I was trying a programming problem, the statement is
If we list all the natural numbers below 10 that are multiples of 3 or 5, we get 3, 5, 6 and 9. The sum of these multiples is 23. Like this we have to find the sum of multiples for 't' test cases with 'n' value each, I have tried to find the solution and my code is
import java.io.*;
import java.util.*;
import java.text.*;
import java.math.*;
import java.util.regex.*;
public class Solution {
public static void main(String[] args) {
long t,n,sum;
Scanner in=new Scanner(System.in);
t=in.nextLong();
for(int i=0;i<t;i++)
{
sum=0;
n=in.nextLong();
long l3=0,l5=0,l15=0;
for(int j=3;j>0;j--)
if((n-j)%3==0&&j<n)
{
l3=n-j;
break;
}
for(int j=5;j>0;j--)
if((n-j)%5==0&&j<n)
{
l5=n-j;
break;
}
for(int j=15;j>0;j--)
if((n-j)%15==0&&j<n)
{
l15=n-j;
break;
}
sum+=(float)(((float)l3/(float)3)/(float)2)*(float)(l3+3);
sum+=(float)(((float)l5/(float)5)/(float)2)*(float)(l5+5);
sum-=(float)(((float)l15/(float)15)/(float)2)*(float)(l15+15);
System.out.println(sum);
}
}
}
And the input I gave was,
12
10
11
12
13
1000
1001
1002
1003
100000000
100000001
100000002
100000003
Here 12 is the number of test cases.
And the output I got was
23
33
33
45
233168
234168
234168
235170
2333333593784320
2333333593784320
2333333593784320
2333333593784320
The problem here is the answer is correct for values in the test case 10,11,12,13,1000,1001,1002,1003 but the output is wrong for remaining bigger inputs. I cant find what i am missing. Could you please help me on why I am getting this kind of wrong result and how to rectify it.
You can get a higher precision and a larger numbers by using BigDecimal and BigInteger:
package test;
import java.math.BigDecimal;
import java.math.BigInteger;
import java.util.Scanner;
public class Solution {
public static void main(String[] args) {
long t,n;
BigInteger sum;
Scanner in=new Scanner(System.in);
t=in.nextLong();
for(int i=0;i<t;i++)
{
sum = BigInteger.ZERO;
n=in.nextLong();
long l3=0,l5=0,l15=0;
for(int j=3;j>0;j--)
if((n-j)%3==0&&j<n)
{
l3=n-j;
break;
}
for(int j=5;j>0;j--)
if((n-j)%5==0&&j<n)
{
l5=n-j;
break;
}
for(int j=15;j>0;j--)
if((n-j)%15==0&&j<n)
{
l15=n-j;
break;
}
BigDecimal x = BigDecimal.valueOf(l3)
.divide(BigDecimal.valueOf(6))
.multiply(BigDecimal.valueOf(l3+3));
sum=sum.add(x.toBigIntegerExact());
x = BigDecimal.valueOf(l5)
.divide(BigDecimal.valueOf(10))
.multiply(BigDecimal.valueOf(l5+5));
sum=sum.add(x.toBigIntegerExact());
x = BigDecimal.valueOf(l15)
.divide(BigDecimal.valueOf(30))
.multiply(BigDecimal.valueOf(l15+15));
sum=sum.subtract(x.toBigIntegerExact());
System.out.println(sum);
}
}
}
Without deeper analysis of your code I would guess the problem is that you are using float, which has a quite short value range. Could you try double instead? Not sure what the correct answer would be, but at least you get different results (I just tried)
The solution looks too complex for such a task. I don't understand why do you need to perform the divisions at the end. You can try the following code:
int t = <some number> // the upper bound
int[] dividers = [...] // those are divisors against which we have to test
long sum = 0;
// check all the number up the bound
for (int number = 1; number < t; number++) {
for (int i = 0; i < dividers.length; i++) {
if (number % dividers[i] == 0) {
// the number is divisible without remainder -> add it to the sum
sum += number;
break;
}
}
}
The idea is to iterate all the numbers you want to check and see if they are divisible by some of the N dividers. If you find a number, you add it to the sum and continue with the next one.
