I am trying to load and parse a shapefile using the GeoTools library. However, when I try to load the file the following call is resulting is a dependency failure for org.geotools.factory.FactoryRegistry:
DataStore newStore = DataStoreFinder.getDataStore(connect);
Error:
org/geotools/factory/FactoryRegistry
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/geotools/factory/FactoryRegistry
I have included the following dependencies in gradle:
compile files ('libs/geotools/gt-opengis-14.2.jar')
compile files ('libs/geotools/gt-api-14.2.jar')
compile files ('libs/geotools/gt-shapefile-14.2.jar')
compile files ('libs/geotools/gt-cql-14.2.jar')
compile files ('libs/geotools/gt-main-14.2.jar')
compile files ('libs/geotools/gt-referencing-14.2.jar')
compile files ('libs/geotools/gt-epsg-hsql-14.2.jar')
I am not sure if all of them are needed but none of them have the missing class. Is there any other dependency I am missing? The class is documented here.
The easy answer to this problem is to use Maven to manage your dependencies, this would then automatically pull in gt-metadata for you and solve your problem.
If you must manage your dependencies by hand then the I wrote a blog post that describes how to use oops to search the GeoTools jars for a class.
Related
I am trying to incorporate ObjectBox in my hybrid Cordova/Android project. By dint of some trial and error I have managed to figure out two of the steps involved.
The app level build.gradle file has to be modified to include the ObjectBox Gradle plugin classpath "io.objectbox:objectbox-gradle-plugin:2.5.0"
Define a build-extras.gradle file to "apply" the ObjectBox plugin ext.postBuildExtras = {apply plugin: 'io.objectbox'}
The next step according to the ObjectBox docs is to define at least one Entity class
However, the issue here is that I need to import the javax.persistence.* classes into the project. It is not clear to me how I do this. I have run into suggestions along the lines of including
compile group: 'javax.persistence', name: 'javax.persistence-api', version: '2.2'
in the dependencies section of the app level build.gradle file. However, this causes gradle to complain that it does not know the compile() function. I'd be much obliged to anyone who might be able to tell me how this should be done.
For the benefit of anyone running into this thread - you can download the JAR file for javax.persistence here. Place this line in the folder src/android/libsof your custom plugin and then modify plugin.xmlwith the line
<lib-file src='src/android/libs/name-of-javax-persistence.jar'/>
I'm trying to implement my own annotation processor in my android studio project. All is working well and compiling until I add this simple line to build.gradle dependencies block:
dependencies {
.
.
.
annotationProcessor(':processor')
}
At that point I get this error when compiling:
Could not find :processor:. Required by:
project :app Search in build.gradle files
I've followed endless tutorials and nothing seems to help. I've just recently upgraded to AS 3.1 and thinking maybe it relates?
Here is the project structure: (mind you - here I add the annotation processor as a jar file. I've also attached an image trying to do it as a different module and same result)
Here is a different I'm trying to add it - creating the annotation processor in the same project with a different module and still no go:
Some extra info in pics...
Project structure:
app.build:
processor.build:
annotation:
MainActivity:
Processor implementation:
If you have everything inside the same artifact, — annotation processor, it's annotations and library classes, used by processor users, Android Gradle plugin requires you to declare two dependencies on the same artifact:
annotationProcessor project(':processor')
compile project(':processor')
or
annotationProcessor files('libs/processor.jar')
compile files('libs/processor.jar')
Note, that such setup might become unsupported in future. It is advisable to split your processor in separate module and make it depend on the rest of code. After doing so you will be able to declare dependencies like this:
annotationProcessor project(':processor') // processor-only jar
compile project(':processor-api') // annotations and classes for user code
I was trying to use AndroidSlidingUpPanel in my app but when I was trying to build the Gradle file is giving me this warning.
All com.android.support libraries must use the exact same version specification (mixing versions can lead to runtime crashes). Found versions 26.0.0-alpha1, 23.4.0. Examples include com.android.support:animated-vector-drawable:26.0.0-alpha1 and com.android.support:recyclerview-v7:23.4.0 more...
I have seen the files in GitHub and saw that the file AndroidSlidingUpPanel/library/build.gradle is using a lower version of :
compile 'com.android.support:support-v4:23.4.0'
compile 'com.android.support:support-annotations:23.4.0'
compile 'com.android.support:recyclerview-v7:23.4.0'
which should be something like this:
compile 'com.android.support:support-v4:26.+'
compile 'com.android.support:support-annotations:26.+'
compile 'com.android.support:recyclerview-v7:26.+'
When I downloaded the library and imported it as module it was giving error too:
Error:(21, 0) Could not read script
'I:\ANDROID\Android_Studio_Projects\TRYS\Theme3\maven_push.gradle' as it
does not exist.
