Develop Reference

How to make a Jtext Component for input and output of a single process ran through ProcessBuilder like netbeans console [duplicate]

I am trying to create a sort of console/terminal that allows the user to input a string, which then gets made into a process and the results are printed out. Just like a normal console. But I am having trouble managing the input/output streams. I have looked into this thread, but that solution sadly doesn't apply to my problem.
Along with the standard commands like "ipconfig" and "cmd.exe", I need to be able to run a script and use the same inputstream to pass some arguments, if the script is asking for input.
For example, after running a script "python pyScript.py", I should be able pass further input to the script if it is asking for it(example: raw_input), while also printing the output from the script. The basic behavior you would expect from a terminal.
What I've got so far:
import java.awt.BorderLayout;
import java.awt.Color;
import java.awt.Dimension;
import java.awt.event.KeyEvent;
import java.awt.event.KeyListener;
import java.io.BufferedReader;
import java.io.BufferedWriter;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.InputStream;
import java.io.InputStreamReader;
import java.io.OutputStream;
import java.io.OutputStreamWriter;
import javax.swing.JFrame;
import javax.swing.JPanel;
import javax.swing.JScrollPane;
import javax.swing.JTextPane;
import javax.swing.text.BadLocationException;
import javax.swing.text.Document;
public class Console extends JFrame{
JTextPane inPane, outPane;
InputStream inStream, inErrStream;
OutputStream outStream;
public Console(){
super("Console");
setPreferredSize(new Dimension(500, 600));
setLocationByPlatform(true);
setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
// GUI
outPane = new JTextPane();
outPane.setEditable(false);
outPane.setBackground(new Color(20, 20, 20));
outPane.setForeground(Color.white);
inPane = new JTextPane();
inPane.setBackground(new Color(40, 40, 40));
inPane.setForeground(Color.white);
inPane.setCaretColor(Color.white);
JPanel panel = new JPanel(new BorderLayout());
panel.add(outPane, BorderLayout.CENTER);
panel.add(inPane, BorderLayout.SOUTH);
JScrollPane scrollPanel = new JScrollPane(panel);
getContentPane().add(scrollPanel);
// LISTENER
inPane.addKeyListener(new KeyListener(){
#Override
public void keyPressed(KeyEvent e){
if(e.getKeyCode() == KeyEvent.VK_ENTER){
e.consume();
read(inPane.getText());
}
}
#Override
public void keyTyped(KeyEvent e) {}
#Override
public void keyReleased(KeyEvent e) {}
});
pack();
setVisible(true);
}
private void read(String command){
println(command);
// Write to Process
if (outStream != null) {
System.out.println("Outstream again");
BufferedWriter writer = new BufferedWriter(new OutputStreamWriter(outStream));
try {
writer.write(command);
//writer.flush();
//writer.close();
} catch (IOException e1) {
e1.printStackTrace();
}
}
// Execute Command
try {
exec(command);
} catch (IOException e) {}
inPane.setText("");
}
private void exec(String command) throws IOException{
Process pro = Runtime.getRuntime().exec(command, null);
inStream = pro.getInputStream();
inErrStream = pro.getErrorStream();
outStream = pro.getOutputStream();
Thread t1 = new Thread(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
try {
String line = null;
while(true){
BufferedReader in = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(inStream));
while ((line = in.readLine()) != null) {
println(line);
}
BufferedReader inErr = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(inErrStream));
while ((line = inErr.readLine()) != null) {
println(line);
}
Thread.sleep(1000);
}
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
});
t1.start();
}
public void println(String line) {
Document doc = outPane.getDocument();
try {
doc.insertString(doc.getLength(), line + "\n", null);
} catch (BadLocationException e) {}
}
public static void main(String[] args){
new Console();
}
}
I don't use the mentioned ProcessBuilder, since I do like to differentiate between error and normal stream.
UPDATE 29.08.2016
With the help of #ArcticLord we have achieved what was asked in the original question.
Now it is just a matter of ironing out any strange behavior like the non terminating process. The Console has a "stop" button that simply calls pro.destroy(). But for some reason this does not work for infinitely running processes, that are spamming outputs.
Console: http://pastebin.com/vyxfPEXC
InputStreamLineBuffer: http://pastebin.com/TzFamwZ1
Example code that does not stop:
public class Infinity{
public static void main(String[] args){
while(true){
System.out.println(".");
}
}
}
Example code that does stop:
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
public class InfinitySlow{
public static void main(String[] args){
while(true){
try {
TimeUnit.SECONDS.sleep(1);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
System.out.println(".");
}
}
}

