I'm writing rest services using jersey and jackson. I have something like this example
import com.mkyong.Track;
#Path("/json/metallica")
public class JSONService {
#GET
#Path("/get")
#Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
public Track getTrackInJSON() {
Track track = new Track();
track.setTitle("Enter Sandman");
track.setSinger("Metallica");
return track;
}
#POST
#Path("/post")
#Consumes(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
public MyResponse createTrackInJSON(Track track) {
return new MyResponse().setResult(true);
}
}
But in my case, the classe Track is not a simple pojo bean.I use a Map to save my data and I create a method to generate json from my object and a constructor to parse json data.
public class JsonObject {
Map<String, String> data = new HashMap<>();
public String toJson(){
return "";
}
}
public class Track extends JsonObject {
public Track(String json) {
//Parse json
// [...]
}
public Track(JsonNode node) {
//Parse node
// [...]
}
public String getTitle() {
if(data.containsKey("title"))
return data.get("title");
return "";
}
public void setTitle(String title) {
data.put("title", title);
}
public String getSinger() {
if(data.containsKey("singer"))
return data.get("singer");
return "";
}
public void setSinger(String singer) {
data.put("singer", singer);
}
#Override
public String toString() {
return "Track [title=" + getTitle() + ", singer=" + getSinger() + "]";
}
public String toJson() {
return "{\"title\": \"" + getTitle() + "\", \"singer\": \"" + getSinger() + "\"}";
}
}
public class MyResponse extends JsonObject {
public boolean getResult() {
if(data.containsKey("result"))
return (boolean) data.get("result");
return false;
}
public MyResponse setResult(boolean value) {
data.put("result", value);
return this;
}
#Override
public String toString() {
return "{\"result\": " + getResult() + "}";
}
}
So my question is: is it possible to create actions before and after the method call to tell to jackson how to generate or parse my object ? using annotation and/or creating an ObjectReader or something like that ?
Thanks
Edit :
Thanks peeskillet.
I'm not sure #JsonAnyGetter et #JsonAnySetter are my solution. I have many objects that extend JsonObject and I want to keep it with getters and setters for my rest api.
So I created a generic JsonSerializer:
public class MyObjectSerializer extends JsonSerializer<JsonObject> {
#Override
public void serialize(JsonObject value, JsonGenerator gen, SerializerProvider serializers)
throws IOException, JsonProcessingException {
gen.writeRaw(value.toJson());
}
}
Then I add this annotation to MyResponse object.
#JsonSerialize(using = MyObjectSerializer.class)
public class MyResponse ...
I wish I did not have to add this annotation in each objects and that was done automatically during rest service return but it works fine and it's not so restrictive.
Now I have another problem with deserialization. I want a generic deserializer calling constructor with parameter JsonNode. But how do I know what class call?
I saw a parameter "as" in #JsonDeserialize annotation.
#JsonDeserialize(using = MyObjectDeserializer.class, as=Track.class)
But I don't find how get this information in the JsonDeserializer. Any idea ?
(Maybe I could open another thread for this question)
I solved my problem.
For the serialization, I created a serializer for my JsonObject I defined in a contextResolver. All classes that extend JsonObject are serialized using this serializer.
public class MyJsonSerializer extends JsonSerializer<JsonObject> {
#Override
public void serialize(JsonObject value, JsonGenerator gen, SerializerProvider serializers)
throws IOException, JsonProcessingException {
gen.writeRaw(value.toJson());
}
}
#Provider
public class JacksonJsonProvider implements ContextResolver<ObjectMapper> {
private static final ObjectMapper MAPPER = new ObjectMapper();
static {
MAPPER.setSerializationInclusion(Include.NON_NULL);
MAPPER.enable(SerializationFeature.INDENT_OUTPUT);
MAPPER.configure(SerializationFeature.WRITE_DATES_AS_TIMESTAMPS, false);
}
public JacksonJsonProvider() {
SimpleModule simpleModule = new SimpleModule("SimpleModule", new Version(1,0,0,null, null, null));
simpleModule.addSerializer(JsonObject.class, new MyJsonSerializer());
MAPPER.registerModule(simpleModule);
}
#Override
public ObjectMapper getContext(Class<?> type) {
LOGGER.debug("JacksonProvider.getContext() called with type: "+type);
return MAPPER;
}
}
For deserialization, I use the annotation #JsonCreator() to indicate to jackson what method used to create object.
#JsonCreator()
public JsonObject(JsonNode json) {
super(json);
}
To configure Jackson in JAX-RS, you can register a Context-Resolver<ObjectMapper>, as seen in this post. You can create custom serializers if you need to.
For your specific use case posted above, something as simple at using #JsonAnyGetter would work without doing any other crazy stuff. #JsonAnySetter for deserialization.
public class JsonObject {
Map<String, String> data = new HashMap<>();
#JsonAnyGetter
public Map<String, String> getData() {
return data;
}
#JsonAnySetter
public void put(String field, String value) {
data.put(field, value);
}
public String toJson(){
return "";
}
}
Jackson will serialize all the data in the map, as if they were properties in the class or subclasses. So you don't need to add any properties in the Track class.
