Given an array of integers return an array in the same order with all 0's removed.
Sample Input #1
remove({1,2,3,4,5,0,1,2,0,0,2})
Sample Output #1
{1,2,3,4,5,1,2,2}
Sample Input #2
remove({0,0,1,2})
Sample Output #2
{1,2}
Sample Input #3
remove({0,0,0,0})
Sample Output #3
{}
MyApproach
I first counted how many zeros are there and then I created a new array and added only those elements which are not zero.
But I am not getting correct output.
Can anyone guide me what I am doing wrong?
Below is my code for the above program:
public int[] remove(int[] arr)
{
int count=0;
for(int i=0;i<arr.length;i++)
{
if(arr[i]==0)
{
count++;
}
}
int p[]=new int[arr.length-count];
for(int m=0;m<p.length;)
{
if(arr[m]==0)
{
m++;
}
else
{
p[m]=arr[m];
m++;
}
}
return p;
}
Parameters Actual Output Expected Output
'{0,1,2,3,0,1}' {0,1,2,3} {1,2,3,1}
You need two counters, one for where you are copying from and one for where you are copying to.
for (int n = 0, m = 0; m < p.length; m++)
if (arr[m] != 0)
p[n++] = arr[m];
or you can do
int n = 0;
for (int x : arr)
if (x != 0)
p[n++] = x;
In Java 8 you can do
public static int[] removeZero(int[] ints) {
return IntStream.of(ints)
.filter(i -> i != 0)
.toArray();
}
Try to use this for removing zeros in your array:
public int[] remove(int[] array)
{
int j = 0;
for( int i=0; i<array.length; i++ )
{
if (array[i] != 0)
array[j++] = array[i];
}
int [] newArray = new int[j];
System.arraycopy( array, 0, newArray, 0, j );
return newArray;
}
Related
For some reason I have only managed as far as printing the odd numbers, but it somehow still prints what appears to be values that are null. I am trying to only print the values that returned as odd.
public class Odd {
public int[] removeEvens(int [] nums) { //start of method
int [] newArray = new int[nums.length];
int count = 0;
// start of array conversion
for(int i = 0; i < nums.length; i++) {
newArray[count] = nums[i];
count++;
}
int counter = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < nums.length; i++)
if (newArray[i] % 2 == 1)
newArray[counter++] = newArray[i];
for (int i=counter; i < nums.length; i++)
newArray[i] = 0;
return newArray;
}
// end of method
public static void main(String[] args) {
Odd labObject = new Odd();
int [] input = {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9};
int [] result = labObject.removeEvens(input);
// Helper method Arrays.toString() converts int[] to a String
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(result)); // Should print [1, 3, 5, 7, 9]
}
}
change it to return Arrays.copyOfRange(newArray, 0, counter); when you make in array of ints in java with a specified size, it sets every value in the array to 0. Doing this will remove all of the extraneous 0s at the end.
This can be easily solved by working out the correct size of the new array first before you create it. Then simply loop the array and only store the odd numbers. Otherwise, remove/trim the array size before returning it.
Here is a solution by modifying your removeEvens method:
public int[] removeEvens(int[] nums)
{ //start of method
int count = 0;
// start of array conversion
// Count the odd numbers to work out the array length
for (int i = 0; i < nums.length; i++)
{
if (nums[i] % 2 == 1 || nums[i] % 2 == -1)
{
count++;
}
}
// Now create a new array of the correct length
int[] newArray = new int[count];
// Now loop through the original array and only store the odd numbers in the new array
int counter = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < nums.length; i++)
{
if (nums[i] % 2 == 1 || nums[i] % 2 == -1)
{
newArray[counter] = nums[i];
counter ++;
}
}
// Return the result
return newArray;
}
Result:
[1, 3, 5, 7, 9]
I just want to ask why the temp in my method NonZeros does not change its elements even though I explicitly assign each element of temp whenever the source has a nonzero element. Here's my work.
package nonzeros;
public class NonZeros {
public static void main(String[] args) {
int [] B = {0,1,2,3,2};
int [] newone = NonZeros(B);
for(int q = 0; q < newone.length; q++){
System.out.println(newone[q]);
}
}
public static int[] NonZeros(int [] A){
int [] temp = new int[4];
for(int i = 0; i < A.length;i++){
if(A[i] != 0){
int j = 0;
temp[j] = A[i];
j++;
}
}
return temp;
}
}
Here's the result:
run:
2
0
0
0
However, the result should be: 1 2 3 2
Step one, count the non zero values. Step two, create the new array. Step three, fill it with non-zero values like
public static int[] NonZeros(int[] A) {
int count = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < A.length; i++) {
if (A[i] != 0) {
count++;
}
}
int[] temp = new int[count];
int p = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < A.length; i++) {
if (A[i] != 0) {
temp[p++] = A[i];
}
}
return temp;
}
Alternatively, use a lambda and filter like
public static int[] NonZeros(int[] A) {
return Arrays.stream(A).filter(i -> i != 0).toArray();
}
You declare int j=0; inside the loop, so all assignments go to the same place.