Edit:
After the clarifications from OP, I came up with another way to do this.
int t = <some number> // the upper bound
int dividers = [3, 5];
int dividerProduct = dividers[0] * dividers[1];
long sum = calculateSumForDivider(dividers[0], t) + calculateSumForDivider(dividers[1], t) - calculateSumForDivider(dividerProduct, t);
public static int calculateSumForDivider(int divider, int number) {
int n = number / divider;
return divider * n * (n + 1) / 2;
}
What is the logic behind all this?
By dividing the target number, we can calculate how many times does the divider "fit" in the target. This is also the number of numbers in the interval [1, number] that are divisible by the divider. Let's see an example:
t = 10, divider = 3
10 / 3 = 3, so they are 3 numbers in the interval [1, 10], divisible by 3
the numbers are: 1 * 3, 2 * 3, 3 * 3
if we calculate the sum we get 1 * 3 + 2 * 3 + 3 * 3 = 3 * (1 + 2 + 3) = 18
analogically, for = 10, divider = 5
10 / 5 = 2
1 * 5 + 2 * 5 = 5 * (1 + 2) = 15
As a conclusion, we have the following formula for the sum:
sum = divider * n * (n + 1) / 2
where n is the result of the division.
The gotcha here is that numbers, divisible by both 3 and 5 (in other words divisible by 15) are going to be added twice to the sum. To correct this we use the same formula as above to calculate their sum and subtract it from the resulting some, reaching the result.
This solution will only work well for 2 dividers, since with multiple the number of numbers that will be added multiple times to the sum will grow exponentially. F.e. if we want to divide be 3, 4 or 5, we will need to take care of 12, 15, 20, 60, etc.
This will also not work if the two one of the dividers is a power of the other, like 3 and 9. In that case we only need the numbers, divisible by 3.
I am not sure about your algorithm because the simplest one should be like:
sum=0;
n=100100000;
for(int j=1;j<n;j++)
if(j%3==0 || j%5==0)
{
sum+=j;
}
System.out.println(sum);
System.out.println(n*n);
And to get a better idea on what should be the result, it is always less than n*n.
The output I found was:
2338002249916668
10020010000000000
So, as your results where less than n*n, if you are sure about you algorithm, then they are correct.
Related
The problem statement is :
Problem Statement-: Altaf has recently learned about number bases and is becoming fascinated.
Altaf learned that for bases greater than ten, new digit symbols need to be introduced, and that the convention is to use the first few letters of the English alphabet. For example, in base 16, the digits are 0123456789ABCDEF. Altaf thought that this is unsustainable; the English alphabet only has 26 letters, so this scheme can only work up to base 36. But this is no problem for Altaf, because Altaf is very creative and can just invent new digit symbols when she needs them. (Altaf is very creative.)
Altaf also noticed that in base two, all positive integers start with the digit 1! However, this is the only base where this is true. So naturally, Altaf wonders: Given some integer N, how many bases b are there such that the base-b representation of N starts with a 1?
Input Format :
The first line of the input contains an integer T denoting the number of test cases. The description of T test cases follows.
Each test case consists of one line containing a single integer N (in base ten).
Output Format :
For each test case, output a single line containing the number of bases b, or INFINITY if there are an infinite number of them.
Constraints:
1 <= T <= 10^5
0 <= N < 10^12
Sample Input
4
6
9
11
24
Sample Output:
4
7
8
14
Explanation:
In the first test case, 6 has a leading digit 1 in bases 2, 4, 5 and 6: 610 = 1102 = 124 = 115 = 106.
I trying this in java , But at some point my loop is not working it only takes the first value and after that it will come out of the loop!! Thank you
My code :
import java.util.*;
public class MyClass {
public static void main(String args[]) {
Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in);
long n,i,j,k,m;
long count=0,rem1,index;
long rem[];
rem = new long[(int)100];
int t = sc.nextInt();
for(i=1;i<=t;i++)
{
n = sc.nextInt();
j=2;
while(j<=n)
{
// for(j=2;j<=n;j++)
// {
index=0;
m = j;
while(n>0)
{
rem1 = n%m;
rem[(int)index++] = rem1;
n = (long) (n / m);
}
// for(k=index-1;k>=0;k--)
// {
if(rem[1]==1)
{
count++;
}
// }
j++;
}
System.out.println(count);
// }
}
}
}
I'm not sure I follow the logic in the loop (and, by your own admission, there's a problem there).