Related
I was asked to change our jackson mapping configuration so that each empty object we deserialize (from JSON) is going to be deserialized as null.
The problem is that I'm struggling to do it, but without any luck. Here is a sample of our ObjectMapper configuration (and example):
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.disable(DeserializationFeature.FAIL_ON_UNKNOWN_PROPERTIES);
mapper.setSerializationInclusion(JsonInclude.Include.NON_NULL);
mapper.configure(SerializationFeature.FAIL_ON_EMPTY_BEANS, true);
mapper.setVisibility(PropertyAccessor.ALL, JsonAutoDetect.Visibility.ANY);
JavaTimeModule javaTimeModule = new JavaTimeModule();
javaTimeModule.addDeserializer(LocalDateTime.class, new LocalDateTimeDeserializer(DateTimeFormatter.ISO_DATE_TIME));
javaTimeModule.addDeserializer(Instant.class, InstantDeserializer.INSTANT);
mapper.registerModule(javaTimeModule);
mapper.configure(SerializationFeature.WRITE_DATES_AS_TIMESTAMPS, false);
mapper.configure(DeserializationFeature.FAIL_ON_UNKNOWN_PROPERTIES, false);
warmupMapper(mapper);
return mapper;
I thought about something like adding:
mapper.configure(
DeserializationFeature.ACCEPT_EMPTY_STRING_AS_NULL_OBJECT, true);
but it just works on strings.
I'm afraid that using a custom deserializer will not help me, because I'm writing a generic (for all objects) mapper. So I probably need something like a delegator or a post process deserialization method.
So for json like "" or {} I expect to be converted to null in java (and not to empty string or Object instance).
What is a empty object for you? A object with null value fields? A object with no fields? You can create a custom to check the nodes and deserialize how you want. I see no problem to use it in a generic way.
I did a little example:
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonParser;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonProcessingException;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.DeserializationContext;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.JsonNode;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.std.StdDeserializer;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.module.SimpleModule;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.util.Objects;
public class DeserializerExample<T> extends StdDeserializer<T> {
private final ObjectMapper defaultMapper;
public DeserializerExample(Class<T> clazz) {
super(clazz);
defaultMapper = new ObjectMapper();
}
#Override
public T deserialize(JsonParser jp, DeserializationContext dc) throws IOException, JsonProcessingException {
System.out.println("Deserializing...");
JsonNode node = jp.getCodec().readTree(jp);
for (JsonNode jsonNode : node) {
if (!jsonNode.isNull()) {
return defaultMapper.treeToValue(node, (Class<T>) getValueClass());
}
}
return null;
}
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
SimpleModule module = new SimpleModule();
module.addDeserializer(Person.class, new DeserializerExample(Person.class));
mapper.registerModule(module);
Person person = mapper.readValue("{\"id\":1, \"name\":\"Joseph\"}", Person.class);
Person nullPerson = mapper.readValue("{\"id\":null, \"name\":null}", Person.class);
System.out.println("Is null: " + Objects.isNull(person));
System.out.println("Is null: " + Objects.isNull(nullPerson));
}
}
The only way to do this is to use a custom deserializer:
class CustomDeserializer extends JsonDeserializer<String> {
#Override
public String deserialize(JsonParser jsonParser, DeserializationContext context) throws IOException, JsonProcessingException {
JsonNode node = jsonParser.readValueAsTree();
if (node.asText().isEmpty()) {
return null;
}
return node.toString();
}
}
Then do:
class EventBean {
public Long eventId;
public String title;
#JsonDeserialize(using = CustomDeserializer.class)
public String location;
}
This solution courtesy of Sach141 on this question.
I had the same problem.
I hava a City class and sometimes I recive 'city':{} from a web service request.
So, the standard serializer create a new City with all empty field.
I created a custom deserializer in this way
public class CityJsonDeSerializer extends StdDeserializer<City> {
#Override
public City deserialize(JsonParser jp, DeserializationContext dc) throws IOException, JsonProcessingException {
JsonNode node = jp.getCodec().readTree(jp);
if(node.isNull() || node.asText().isEmpty()|| node.size()==0)
return null;
City city = new City();
... // set all fields
return city;
}
}
The if check the conditions:
'city' : null
'city' : ''
'city' : '{}'
and if it's true, the deserializer returns null.
Another approach is to use a com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.util.Converter<IN,OUT>, which is essentially a postprocessor for deserialization.
Imagine we have a class:
public class Person {
public String id;
public String name;
}
Now imagine we want to deserialize an empty JSON object {} as null, rather than a Person with null values for id and name. We can create the following Converter:
public PersonConverter implements Converter<Person,Person> {
#Override
public Person convert(Person p) {
return isEmpty(p) ? null : value;
}
private static boolean isEmpty(Person p) {
if(p == null) {
return true;
}
if(Optional.ofNullable(p.id).orElse("").isEmpty() &&
Optional.ofNullable(p.name).orElse("").isEmpty()) {
return true;
}
return false;
}
#Override
public JavaType getInputType(TypeFactory typeFactory) {
return typeFactory.constructType(Person.class);
}
#Override
public JavaType getOutputType(TypeFactory typeFactory) {
return typeFactory.constructType(Person.class);
}
}
Note that we have to handle the blank String case because that is (counter-intuitively) the default value assigned to properties not given in JSON, as opposed to null.