You need to move the j index outside of the loop:
public static int[] NonZeros(int [] A){
int [] temp = new int[4];
int j = 0;
for (int i=0; i < A.length; i++) {
if (A[i] != 0) {
temp[j] = A[i];
j++;
}
}
return temp;
}
The reason why your current output happens to be [2, 0, 0, 0] is that the final element in the input array is 2, and gets written to the first entry in the output array. In fact, currently all values are being written to the first entry of the output array.
The scope of the "j" variable that you are defining is the if block that contains it because you are declaring it inside the condition which results in you overwriting the first element in your temp array each time you find a non-zero number in the source while the rest of your temp elements remain unchanged.
The solution is to move the declaration of "j" to the body of the method just before the loop, that is:
public static int[] NonZeros(int [] A){
int [] temp = new int[4];
int j = 0;
for(int i = 0; i < A.length;i++){
if(A[i] != 0){
temp[j] = A[i];
j++;
}
}
return temp;
}
Here is the problem: When given an array arr, return an array which contains only odd integers in the original order from arr.
A Few Examples:
youMakeMeOdd({1,2,3}) → {1, 3}
youMakeMeOdd({1,3,5}) → {1, 3, 5}
youMakeMeOdd({2,4,6}) → {}
And here is my code:
public int [] youMakeMeOdd(int [] arr)
{
int x=0;
for (int i=0; i<arr.length; i++)
{
if (arr[i]%2==1)
{
x++;
}
}
for (int i=0, m=0, j=0; j<x; m++, j++)
{
if (arr[i]%2==1)
{
arr[m]=arr[j];
}
}
return arr;
}
Thank you very much!
Arrays in Java are fixed-size: their length cannot be changed.
So you need to create and return a new array because the result might contain fewer elements.
Determine the size of the output array (count the odd values) to know the length of the result array, then iterate over your input and add the odd numbers to the output.
Example:
public static int[] youMakeMeOdd(int[] arr) {
int count = 0;
for (int n : arr)
if (n % 2 == 1)
count++;
int[] result = new int[count];
int i = 0;
for (int n : arr)
if (n % 2 == 1)
result[i++] = n;
return result;
}
So I know how to get the size of a combination - factorial of the size of the array (in my case) over the size of the subset of that array wanted. The issue I'm having is getting the combinations. I've read through most of the questions so far here on stackoverflow and have come up with nothing. I think the issue I'm finding is that I want to add together the elements in the combitorial subsets created. All together this should be done recursively
So to clarify:
int[] array = {1,2,3,4,5};
the subset would be the size of say 2 and combinations would be
{1,2},{1,3},{1,4},{1,5},{2,3},{2,4},{2,5},{3,4},{3,5},{4,5}
from this data I want to see if the subset say... equals 6, then the answers would be:
{1,5} and {2,4} leaving me with an array of {1,5,2,4}
so far I have this:
public static int[] subset(int[] array, int n, int sum){
// n = size of subsets
// sum = what the sum of the ints in the subsets should be
int count = 0; // used to count values in array later
int[] temp = new temp[array.length]; // will be array returned
if(array.length < n){
return false;
}
for (int i = 1; i < array.length; i++) {
for (int j = 0; j < n; j++) {
int[] subset = new int[n];
System.arraycopy(array, 1, temp, 0, array.length - 1); // should be array moved forward to get new combinations
**// unable to figure how how to compute subsets of the size using recursion so far have something along these lines**
subset[i] = array[i];
subset[i+1] = array[i+1];
for (int k = 0; k < n; k++ ) {
count += subset[k];
}
**end of what I had **
if (j == n && count == sum) {
temp[i] = array[i];
temp[i+1] = array[i+1];
}
}
} subset(temp, n, goal);
return temp;
}
How should I go about computing the possible combinations of subsets available?
