I am using Arquillian to run integration tests. The tool is great, however I am not sure if I am using it correctly. The matter is that after each deployment (I have one deployment per test suite) jboss stops and starts again. It is very annoying as because of it time of running suites is very big. Is there any way to make jboss not restart between deployments?
Thanks in advance
I would guess it's because you are running your Arquillian tests on an embedded container (like this one) which by design automatically stops when the test suite finishes.
You can deploy your tests on a running application server and it wouldn't automatically shut down.
Related
I am trying to make the integration tests run in memory in MongoDB. I would appreciate any idea or suggestion.
What I did:
A dependency on de.flapdoodle.embed:de.flapdoodle.embed.mongo is added to provide embedded MongoDB for integration tests.
The embedmongo-maven-plugin is added to start or stop an instance of MongoDB during a Maven build.
My idea here is when I run 'mvn clean test' command the integration tests connect to the embedded mongo instance and not the "live" one(mongo-java-driver). After running test, I can see in the consolo log embedded mongo is started:
o.s.b.a.mongo.embedded.EmbeddedMongo : 2021-08-04T15:23:14.303+0300 I CONTROL [initandlisten] MongoDB starting : pid=26673 port=54871 dbpath=/var/folders/qv/......
However, I think it doesn't work as expected. Because, in the console log, I can also see:
org.mongodb.driver.cluster : Monitor thread successfully connected to server with description ServerDescription{address=...
If I shut down the live instance of Mongo, tests failed. :(
Is there anyone to help me to overcome this issue? I want to thank in advance for your time.
After some radical changes to our schema and reading some posts on why you should avoid in memory databases.
We have decided to use MySQL locally for testing and developing. Using a MySQL docker container with a volume for persistence.
This is fairly straightforward however the issues we are having are the following:
Requires the container to be executed separate from the spring boot application (a manual task docker run
Same goes for stopping the container, its a independant process
My question is essentially, is it possible to have spring boot (when using a dev config profile) to manage this docker container.
i.e. I start development work in IntelliJ and run the service, the service checks if the container is running, if not starts it up.
If this idea is bad, then please let me know.
For testing its not issue, because we are using a maven docker plugin to create the container during the maven lifecycle.
Its more for devs working locally, and getting the service running locally with ease.
Any suggestions welcomed!
Bonus for Intellij setup!
I would like Flyway to run whenever I deploy a new war to my server.
Does flyway automatically get run when a server is deployed? Do I have to always automate a script which would then the flyway migration command? Or what is the best way to do this?
Server:
The server is a Java Tomcat Server running on Elastic Beanstalk (AWS) that is connected to a MySQL database.
Deployment Process
We run our sql migration scripts on the database manually. Then we upload a new war of the server to Elastic Beanstalk.
This can be useful:
Auto-migration on startup : https://flywaydb.org/documentation/api/
So for Java all it takes is to create scripts (eg. V1__initial_schema.sql, ...), put them under /src/main/resources/db/migration/
and then:
Flyway flyway = new Flyway();
flyway.setDataSource(...);
flyway.migrate();
As the comments said, there may be multiple ways to do this.
ServletContextListener
One common way is to use the hook defined by the Java Servlet spec for being notified when your web app is launching and shutting-down. That hook is the ServletContextListener interface. Add a class to your project implementing the two methods in this interface, one for launch and one for shutdown. In the launch method, run your Flyway code.
The word “context” is the technical term meaning your web app.
contextInitializedYour web app is launching. No incoming web request has yet been handled, and will not be handled until your implementation of this method completes. Run your Flyway migrations here.
contextDestroyedYour web app is shutting down. The last remaining web request has been serviced, and no more will be accepted.
Annotating this class with #WebListener is the easiest of multiple ways to get your Servlet container to register an instance.
Pretty easy.
Your ServletContextListener is guaranteed to be called and run to completion before the first execution of any Servlet (or Filter) in your web app. So this is the perfect place to do setup work that you want finished before your servlets go to work. Flyway seems like a natural fit to me.