Given the converter, we can then annotate our original Person class:
#JsonDeserialize(converter=PersonConverter.class)
public class Person {
public String id;
public String name;
}
The benefit of this approach is that you don't have to think or care about deserialization at all; you're simply deciding what to do with the deserialized object after it's deserialized. And there are many other transformations you can do with a Converter, too. But this works nicely for nullifying "empty" values.
I want to deserialize classes of the form:
public class TestFieldEncryptedMessage implements ITextMessage {
#JsonProperty("text")
#Encrypted(cipherAlias = "testAlias")
private String text;
public TestFieldEncryptedMessage() {
}
#JsonCreator
public TestFieldEncryptedMessage(#JsonProperty("text") String text) {
this.text = text;
}
public String getText() {
return text;
}
public void setText(String text) {
this.text = text;
}
}
Where the text is encrypted and deserialization should unencrypt the value before rebuilding the TestFieldEncryptedMessage instance.
I am following an approach very similar to: https://github.com/codesqueak/jackson-json-crypto
That is, I am building a module extending SimpleModule:
public class CryptoModule extends SimpleModule {
public final static String GROUP_ID = "au.com.auspost.messaging";
public final static String ARTIFACT_ID = "jackson-json-crypto";
private EncryptedSerializerModifier serializerModifier;
private EncryptedDeserializerModifier deserializerModifier;
public CryptoModule() {
}
public CryptoModule addEncryptionService(final EncryptionService encryptionService) {
serializerModifier = new EncryptedSerializerModifier(encryptionService);
deserializerModifier = new EncryptedDeserializerModifier(encryptionService);
return this;
}
#Override
public String getModuleName() {
return ARTIFACT_ID;
}
#Override
public Version version() {
return new Version(major, minor, patch, null, GROUP_ID, ARTIFACT_ID);
}
#Override
public void setupModule(final SetupContext context) {
if ((null == serializerModifier) || (null == deserializerModifier))
throw new EncryptionException("Crypto module not initialised with an encryption service");
context.addBeanSerializerModifier(serializerModifier);
context.addBeanDeserializerModifier(deserializerModifier);
}
}
As you can see, two modifiers are set up: the EncryptedSerializerModifier works perfectly and is called by the ObjectMapper, but the deserializer behind the EncryptedDeserializerModifier is ignored.
As is seen in many other examples on SO such as here: How can I include raw JSON in an object using Jackson?, I set up the EncryptedDeserializerModifier with:
public class EncryptedDeserializerModifier extends BeanDeserializerModifier {
private final EncryptionService encryptionService;
private Map<String, SettableBeanProperty> properties = new HashMap<>();
public EncryptedDeserializerModifier(final EncryptionService encryptionService) {
this.encryptionService = encryptionService;
}
#Override
public BeanDeserializerBuilder updateBuilder(final DeserializationConfig config, final BeanDescription beanDescription, final BeanDeserializerBuilder builder) {
Encrypted annotation = beanDescription.getType().getRawClass().getAnnotation(Encrypted.class);
Iterator it = builder.getProperties();
while (it.hasNext()) {
SettableBeanProperty p = (SettableBeanProperty) it.next();
if (null != p.getAnnotation(Encrypted.class)) {
JsonDeserializer<Object> current = p.getValueDeserializer();
properties.put(p.getName(), p);
builder.addOrReplaceProperty(p.withValueDeserializer(new EncryptedJsonDeserializer(encryptionService, current, p)), true);
}
}
return builder;
}
}
Finally, the EncryptedJsonDeserializer itself overrides the following:
#Override
public Object deserialize(final JsonParser parser, final DeserializationContext context) throws JsonMappingException {
JsonDeserializer<?> deserializer = baseDeserializer;
if (deserializer instanceof ContextualDeserializer) {
deserializer = ((ContextualDeserializer) deserializer).createContextual(context, property);
}
return service.decrypt(parser, deserializer, context, property != null ? property.getType() : type);
}
#Override
public JsonDeserializer<?> createContextual(final DeserializationContext context, final BeanProperty property) throws JsonMappingException {
JsonDeserializer<?> wrapped = context.findRootValueDeserializer(property.getType());
return new EncryptedJsonDeserializer(service, wrapped, property);
}
The createContextual() method is called, but the deserialize method is not called. The property throughout the execution is always the "text" property, so I seem to have the right context.
anyone know why the ObjectMapper doesn't find the right Deserializer?
EDIT added implements ITextMessage to decrypted class, which I thought was an unimportant detail, but turned out to be the cause of the issue.
I found the issue! If you look closely at the TestFieldEncryptedMessage class, whose text field is encrypted, you can see that it implements an interface. The interface is used so that the messages give some extra tooling for asserts in tests, however for deserialization, there is an unintended consequence. When the ObjectMapper is working its way through the json string, it tries, I think, to match a deserializer to a field inside ITextMessage, not to a field inside TestFieldEncryptedMessage, which is why the custom deserializer was not called (there is no text field in ITextMessage).
Once I stopped implementing ITextMessage, the custom deserializer was called.
