I have a Proton CEP instance deployed on my own server with 2 CPUs and 4GB RAM.
After leaving it working overnight, CPU usage increases heavily, up to 100% of each core. The command being executed is:
java -Djava.security.egd=file:/dev/./urandom -Djava.awt.headless=true -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=256m -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC -classpath /usr/share/tomcat/bin/bootstrap.jar:/usr/share/tomcat/bin/tomcat-juli.jar:/usr/share/java/commons-daemon.jar -Dcatalina.base=/usr/share/tomcat -Dcatalina.home=/usr/share/tomcat -Djava.endorsed.dirs= -Djava.io.tmpdir=/var/cache/tomcat/temp -Djava.util.logging.config.file=/usr/share/tomcat/conf/logging.properties -Djava.util.logging.manager=org.apache.juli.ClassLoaderLogManager org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap start
Looking at the logs, I also see:
Feb 17, 2016 10:00:00 AM com.ibm.hrl.proton.server.executorServices.SimpleThreadFactory$ProtonExceptionHandler uncaughtException
SEVERE: Uncaught exception in thread: Thread[31516,5,main],exception: Java heap space
Feb 17, 2016 10:02:31 AM com.ibm.hrl.proton.server.executorServices.SimpleThreadFactory$ProtonExceptionHandler uncaughtException
SEVERE: Uncaught exception in thread: Thread[31643,5,main],exception: Java heap space
Althought from htop it seems that up to 2 GB of RAM are still free.
Is this normal?
The same server is also running Orion, but that one is not experiencing issues.
The problem was that due to a bug in our code, we were sending ever larger requests with data to Orion which forwarded them to Proton. Eventually the requests grew from 100B to over 50MB, causing Proton to stall as it was unable to process all the data in time.
Related
I have an application in Java 17 configured like so:
-Xms4096m -Xmx4096m -XX:+UseG1GC -XX:MaxMetaspaceSize=1024m
It's a rather large web service that is pretty memory intensive over the years that's grown from a baseline other services use:
-Xms1024m -Xmx1024m -XX:+UseG1GC -XX:MaxMetaspaceSize=128m
I've started to trial ZGC in our company on our web services to try and get a little bit more performance out of our services so I switched some of our baseline services which seemed to perform fine:
-Xms1024m -Xmx1024m -XX:+UseZGC -XX:MaxMetaspaceSize=128m
but when I went to try our single large service on ZGC I run into an error:
-Xms4096m -Xmx4096m -XX:+UseZGC -XX:MaxMetaspaceSize=1024m
Results in:
Apr 4, 2022 # 15:06:22.103 Error: Could not create the Java Virtual Machine.
Apr 4, 2022 # 15:06:22.026 [0.983s][error][gc] Failed to allocate initial Java heap (4096M)
Apr 4, 2022 # 15:06:21.952 [0.966s][error][gc] Failed to commit memory (Not enough space)
Apr 4, 2022 # 15:06:21.881 [0.983s][error][gc] Forced to lower max Java heap size from 4096M(100%) to 3366M(82%)
Apr 4, 2022 # 15:06:21.826 [0.982s][error][gc] Failed to commit memory (Not enough space)
Apr 4, 2022 # 15:06:21.826 Error: A fatal exception has occurred. Program will exit.
Apr 4, 2022 # 15:06:21.783 [0.934s][error][gc] Failed to commit memory (Not enough space)
Apr 4, 2022 # 15:06:21.226 [0.979s][error][gc] Failed to commit memory (Not enough space)
Apr 4, 2022 # 15:06:20.224 [0.591s][error][gc] Failed to commit memory (Not enough space)
I noticed that there was a similar JDK issue logged on one of their tests here and although I'm not using the -XX:+UseLargePages I believe the implication is that I'm not leaving enough space in the heap to let ZGC start up compared to G1GC. I'd definitely like to use ZGC in the bigger service as I feel like there's the most gain there; but ZGC is new enough that I haven't found a lot of information on it during my search. What are the appropriate values/ratios in the flags for utilizing ZGC? Are there official recommendations on when to use ZGC over Shenandoah or G1GC?
Been digging on this for a while. I reviewed multiple articles on this issue. This one was the closest:
Tomcat 8 on CentOS 7 does not start as service (but it starts manually ....)
