an unusual action to take; normally, the stop method that takes no arguments should be used.
This method, like the parameterless version, is deprecated, so just keep that in mind.

Related

What is an InterruptedException in Java?

I have seen many times in my code that I get an Interrupted Exception. How do I fix it?
Example:
for (int i = 0; i < readLimit; i++) {
if (fileName.exists())
return readFile(fileName);
Thread.sleep(1000); // Here is where I get the error
}
}
Since I don't know how much you know about Java, how java works exactly and what's concurrency, I'll try to explain as much as possible with nearly no background information needed.
At first we're going to take a look at Oracle's documentation of the InterruptedException.
Thrown when a thread is waiting, sleeping, or otherwise occupied, and the thread is interrupted, either before or during the activity. [...]
What does this mean?
Before answering this question you have to rudimentary understand how a Thread works.
A thread is originally just a piece of code that can be managed seperately from other threads. It can run at the same time (see concurrency), run scheduled, etc.
Example
If you start a normal java program the main() method is created in an own thread 1. Everything you do will be executed in this thread. Every class you create, every method you call and basically everything that originated from main().
But if you create a Thread, it runs in an own thread 2. Everything you do in the run() method will be executed in thread 2.
What happens if you create a new Thread?
The join() method is called.
The join() method starts the thread and run() is being executed.
There's not only the join() method with no parameters but also a join(long millis) with a parameter.
When and why is it thrown?
As Rahul Iyer already said there's a variety of reasons. I'm picking some of them to get you a feeling when they're called.
Timeout
The InterruptedException can be indeed thrown when a timeout was exceeded. This happens when the join(long millis) is called. The parameter specifies that the thread can run for the given amount of milliseconds. When the thread exceeds this timeout it is interrupted. source (from line 769 to line 822).
OS is stopping the thread
Maybe the Operating System (Windows, Linux, Android, etc.) decided to stop the program. Why? To free resources, your program was mistaken as a virus, hardware is shutting down, the user manually closed it, etc.
An InterruptedException is thrown in the Thread
For example you're connected to the internet and you're reading something and the internet disconnects suddenly.
interrupt() is called
As already mentioned, an InterruptedException is also thrown, when you call the interrupt() on any Thread (quite logical).
How to handle it?
You can/should handle it like every other exception. Wrap it in a try and catch, declare that the method throws it, log it, etc.
This may be the best resource for you: Handling InterruptedException in Java.
From the docs: https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/lang/InterruptedException.html
public class InterruptedException extends Exception
Thrown when a thread is waiting, sleeping, or otherwise occupied, and the thread is
interrupted, either before or during the activity. Occasionally a
method may wish to test whether the current thread has been
interrupted, and if so, to immediately throw this exception. The
following code can be used to achieve this effect:
if (Thread.interrupted()) // Clears interrupted status!
throw new InterruptedException();
You can follow oracles tutorial here:
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/essential/concurrency/interrupt.html
The way to fix it is probably to surround the code that causes it with a Try-Catch block and handle the exception. For example (from Oracles tutorial):
for (int i = 0; i < importantInfo.length; i++) {
// Pause for 4 seconds
try {
Thread.sleep(4000);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
// We've been interrupted: no more messages.
return;
}
// Print a message
System.out.println(importantInfo[i]);
}
There are more examples in the above link on how to handle different scenarios.
Shortly, InterruptedException is usually thrown when a thread or some other action is interrupted. It does not matter if the thread was doing something or sleeping, you can programmatically do this by calling interrupt() or other methods on and "occupied" thread, who is for sleeping.