I have the following class:
class A{
String abc;
String def;
// appropriate getters and setters with JsonProperty Annotation
}
and I call Jacksons objectMapper.writeValueAsString(A) which works fine.
Now I need to add another instance member:
class A{
String abc;
String def;
JSONObject newMember; // No, I cannot Stringify it, it needs to be JSONObject
// appropriate getters and setters with JsonProperty Annotation
}
but when I serialize, I am getting exception:
org.codehaus.jackson.map.JsonMappingException: No serializer found for class org.json.JSONObject and no properties discovered to create BeanSerializer
I tried JSONNode but it gave Output as {outerjson:"{innerjson}"} not {outerjson:{innerjson}}.
Is it possible to use Jackson to achieve the above output, i.e. JSONObject within JSONObject?
What about to use jackson-datatype-json-org
// import com.fasterxml.jackson.datatype.jsonorg.JsonOrgModule;
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.registerModule(new JsonOrgModule());
See https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-datatype-json-org
Well, if you cannot replace the JSONObject on a POJO or a Map, then you can write a custom serializer. Here is an example:
public class JacksonJSONObject {
public static class MyObject {
public final String string;
public final JSONObject object;
#JsonCreator
public MyObject(#JsonProperty("string") String string, #JsonProperty("object") JSONObject object) {
this.string = string;
this.object = object;
}
#Override
public String toString() {
return "MyObject{" +
"string='" + string + '\'' +
", object=" + object +
'}';
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
SimpleModule module = new SimpleModule("org.json");
module.addSerializer(JSONObject.class, new JsonSerializer<JSONObject>() {
#Override
public void serialize(JSONObject value, JsonGenerator jgen, SerializerProvider provider) throws IOException {
jgen.writeRawValue(value.toString());
}
});
module.addDeserializer(JSONObject.class, new JsonDeserializer<JSONObject>() {
#Override
public JSONObject deserialize(JsonParser jp, DeserializationContext ctxt) throws IOException {
Map<String, Object> bean = jp.readValueAs(new TypeReference<Map<String, Object>>() {});
return new JSONObject(bean);
}
});
mapper.registerModule(module);
JSONObject object = new JSONObject(Collections.singletonMap("key", "value"));
String json = mapper.writerWithDefaultPrettyPrinter().writeValueAsString(new MyObject("string", object));
System.out.println("JSON: " + json);
System.out.println("Object: " + mapper.readValue(json, MyObject.class));
}
}
Output:
JSON: {
"string" : "string",
"object" : {"key":"value"}
}
Object: MyObject{string='string', object={"key":"value"}}
Use #JsonSerialize with the attribute and implement a custom serializer.
#JsonSerialize(using = JsonObjectSerializer.class)
private JSONObject jsonObject;
public static class JsonObjectSerializer extends JsonSerializer<JSONObject> {
#Override
public void serialize(JSONObject jsonObject, JsonGenerator jsonGenerator, SerializerProvider serializerProvider) throws IOException {
jsonGenerator.writeRawValue(jsonObject.toString());
}
}
Use JsonNode instead of JSONObject.
JsonNode jsonNode = JsonLoader.fromString(YOUR_STRING);
I am developing a REST interface for my app using Jackson to serialize my POJO domain objects to JSON representation. I want to customize the serialization for some types to add additional properties to the JSON representation that do not exist in POJOs (e.g. add some metadata, reference data, etc). I know how to write my own JsonSerializer, but in that case I would need to explicitly call JsonGenerator.writeXXX(..) methods for each property of my object while all I need is just to add an additional property. In other words I would like to be able to write something like:
#Override
public void serialize(TaxonomyNode value, JsonGenerator jgen, SerializerProvider provider) {
jgen.writeStartObject();
jgen.writeAllFields(value); // <-- The method I'd like to have
jgen.writeObjectField("my_extra_field", "some data");
jgen.writeEndObject();
}
or (even better) to somehow intercept the serialization before the jgen.writeEndObject() call, e.g.:
#Override void beforeEndObject(....) {
jgen.writeObjectField("my_extra_field", "some data");
}
I thought I could extend BeanSerializer and override its serialize(..) method but it's declared final and also I couldn't find an easy way to create a new instance of BeanSerializer without providing it with all the type metadata details practically duplicating a good portion of Jackson. So I've given up on doing that.
My question is - how to customize Jackson's serialization to add additional stuff to the JSON output for particular POJOs without introducing too much of the boilerplate code and reusing as much as possible of the default Jackson behaviour.
Jackson 2.5 introduced the #JsonAppend annotation, which can be used to add "virtual" properties during serialization. It can be used with the mixin functionality to avoid modifying the original POJO.
The following example adds an ApprovalState property during serialization:
#JsonAppend(
attrs = {
#JsonAppend.Attr(value = "ApprovalState")
}
)
public static class ApprovalMixin {}
Register the mixin with the ObjectMapper:
mapper.addMixIn(POJO.class, ApprovalMixin.class);
Use an ObjectWriter to set the attribute during serialization:
ObjectWriter writer = mapper.writerFor(POJO.class)
.withAttribute("ApprovalState", "Pending");
Using the writer for serialization will add the ApprovalState field to the ouput.