The difference being that I am running Tomcat 9.0.33. Here are the particulars:
java version "1.8.0_121"\
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_121-b13)\
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.121-b13, mixed mode)\
Tomcat 9.0.33
NAME="CentOS Linux"\
VERSION="7 (Core)"\
ID="centos"\
ID_LIKE="rhel fedora"\
VERSION_ID="7"\
PRETTY_NAME="CentOS Linux 7 (Core)"\
ANSI_COLOR="0;31"\
CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:centos:centos:7"\
HOME_URL="https://www.centos.org/"\
BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.centos.org/"\
CENTOS_MANTISBT_PROJECT="CentOS-7"\
CENTOS_MANTISBT_PROJECT_VERSION="7"\
REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="centos"\
REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT_VERSION="7"\
As a side note, everything was starting normally with no issues until recently. As far as I know there haven't been any major changes to the environment. But, when I ran the "systemctl restart" command recently, the startup began to fail. There are 5 instances of Tomcat 9.0.33 running at different ports and paths and those have not changed. I have not restarted two of the instance (afraid they won't start) the other three flat out won't start. Details below:
Systemd unit file for tomcat\
[Unit]\
Description=Apache Tomcat Web Application Container in Liferay 7.32 TEST for UAT\
After=syslog.target network.target
[Service]\
Type=forking
Environment=JAVA_HOME=/opt/jdk1.8.0_121/jre\
Environment=CATALINA_PID=/opt/liferay/uatapi/liferay-ce-portal-7.3.2-ga3/tomcat-9.0.33/temp/tomcat.pid\
Environment=CATALINA_HOME=/opt/liferay/uatapi/liferay-ce-portal-7.3.2-ga3/tomcat-9.0.33\
Environment=CATALINA_BASE=/opt/liferay/uatapi/liferay-ce-portal-7.3.2-ga3/tomcat-9.0.33\
Environment='CATALINA_OPTS=-Xms1024m -Xmx2048m -XX:+UseParNewGC -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC -XX:+CMSParallelRemarkEnabled -XX:SurvivorRatio=20 -XX:ParallelGCThreads=8 -server -Xdebug -Xrunjdwp:transport=dt_socket,address=5000,server=y,suspend=n'\
Environment='JAVA_OPTS=-Djava.awt.headless=true -Djava.security.egd=file:/dev/./urandom -Duser.timezone=GMT -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8'
ExecStart=/opt/liferay/uatapi/liferay-ce-portal-7.3.2-ga3/tomcat-9.0.33/bin/startup.sh\
ExecStop=/bin/kill -15 $MAINPID
User=tomcat\
Group=tomcat\
UMask=0007
[Install]\
WantedBy=multi-user.target\
Results when running systemctl start liferayuat
● liferayuat.service - Apache Tomcat Web Application Container in Liferay 7.32 TEST for UAT\
Loaded: loaded (/etc/systemd/system/liferayuat.service; enabled; vendor preset: disabled)\
Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Sat 2020-12-05 08:44:08 CST; 3s ago\
Process: 10891 ExecStop=/bin/kill -15 $MAINPID (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE)\
Process: 10851 ExecStart=/opt/liferay/uatapi/liferay-ce-portal-7.3.2-ga3/tomcat-9.0.33/bin/startup.sh \(code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)\
Main PID: 10861 (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
Dec 05 08:44:08 systemd[1]: Starting Apache Tomcat Web Application Container in Liferay 7.32 TEST for UAT...\
Dec 05 08:44:08 startup.sh[10851]: Existing PID file found during start.\
Dec 05 08:44:08 startup.sh[10851]: Removing/clearing stale PID file.\
Dec 05 08:44:08 startup.sh[10851]: Tomcat started.\
Dec 05 08:44:08 systemd[1]: Started Apache Tomcat Web Application Container in Liferay 7.32 TEST for UAT.\
Dec 05 08:44:08 systemd[1]: liferayuat.service: control process exited, code=exited status=1\
Dec 05 08:44:08 systemd[1]: Unit liferayuat.service entered failed state.\
Dec 05 08:44:08 systemd[1]: liferayuat.service failed.
Then the ONLY thing in catalina.out:
Listening for transport dt_socket at address: 5000\
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina\
at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:381)\
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:424)\
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:357)\
at org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.init(Bootstrap.java:261)\
at org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.main(Bootstrap.java:443)\
So, when I start the instance with systemctl start it will fail. But if I run this command (as root...) then it will start:
/opt/liferay/uatapi/liferay-ce-portal-7.3.2-ga3/tomcat-9.0.33/bin/startup.sh
If I run that full commmand AS tomcat it doesn't start with the same error. So, it appears that the issue is permissions. The tomcat user and group are owners of all files and folders. But, somehow, the tomcat user either doesn't have permissions or the path gets jacked up so that the class files can't be found. I followed the suggestions in the article I referenced above but the changes had no impact.