Search Stack Overflow for “ServletContextListener” to learn more and see examples, such as my own Question & Answer.
Handling failure
Be aware that stopping a web app’s deployment when something goes wrong (when your ServletContextListener encounters an Exception) is not well-defined in the Servlet spec.
An example might be your Flyway migrations failing for some reason, such as not able to connect to database. At that point you might want to halt deployment of your web app.
See my own Question and Answer and the group of related questions I list in that answer. Tomcat 8.0.33 halts the deployment, and un-deploys the web app, but unfortunately does not report the offending Exception (or at least I could not find any such report in the logs nor in the IDE console while in development mode). The behavior of other Servlet containers may vary.
I'm maintaining a Java Enterprise Application that exposes a few webservices and interacts with a few JMS queues and a database.
I've got most of the code unit tested and I thought all was good until in a refactoring I moved a class in another package and that changed a namespace in my webservice without me noticing and breaking all clients.
An Integration Test would have caught that, so I'm trying to write one.
The application is deployed on JBoss EAP 6.4, how can I make a webservice call in my mvn verify step?
What about JMS Queues? They are configured on the Application Server.
Is the application supposed to be already deployed?
Am I supposed to deploy the application with maven to a JBoss installation before the verify step or start an embedded webserver?
Most of the docs around are confusing to me and often I see suggestion to mock stuff, which is not integration testing (and I already do in Unit tests).
Someone told me "just use Jenkins" and I read the docs, installed it and still don't understand how that is supposed to help me write integration tests since all it does is run mvn verify anyway.
This topic and is too broad, there might be many different correct answers for this question and will depend a lot on the technologies you're using, so I'll focus first in this part only:
that changed a namespace in my webservice without me noticing and
breaking all clients
You can create unit tests for endpoints too, I do that all the time with spring-boot. For example, the code below starts the application, runs the testEndpoint() test and shuts down the application right after.
#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
#SpringApplicationConfiguration(classes = {MyApplication.class})
#WebAppConfiguration
#IntegrationTest("server.port:0")
public class MyControllerTest {
#Value("${local.server.port}")
private int port;
#Test
public void testEndpoint() {
String endpointUrl = "http://localhost:" + port;
// make a HTTP request here to test the endpoint
}
}
I believe this can be done with any spring-mvc application, but the code would be a bit different and not as easy as with spring-boot.
Although this would usually catch most bugs in endpoints, it doesn't eliminate the need of integration tests against a deployed project.
So focusing on the bigger picture now, if you want to create end-to-end tests, including WebServices, JMS queues and databases, I suggest creating a separate project with tests only, probably using Cucumber or something similar. This project should be triggered in Jenkins (or any other CI tool) whenever needed (e.g. before a deployment, every hour, every commit and/or every night) and it will require that all applications are already deployed.
Alternatively, you could have Jenkins deploy an application and run integration tests only against this one application. In this case the tests will depend on all other applications to be already deployed.
I have a three tier application under development and am creating integration tests for DAOs in the persistence layer. When the application runs in Websphere or JBoss I expect to use the connection pooling and transaction manager of those application servers. When the application runs in Tomcat or Jetty, we'll be using C3P0 for pooling and Atomikos for transactions.
Because of these different subsystems, should the DAO's be tested in a fully configured application server environment or should we handle those concerns when integration testing the service layer? Currently we plan on setting up a simple JDBC data source with non-JTA (i.e. resource-local) transactions for DAO integration testing, thus no application server is involved....but this leaves me wondering about environmental problems we won't uncover.
Besides testing each module using unittests, the integration test should test groups of modules.
I don't want to be pedantic but in therorie this is folowed by system test for black box testing by QA.
For smaller projects this may not be feasible
I think you're on the right track with this line of thinking. If possible you should set up a continuous integration server (e.g. Hudson) that runs your production environment. That way you can develop with pretty high confidence using Tomcat etc., running tests against your local setup, and when you check in your code be sure that those same tests are being run against the real deal.