Since (I think) Jackson 1.7 you can do this with a BeanSerializerModifier and extending BeanSerializerBase. I've tested the example below with Jackson 2.0.4.
import java.io.IOException;
import org.junit.Test;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonGenerationException;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonGenerator;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.BeanDescription;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.JsonSerializer;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.SerializationConfig;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.SerializerProvider;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.module.SimpleModule;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ser.BeanSerializerModifier;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ser.impl.ObjectIdWriter;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ser.std.BeanSerializerBase;
public class JacksonSerializeWithExtraField {
#Test
public void testAddExtraField() throws Exception
{
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.registerModule(new SimpleModule() {
public void setupModule(SetupContext context) {
super.setupModule(context);
context.addBeanSerializerModifier(new BeanSerializerModifier() {
public JsonSerializer<?> modifySerializer(
SerializationConfig config,
BeanDescription beanDesc,
JsonSerializer<?> serializer) {
if (serializer instanceof BeanSerializerBase) {
return new ExtraFieldSerializer(
(BeanSerializerBase) serializer);
}
return serializer;
}
});
}
});
mapper.writeValue(System.out, new MyClass());
//prints {"classField":"classFieldValue","extraField":"extraFieldValue"}
}
class MyClass {
private String classField = "classFieldValue";
public String getClassField() {
return classField;
}
public void setClassField(String classField) {
this.classField = classField;
}
}
class ExtraFieldSerializer extends BeanSerializerBase {
ExtraFieldSerializer(BeanSerializerBase source) {
super(source);
}
ExtraFieldSerializer(ExtraFieldSerializer source,
ObjectIdWriter objectIdWriter) {
super(source, objectIdWriter);
}
ExtraFieldSerializer(ExtraFieldSerializer source,
String[] toIgnore) {
super(source, toIgnore);
}
protected BeanSerializerBase withObjectIdWriter(
ObjectIdWriter objectIdWriter) {
return new ExtraFieldSerializer(this, objectIdWriter);
}
protected BeanSerializerBase withIgnorals(String[] toIgnore) {
return new ExtraFieldSerializer(this, toIgnore);
}
public void serialize(Object bean, JsonGenerator jgen,
SerializerProvider provider) throws IOException,
JsonGenerationException {
jgen.writeStartObject();
serializeFields(bean, jgen, provider);
jgen.writeStringField("extraField", "extraFieldValue");
jgen.writeEndObject();
}
}
}
You can do this (previous version did not work with Jackson after 2.6, but this works with Jackson 2.7.3):
public static class CustomModule extends SimpleModule {
public CustomModule() {
addSerializer(CustomClass.class, new CustomClassSerializer());
}
private static class CustomClassSerializer extends JsonSerializer {
#Override
public void serialize(Object value, JsonGenerator jgen, SerializerProvider provider) throws IOException {
//Validate.isInstanceOf(CustomClass.class, value);
jgen.writeStartObject();
JavaType javaType = provider.constructType(CustomClass.class);
BeanDescription beanDesc = provider.getConfig().introspect(javaType);
JsonSerializer<Object> serializer = BeanSerializerFactory.instance.findBeanSerializer(provider,
javaType,
beanDesc);
// this is basically your 'writeAllFields()'-method:
serializer.unwrappingSerializer(null).serialize(value, jgen, provider);
jgen.writeObjectField("my_extra_field", "some data");
jgen.writeEndObject();
}
}
}
Update:
I tried it out with Jackson 2.9.0 and 2.9.6 and it worked as expected with both. Perhaps try this out: http://jdoodle.com/a/z99 (run it locally - jdoodle apparently can't handle Jackson).
Though this question is already answered, I found another way that requires no special Jackson hooks.
static class JsonWrapper<T> {
#JsonUnwrapped
private T inner;
private String extraField;
public JsonWrapper(T inner, String field) {
this.inner = inner;
this.extraField = field;
}
public T getInner() {
return inner;
}
public String getExtraField() {
return extraField;
}
}
static class BaseClass {
private String baseField;
public BaseClass(String baseField) {
this.baseField = baseField;
}
public String getBaseField() {
return baseField;
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) throws JsonProcessingException {
Object input = new JsonWrapper<>(new BaseClass("inner"), "outer");
System.out.println(new ObjectMapper().writerWithDefaultPrettyPrinter().writeValueAsString(input));
}
Outputs:
{
"baseField" : "inner",
"extraField" : "outer"
}
For writing collections, you can simply use a view:
public static void main(String[] args) throws JsonProcessingException {
List<BaseClass> inputs = Arrays.asList(new BaseClass("1"), new BaseClass("2"));
//Google Guava Library <3
List<JsonWrapper<BaseClass>> modInputs = Lists.transform(inputs, base -> new JsonWrapper<>(base, "hello"));
System.out.println(new ObjectMapper().writerWithDefaultPrettyPrinter().writeValueAsString(modInputs));
}
Output:
[ {
"baseField" : "1",
"extraField" : "hello"
}, {
"baseField" : "2",
"extraField" : "hello"
} ]
Another and perhaps the most simple solution:
Make serialisation a 2-step process. First create a Map<String,Object> like:
Map<String,Object> map = req.mapper().convertValue( result, new TypeReference<Map<String,Object>>() {} );
then add the properties you want like:
map.put( "custom", "value" );
then serialise this to json:
String json = req.mapper().writeValueAsString( map );
For my use case, I could use a much simpler way. In a the base class I have for all my "Jackson Pojos" I add:
protected Map<String,Object> dynamicProperties = new HashMap<String,Object>();
...