I tripped across one article on SELINX that seemed to point to an issue there. This are the SELINUX settings:
SELinux status: enabled
SELinuxfs mount: /sys/fs/selinux
SELinux root directory: /etc/selinux
Loaded policy name: targeted
Current mode: permissive
Mode from config file: permissive
Policy MLS status: enabled
Policy deny_unknown status: allowed
Max kernel policy version: 31\
The workaround to keep the instances running is just to manually start them but what is causing systemctl start NOT to work? I suspect permissions but I sure as heck can't see why since everything is owned by tomcat:tomcat
So, this is self-inflicted as most "mysteries" are. I still cannot account for some of the differences I see when looking into SELinux contexts between the instances but the REAL cause was subtle (to me). Permissions on the {tomcat root}/lib and {tomcat root}/lib/ext had no execute permissions. That may have been due to a jar that was added recently and then needed to be updated by owner and permissions. In any case, the original issue resulted in many trial and error attempts to fix it which complicated matters further.
I discovered the solution by doing a folder by folder, file by file comparison between working and non-working instances. Apparently the new jar and the owner/permission changes were applied to all but the production version.
Thanks for the suggestions.
i am using digitalocean and trying to install and start tomcat on ubuntu but unfortunately i can not do it. (created new droplets and tried 10 times)
1GB Ram 30GB SSD Disk Amsterdam 2 Ubuntu 14.04 x64
When i start tomcat, it says "Tomcat started". But i can not access page from browser. and ./shutdown.sh returns error.
What can be the problem ?
I noticed something now. While i am writing this question, tomcat page is displayed. it took 28 minutes to display the page
catalina.out says: INFO: Creation of SecureRandom instance for session ID generation using [SHA1PRNG] took [1,718,769] milliseconds.
Here are my installation steps (These steps works on different vps but doesn't work on digitalocean droplets):
Install oracle jdk
sudo apt-get install python-software-properties
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:webupd8team/java
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install oracle-java7-installer
sudo apt-get install oracle-java7-set-default
java -version
java version "1.7.0_72"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_72-b14)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 24.72-b04, mixed mode)
Set java path
sudo nano /etc/environment
JAVA_HOME="/usr/lib/jvm/java-7-oracle"
source /etc/environment
wget http://ftp.itu.edu.tr/Mirror/Apache/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.56/bin/apache-tomcat-7.0.56.tar.gz
tar xvzf apache-tomcat-7.0.56.tar.gz
mv apache-tomcat-7.0.56/ apache-tomcat-7.0.56-server-1/
Start Tomcat
./startup.sh
Using CATALINA_BASE: /usr/local/apache-tomcat-7.0.56-server-1
Using CATALINA_HOME: /usr/local/apache-tomcat-7.0.56-server-1
Using CATALINA_TMPDIR: /usr/local/apache-tomcat-7.0.56-server-1/temp
Using JRE_HOME: /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-oracle/jre
Using CLASSPATH: /usr/local/apache-tomcat-7.0.56-server-1/bin/bootstrap.jar:/usr/local/apache-tomcat-7.0.56-server-1/bin/tomcat-juli.jar
Tomcat started.
Checkout Port 8080
netstat -ln
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:22 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
tcp6 0 0 :::8009 :::* LISTEN
tcp6 0 0 :::8080 :::* LISTEN
tcp6 0 0 :::22 :::* LISTEN
Checkout process
ps -ef | grep tomcat
root 2825 1 1 14:23 pts/0 00:00:03 /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-oracle/jre/bin/java -Djava.util.logging.config.file=/usr/local/apache-tomcat-7.0.56-server-1/conf/logging.properties -Djava.util.logging.manager=org.apache.juli.ClassLoaderLogManager -Djava.endorsed.dirs=/usr/local/apache-tomcat-7.0.56-server-1/endorsed -classpath /usr/local/apache-tomcat-7.0.56-server-1/bin/bootstrap.jar:/usr/local/apache-tomcat-7.0.56-server-1/bin/tomcat-juli.jar -Dcatalina.base=/usr/local/apache-tomcat-7.0.56-server-1 -Dcatalina.home=/usr/local/apache-tomcat-7.0.56-server-1 -Djava.io.tmpdir=/usr/local/apache-tomcat-7.0.56-server-1/temp org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap start
Open web site at port 8080 http://5.101.107.56:8080/ Page is waiting... [content is displayed after 28 minute or more]
Try to shutdown tomcat if content is not displayed yet (before tomcat starts properly).