I hope you will love me. Only thing you have to do is to merge results in one array, but it checks all possibilities (try to run the program and look at output) :) :
public static void main(String[] args) {
int[] array = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
int n = 2;
subset(array, n, 6, 0, new int[n], 0);
}
public static int[] subset(int[] array, int n, int sum, int count, int[] subarray, int pos) {
subarray[count] = array[pos];
count++;
//If I have enough numbers in my subarray, I can check, if it is equal to my sum
if (count == n) {
//If it is equal, I found subarray I was looking for
if (addArrayInt(subarray) == sum) {
return subarray;
} else {
return null;
}
}
for (int i = pos + 1; i < array.length; i++) {
int[] res = subset(array, n, sum, count, subarray.clone(), i);
if (res != null) {
//Good result returned, so I print it, here you should merge it
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(res));
}
}
if ((count == 1) && (pos < array.length - 1)) {
subset(array, n, sum, 0, new int[n], pos + 1);
}
//Here you should return your merged result, if you find any or null, if you do not
return null;
}
public static int addArrayInt(int[] array) {
int res = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
res += array[i];
}
return res;
}
You should think about how this problem would be done with loops.
for (int i = 0; i < array.length - 1; i++) {
for (int j = i + 1; j < array.length; j++) {
if (array[i] + array[j] == sum) {
//Add the values to the array
}
}
}
Simply convert this to a recursive code.
The best way I can think to do this would be to have each recursive call run on a subset of the original array. Note that you don't need to create a new array to do this as you are doing in your code example. Just have a reference in each call to the new index in the array. So your constructor might look like this:
public static int[] subset(int[] array, int ind, int sum)
where array is the array, ind is the new starting index and sum is the sum you are trying to find
CodingBat > Java > Array-1 > reverse3:
Given an array of ints length 3, return a new array with the elements in reverse order, so {1, 2, 3} becomes {3, 2, 1}.
public int[] reverse3(int[] nums) {
int[] values = new int[3];
for (int i = 0; i <= nums.length - 1; i++) {
for (int j = nums.length-1; j >= 0; j--) {
values[i] = nums[j];
}
}
return values;
}
I can't get this to work properly, usually the last int in the array, becomes every single int in the new array
You don't want a two-level loop. Just have one loop:
for(int i = 0, j = nums.length - 1; i < nums.length; i++,j--) {
values[i] = nums[j];
}
or, alternately, just don't track j sepearately, and do this:
for(int i = 0; i < nums.length; i++) {
values[i] = nums[nums.length - 1 - i];
}
Unless this is a homework, why not just use Apache ArrayUtils'
ArrayUtils.reverse(nums)
Never re-invent the wheel :)
The length of the input int[] is fixed at 3? Then it doesn't get any simpler than this.
public int[] reverse3(int[] nums) {
return new int[] { nums[2], nums[1], nums[0] };
}
See also:
CodingBat/Java/Array-1/reverse3
Note that Array-1 is "Basic array problems -- no loops." You can use a loop if you want, but it's designed NOT to be solved using loops.
Firstly, while creating new array give it size of old array.
Next, when you're reversing an array, you don't need two loops, just one:
int length = oldArray.length
for(int i = 0; i < length; i++)
{
newArray[length-i-1] = oldArray[i]
}
You only want a single loop, but with indices going both ways:
public int[] reverse(int[] nums) {
int[] back = new int[nums.length];
int i,j;
for (i=0,j=nums.length-1 ; i<nums.length ; i++,j--)
back[i] = nums[j];
return back;
}
public int[] reverse3(int[] nums) {
int rotate[]={nums[2],nums[1],nums[0]};
return rotate;
}
This code gives correct output:-
public int[] reverse3(int[] nums) {
int[] myArray=new int[3];
myArray[0]=nums[2];
myArray[1]=nums[1];
myArray[2]=nums[0];
return myArray;
}
I got this with Python.. So you can get the idea behind it
def reverse3(nums):
num = []
for i in range(len(nums)):
num.append(nums[len(nums) - i - 1])
return num
In your code, for each value of i, you are setting target array elements at i to value in "nums" at j. That is how you end up with same value for all the elements at the end of all iterations.
First of all, very bad logic to have two loops for a simple swap algorithm such as :
public static void reverse(int[] b) {
int left = 0; // index of leftmost element
int right = b.length-1; // index of rightmost element
while (left < right) {
// exchange the left and right elements
int temp = b[left];
b[left] = b[right];
b[right] = temp;
// move the bounds toward the center
left++;
right--;
}
}//endmethod reverse
or simplified:
for (int left=0, int right=b.length-1; left<right; left++, right--) {
// exchange the first and last
int temp = b[left]; b[left] = b[right]; b[right] = temp;
}
Why go through all this pain, why dont you trust Java's built-in APIs and do something like
public static Object[] reverse(Object[] array)
{
List<Object> list = Arrays.asList(array);
Collections.reverse(list);
return list.toArray();
}
public int[] reverse3(int[] nums) {
int[] values = new int[nums.length];
for(int i=0; i<nums.length; i++) {
values[nums.length - (i + 1)]=nums[i];
}
return values;
}