public Object get(String name) {
return dynamicProperties.get(name);
}
// "any getter" needed for serialization
#JsonAnyGetter
public Map<String,Object> any() {
return dynamicProperties;
}
#JsonAnySetter
public void set(String name, Object value) {
dynamicProperties.put(name, value);
}
I can now deserialize to Pojo, work with fields and reserialize witjout losing any properties. I can also add/change non pojo properties:
// Pojo fields
person.setFirstName("Annna");
// Dynamic field
person.set("ex", "test");
(Got it from Cowtowncoder)
We can use reflection to get all the fields of the object you want to parse.
#JsonSerialize(using=CustomSerializer.class)
class Test{
int id;
String name;
String hash;
}
In custom serializer, we have our serialize method like this :
#Override
public void serialize(Test value, JsonGenerator jgen,
SerializerProvider provider) throws IOException,
JsonProcessingException {
jgen.writeStartObject();
Field[] fields = value.getClass().getDeclaredFields();
for (Field field : fields) {
try {
jgen.writeObjectField(field.getName(), field.get(value));
} catch (IllegalArgumentException | IllegalAccessException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
jgen.writeObjectField("extra_field", "whatever_value");
jgen.writeEndObject();
}
Inspired from what wajda said and written in this gist:
Here is how to add a listener for bean serialization in jackson 1.9.12. In this example, the listerner is considered as a Chain Of Command which interface is :
public interface BeanSerializerListener {
void postSerialization(Object value, JsonGenerator jgen) throws IOException;
}
MyBeanSerializer.java:
public class MyBeanSerializer extends BeanSerializerBase {
private final BeanSerializerListener serializerListener;
protected MyBeanSerializer(final BeanSerializerBase src, final BeanSerializerListener serializerListener) {
super(src);
this.serializerListener = serializerListener;
}
#Override
public void serialize(final Object bean, final JsonGenerator jgen, final SerializerProvider provider) throws IOException, JsonGenerationException {
jgen.writeStartObject();
if (_propertyFilterId != null) {
serializeFieldsFiltered(bean, jgen, provider);
} else {
serializeFields(bean, jgen, provider);
}
serializerListener.postSerialization(bean, jgen);
jgen.writeEndObject();
}
}
MyBeanSerializerBuilder.java:
public class MyBeanSerializerBuilder extends BeanSerializerBuilder {
private final BeanSerializerListener serializerListener;
public MyBeanSerializerBuilder(final BasicBeanDescription beanDesc, final BeanSerializerListener serializerListener) {
super(beanDesc);
this.serializerListener = serializerListener;
}
#Override
public JsonSerializer<?> build() {
BeanSerializerBase src = (BeanSerializerBase) super.build();
return new MyBeanSerializer(src, serializerListener);
}
}
MyBeanSerializerFactory.java:
public class MyBeanSerializerFactory extends BeanSerializerFactory {
private final BeanSerializerListener serializerListener;
public MyBeanSerializerFactory(final BeanSerializerListener serializerListener) {
super(null);
this.serializerListener = serializerListener;
}
#Override
protected BeanSerializerBuilder constructBeanSerializerBuilder(final BasicBeanDescription beanDesc) {
return new MyBeanSerializerBuilder(beanDesc, serializerListener);
}
}
The last class below shows how to provide it using Resteasy 3.0.7:
#Provider
public class ObjectMapperProvider implements ContextResolver<ObjectMapper> {
private final MapperConfigurator mapperCfg;
public ObjectMapperProvider() {
mapperCfg = new MapperConfigurator(null, null);
mapperCfg.setAnnotationsToUse(new Annotations[]{Annotations.JACKSON, Annotations.JAXB});
mapperCfg.getConfiguredMapper().setSerializerFactory(serializerFactory);
}
#Override
public ObjectMapper getContext(final Class<?> type) {
return mapperCfg.getConfiguredMapper();
}
}
We can extend BeanSerializer, but with little trick.
First, define a java class to wrapper your POJO.
#JsonSerialize(using = MixinResultSerializer.class)
public class MixinResult {
private final Object origin;
private final Map<String, String> mixed = Maps.newHashMap();
#JsonCreator
public MixinResult(#JsonProperty("origin") Object origin) {
this.origin = origin;
}
public void add(String key, String value) {
this.mixed.put(key, value);
}
public Map<String, String> getMixed() {
return mixed;
}
public Object getOrigin() {
return origin;
}
}
Then，implement your custom serializer.
