This program is supposed to print out the number of times each number has been generated of 100 random numbers in the scale of 1 to 10 (then put it in the array).
I can't think of any other way than to have an if-statement for each number.
Is there any way to avoid so many if statements by another code or something?
public static void countNumbers() {
Random generator = new Random();
int arr[] = new int[101];
int add[] = new int[10];
for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
int sum = 0;
arr[i] = generator.nextInt(10)+1;
if(arr[i] ==1){
add[0]++;
}
if(arr[i] ==2){
add[1]++;
}
if(arr[i] ==3){
add[2]++;
}
if(arr[i] ==4){
add[3]++;
}
if(arr[i] ==5){
add[4]++;
}
if(arr[i] ==6){
add[5]++;
}
if(arr[i] ==7){
add[6]++;
}
if(arr[i] ==8){
add[7]++;
}
if(arr[i] ==9){
add[8]++;
}
if(arr[i] ==10){
add[9]++;
}
}
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(add));
System.out.println();
}
You should note that all your if statements have a similar structure :
if(arr[i] ==x){
add[x-1]++;
}
Therefore they can be replaced by add[arr[i]-1]++;.
You only need a single if statement to validate that you don't get out of the bounds of the add array :
if (arr[i] <= 10 && arr[i] >= 1) {
add[arr[i]-1]++;
}
EDIT :
As assylias commented, you don't really need the if statement, since you initialize your arr array to values between 1 and 10.
Yes.
If you notice, you have a repeating pattern:
if(arr[i] == 1){
add[0]++;
}
Then you can replace it with the next one:
add[arr[i] - 1]++;
And the resulting for will look alike:
for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
arr[i] = generator.nextInt(10) + 1;
add[arr[i] - 1]++;
}
Your whole method can be replaced by:
public static void countNumbers() {
Random generator = new Random();
int add[] = new int[10];
for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
add[generator.nextInt(10)]++;
}
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(add));
System.out.println();
}
The other variables (such as the arr array) are not used at the moment so I suggest getting rid of them until you actually need them.
I think it is good to re-use the size of you add[] this way you can keep your code more flexible.
int add[] = new int[10];
for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
int index = generator.nextInt(add.length);
arr[index]++;
}
Related
I can't wrap my head around this. Need to find duplicates and I did. All now that is left is to print how many times a duplicate appears in the array. I just started with Java,so this needs to be hard coded for me to understand. Spend last two days trying to figure it out but with no luck.. Any help will be great! Talk is cheap,here is the code..
import java.util.Arrays;
public class LoopTest {
public static void main(String[] args) {
int[] array = {12,23,-22,0,43,545,-4,-55,43,12,0,-999,-87};
int positive_counter = 0;
int negative_counter = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
if(array[i] > 0) {
positive_counter++;
} else if(array[i] < 0) {
negative_counter++;
}
}
int[] positive_array = new int[positive_counter];
int[] negative_array = new int[negative_counter];
positive_counter = 0;
negative_counter = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
if(array[i] > 0) {
positive_array[positive_counter++] = array[i];
} else if(array[i] < 0) {
negative_array[negative_counter++] = array[i];
}
}
System.out.println("Positive array: " + (Arrays.toString(positive_array)));
System.out.println("Negative array: " + (Arrays.toString(negative_array)));
Arrays.sort(array);
System.out.println("Array duplicates: ");
for (int i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
for (int j = i + 1; j < array.length; j++) {
if(array[i] == array[j]) {
System.out.println(array[j]);
}
}
}
}
}
Since you are already sorting the array you can find the duplicates with just one loop (they will be next to each other right?). So you can do something like:
Arrays.sort(array);
System.out.println("Array duplicates: ");
int lastValueCount=1; //How many times we met the current value (at least 1 - this time)
for (int i = 1; i < array.length; i++){
if(array[i] == array[i-1])
lastValueCount++; //If it is the same as the previous increase the count
else {
if(lastValueCount>1) //If it is duplicate print it
System.out.println(array[i-1]+" was found "+lastValueCount+" times");
lastValueCount=1; //reset the counter
}
}
Result for your array is:
Array duplicates:
0 was found 2 times
12 was found 2 times
43 was found 2 times
Also you can use some of the Java bells and whistles like inserting the values into Map or something like that but I guess you are looking from an algorithmic point of view so the above is the simple answer with just one loop
Just go through your solution, first you separate positive and negative numbers in two different arrays, then you never use them, so what's the purpose of this separation ?