You are on the right way with your code. There are only some minor things you missed.
Lets start with your read method:
private void read(String command){
[...]
// Write to Process
if (outStream != null) {
[...]
try {
writer.write(command + "\n"); // add newline so your input will get proceed
writer.flush(); // flush your input to your process
} catch (IOException e1) {
e1.printStackTrace();
}
}
// ELSE!! - if no outputstream is available
// Execute Command
else {
try {
exec(command);
} catch (IOException e) {
// Handle the exception here. Mostly this means
// that the command could not get executed
// because command was not found.
println("Command not found: " + command);
}
}
inPane.setText("");
}
Now lets fix your exec method. You should use separate threads for reading normal process output and error output. Additionally I introduce a third thread that waits for the process to end and closes the outputStream so next user input is not meant for process but is a new command.
private void exec(String command) throws IOException{
Process pro = Runtime.getRuntime().exec(command, null);
inStream = pro.getInputStream();
inErrStream = pro.getErrorStream();
outStream = pro.getOutputStream();
// Thread that reads process output
Thread outStreamReader = new Thread(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
try {
String line = null;
BufferedReader in = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(inStream));
while ((line = in.readLine()) != null) {
println(line);
}
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
System.out.println("Exit reading process output");
}
});
outStreamReader.start();
// Thread that reads process error output
Thread errStreamReader = new Thread(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
try {
String line = null;
BufferedReader inErr = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(inErrStream));
while ((line = inErr.readLine()) != null) {
println(line);
}
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
System.out.println("Exit reading error stream");
}
});
errStreamReader.start();
// Thread that waits for process to end
Thread exitWaiter = new Thread(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
try {
int retValue = pro.waitFor();
println("Command exit with return value " + retValue);
// close outStream
outStream.close();
outStream = null;
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
});
exitWaiter.start();
}
Now this should work.
If you enter ipconfig it prints the command output, closes the output stream and is ready for a new command.
If you enter cmd it prints the output and let you enter more cmd commands like dir or cd and so on until you enter exit. Then it closes the output stream and is ready for a new command.
You may run into problems with executing python scripts because there are problems with reading Process InputStreams with Java if they are not flushed into system pipeline.
See this example python script
print "Input something!"
str = raw_input()
print "Received input is : ", str
You could run this with your Java programm and also enter the input but you will not see the script output until the script is finished.
The only fix I could find is to manually flush the output in the script.
import sys
print "Input something!"
sys.stdout.flush()
str = raw_input()
print "Received input is : ", str
sys.stdout.flush()
Running this script will bahave as you expect.
You can read more about this problem at
Java: is there a way to run a system command and print the output during execution?
Why does reading from Process' InputStream block altough data is available
Java: can't get stdout data from Process unless its manually flushed
EDIT: I have just found another very easy solution for the stdout.flush() problem with Python Scripts. Start them with python -u script.py and you don't need to flush manually. This should solve your problem.
EDIT2: We discussed in the comments that with this solution output and error Stream will be mixed up since they run in different threads. The problem here is that we cannot distinguish if output writing is finish when error stream thread comes up. Otherwise classic thread scheduling with locks could handle this situation. But we have a continuous stream until process is finished no matter if data flows or not. So we need a mechanism here that logs how much time has elapsed since last line was read from each stream.
For this I will introduce a class that gets an InputStream and starts a Thread for reading the incoming data. This Thread stores each line in a Queue and stops when end of stream arrives. Additionally it holds the time when last line was read and added to Queue.
public class InputStreamLineBuffer{
private InputStream inputStream;
private ConcurrentLinkedQueue<String> lines;
private long lastTimeModified;
private Thread inputCatcher;
private boolean isAlive;
public InputStreamLineBuffer(InputStream is){
inputStream = is;