public final class MixinResultSerializer extends BeanSerializer {
public MixinResultSerializer() {
super(SimpleType.construct(MixinResult.class), null, new BeanPropertyWriter[0], new BeanPropertyWriter[0]);
}
public MixinResultSerializer(BeanSerializerBase base) {
super(base);
}
#Override
protected void serializeFields(Object bean, JsonGenerator gen, SerializerProvider provider) throws IOException {
if (bean instanceof MixinResult) {
MixinResult mixin = (MixinResult) bean;
Object origin = mixin.getOrigin();
BeanSerializer serializer = (BeanSerializer) provider.findValueSerializer(SimpleType.construct(origin.getClass()));
new MixinResultSerializer(serializer).serializeFields(origin, gen, provider);
mixin.getMixed().entrySet()
.stream()
.filter(entry -> entry.getValue() != null)
.forEach((entry -> {
try {
gen.writeFieldName(entry.getKey());
gen.writeRawValue(entry.getValue());
} catch (IOException e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e);
}
}));
} else {
super.serializeFields(bean, gen, provider);
}
}
}
This way, we can handle the case that origin object using jackson annotations to custom serialize behavior.
I needed this ability as well; in my case, to support field expansion on REST services. I ended up developing a tiny framework to solve this problem, and it's open sourced on github. It's also available in the maven central repository.
It takes care of all the work. Simply wrap the POJO in a MorphedResult, and then add or remove properties at will. When serialized, the MorphedResult wrapper disappears and any 'changes' appear in the serialized JSON object.
MorphedResult<?> result = new MorphedResult<>(pojo);
result.addExpansionData("my_extra_field", "some data");
See the github page for more details and examples. Be sure to register the libraries 'filter' with Jackson's object mapper like so:
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.setFilters(new FilteredResultProvider());
This google groups thread points to the BeanSerializerModifier.changeProperties method:
https://groups.google.com/g/jackson-user/c/uYIxbRZhsIM/m/1QpLh7G72C0J
It looks like this method makes the least interference with the object serialization, which is very convenient if you have other serialization customizations.
You can add more objects to the given beanProperties list.
Suppose, we have this bean to be serialized:
public class MyClass {
private final String name;
private final String description;
public MyClass(String name, String description) {
this.name = name;
this.description = description;
}
#JsonProperty(access = JsonProperty.Access.READ_ONLY)
public String getName() {
return name;
}
#JsonProperty(access = JsonProperty.Access.READ_ONLY)
public String getDescription() {
return description;
}
}
Then you can add a SerializerModifier to your ObjectMapper instance.
The most interesting parts are the MyBeanSerializerModifier.changeProperties and the CustomPropertyWriter.value methods.
private void addSerializationCustomization(ObjectMapper objectMapper,
SomeAdditionalDataFactory dataFactory) {
SimpleModule module = new SimpleModule();
BeanSerializerModifier modifier = new MyBeanSerializerModifier(dataFactory);
module.setSerializerModifier(modifier);
objectMapper.registerModule(module);
}
private static class MyBeanSerializerModifier extends BeanSerializerModifier {
private final SomeAdditionalDataFactory dataFactory;
public MyBeanSerializerModifier(SomeAdditionalDataFactory dataFactory) {
this.dataFactory = dataFactory;
}
#Override
public List<BeanPropertyWriter> changeProperties(SerializationConfig config,
BeanDescription beanDesc,
List<BeanPropertyWriter> beanProperties) {
if (MyClass.class.isAssignableFrom(beanDesc.getBeanClass())) {
Map<String, Function<MyClass, String>> additionalFields = Map.of(
"someData1",
myObj -> dataFactory.getSomeData1(myObj),
"someData2",
myObj -> dataFactory.getSomeData2(myObj),
"someData3",
myObj -> dataFactory.getSomeData3(myObj)
);
JavaType javaType = SimpleType.constructUnsafe(String.class);
for (Map.Entry<String, Function<MyClass, String>> entry : additionalFields.entrySet()) {
VirtualAnnotatedMember member = new VirtualAnnotatedMember(
null, beanDesc.getBeanClass(), entry.getKey(), javaType);
BeanPropertyDefinition definition = SimpleBeanPropertyDefinition
.construct(config, member, new PropertyName(entry.getKey()));
BeanPropertyWriter writer = new CustomPropertyWriter<>(
definition, javaType, entry.getValue());
beanProperties.add(writer);
}
}
return super.changeProperties(config, beanDesc, beanProperties);
}
}
private static class CustomPropertyWriter<T> extends VirtualBeanPropertyWriter {
private final Function<T, String> getter;
public CustomPropertyWriter(BeanPropertyDefinition propDef,
JavaType declaredType,
Function<T, String> getter) {
super(propDef, null, declaredType);
this.getter = getter;
}
#Override
#SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
protected Object value(Object bean,
JsonGenerator gen,
SerializerProvider prov) throws Exception {
return getter.apply((T) bean);
}
#Override
public VirtualBeanPropertyWriter withConfig(MapperConfig<?> config,
AnnotatedClass declaringClass,
BeanPropertyDefinition propDef,
JavaType type) {
throw new IllegalStateException("Should not be called on this type");
}
}
After looking more on the Jackson source code I concluded that it's simply impossible to achieve without writing my own BeanSerializer, BeanSerializerBuilder and BeanSerializerFactory and provide some extension points like:
/*
/**********************************************************
/* Extension points
/**********************************************************
*/
protected void beforeEndObject(T bean, JsonGenerator jgen, SerializerProvider provider) throws IOException, JSONException {
// May be overridden
}
protected void afterStartObject(T bean, JsonGenerator jgen, SerializerProvider provider) throws IOException, JSONException {
// May be overridden
}
Unfortunately I had to copy and paste entire Jackson's BeanSerializer source code to MyCustomBeanSerializer because the former is not developed for extensions declaring all the fields and some important methods (like serialize(...)) as final
I would like serialize an object such that one of the fields will be named differently based on the type of the field. For example:
public class Response {
private Status status;
private String error;
private Object data;
[ getters, setters ]
}
Here, I would like the field data to be serialized to something like data.getClass.getName() instead of always having a field called data which contains a different type depending on the situation.