I am giving you just an idea related to your problem, it's better to solve it by your self so that you can get hands on Java.
Solution: you can use Dictionary-key value pair. Go through your array, put element in dictionary as a key and value as zero, on every iteration check if that key already exist in Dictionary, just increment its value. In the end, all of the values are duplicates that occurs in your array.
Hope it helps you.
From the algorithmic point of view, Veselin Davidov's answer is good (the most efficient).
In a production code, you would rather write it like this :
Map<Integer, Long> result =
Arrays.stream(array)
.boxed() //converts IntStream to Stream<Int>
.collect(Collectors.groupingBy(i -> i, Collectors.counting()));
The result is this Map :
System.out.println(result);
{0=2, 545=1, -4=1, -22=1, -87=1, -999=1, -55=1, 23=1, 43=2, 12=2}
An easy way would be using Maps. Without changing code too much:
for (int i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
int count = 0;
for (int j = i + 1; j < array.length; j++) {
if(array[i] == array[j]) {
System.out.println(array[j]);
count++;
}
}
map.put(array[i], count);
}
Docs:
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/util/Map.html
Edit: As a recommendation, after you are done with the example, you should analize your code and find what isnĀ“t neccesary, what could be done better, etc.
Are all your auxiliary arrays neccesary? Are all loops necessary?
You can do it by creating an array list for duplicate values:-
Arrays.sort(array);
System.out.println("Array duplicates: ");
ArrayList<Integer> duplicates = new ArrayList<Integer>();
for (int i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
for (int j = 0; j < array.length; j++) {
if(j != i && array[i] == array[j] && !duplicates.contains(array[i])){
duplicates.add(array[i]);
System.Out.println(duplicates[duplicates.size()-1]);
}
}
}
public static void findDuplicate(String s){
char[] charArray=s.toCharArray();
ArrayList<Character> duplicateList = new ArrayList<>();
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(charArray));
for(int i=0 ; i<=charArray.length-1; i++){
if(duplicateList.contains(charArray[i]))
continue;
for(int j=0 ; j<=charArray.length-1; j++){
if(i==j)
continue;
if(charArray[i] == charArray[j]){
duplicateList.add(charArray[j]);
System.out.println("Dupliate at "+i+" and "+j);
}
}
}
}
I'm doing the old Lotto exercise and I need to specifically use an Array[] of integers and not an ArrayList. I have what I thought would work, but I seem to be wrong. I looked for posts similar to these and all of them involved an ArrayList<>. Here is a partition of my code.
Integer[] lottoNums;
lottoNums = new Integer[7];
for(int i = 0; i < lottoNums.length; i++){
lottoNums[i] = randomNums.nextInt((59)+1);
if(i <= 5) {
if(lottoNums[i].equals(lottoNums[i+1])){
if(lottoNums[i] < 58 && lottoNums[i] > 1)
lottoNums[i] = lottoNums[i] +1;
}
}
else if(i >= 1) {
if(lottoNums[i].equals(lottoNums[i-1])){
if(lottoNums[i] < 58 && lottoNums[i] > 1)
lottoNums[i] = lottoNums[i] +1;
}
}
}
Arrays.sort(lottoNums);
System.out.print("Winning numbers: "+lottoNums[0]);
for (int i = 1; i < 6; i++) {
System.out.print(", " + lottoNums[i]);
}
System.out.print(System.getProperty("line.separator"));
System.out.println("Bonus Number: "+lottoNums[6]);
I need to get it to generate a number in between 1 and 59 and not duplicate. I was trying to pair it up with the value stored in the element before and after it (if it had one) and if it was equal to it, it would add 1 to it. I run it a few times and every once in a while im still getting duplicate numbers. How can i do this efficiently, using Arrays[] of integers ONLY?