Monitor thread status

So I have this very relevant thread I start when the program starts.
The thread is listening to events coming from a bigger system as the main thread does other stuff.
The thread should never stop working and if it does, it should be recreated and started.
I think I know multiple ways to achieve this, but I'd like to know your opinion on some things :
Am I just striving for nothing? I mean, if I ideally try-catch all the code that can go wrong, will the thread ever betray me for no obvious reason?
What's the best practice to do what I stated? Periodically check the thread health with another thread and a ScheduledExecutor? Implement some kind of observable-observer pattern?
You can create the ExecutorService which is listening to the events via Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor().
In that case You don't have to take a look at the thread if it is healthy, the ExecutorService takes care of that. The SingleThreadExecutor is responsible that only one Task (Runnable or Callable) is running at one time.
If you are checking using normal Java provided methods to view the thread state correctly, you should not have any errors. In the case that a checked exception is thrown or the thread exits for some weird reason, a try-finally block should be sufficient to start a new thread (also ensure it is non-daemon). You could use a while loop with a periodic pause, preferably using a thread scheduling mechanism such as timed wait(...), or timed LockSupport#park(...). You can also sleep the thread as well.
The thread should never stop working and if it does,...
OK, so write it so that it will never stop working.
public void run() {
while (true) {
try {
Message message = receiveNextMessage();
handleMessage(message);
} catch (Exception ex) {
LOGGER.error(ex);
if (somethingTrulyHorribleHasHappened(ex)) {
Runtime.getRuntime().exit(1);
} else {
maybeResetSomethingThatNeedsToBeReset();
}
}
}
}
This is a somewhat pointless and futile exercise. An app-lifetime thread should be debugged and made to not stop. The main thread of your app lasts for the process lifetime and any other threads should be designed, tested and debugged to the same standard.
What would happen if the thread that stopped had corrupted data in other threads when it crashed? If you just restarted it somehow, the data corruption may well make the situation worse.

Killing Thread without periodically checking alive status

I am runnning ExecutorService to perform a heavy computation, however I don't want to pollute the algorithmic class/method code with runner operations, in this case I'd like to do periodical check if it should be terminated gracefully.
I tried to search for solutions, still with no success, what I concluded is that this is not possible because only the thread itself is allowed to "autokill himself".
So my question is, if there is any way to terminate the thread "outside" of the thread by invoking some forcefull atempt to kill the thread.
If not maybe the best solution is to use aspect and intercept each iteration by adding a kill status check ?
You can call thread.interrupt(). This can cause thread to exit if it "respects" interruptions. For example if thread is blocked on IO or on wait() or on sleep() InterruptedExcption will be thrown. However if it is "blocked" on busy loop that does not check isInterrupted() flag interruption will not work.
Other way to indeed kill the thread is to call deprecated method stop(). However this is the last possibility. This method is deprecated because it indeed kills threads immediately (like kill -9) that can cause resource leaks.
Bottom line: to be able to stop threads grecefully you have to write code that is ready for this and the standard solution is to respect thread interrupts.
There sure is a way to forcefully terminate a thread: Thread#stop, but it is almost never advisable. Your idea with aspects seems quite fruitful, but if you have any sort of a main loop in your task, then consider replacing the loop with a series of submitted tasks where each task is one iteration. This will allow ExecutorService#shutdown to interrupt the processing. All state can be carried along in the instance of Runnable that is being submitted.
I haven't used the ExecutorService much. But reading the JavaDocs it appears that you submit a callable or runnable to the service. Those methods return a Future object which have a cancel method on it.
cancel(boolean mayInterruptIfRunning)
Have you tried using that?
The method thread.interrupt() stop the thread and you can call it outside the thread itself!
If you do not want to change the original implementation, you could wrap the thread. I'm not very familar with Java, so I'm sorry for the obviously not compiling example:
class ThreadWrapper extends Thread {
public ThreadWrapper(Thread t, TerminateCallback c) {
// ...
}
#Override
public void run() {
t.start(Thread.SYNCHRONOUS);
c.done(this);
}
}
You'd need to implement TerminateCallback yourself. I also assume there is a way to start a thread synchronously, Thread.SYNCHRONOUS is just a place holder. If this condition is fulfilled, I'm sure you can transfer it into valid code. :)

How do I make a thread wait until a file is created?

