Develop Reference

Deserialize JSON object from MongoDB to Java object on GET request

I have some nested classes in Java, simplified here. Getters and setters exist.
Example
public class Planet {
#JsonProperty("name")
private String name;
#JsonProperty("moons")
private List<Moon> moons;
}
public class Moon {
#JsonProperty("moonname")
private String name;
#JsonProperty("craters")
private int craters;
}
I want to be able to deserialize the records on mongo (following this same structure) to java objects on the rest controller, specifically the HTTP GET request.
#RestController
#RequestMapping("/planets")
public class PlanetController {
#Autowired
private PlanetService planetService;
#RequestMapping("/")
public List<Planet> getAllPlanets() {
//Need to deserialize here
return planetService.getAll();
}
#RequestMapping("/{name}")
public Planet getItemsWithName(#PathVariable("name") String name) {
//deserialize here
return planetService.getEntryWithName(name.toLowerCase());
}
PlanetService.getAll() is expecting return type of List. getEntryWithName() is expecting return type of Planet.
How can I loop the results in the getAll() so I can deserialize them before they are returned?
Using Jackson's object mapper, I can do the serialization of a Java object to a JSON object.
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
try {
mapper.writeValue(new File("target/mars.json"), mars);
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
I can probably use readValue for the opposite process but I don't know how to loop the results.
I will appreciate the help. Let me know if something is not clear.

public List<Planet> getAllPlanets() {
List<Planet> planets = planetService.getAll();
String jsonString = new ObjectMapper().writeValueAsString(planets);
return planets;
}

deserialize Json into POJO

I am trying to convert the following JSON structure (part of a larger JSON object) to a POJO but getting the exception copied below (using Java/Jackson).
JSON
"outputKeys":
{"ABC":"gGyIioUr4Jfr5QiCm6Z==",
"DEF":"RxHfNyD2JyPOpG5tv3Jaj5g=="}
Java class
private class OutputKeys {
private String key;
private String value;
public OutputKeys(String key, String value) {
this.key = key;
this.value = value;
}
}
&
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.readValue(jsonString, Test.class);
exception:
no suitable constructor found, can not deserialize from Object value (missing default constructor or creator, or perhaps need to add/enable type information?
Test class has the OutputKeys as an attribute.
Any suggestions would be welcome. I have tried using a List of OutputKeys as well .
Update:
I have tried the following without success:
class OutputKeys {
public Map<String, String> keys;
///with constructor/setter/getters
}
&
class OutputKeys {
public List<OutputKey> keys;
///with constructor/setter/getters
public class OutputKey {
Map<String, String> outputs = new HashMap<>();
// tried this too:
// String key
//String value
}

You require below mentioned single class only, containing
All keys(ABC and DEF)
getters/setters
toString() which you'll use interact with JSON.
public class OutputKeys
{
private String ABC;
private String DEF;
public String getABC ()
{
return ABC;
}
public void setABC (String ABC)
{
this.ABC = ABC;
}
public String getDEF ()
{
return DEF;
}
public void setDEF (String DEF)
{
this.DEF = DEF;
}
#Override
public String toString()
{
return "ClassPojo [ABC = "+ABC+", DEF = "+DEF+"]";
}
}
Let me know if you require more details.

Since the keys were dynamic, I ended up deserializing the data using the iterator on the JsonNode:
jsonNode.get("outputKeys").iterator()
& then getting the relevant dynamic key information via the iterator.

I needed a similar tool for NodeJS. So that I can write tests on parts of a bigger model that was serialized (JSON).
So, if I need only "ABC":"gGyIioUr4Jfr5QiCm6Z==" or "XYZ":{"Hello": "My String", "Content": [1,2,3]}, the only property I care to test at the moment is:
var sutXYX = { Hello: "My String", Content: [ 1, 2, 2]};
I wrote this tool as a utility https://github.com/whindes/PojoScriptifyFromJSON

Usage of abstract class in the builder pattern?

I have two types of payload coming from upstream: It's either PayloadA or PayloadB. There are some common fields between PayloadA and PayloadB so I created Payload class with those common fields and for rest I created two builder class one for each payload.
Below is the builder class for PayloadA:
public final class PayloadA {
private final String clientId;
private final String langid;
private final String deviceId;
private final Map<String, String> applicationPayload;
private PayloadA(Builder builder) {
this.clientId = builder.clientId;
this.langid = builder.langid;
this.deviceId = builder.deviceId;
this.applicationPayload = builder.applicationPayload.build();
}
public static class Builder {
protected final String deviceId;
protected String clientId;
protected String langid;
protected ImmutableMap.Builder<String, String> applicationPayload = ImmutableMap.builder();
public Builder(String deviceId) {
this.deviceId = deviceId;
}
public Builder setClientId(String clientId) {
this.clientId = clientId;
return this;
}
public Builder setLangid(String langid) {
this.langid = langid;
return this;
}
public Builder setPayload(Map<String, String> payload) {
this.applicationPayload.putAll(payload);
return this;
}
public PayloadA build() {
return new PayloadA(this);
}
}
// getters and to string here
}
Now below is the class for PayloadB:
public final class PayloadB {
private final String clientid;
private final String type;
private final String payId;
private PayloadB(Builder builder) {
this.clientid = builder.clientid;
this.type = builder.type;
this.payId = builder.payId;
}
public static class Builder {
protected final String type;
protected String payId;
protected String clientid;
public Builder(String type) {
this.type = type;
}
public Builder setPayId(String payId) {
this.payId = payId;
return this;
}
public Builder setClientId(String clientid) {
this.clientid = clientid;
return this;
}
public PayloadB build() {
return new PayloadB(this);
}
}
// getters and to string here
}
Now I have created another class which is Payload class (does this have to be abstract class?) in which I have all the common fields both for PayloadA and PayloadB so I have to set these fields as well somehow and I am not sure how to use below class:
public abstract class Payload {
private long createTimestamp;
private String partition;
private String key;
// some other fields here
// getters and setters here
}
Question:
Now let's say if we get PayloadB from upstream, then I want key field in the Payload class to be whatever is the value of type in PayloadB class in all lower case and if we get PayloadA from upstream, then I want key to be world.
And also if we get PayloadB from upstream and if clientId was set, then I want partition to be 15 and if we get PayloadA from upstream and if clientId was set then I want partition to be 15 but if it was not set and langId was there, then I want partition to be 17.
And I want to set createTimestamp as well which I have to do after building a Payload object. So for example I have build PayloadA object and it will be passed to some other class and there I need to set createTimestamp value on PayloadA object. Not sure how to do that as well? Do I have to clone something?
How can I use Payload class in my builder pattern? I will get two different payloads and there will be few things common in them so common fields I have separated them out in an abstract class.
Should I have on big builder pattern class with everything in it or multiple builder pattern extending something?