lines = new ConcurrentLinkedQueue<String>();
lastTimeModified = System.currentTimeMillis();
isAlive = false;
inputCatcher = new Thread(new Runnable(){
#Override
public void run() {
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(100);
int b;
try{
while ((b = inputStream.read()) != -1){
// read one char
if((char)b == '\n'){
// new Line -> add to queue
lines.offer(sb.toString());
sb.setLength(0); // reset StringBuilder
lastTimeModified = System.currentTimeMillis();
}
else sb.append((char)b); // append char to stringbuilder
}
} catch (IOException e){
e.printStackTrace();
} finally {
isAlive = false;
}
}});
}
// is the input reader thread alive
public boolean isAlive(){
return isAlive;
}
// start the input reader thread
public void start(){
isAlive = true;
inputCatcher.start();
}
// has Queue some lines
public boolean hasNext(){
return lines.size() > 0;
}
// get next line from Queue
public String getNext(){
return lines.poll();
}
// how much time has elapsed since last line was read
public long timeElapsed(){
return (System.currentTimeMillis() - lastTimeModified);
}
}
With this class we could combine the output and error reading thread into one. That lives while the input reading buffer threads live and have not comsumed data. In each run it checks if some time has passed since last output was read and if so it prints all unprinted lines at a stroke. The same with the error output. Then it sleeps for some millis for not wasting cpu time.
private void exec(String command) throws IOException{
Process pro = Runtime.getRuntime().exec(command, null);
inStream = pro.getInputStream();
inErrStream = pro.getErrorStream();
outStream = pro.getOutputStream();
InputStreamLineBuffer outBuff = new InputStreamLineBuffer(inStream);
InputStreamLineBuffer errBuff = new InputStreamLineBuffer(inErrStream);
Thread streamReader = new Thread(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
// start the input reader buffer threads
outBuff.start();
errBuff.start();
// while an input reader buffer thread is alive
// or there are unconsumed data left
while(outBuff.isAlive() || outBuff.hasNext() ||
errBuff.isAlive() || errBuff.hasNext()){
// get the normal output if at least 50 millis have passed
if(outBuff.timeElapsed() > 50)
while(outBuff.hasNext())
println(outBuff.getNext());
// get the error output if at least 50 millis have passed
if(errBuff.timeElapsed() > 50)
while(errBuff.hasNext())
println(errBuff.getNext());
// sleep a bit bofore next run
try {
Thread.sleep(100);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
System.out.println("Finish reading error and output stream");
}
});
streamReader.start();
// remove outStreamReader and errStreamReader Thread
[...]
}
Maybe this is not a perfect solution but it should handle the situation here.
EDIT (31.8.2016)
We discussed in comments that there is still a problem with the code while implementing a stop button that kills the started
process using Process#destroy(). A process that produces very much output e.g. in an infinite loop will
be destroyed immediately by calling destroy(). But since it has already produced a lot of output that has to be consumed
by our streamReader we can't get back to normal programm behaviour.
So we need some small changes here:
We will introduce a destroy() method to the InputStreamLineBuffer that stops the output reading and clears the queue.
The changes will look like this:
public class InputStreamLineBuffer{
private boolean emergencyBrake = false;
[...]
public InputStreamLineBuffer(InputStream is){
[...]
while ((b = inputStream.read()) != -1 && !emergencyBrake){
[...]
}
}
[...]
// exits immediately and clears line buffer
public void destroy(){
emergencyBrake = true;
lines.clear();
}
}
And some little changes in the main programm
public class ExeConsole extends JFrame{
[...]
// The line buffers must be declared outside the method
InputStreamLineBuffer outBuff, errBuff;
public ExeConsole{
[...]
btnStop.addActionListener(new ActionListener() {
public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {
if(pro != null){
pro.destroy();
outBuff.destroy();
errBuff.destroy();
}
}});
}
[...]
private void exec(String command) throws IOException{
[...]
//InputStreamLineBuffer outBuff = new InputStreamLineBuffer(inStream);
//InputStreamLineBuffer errBuff = new InputStreamLineBuffer(inErrStream);
outBuff = new InputStreamLineBuffer(inStream);
errBuff = new InputStreamLineBuffer(inErrStream);
[...]
}
}
Now it should be able to destroy even some output spamming processes.
Note: I found out that Process#destroy() is not able to destroy child processes. So if you start cmd on windows
and start a java programm from there you will end up destroying the cmd process while the java programm is still running.
You will see it in the task manager. This problem could not be solved with java itself. it will need
some os depending external tools to get the pids of these processes and kill them manually.