EDIT:
Initialized array to remove NullPointerException.
Updated Code:
for(int i = 0; i < lottoNums.length; i++){
lottoNums[i] = randomNums.nextInt((59)+1);
}
for (int i = 0; i < 6; i++) {
int rnd = randomNums.nextInt((lottoNums).length-i);
int k = lottoNums[lottoNums.length-i-1];
lottoNums[lottoNums.length-i-1] = lottoNums[rnd];
lottoNums[rnd] = k;
}
Arrays.sort(lottoNums);
System.out.print("Winning numbers: "+lottoNums[0]);
//PRINTING LOTTO NUMBERS
for (int i = 1; i < 6; i++) {
System.out.print(", " + lottoNums[i]);
}
System.out.print(System.getProperty("line.separator"));
System.out.println("Bonus Number: "+lottoNums[6]);
You can do this by switching the selected number with the last number in the array each time, and then selecting the next from the prefix you have not yet stored:
for (int i = 0; i < 6; i++) {
int rnd = randomNums.nextInt(numbers.length-i);
int k = numbers[numbers.length-i-1];
numbers[numbers.length-i-1] = numbers[rnd];
numbers[rnd] = k;
}
At the end of this loop your selected numbers will be in numbers[numbers.length-7..numbers.length-1], etc.
I would use two arrays. Each time you draw a number see if it exists in the second array. If not use it and add it to the second array.
i have an array of integers like this one :
A={1,1,4,4,4,1,1}
i want to count the each number once , for this example the awnser is 2 becuase i want to count 1 once and 4 once
i dont want to use sorting methods
i am unable to find a way to solve it using java.
i did this but it gives me 0
public static void main(String args[]) {
int a[] = { 1,1,4,4,4,4,1,1};
System.out.print(new Test4().uniques(a));
}
public int uniques(int[] a) {
int unique = 0;
int tempcount = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < a.length; i++) {
for (int j = 0; j < a.length; j++) {
if (a[i] == a[j]) {
tempcount++;
}
}
if (tempcount <= 2) {
unique=a[i];
}
tempcount = 0;
}
return unique;
}
the purpose of the question is to understand the logic of it but not solving it using ready methods or classes
This one should work. I guess this might be not the most elegant way, but it is pretty straightforward and uses only simple arrays. Method returns number of digits from array, but without counting duplicates - and this I believe is your goal.
public int uniques(int[] a) {
int tempArray[] = new int[a.length];
boolean duplicate = false;
int index = 0;
int digitsAdded = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < a.length; i++) {
for (int j = 0; j < tempArray.length; j++) {
if (a[i] == tempArray[j]) {
duplicate = true;
}
}
if(!duplicate) {
tempArray[index] = a[i];
index++;
digitsAdded++;
}
duplicate = false;
}
//this loop is needed if you have '0' in your input array - when creating temp
//array it is filled with 0s and then any 0 in input is treated as a duplicate
//again - not most elegant solution, maybe I will find better later...
for(int i = 0; i < a.length; i++) {
if(a[i] == 0) {
digitsAdded++;
break;
}
}
return digitsAdded;
}
Okay first of all in your solution you are returning the int unique, that you are setting as the value that is unique a[i]. So it would only return 1 or 4 in your example.
Next, about an actual solution. You need to check if you have already seen that number. What you need to check is that for every number in the array is only appears in front of your position and not before. You can do this using this code below.
public int uniques(int[] a) {
int unique = 1;
boolean seen = false;
for (int i = 1; i < a.length; i++) {
for (int j = 0; j < i; j++) {
if (a[i] == a[j]) {
seen = true;
}
}
if (!seen) {
unique++;
}
seen = false;
}
return unique;
}
In this code you are iterating over the number you have seen and comparing to the number you are checking (a[i]). You know that for it to be unique you cant have seen it before.