./shutdown.sh
SEVERE: Could not contact localhost:8005. Tomcat may not be running.
Oct 17, 2014 2:40:29 PM org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina stopServer
SEVERE: Catalina.stop:
java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused
at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketConnect(Native Method)
at java.net.AbstractPlainSoc
Checkout logs
catalina.out
Oct 17, 2014 2:31:47 PM org.apache.coyote.AbstractProtocol init
INFO: Initializing ProtocolHandler ["ajp-bio-8009"]
Oct 17, 2014 2:31:47 PM org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina load
INFO: Initialization processed in 1492 ms
Oct 17, 2014 2:31:47 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardService startInternal
INFO: Starting service Catalina
Oct 17, 2014 2:31:47 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngine startInternal
INFO: Starting Servlet Engine: Apache Tomcat/7.0.56
Oct 17, 2014 2:31:47 PM org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig deployDirectory
INFO: Deploying web application directory /usr/local/apache-tomcat-7.0.56-server-1/webapps/host-manager
I also installed nginx and navigate to http://5.XXX.XXX.XX/ nginx welcome page is opened immediately
I checked catalina.out when i see the page in browser, it says:
Oct 17, 2014 2:31:47 PM org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig deployDirectory
INFO: Deploying web application directory /usr/local/apache-tomcat-7.0.56-server-1/webapps/host-manager
Oct 17, 2014 3:00:27 PM org.apache.catalina.util.SessionIdGenerator createSecureRandom
INFO: Creation of SecureRandom instance for session ID generation using [SHA1PRNG] took **[1,718,769] milliseconds.**
Memory:
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 1017912 849512 168400 332 18780 688468
Replacing securerandom.source=file:/dev/urandom with securerandom.source=file:/dev/./urandom in $JAVA_PATH/jre/lib/security/java.security has solved my problem.
Even when file:/dev/urandom is specified, JRE will still use /dev/random for SHA1PRNG (see bug JDK-4705093):
In SHA1PRNG, there is a SeedGenerator which does various things
depending on the configuration.
If java.security.egd or securerandom.source point to "file:/dev/random" or "file:/dev/urandom", we will use
NativeSeedGenerator, which calls super() which calls
SeedGenerator.URLSeedGenerator(/dev/random). (A nested class within
SeedGenerator.) The only things that changed in this bug was that
urandom will also trigger use of this code path.
If those properties point to another URL that exists, we'll initialize SeedGenerator.URLSeedGenerator(url). This is why
"file:///dev/urandom", "file:/./dev/random", etc. will work.
From Wikipedia on /dev/random:
In this implementation, the generator keeps an estimate of the number
of bits of noise in the entropy pool. From this entropy pool random
numbers are created. When read, the /dev/random device will only
return random bytes within the estimated number of bits of noise in
the entropy pool. /dev/random should be suitable for uses that need
very high quality randomness such as one-time pad or key generation.
When the entropy pool is empty, reads from /dev/random will block
until additional environmental noise is gathered. The intent is to
serve as a cryptographically secure pseudorandom number generator,
delivering output with entropy as large as possible. This is suggested
for use in generating cryptographic keys for high-value or long-term
protection.
Environmental noise?
The random number generator gathers environmental noise from device
drivers and other sources into an entropy pool. The generator also
keeps an estimate of the number of bits of noise in the entropy pool.
From this entropy pool random numbers are created.
That means in practice, it’s possible to block tomcat for an unknown amount of time.
This also works:
Actually, by setting the following in /etc/default/tomcat7, I was fine:
JAVA_OPTS="-Djava.security.egd=file:/dev/./urandom -Djava.awt.headless=true -Xmx1024m -XX:MaxPermSize=512m -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC"
Comment from :
https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-install-apache-tomcat-7-on-ubuntu-14-04-via-apt-get
While using /dev/urandom as the source for entropy is a workaround that reduces the startup time for Tomcat, it is not a good idea because it can have unintended side effects.
Other components running in the Tomcat server (e.g. web applications) might depend on a securely initialized SecureRandom instance and there might be security issues when the entropy for the random numbers is not sufficient.