Although #ArticLord solution is nice and neat, recently I faced the same kind of problem and came up with a solution that's conceptually equivalent, but slightly different in its implementation.
The concept is the same, namely "bulk reads": when a reader thread acquires its turn, it consumes all the stream it handles, and pass the hand only when it is done.
This guarantees the out/err print order.
But instead of using a timer-based turn assignment, I use a lock-based non-blocking read simulation:
// main method for testability: replace with private void exec(String command)
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception
{
// create a lock that will be shared between reader threads
// the lock is fair to minimize starvation possibilities
ReentrantLock lock = new ReentrantLock(true);
// exec the command: I use nslookup for testing on windows
// because it is interactive and prints to stderr too
Process p = Runtime.getRuntime().exec("nslookup");
// create a thread to handle output from process (uses a test consumer)
Thread outThread = createThread(p.getInputStream(), lock, System.out::print);
outThread.setName("outThread");
outThread.start();
// create a thread to handle error from process (test consumer, again)
Thread errThread = createThread(p.getErrorStream(), lock, System.err::print);
errThread.setName("errThread");
errThread.start();
// create a thread to handle input to process (read from stdin for testing purpose)
PrintWriter writer = new PrintWriter(p.getOutputStream());
Thread inThread = createThread(System.in, null, str ->
{
writer.print(str);
writer.flush();
});
inThread.setName("inThread");
inThread.start();
// create a thread to handle termination gracefully. Not really needed in this simple
// scenario, but on a real application we don't want to block the UI until process dies
Thread endThread = new Thread(() ->
{
try
{
// wait until process is done
p.waitFor();
logger.debug("process exit");
// signal threads to exit
outThread.interrupt();
errThread.interrupt();
inThread.interrupt();
// close process streams
p.getOutputStream().close();
p.getInputStream().close();
p.getErrorStream().close();
// wait for threads to exit
outThread.join();
errThread.join();
inThread.join();
logger.debug("exit");
}
catch(Exception e)
{
throw new RuntimeException(e.getMessage(), e);
}
});
endThread.setName("endThread");
endThread.start();
// wait for full termination (process and related threads by cascade joins)
endThread.join();
logger.debug("END");
}
// convenience method to create a specific reader thread with exclusion by lock behavior
private static Thread createThread(InputStream input, ReentrantLock lock, Consumer<String> consumer)
{
return new Thread(() ->
{
// wrap input to be buffered (enables ready()) and to read chars
// using explicit encoding may be relevant in some case
BufferedReader reader = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(input));
// create a char buffer for reading
char[] buffer = new char[8192];
try
{
// repeat until EOF or interruption
while(true)
{
try
{
// wait for your turn to bulk read
if(lock != null && !lock.isHeldByCurrentThread())
{
lock.lockInterruptibly();
}
// when there's nothing to read, pass the hand (bulk read ended)
if(!reader.ready())
{
if(lock != null)
{
lock.unlock();
}
// this enables a soft busy-waiting loop, that simultates non-blocking reads
Thread.sleep(100);
continue;
}
// perform the read, as we are sure it will not block (input is "ready")
int len = reader.read(buffer);
if(len == -1)
{
return;
}
// transform to string an let consumer consume it
String str = new String(buffer, 0, len);
consumer.accept(str);
}
catch(InterruptedException e)
{
// catch interruptions either when sleeping and waiting for lock
// and restore interrupted flag (not necessary in this case, however it's a best practice)
Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
return;
}
catch(IOException e)
{
throw new RuntimeException(e.getMessage(), e);
}
}
}
finally
{
// protect the lock against unhandled exceptions
if(lock != null && lock.isHeldByCurrentThread())
{
lock.unlock();
}
logger.debug("exit");
}
});
}
Note that both solutions, #ArticLord's and mine, are not totally starvation-safe, and chances (really few) are inversely proportional to consumers speed.
Happy 2016! ;)