I see two possible solutions:
using set
public int unique(int[] a) {
Set<Integer> set = new HashSet<>();
for (int i : a) {
set.add(i);
}
return set.size();
}
using quick sort
public int unique(int[] a) {
Arrays.sort(a);
int cnt = 1;
int example = a[0];
for (int i = 1; i < a.length; i++) {
if (example != a[i]) {
cnt++;
example = a[i];
}
}
return cnt;
}
My performance tests say that second solution is faster ~ 30%.
if restricted to only arrays, consider trying this:
Lets Take a temporary array of the same size of orignal array, where we store each unique letter and suppose a is your orignal array,
int[] tempArray= new int[a.length];
int tempArraycounter = 0;
bool isUnique = true;
for (int i = 0; i < a.length; i++)
{
isUnique = true;
for (int j = 0; j < tempArray.length; j++)
{
if(tempArray[j] == a[i])
isUnique = false;
}
if(isUnique)
{
tempArray[tempArraycounter] = a[i];
tempArraycounter++;
isUnique = false;
}
}
now tempArraycounter will be your answer ;)
Try Following code:
int test[]={1,1,4,4,4,1,1};
Set<Integer> set=new LinkedHashSet<Integer>();
for(int i=0;i<test.length;i++){
set.add(test[i]);
}
System.out.println(set);
Output :
[1, 4]
At the end set would contain unique integers.
This question already has answers here:
How to get unique values from array
(13 answers)
Closed 8 years ago.
void RemoveDups(){
int f=0;
for(int i=1;i<nelems;i++){
if(arr[f]==arr[i]){
for(int k=i;k<nelems;k++)
{
arr[k]=arr[k+1];
}
nelems--;
}
if(i==(nelems+1)){
f++;
i=f+1; //increment again
}
}
}
This is the logic i have written to remove duplicate elements from an array ,but this is not working at all ?what changes i should make to make it work? or you people have better logic for doing the same considering time complexity.and i don't want to use built-in methods to achieve this.
int end = input.length;
for (int i = 0; i < end; i++) {
for (int j = i + 1; j < end; j++) {
if (input[i] == input[j]) {
int shiftLeft = j;
for (int k = j + 1; k < end; k++, shiftLeft++) {
input[shiftLeft] = input[k];
}
end--;
j--;
}
}
}
I think you can use Set Collection
copy all the values to an HashSet and then using Iterator access the Values
Set<Integer> hashset= new HashSet<Integer>();
You have two options, C# has the Distinct() Linq expression that will do this for you (Missed the Java tag), however if you need to remove items, have you thought about sorting the list first, then comparing the current item to the previous item and if they're the same, remove them. It would mean your diplicate detection is only ever running through the array once.
If you're worried about sort you could easily implement an efficient bubble sort or somthing to that effect
You never decrease i after You compared for examlpe arr[0] to arr[5], You never will test arr[1] == arr[2]
You need to start a new loop (i) after You've incremented f.
try
for(int f=0;f<nelems-1;f++)
{
for(int i=f+1;i<nelems;i++)
{
...
}
}
with this nested for loop you can compare every two element of the array.
a good start is to eliminate duplicate elements without shrinking the array which is done lastly:
public class run2 extends Thread {
public static void main(String[] args) {
int arr[] = { 1, 2, 2, 3, 5, 6, 5, 5, 6, 7 };
for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
for (int j = i + 1; j < arr.length; j++) {
if (arr[j] == -1)
j++;
if (arr[i] == arr[j])
arr[j] = -1;
}
}
for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
System.out.print(arr[i] + ",");
}
System.out.println();
for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
if (arr[i] == -1) {
for (int j = i; j < arr.length; j++) {
if (arr[j] != -1) {
arr[i] = arr[j];
arr[j] = -1;
break;
}
}
}
}
for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
System.out.print(arr[i] + ",");
}
}
}
Adapt this code :
public static int[] removeDuplicates(int[] numbersWithDuplicates) {
// Sorting array to bring duplicates together
Arrays.sort(numbersWithDuplicates);
int[] result = new int[numbersWithDuplicates.length];
int previous = numbersWithDuplicates[0];
result[0] = previous;
for (int i = 1; i < numbersWithDuplicates.length; i++) {
int ch = numbersWithDuplicates[i];
if (previous != ch) {
result[i] = ch;
}
previous = ch;
}
return result;
}
As far as I understood from your code,you are comparing each value starting from index 0 to the rest of the element and when you see the element which is located at index f your are trying to shift the entire array and decrementing the size of array(nelems).Look at line no. 11
if(i==(nelems+1)){
f++;
i=f+1;
The problem is when i is set to f+1,i will again be incremented in the for loop for the next iteration.So basically i starts comparing from f+2.And also you are comparing i with (nelems+1) considering the case when nelems decremented but you are not considering the case when i reaches the end without decreasing nelems in that case i will never be equale to (nelems+1).Now considering your logic you could do 2 things.