Open File
Even after copying maven_push.gradle to root it is giving this error:Error:Could not get unknown property 'GROUP' for object of type org.gradle.api.publication.maven.internal.deployer.DefaultGroovyMavenDeployer.
So what to do?
open android studio and get to this page
press this part
it will open a drop-down menu press git and then
press clone and your done
You have two options
Post an issue in the library on GitHub and wait for the creator to update.
Add it to your project manually by pulling​ the project from git and update the libraries your self.
Remove lines referring to maven_push.gradle from the build.gradle on the specified project.
Example:
apply from: 'https://raw.github.com/chrisbanes/gradle-mvn-push/master/gradle-mvn-push.gradle'
apply from: './mvn-push.gradle'
Just comment them out. I've got this solution after going through this
In gradle if I my project depends on another package, for example:
compile 'com.example:foo:0.82.2'
And in my javadoc, it references symbol in that package.
Then if I run javadoc task, it will say error: reference not found
I know I should add that package to class path, just like the following way to add android library
classpath += project.files(android.getBootClasspath().join(File.pathSeparator))
But how could I know the classpath for my dependency except add a hard coding path point to the gradle cache?
A project runs on Google App Engine. The project has dependency that uses a class that can't be invoked on App Engine due to security constraints (it's not on the whitelist). My (very hacky) solution was to just copy a modified version of that class into my project (matching the original Class's name and package) that doesn't need the restricted class. This works on both dev and live, I assume because my source appears in the classpath before my external dependencies.
To make it a bit cleaner, I decided to put my modified version of that class into it's own project that can be packaged up in a jar and published for anyone else to use should they face this problem.
Here's my build.gradle:
// my jar that has 'fixed' version of Class.
compile files('path/to/my-hack-0.0.1.jar')
// dependency that includes class that won't run on appengine
compile 'org.elasticsearch:elasticsearch:1.4.4'
On my local dev server, this works fine, the code finds my hacked version of the class first at runtime. On live, for some unknown reason, the version in the elasticsearch dependency is loaded first.
I know having two versions of the same class in the classpath isn't ideal but I was hoping I could reliably force my version to be at the start of the classpath. Any ideas? Alternatively, is there a better way to solve this problem?
Not really sure if this is what people visiting this question were looking for, but this was what my problem and a solution that I reached at.
Jar A: contains class XYZ
Jar B: also contains class XYZ
My Project needs Jar B on the classpath before Jar A to be able to get compiled.
Problem is Gradle sorts the dependencies based on alphabetical order post resolving them which meant Jar B will be coming after Jar A in the generated classpath leading to error while compiling.
Solution:
Declare a custom configuration and patch the compileClasspath. This is how the relevant portion of build.gradle might look like.
configurations {
priority
sourceSets.main.compileClasspath = configurations.priority + sourceSets.main.compileClasspath
}
dependencies {
priority 'org.blah:JarB:2.3'
compile 'org.blah:JarA:2.4'
...
}
It's the app engine classloader I should have been investigating, not gradle...
App Engine allows you to customise the class loader JAR ordering with a little bit of xml in your appengine-web.xml. In my case:
<class-loader-config>
<priority-specifier filename="my-hack-0.0.1.jar"/>
</class-loader-config>
This places my-hack-0.0.1.jar as the first JAR file to be searched for classes, barring those in the directory war/WEB-INF/classes/.
...Thanks to a nudge in the right direction from #Danilo Tommasina :)
UPDATE 2020:
I just hit the same problem again and came across my own question... This time, live appengine was loading a different version of org.json than was being loaded in dev. Very frustrating and no amount of fiddling the build script would fix it. For future searchers, if you're getting this:
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.json.JSONObject.keySet()Ljava/util/Set;
It's because it's loading an old org.json dependency from god-knows-where. I fixed it by adding this to my appengine-web.xml:
<class-loader-config>
<priority-specifier filename="json-20180130.jar"/>
</class-loader-config>
You'll also need a matching dependency in build.gradle if you don't already have one:
compile 'org.json:json:20180130'
According to gradle dependencies documentation, the order of dependencies defines the order in the classpath. So, we can simply put the libraries in the correct order in "dependencies".
But beware! here are two rules with higher priorities:
For a dynamic version, a 'higher' static version is preferred over a 'lower' version.
Modules declared by a module descriptor file (Ivy or POM file) are preferred over modules that have an artifact file only.