The logic of the loop (i.e., "how many bases represent the number N with a representation starting by 1"), can be greatly simplified.
The first step is finding the highest power of the base B required to represent the number N. This is given by logb(n), truncated to the nearest integer. Java doesn't have a built-in log function with a variable base, but you can get this result by calculating log(n)/log(b).
Then, you need to find the digit in this position. This can be calculated by dividing N by Bpower using integer division.
From there on, you just need to check if the result is 1, and if so, record it.
Put it all together and you'll end up with something like this:
private static int howManyBasesStartWithOne(int num) {
int count = 0;
for (int i = 2; i <= num; ++i) {
int highestBase = (int) (Math.log(num) / Math.log(i));
int leadingDigit = num / (int) Math.pow(i, highestBase);
if (leadingDigit == 1) {
++count;
}
}
return count;
}
Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
Given a positive integer num consisting only of digits 6 and 9.
Return the maximum number you can get by changing at most one digit (6 becomes 9, and 9 becomes 6).
Example 1:
Input: num = 9669
Output: 9969
Explanation:
Changing the first digit results in 6669.
Changing the second digit results in 9969.
Changing the third digit results in 9699.
Changing the fourth digit results in 9666.
The maximum number is 9969.
Example 2:
Input: num = 9996
Output: 9999
Explanation: Changing the last digit 6 to 9 results in the maximum number.
Example 3:
Input: num = 9999
Output: 9999
Explanation: It is better not to apply any change.
Traverse from left to right and change the first occurrence of 6 to 9. If there is not any 6 while traversal then does not change any digit.
Following code may help:-
import java.io.File;
import java.io.FileNotFoundException;
import java.util.Scanner;
public class testing {
public static void main(String[] args) throws FileNotFoundException {
Scanner sc=new Scanner(System.in);
System.out.print("Enter a number : ");
int a=sc.nextInt();
String numberString = Integer.toString(a);
for (int i = 0; i < numberString.length(); i++){
char c = numberString.charAt(i);
if(c=='6') { // check if the digit is 6 or not, if 6 is present then change it to 9
numberString = numberString.substring(0, i) + '9' + numberString.substring(i + 1);
break; // break the loop if 6 is changed to 9
}
}
System.out.println("Largest Number is : "+numberString);
}
}
public class Maximum69 {
public static void main(String[] args) {
int num=6669;
int added = 0;
int cur = 1;
int curNum = num;
while(curNum > 0) {
if(curNum % 10 == 6)
added = cur;
cur *= 10;
curNum = curNum / 10;
}
System.out.println(num + added * 3);
}
}
I found out how to slove, This takes less time to run:
I have found a formule, it could have been a single line solution but for clarity I have divided in two lines
First , get the highest number based on input number of digits , for example if input is 6, topNumber will be 9, for 69 top will be 99 , for 696 top is 999, so topNumber can be 9 or 99 or 999 or 9999 or 99999,etc up to java limit, the formula to get number of digits in an integer is :
floor(log10(input)) + 1
Then you can notice that the top number minus the input, it gives you a number that starts with 3, for example 9-6 = 3 , 99 - 69 = 30 , 999 - 696 = 303, except when the input is equal to the top number, in that case the result is 0,
knowing that fact, we can conclude that for switching the first 6 in the number can be achieved by summing up 3 * (((the position of the 6) -1) * 10) , eg. 3 or 30 or 300 or 3000 or 30000, etc.