1.Here is your working code.
for(int i=1;i<nelems;i++){
if(arr[f]==arr[i]){
for(int k=i+1;k<nelems;k++)
{
arr[k-1]=arr[k];
}
if(i==(nelems-1)){
f++;
i=f;
}
nelems--;
}
if(i==(nelems-1)){//end of the loop
f++;
i=f; //increment again
}
}
2.You could use an outer for loop alternatively that will increment the f value once the inner for is completed.
void RemoveDups(){
for(int f=0;f<nelems;++f){
for(int i=1;i<nelems;i++){
if(arr[f]==arr[i]){
for(int k=i;k<nelems;k++)
arr[k]=arr[k+1];
nelems--;
}
}
}
}
Now your problem is solved but the time complexity of your code will be(O(N^3)).
Now instead of shifting the entire array at line 4,you could just swap the arr[f] with last element.
if(arr[f]==arr[i]){
swap(arr[f],arr[nelems-1]);
nelems--;
}
it will reduce the time complexity from O(N^3) to O(N^2).
Now I'll suggest you my method
1.just sort the array.It will be done in O(NlogN).
2.now using one for loop you can get what do you wanted.
void RemoveDups(){
int k=0,i;
for(i=1;i<nelems;++i){
while(arr[i]==arr[i-1])
++i;
arr[k++]=arr[i-1];
}
arr[k++]=arr[i-1];
}
Now basically you got an array of size k,which contains non repeated element in sorted order and the time complexity of my solution is O(NlogN).
I have to create a program that takes an array of both even and odd numbers and puts all the even numbers into one array and all the odd numbers into another. I used a for loop to cycle through all the numbers and determine if they are even or odd, but the problem I'm having is that since the numbers in the original array are random, I don't know the size of either the even or the odd array and therefore can't figure out how to assign numbers in the original array to the even/odd arrays without having a bunch of spots left over, or not having enough spots for all the numbers. Any ideas?
Try using an ArrayList. You can use
num % 2 == 0
to see if num is even or odd. If it does == 0 then it is even, else it is odd.
List<Integer> odds = new ArrayList();
List<Integer> evens = new ArrayList();
for (int i = 0; i< array.length; i++) {
if (array[i] % 2 == 0) {
evens.add(array[i]);
}
else {
odds.add(array[i]);
}
}
to convert the ArrayLists back to arrays you can do
int[] evn = evens.toArray(new Integer[evens.size()]);
(Note: untested code so there could be a few typos)
EDIT:
If you are not allowed to use ArrayLists then consider the following that just uses Arrays. It's not as efficient as it has to do two passes of the original array
int oddSize = 0;
int evenSize = 0;
for (int i = 0; i< array.length; i++) {
if (array[i] % 2 == 0) {
evenSize++;
}
else {
oddSize++;
}
}
Integer[] oddArray = new Integer[oddSize];
Integer[] evenArray = new Integer[evenSize];
int evenIdx = 0;
int oddIdx = 0;
for (int i = 0; i< array.length; i++) {
if (array[i] % 2 == 0) {
evenArray[evenIdx++] = array[i];
}
else {
oddArray[oddIdx++] = array[i];
}
}
You can do it without using arrays or any '%' Just a simple idea
input = new Scanner(System.in);
int x;
int y = 0; // Setting Y for 0 so when you add 2 to it always gives even
// numbers
int i = 1; // Setting X for 1 so when you add 2 to it always gives odd
// numbers
// So for example 0+2=2 / 2+2=4 / 4+2=6 etc..