Actually, this is one of the reasons why using /dev/urandom does not work, but /dev/./urandom does. The SHA1PRNG heavily relies on a good seed. If the seed is not good, the random numbers are predictable. Therefore, the developer ensured that for this purpose /dev/random is used as the source of entropy, even if the JVM is configured to use /dev/urandom. There are two bug reports about this (bug 1, bug 2).
So instead of changing the entropy source to /dev/urandom, one should rather make sure that /dev/random has enough entropy. If the system has a hardware RNG, installing rng-tools should do the trick. Otherwise, installing haveged provides a very good source of entropy that does not rely on a special hardware RNG to be present. In a virtual machine, rng-tools can use entropy from the host through a virtual hardware RNG. As an alternative to this, EGD could be used, but at the moment this software is not included in the Ubuntu repositories, so that it is bothersome to use it.
i had the /var disk full on my debian server and neo4j stopped as expected. I freed up the space on the disk but the neo4j server does not start throwing the error given below in the logs. I don't have any java or neo4j process running on the server that i may kill.
Things were stable with my neo4j setup for the past 6 months with around 1000 nodes. I am little novice on the java side so please let me know if i have missed out on anything basic.
Output on command line: service neo4j-service restart
Restarting Neo4j Graph Database: neo4jWARNING: Max 1024 open files
allowed, minimum of 40 000 recommended. See the Neo4j manual. WARNING!
You are using an unsupported Java runtime.
* Please use Oracle(R) Java(TM) 7 to run Neo4j Server. Download "Java Platform (JDK) 7" from:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/index.html
* Please see http://docs.neo4j.org/ for Neo4j Server installation instructions. Using additional JVM arguments: -server
-XX:+DisableExplicitGC -Dorg.neo4j.server.properties=conf/neo4j-server.properties -Djava.util.logging.config.file=conf/logging.properties -Dlog4j.configuration=file:conf/log4j.properties -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC -XX:+CMSClassUnloadingEnabled Starting Neo4j Server...WARNING: not changing user process [4733]... waiting for
server to be ready..... Failed to start within 120 seconds. Neo4j
Server may have failed to start, please check the logs. failed!
Logfile:
Sep 26, 2014 3:31:38 PM org.neo4j.server.logging.Logger log
SEVERE: Failed to start Neo Server on port [7474]
Sep 26, 2014 3:33:00 PM org.neo4j.server.logging.Logger log
WARNING: You are using an unsupported Java runtime. Please use Oracle(R) Java(TM) Runtime Environment 7.
Sep 26, 2014 3:33:00 PM org.neo4j.server.logging.Logger log
INFO: Setting startup timeout to: 120000ms based on -1
Sep 26, 2014 3:33:03 PM org.neo4j.server.logging.Logger log
SEVERE:
org.neo4j.server.ServerStartupException: Starting Neo4j Server failed: Error starting org.neo4j.kernel.EmbeddedGraphDatabase, /var/lib/neo4j/data/graph.db
at org.neo4j.server.AbstractNeoServer.start(AbstractNeoServer.java:218)
at org.neo4j.server.Bootstrapper.start(Bootstrapper.java:87)
at org.neo4j.server.Bootstrapper.main(Bootstrapper.java:50)
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Error starting org.neo4j.kernel.EmbeddedGraphDatabase, /var/lib/neo4j/data/graph.db
at org.neo4j.kernel.InternalAbstractGraphDatabase.run(InternalAbstractGraphDatabase.java:330)
at org.neo4j.kernel.EmbeddedGraphDatabase.<init>(EmbeddedGraphDatabase.java:63)
at org.neo4j.graphdb.factory.GraphDatabaseFactory$1.newDatabase(GraphDatabaseFactory.java:92)
at org.neo4j.graphdb.factory.GraphDatabaseBuilder.newGraphDatabase(GraphDatabaseBuilder.java:198)
at org.neo4j.kernel.impl.recovery.StoreRecoverer.recover(StoreRecoverer.java:115)
at org.neo4j.server.preflight.PerformRecoveryIfNecessary.run(PerformRecoveryIfNecessary.java:59)
at org.neo4j.server.preflight.PreFlightTasks.run(PreFlightTasks.java:70)
at org.neo4j.server.AbstractNeoServer.runPreflightTasks(AbstractNeoServer.java:333)
at org.neo4j.server.AbstractNeoServer.start(AbstractNeoServer.java:152)
... 2 more
Caused by: org.neo4j.kernel.lifecycle.LifecycleException: Component 'org.neo4j.kernel.impl.transaction.TxManager#61615142' was successfully initialized, but failed to start. Please see attached cause exception.