resulting in the last part of the function : input + (10^(NumberOfDigits(top - input)) -1) * 3
private static int largest69(int number) {
int topNumber = (int) (Math.pow(10,(int)(Math.log10(number)) + 1) -1);
return number + (int) Math.pow(10,(( (int)(Math.log10(topNumber - number)) + 1 ) -1) ) * 3;
}
If you're not as good as nitinsridar at intuitively implementing math into your algorithm, and if you don't want to mess around with strings like backdoor did, then you can utilize data structures to help you come to a solution without much thought
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println(maxNumber(9669));
}
public static int maxNumber(int number) {
Stack<Integer> numbers = new Stack<Integer>();
int numberLength = 0;
while(number > 0) {
numbers.push(number % 10);
number /= 10;
numberLength++;
}
boolean changedFirstOccurrence = false;
int maxNumber = 0;
for(int i = numberLength; i > 0; i--) {
int numberToAdd = numbers.pop();
if (numberToAdd == 6 && !changedFirstOccurrence) {
numberToAdd = 9;
changedFirstOccurrence = true;
}
maxNumber += numberToAdd * (int) Math.pow(10, i);
}
return maxNumber / 10;
}
Is this the best solution? Nope, I would go with nitinsridar's answer (I also believe that his/her answer should get the green checkmark).
Backdoor's answer is definitely how I would've solved this problem before I took my data structures and algorithms class. I'm not saying it's a bad answer. In fact, his algorithm is more concise than mine. It's just my opinion that you don't want to get in the habit of relying on string manipulation to solve these sort of "numerical" problems, because one day it's not going to work; in this case, it did. I'm just providing another way of doing it
When given 4 numbers, how do i find which 3 numbers out of the 4 will give the greatest sum.
So if given 3 2 5 5, i want java to sum 3 5 5 for a total of 13
I have been searching for about 20 minutes and all i find is how the find the highest number of the 4 numbers. I know i absolutely can just write 16 lines of code comparing the 16 different combinations but i was hoping someone could point me in a faster direction.
First find the smallest number.
So for 3 2 5 5 it would be 2. Make sure you store this.
Thus, the numbers to sum are 3, 5 and 5
To get the total sum you need to add all the numbers together so:
3 + 2 + 5 + 5 = 15
And then minus the smallest number from the sum. So 15-2 which equals 13
First find the greatest of the four numbers and keep it aside.
Then find the greatest of the remaining three numbers and keep it aside.
Then find the greatest of the remaining two numbers and keep it aside.
Then sum up the numbers kept aside and display the result.
public static void main(String args[]) {
int[] vals = new int[4];
vals[0] = 3;
vals[1] = 2;
vals[2] = 5;
vals[3] = 5;
int result = sum4(vals);
System.out.println("Sum of x+y = " + result);
}
private static int sum4(int[] nums)
{
int retVal = 0;
int lowest = Integer.MAX_VALUE;
for (int i=0; i<nums.length; i++)
{
if (nums[i] < lowest)
lowest = nums[i];
retVal += nums[i];
}
retVal -= lowest;
return retVal;
}
folks, I've been struggling to figure out the algorithm to get the list of all of the prime factors of the given number (in my case, the given number is myNumber = 14). For example,
14 = 2 × 7
15 = 3 × 5
645 = 3 × 5 × 43
646 = 2 × 17 × 19
But my code is running infinitely and I'm not pretty sure if my algorithm works fine. Could smb take a look or give me a hand how to see the problem? Thanks in advance!
import java.util.*;
public class DistinctFactors {
public static final List<Integer> myList = new ArrayList<>();
public static void main(String[] args){
int result = 1;
int myNumber = 14;
int i = 2;
while(result != myNumber){
if(isPrime(i)){
myList.add(i);
result *= i;
}
i++;
}
for(int j = 0; i < myList.size(); j++){
System.out.print(myList.get(j) + " ");
}
}
private static boolean isPrime(int number){
for(int i = 2; i < number; i++){
if(number % 2 == 0){
return false;
}
}
return true;
}
}
I mean, let's look at what the values of result and i will be.
Pass 1: r = 1, i = 2
Pass 2: r = 2, i = 3
Pass 3: r = 6, i = 4
Pass 4: r = 6, i = 5
Pass 5: r = 30, i = 6
From this point on, r will only increase, and it's already greater than 14. So of course this loop will never terminate.
Your method is also extremely wrong. I have no idea why you chose this way to try and get prime factors.
Not to mention, even your isPrime method is kind of dumb. It checks all the way up to the number you're checking, which is extremely wasteful.