waitFor() method returning null although the process is finish

Here is my code:
private static model connectRemoteSession(String accountName,String password) throws IOException{
StringBuilder output = new StringBuilder();
StringBuilder error = new StringBuilder();
Runtime runtime = Runtime.getRuntime();
String com = // some command
proc = runtime.exec(com);
Worker worker = new Worker(proc);
reader = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(proc.getInputStream()));
stderr = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(
proc.getErrorStream()));
String outLine;
String errLine;
worker.start();
try {
worker.join(300000);
if (worker.exit != null){
//read the outout and error stream and take actions accordingly
}
else{
proc.destroy();
while ((outLine = reader.readLine()) != null)
{
CloudBackup.logger.info("online exchange output line ="+outLine);
output.append(outLine);
}
while((errLine = stderr.readLine()) != null){
CloudBackup.logger.info("online exchange error line ="+errLine);
error.append(errLine);
}
throw new TimeoutException();
}
} catch(InterruptedException ex) {
worker.interrupt();
Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
throw ex;
} finally {
proc.destroy();
}
}catch(Exception e){
CloudBackup.logger.severe(e.getMessage());
}finally{
reader.close();
proc.getOutputStream().close();
stderr.close();
}
return model;
}
class Worker extends Thread {
private final Process process;
Integer exit;
Worker(Process process) {
this.process = process;
}
public void run() {
try {
exit = process.waitFor();
} catch (InterruptedException ignore) {
return;
}
}
This issue I am facing is one one machine the code is working fine but on another machine the worker.exit is always null, although I put the logs in the worker.exit == null and saw that the process is getting over but somehow process.waitFor is not capturing it.
I know that process.waitFor() is available in Java 8 so I checked the version on both the machined and they have same version Java 8. Also there is no other thread running.

Try this, it can be a caching issue.
volatile Integer exit;

Interfacing Python and Java - Multithreaded Input and Output Streams

I have a Python app and a Java app running simultaneously.
I want Java to start the Python process and then communicate using the normal STDIN/STDOUT streams with Python.
I have started the process correctly and have two threads to handle the two I/O streams.
OUTPUT THREAD:
class output2 extends Thread {
Process process;
OutputStream stdin;
BufferedWriter writer;
Scanner in = new Scanner(System.in);
output2(Process p) {
try {
process = p;
stdin = process.getOutputStream();
writer = new BufferedWriter(new OutputStreamWriter(stdin));
} catch (Exception e) {
System.out.println("ERROR output2(): " + e);
}
}
#Override
public void run() {
System.out.println("Starting OUTPUT THREAD");
try {
while (true) {
String input = in.nextLine();
writer.write(input);
writer.flush();
}
} catch (Exception e) {
System.out.println("ERROR output2_run(): " + e);
}
System.out.println("Ending OUTPUT THREAD");
}
}
INPUT THREAD :
class input2 extends Thread {
Process process;
InputStream stdout;
BufferedReader reader;
input2(Process p) {
try {
process = p;
stdout = process.getInputStream();
reader = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(stdout));
} catch (Exception e) {
System.out.println("ERROR input2(): " + e);
}
}
#Override
public void run() {
System.out.println("Started INPUT THREAD");
try {
while (true) {
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + " is executing");
if (reader.readLine() != null) {
System.out.println("Stdout: " + reader.readLine());
}
Thread.sleep(1000);
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + " stopped executing");
}
} catch (Exception e) {
System.out.println("ERROR input2_run(): " + e);
}
System.out.println("Ending INPUT THREAD");
}
}
MAIN :
public class My_Java {
public static void main(String args[]) {
File file = new File("C:\\Location\\");
try {
Process process = Runtime.getRuntime().exec("C:\\Python27\\python.exe chat_from_file.py", null, file);
input2 input = new input2(process);
output2 output = new output2(process);
input.setName("INPUT THREAD");
output.setName("OUTPUT THREAD");
input.start();
output.start();
} catch (Exception e) {
System.out.println("ERROR main(): " + e);
}
}
}
This doesn't seem to give any response at all.
It starts both threads, says INPUT THREAD is executing but nothing after that.
Where am I going wrong?