at org.neo4j.kernel.lifecycle.LifeSupport$LifecycleInstance.start(LifeSupport.java:509)
at org.neo4j.kernel.lifecycle.LifeSupport.start(LifeSupport.java:115)
at org.neo4j.kernel.InternalAbstractGraphDatabase.run(InternalAbstractGraphDatabase.java:307)
... 10 more
Caused by: org.neo4j.graphdb.TransactionFailureException: Unable to start TM
at org.neo4j.kernel.impl.transaction.TxManager.openLog(TxManager.java:824)
at org.neo4j.kernel.impl.transaction.TxManager.start(TxManager.java:198)
at org.neo4j.kernel.lifecycle.LifeSupport$LifecycleInstance.start(LifeSupport.java:503)
... 12 more
Caused by: java.io.IOException: Branch[����] found for [GlobalId[NENEOK|5930761323375553953|5569093129887285248|13248], BranchId[ ]] but no record list found in map
at org.neo4j.kernel.impl.transaction.TxLog.readBranchAddRecordInto(TxLog.java:520)
at org.neo4j.kernel.impl.transaction.TxLog.getDanglingRecords(TxLog.java:440)
at org.neo4j.kernel.impl.transaction.TxLog.recreateActiveTransactionState(TxLog.java:133)
at org.neo4j.kernel.impl.transaction.TxLog.<init>(TxLog.java:128)
at org.neo4j.kernel.impl.transaction.TxManager.openLog(TxManager.java:796)
... 14 more
Sep 26, 2014 3:33:03 PM org.neo4j.server.logging.Logger log
SEVERE: Failed to start Neo Server on port [7474]
I am using an openjdk 1.7 runtime environment which i think i should upgrade but i don't understand what is the cause of the error since everything was working fine before. Thanks for any help!
You should never ever manually modify anything inside the graph.db directory unless you're 100% sure what you're doing.
To prevent the datastore directory from continuously growing check your setting for keep_logical_logs in neo4j.properties, see http://docs.neo4j.org/chunked/stable/configuration-logical-logs.html.
Unless you require logical logs for online backup or cluster synchronization, you might be save deleting nioneo_logical.log.v* files. Make sure to have a backup first!
Also check your settings for open file limits, http://docs.neo4j.org/chunked/stable/linux-performance-guide.html#_setting_the_number_of_open_files.
There used to be a outdated version of Neo4j having a bug that might corrupt your datastore when running out of disc space. If that has happened to you either need to manually fix it on a binary level (which requires a lot of knowledge on Neo4j internals) or restore a previous backup from a time before you run out of disc.
After being killed once, selenium server hangs on all further startups without even trying to acquire the server port.
Rebooting fixes the problem. Running as a different user makes selenium start up again as well, but after that process gets killed it won't work no more.
This is on Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (debian squeeze) in a VirtualBox VM. Looking at a log of the system calls when it's working and when it's not, some component seems to lock up before the socket is even bound. The selenium log isn't of much help.
The output doesn't give any indication either:
$ java -jar selenium-server-standalone-2.28.0.jar
Dec 27, 2012 5:41:35 PM org.openqa.grid.selenium.GridLauncher main
INFO: Launching a standalone server
17:41:35.703 INFO - Java: Sun Microsystems Inc. 14.0-b16
17:41:35.704 INFO - OS: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 amd64
17:41:35.737 INFO - v2.28.0, with Core v2.28.0. Built from revision 18309
17:41:35.867 INFO - RemoteWebDriver instances should connect to: http://127.0.0.1:4444/wd/hub
17:41:35.868 INFO - Version Jetty/5.1.x
17:41:35.868 INFO - Started HttpContext[/selenium-server/driver,/selenium-server/driver]
17:41:35.869 INFO - Started HttpContext[/selenium-server,/selenium-server]
17:41:35.869 INFO - Started HttpContext[/,/]
This is a Java problem; its RNG needlessly reads from /dev/random. On a VM, the random pool is limited and often exhausted after one or two runs. For some reason, a part of the selenium/Jetty startup asks for the problematic RNG. To fix the problem, advise Java to use /dev/urandom instead:
java -Djava.security.egd=file:/dev/./urandom \
-jar selenium-server-standalone-2.28.0.jar
works fine.