I won't pass builder instance to the PayloadX constructor. Either pass values as individual constructor arguments or call setters.
You can define Payload.Builder which would hold common fields of PayloadA and PayloadB. This class will be an abstract class declaring an abstract build method.
PayloadA.Builder and PayloadB.Builder will extend Payload.Builder, implementing the build method.
In this build method you implement whatever custom logic you need to create and set the fields of the PayloadX.
It seems like you want to make your class immutable (careful with applicationPayload by the way). In this case you can't really "set" anything. You can only produce a new instance. There are many ways to do this, for instance you can implement PayloadX withTimestamp(...) method. Or you can extend your build to accept PayloadX and set timestamp there, resulting in something like new PayloadX.Builder(payloadXInstance).setTimestamp(...).build().

Json Deserialization in Java /w Jackson of mixed types, contained in one array

Consider the following json, getting from an public API:
anyObject : {
attributes: [
{
"name":"anyName",
"value":"anyValue"
},
{
"name":"anyName",
"value":
{
"key":"anyKey",
"label":"anyLabel"
}
}
]
}
As you can see, sometimes the value is a simple string and sometimes its an object. Is it somehow possible to deserialize those kind of json-results, to something like:
class AnyObject {
List<Attribute> attributes;
}
class Attribute {
private String key;
private String label;
}
How would I design my model to cover both cases. Is that possible ?

Despite being hard to manage as others have pointed out, you can do what you want. Add a custom deserializer to handle this situation. I rewrote your beans because I felt your Attribute class was a bit misleading. The AttributeEntry class in the object that is an entry in that "attributes" list. The ValueObject is the class that represents that "key"/"label" object. Those beans are below, but here's the custom deserializer. The idea is to check the type in the JSON, and instantiate the appropriate AttributeEntry based on its "value" type.
public class AttributeDeserializer extends JsonDeserializer<AttributeEntry> {
#Override
public AttributeEntry deserialize(JsonParser p, DeserializationContext ctxt) throws IOException, JsonProcessingException {
JsonNode root = p.readValueAsTree();
String name = root.get("name").asText();
if (root.get("value").isObject()) {
// use your object mapper here, this is just an example
ValueObject attribute = new ObjectMapper().readValue(root.get("value").asText(), ValueObject.class);
return new AttributeEntry(name, attribute);
} else if (root.get("value").isTextual()) {
String stringValue = root.get("value").asText();
return new AttributeEntry(name, stringValue);
} else {
return null; // or whatever
}
}
}
Because of this ambiguous type inconvenience, you will have to do some type checking throughout your code base.
You can then add this custom deserializer to your object mapper like so:
ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
SimpleModule simpleModule = new SimpleModule();
simpleModule.addDeserializer(AttributeEntry.class, new AttributeDeserializer());
objectMapper.registerModule(simpleModule);
Here's the AttributeEntry:
public class AttributeEntry {
private String name;
private Object value;
public AttributeEntry(String name, String value) {
this.name = name;
this.value = value;
}
public AttributeEntry(String name, ValueObject attributes) {
this.name = name;
this.value = attributes;
}
/* getters/setters */
}
Here's the ValueObject:
public class ValueObject {
private String key;
private String label;
/* getters/setters */
}

Deserializing JSON objects as List<type> not working in HTTPHandler

I am facing problem while deserializing to below entity using Javascript Serializer. Please help
JSON String:
{"AccountNo":0,"EmailAddress":"test#gmail.com","Destination_Prefernce":[{"Value":"Test Data"}]}
Java Code
public class EMailPreferenceEntity
{
private int _accountNo;
private string emailAddress;
private DestinationPreferences _destinationPrefernce = new DestinationPreferences();
public int AccountNo
{
get { return _accountNo; }
set { _accountNo = value; }
}
public string EmailAddress
{
get { return emailAddress; }
set { emailAddress = value; }
}
public DestinationPreferences Destination_Prefernce
{
get { return _destinationPrefernce; }
set { _destinationPrefernce = value; }
}
}
Handler File:
public class AjaxHandler : IHttpHandler, IRequiresSessionState
{
public void ProcessRequest (HttpContext context) {
string jsData = context.Request["Data"];
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(jsData))
{
JavaScriptSerializer ser = new JavaScriptSerializer();
EMailPreferenceEntity jsEntity = ser.Deserialize<EMailPreferenceEntity>(jsData);
}
}

Type erasure means your List will just become List after compilation so, when your http request arrives, it will try to deserialize List, and probably won't hit whatever you registered for List.
I'm not sure how your serializer handles it, but in Gson's case, you create a TypeToken out of the generic, so that the connection between type and serializer doesn't get lost after compilation.