How might I achieve such a trick using Jackson?
I had a simpler solution using #JsonAnyGetter annotation, and it worked like a charm.
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.Map;
public class Response {
private Status status;
private String error;
#JsonIgnore
private Object data;
[getters, setters]
#JsonAnyGetter
public Map<String, Object> any() {
//add the custom name here
//use full HashMap if you need more than one property
return Collections.singletonMap(data.getClass().getName(), data);
}
}
No wrapper needed, no custom serializer needed.
Using a custom JsonSerializer.
public class Response {
private String status;
private String error;
#JsonProperty("p")
#JsonSerialize(using = CustomSerializer.class)
private Object data;
// ...
}
public class CustomSerializer extends JsonSerializer<Object> {
public void serialize(Object value, JsonGenerator jgen, SerializerProvider provider) throws IOException, JsonProcessingException {
jgen.writeStartObject();
jgen.writeObjectField(value.getClass().getName(), value);
jgen.writeEndObject();
}
}
And then, suppose you want to serialize the following two objects:
public static void main(String... args) throws Exception {
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
Response r1 = new Response("Error", "Some error", 20);
System.out.println(mapper.writeValueAsString(r1));
Response r2 = new Response("Error", "Some error", "some string");
System.out.println(mapper.writeValueAsString(r2));
}
The first one will print:
{"status":"Error","error":"Some error","p":{"java.lang.Integer":20}}
And the second one:
{"status":"Error","error":"Some error","p":{"java.lang.String":"some string"}}
I have used the name p for the wrapper object since it will merely serve as a placeholder. If you want to remove it, you'd have to write a custom serializer for the entire class, i.e., a JsonSerializer<Response>.
my own solution.
#Data
#EqualsAndHashCode
#ToString
#JsonSerialize(using = ElementsListBean.CustomSerializer.class)
public class ElementsListBean<T> {
public ElementsListBean()
{
}
public ElementsListBean(final String fieldName, final List<T> elements)
{
this.fieldName = fieldName;
this.elements = elements;
}
private String fieldName;
private List<T> elements;
public int length()
{
return (this.elements != null) ? this.elements.size() : 0;
}
private static class CustomSerializer extends JsonSerializer<Object> {
public void serialize(Object value, JsonGenerator jgen, SerializerProvider provider) throws IOException,
JsonProcessingException
{
if (value instanceof ElementsListBean) {
final ElementsListBean<?> o = (ElementsListBean<?>) value;
jgen.writeStartObject();
jgen.writeArrayFieldStart(o.getFieldName());
for (Object e : o.getElements()) {
jgen.writeObject(e);
}
jgen.writeEndArray();
jgen.writeNumberField("length", o.length());
jgen.writeEndObject();
}
}
}
}
You can use the annotation JsonTypeInfo, which tell Jackson exactly that and you don't need to write a custom serializer. There's various way to include this information, but for your specific question you'd use As.WRAPPER_OBJECT and Id.CLASS. For example:
public static class Response {
private Status status;
private String error;
#JsonTypeInfo(include = As.WRAPPER_OBJECT, use = Id.CLASS)
private Object data;
}
This, however, will not work on primitive type, such as a String or Integer. You don't need that information for primitives anyways, since they are natively represented in JSON and Jackson knows how to handle them. The added bonus with using the annotation is that you get deserialization for free, if you ever need it. Here's an example:
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
Response r1 = new Response("Status", "An error", "some data");
Response r2 = new Response("Status", "An error", 10);
Response r3 = new Response("Status", "An error", new MyClass("data"));
System.out.println(mapper.writeValueAsString(r1));
System.out.println(mapper.writeValueAsString(r2));
System.out.println(mapper.writeValueAsString(r3));
}
#JsonAutoDetect(fieldVisibility=Visibility.ANY)
public static class MyClass{
private String data;
public MyClass(String data) {
this.data = data;
}
}
and the result:
{"status":"Status","error":"An error","data":"some data"}
{"status":"Status","error":"An error","data":10}
{"status":"Status","error":"An error","data":{"some.package.MyClass":{"data":"data"}}}
Based on #tlogbon response,
Here is my solution to wrap a List of Items with a specific/dynamic filed name
public class ListResource<T> {
#JsonIgnore
private List<T> items;
#JsonIgnore
private String fieldName;
public ListResource(String fieldName, List<T> items) {
this.items = items;
this.fieldName = fieldName;
}
#JsonAnyGetter
public Map<String, List<T>> getMap() {
return Collections.singletonMap(fieldName, items);
}