I need a thread to wait until a file is exist or created.
I have the following code so far:
while(!receivedDataFile.isFileExists("receiveddata.txt"))
{
try {
Thead.sleep(1000);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
return null;
}
}
When I run it, the following exception appears, and the thread ends:
java.lang.InterruptedException: sleep interrupted
A thread is interrupted when it is blocking (the call to sleep) and another thread calls its interrupt method. The call to interrupt must be made explicitly for this to happen.
Seems that repeating the check for the file would be the logical thing to do if the thread is interrupted, but without knowing the cause of the interruption it's hard to say.
As usual, when it comes to threading, Brian Goetz has something to say on the matter of InterruptedException:
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-jtp05236.html
I must agree Bombes comment: threads don't get interrupted on their own. Contrary to Jokis comment - they're not interrupted when a thread context swap takes place either (in fact, if a thread sleeps, it will surrender it's quantum to any thread that has work to do, but I digress).
Furthermore, I would advise an alternative means of communication than polling for files. You cannot be certain, for example, that once you have spotted a file, that it has been completely written without extra work from the file-writer (such as renaming it when ready, or creating a 'ready' file).
Consider using something more 'data push' such as RMI, HTTP-POST, JMS queues, etc.
You should find out which thread interrupts that thread. Threads don’t do that on their own.
If all you want is a notification when a file is created, AND you can (and willing) to go native (JNI) AND you want only win32 support, you could use the code here.
Well, if you don't know what InterruptedException is and/or don't want to do anything about it, obviously you should at least do something besides returning and exiting your loop. Take out the return, and then you'll keep waiting.
But I'd check into why you're getting interrupted. Something is trying to cancel your thread.

What kind of behaviour causes an interrupted exception?

I'm relatively new to Threading in Java and I've noticed that everytime I use Thread.sleep() I have to catch InterrupetdException.
What kind of behaviour causes this, and in simple applications where I have a monitor thread can I just Ignore the exception?
It happens when something calls interrupt() on the thread. This article by Brian Goetz explains the interruption mechanism and how you should handle InterruptedExceptions:
"The most common response to InterruptedException is to swallow it -- catch it and do nothing (or perhaps log it, which isn't any better) -- as we'll see later in Listing 4. Unfortunately, this approach throws away important information about the fact that an interrupt occurred, which could compromise the application's ability to cancel activities or shut down in a timely manner."
"If you catch InterruptedException but cannot rethrow it, you should preserve evidence that the interruption occurred [...]. This task is accomplished by calling interrupt() to "reinterrupt" the current thread."
As others have said, it is caused by some other thread calling interrupt() on the Thread object that is sleeping.
What this means in plain english, is that some other thread has decided to cancel the sleeping thread. The try/catch block is there so you can gracefully handle the cancellation of the thread, and safely clean up any resources, or shut down whatever operation it was doing correctly.
If you don't actually need to do any of that, then yes, you still need an empty catch block. But that's Java for you...​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​
Some advices from Java Concurrency in Practice:
Propagate the exception (possibly after some task-specific cleanup), making your method an interruptible blocking method, too; or
Restore the interruption status so that code higher up on the call stack can deal with it.
Only code that implements a thread's interruption policy may swallow an interruption request. General-purpose task and library code should never swallow interruption requests.
The primary case is when someone calls Thread.interrupt() on your thread.
It may be safer to throw a RuntimeException if it happens when you're really not expecting it, but for very simple cases you can probably ignore it.
From the javadocs:
Class InterruptedException
Thrown when a thread is waiting,
sleeping, or otherwise paused for a
long time and another thread
interrupts it using the interrupt
method in class Thread.
Hope that answers your question.
Well if some other Thread calls thread.interupt(), while the thread is sleeping, you'll get the Exception. And yes, you can probably just put try..catch arround the sleep() and ignore it ;)
InterruptedException is a checked exception so unfortunately you cannot just ignore it. In most simple cases you do not have to do anything in the catch clause because you are sure that it will not happen.
From the API
Thrown when a thread is waiting, sleeping, or otherwise paused for a long time and another thread interrupts it using the interrupt method in class Thread.

Categories

Resources