To check if a number n is prime, you should instead compute the square root; if it is an integer, then the number is obviously not prime. Otherwise, take the floor of that sqrt(n) - let's call it k - and run the loop up to k. If n is not prime, you will find a divisor in that range; if you find none, n is prime.
(That is an O(log(n)) method. The best method is the one that involves checking whether the number satisfies Fermat's Little Theorem for random values, which is constant time).
EDIT: Well, not exactly constant time if you don't consider certain operations O(1). For huge numbers it's much better than the other method
Your current loop just checks whether the number is even a bunch of times...
I decided to just try and get the small example of only going to 10 like the example shown.
If we list all the natural numbers below 10 that are multiples of 3 or 5, we get 3, 5, 6 >and 9. The sum of these multiples is 23.
Find the sum of all the multiples of 3 or 5 below 1000.
public class project1 {
public static void main(String[] args) {
int three=0;
int tot3=0;
int five=0;
int tot5=0;
int total;
while (tot3<10) {
three+=3;
tot3=tot3+three;
};
while (tot5<10) {
five+=5;
tot5=tot5+five;
};
total=tot3+tot5;
System.out.println("Three's: " + tot3);
System.out.println("Five's: " + tot5);
System.out.println("Combined: " + total);
}
}
My output is as show:
Three's: 18
Five's: 15
Combined: 33
Numbers that are both multiples of 3 and 5 (like 15 for instance), are counted twice - once in each loop.
while (tot3<10) {
three+=3;
tot3=tot3+three;
};
I think you mean
while (tot3<10) {
three += tot3; // Add this multiple of 3 to the total.
tot3+=3; // increment the "next multiple"
}
(same for 5)
Lone nebula also makes a good point - you'd need to add logic to the "5" loop to check it's not already counted in the 3 loop. The mod (%) operator can help there.
First,
while (tot3<10) {
three+=3;
tot3=tot3+three;
};
while (tot5<10) {
five+=5;
tot5=tot5+five;
};
This should be
while (three<10) {
three+=3;
tot3=tot3+three;
};
while (five<10) {
five+=5;
tot5=tot5+five;
};
Because you're concerned about when you start counting numbers above 10, not when your TOTAL of those numbers is above 10.
Secondly, your solution will count numbers that are a multiple of three and of five twice. For example, 15 will be added twice. Learn about the modulo operator, %, to come up with a solution to this (for example, not adding five to the tot5 count if five % 3 == 0)
I would recommend looking into using the modular operator to solve this problem. In java % will allow you to perform modular arithmetic. For example any multiple of 3 such as 9 % 3 = 0 while 9 % 2 = 1. It can be thought of as what remains after you divide the first number by the second. All multiples of a number modded by that number will return zero.
Keep track of your variables through the loop and you'll see the problem:
for tot3
=3
=9
=18
=30
You're keeping track of the sum, instead of tracking the multiples. This problem is partially solved in by
while(three<10)
Again, keeping track of the variable through the loop you'll see that this is wrong- it stops at 12, not 9 as you want it. Change it to
While(three<9)
//ie the last divisible number before the limit, or that limit if its divisible (in the case of 5)
All said, an infinitely more elegant solution would involve modulus and a nice little if statement. I hope this helps!
public class project1 {
public static void main(String[] args) {
int number = 0;
int total = 0;
while (number < 10) {
System.out.println(number);
if ((number % 3) == 0) {
System.out.println(number + " is a multiple of 3");
total = total + number;
}
else if ((number % 5) == 0) {
System.out.println(number + " is a multiple of 5");
total = total+number;
}
number++;
}
System.out.println("total = "+ total);
}
}
Looking at how slow I was, I did roughly the same thing as everyone else but swapped to a modulus function. The modulus function gives you the remainder(int) of dividing the first number by the second number, and can be compared to another integer. Here I have used it to check if the current number is directly divisible by 3 or 5, and add it to the total if the value is true.
Try this
import java.util.*;
public class Solution {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Scanner in = new Scanner(System.in);
int t = in.nextInt();
for(int a0 = 0; a0 < t; a0++){
long n = in.nextLong()-1;
System.out.println((n-n%3)*(n/3+1)/2 + (n-n%5)*(n/5+1)/2 - (n-n%15)*(n/15+1)/2);
}
}
}