System.out.print("Please input a number: ");
x = input.nextInt();
for (;;) { // infinite loop so it keeps on adding 2 until the number you
// input is = to one of y or i
if (x == y) {
System.out.print("The number is even ");
System.exit(0);
}
if (x == i) {
System.out.print("The number is odd ");
System.exit(0);
}
if (x < 0) {
System.out.print("Invald value");
System.exit(0);
}
y = y + 2;
i = i + 2;
}
}
Use a List instead. Then you don't need to declare the sizes in advance, they can grow dynamically.
You can always use the toArray() method on the List afterwards if you really need an array.
The above answers are correct and describe how people would normally implement this. But the description of your problem makes me think this is a class assignment of sorts where dynamic lists are probably unwelcome.
So here's an alternative.
Sort the array to be divided into two parts - of odd and of even numbers. Then count how many odd/even numbers there are and copy the values into two arrays.
Something like this:
static void insertionSort(final int[] arr) {
int i, j, newValue;
int oddity;
for (i = 1; i < arr.length; i++) {
newValue = arr[i];
j = i;
oddity = newValue % 2;
while (j > 0 && arr[j - 1] % 2 > oddity) {
arr[j] = arr[j - 1];
j--;
}
arr[j] = newValue;
}
}
public static void main(final String[] args) {
final int[] numbers = { 1, 3, 5, 2, 2 };
insertionSort(numbers);
int i = 0;
for (; i < numbers.length; i++) {
if (numbers[i] % 2 != 0) {
i--;
break;
}
}
final int[] evens = new int[i + 1];
final int[] odds = new int[numbers.length - i - 1];
if (evens.length != 0) {
System.arraycopy(numbers, 0, evens, 0, evens.length);
}
if (odds.length != 0) {
System.arraycopy(numbers, i + 1, odds, 0, odds.length);
}
for (int j = 0; j < evens.length; j++) {
System.out.print(evens[j]);
System.out.print(" ");
}
System.out.println();
for (int j = 0; j < odds.length; j++) {
System.out.print(odds[j]);
System.out.print(" ");
}
}
Iterate through your source array twice. The first time through, count the number of odd and even values. From that, you'll know the size of the two destination arrays. Create them, and take a second pass through your source array, this time copying each value to its appropriate destination array.
I imagine two possibilities, if you can't use Lists, you can iterate twice to count the number of even and odd numbers and then build two arrays with that sizes and iterate again to distribute numbers in each array, but thissolution is slow and ugly.
I imagine another solution, using only one array, the same array that contains all the numbers. You can sort the array, for example set even numbers in the left side and odd numbers in the right side. Then you have one index with the position in the array with the separation ofthese two parts. In the same array, you have two subarrays with the numbers. Use a efficient sort algorithm of course.
Use following Code :
public class ArrayComparing {
Scanner console= new Scanner(System.in);
String[] names;
String[] temp;
int[] grade;
public static void main(String[] args) {
new ArrayComparing().getUserData();
}
private void getUserData() {
names = new String[3];
for(int i = 0; i < names.length; i++) {
System.out.print("Please Enter Student name: ");
names[i] =console.nextLine();
temp[i] = names[i];
}
grade = new int[3];
for(int i =0;i<grade.length;i++) {
System.out.print("Please Enter Student marks: ");
grade[i] =console.nextInt();
}
sortArray(names);
}
private void sortArray(String[] arrayToSort) {
Arrays.sort(arrayToSort);
getIndex(arrayToSort);
}
private void getIndex(String[] sortedArray) {
for(int x = 0; x < sortedArray.length; x++) {
for(int y = 0; y < names.length; y++) {
if(sortedArray[x].equals(temp[y])) {
System.out.println(sortedArray[x] + " " + grade[y]);
}
}
}
}
}