First of all, after calling if (reader.readLine() != null) { in your input class, you effectively have read the line and the next call will return null.
Use ready to check for non-blocking read possibility. Don't read upfront.
However, I'm pretty sure that you process exists abnormally, with something like python: can't open file 'chat_from_file.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory or, throws a stacktrace and exits.
Use getErrorStream to check what the process is outputting if an error exists. This will put you on the correct path to solve your issue.
Also, just in case, make sure there's actually something to be read. Make sure your Python application is outputting enough data for buffers to be flushed (or flushing its writes).
And don't forget to join and exit cleanly and correctly. Good luck.

Exit gracefully from blocked process

I am launching a service (process) with the code below. My issue is as follows:
I need to read the output of the process to make sure it gets started
if it gets started, I return and everything is fine
if it does not get started for whatever reason, the while will block forever as the process just hangs without outputting anything
Any ideas how I could exit the method gracefully if I don't get the expected string?
ps: I could do it with a Future and a timeout on get but thought there might be a better way.
public boolean startService() {
try {
ProcessBuilder pb = new ProcessBuilder("service.exe");
pb.directory(new File("C:/serviceFolder/"));
pb.redirectErrorStream(true);
Process p = pb.start();
BufferedReader reader = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(p.getInputStream()));
String line;
while ((line = reader.readLine()) != null) {
if (line.toLowerCase().contains("started")) {
return true;
}
}
return false; //I never get there when it fails
} catch (IOException e) {
throw new RuntimeException("Could not start the service.exe process", e);
}
}

If you can modify the service code, it's better to change it not to hang if it can't start - it should exit and log an error message. This way your Java code will work as-is.
If you can't, there is no other way beside setting a timeout, because your Java code has no means to know what's going on.
Of course, if you can modify the service, an alternative is to watch for output other then the process's standard output/error, like a PID file, an error log message, or whatever. If the subprocess already creates a PID file, for example, you can schedule a check on this file instead of the standard input, but really it's the same concept, just applied differently to use nicer/simpler code

Something like this should work. Essentially, start the service in a separate thread and create a Timer that interrupts it after a certain period. Note that the timer task is a Daemon so it should not hold up your process if it needs to quit.
Obviously this will not work if reader.readLine() consumes and discards interrupts.
private static class ServiceRunner implements Runnable {
// Am I running?
volatile boolean running = true;
// My thread.
volatile Thread thread = Thread.currentThread();
#Override
public void run() {
// Start a timer.
Timer timer = new Timer("Wait for ServiceRunner to finish.", true);
// Fire it after 2 seconds.
timer.schedule(new StopTask(), 2000);
try {
// Start the service.
startService();
} finally {
// No longer running.
running = false;
}
}
class StopTask extends TimerTask {
#Override
public void run() {
if (running) {
// Interrupt the service runner.
thread.interrupt();
}
}
}
public boolean startService() {
try {
ProcessBuilder pb = new ProcessBuilder("service.exe");
pb.directory(new File("C:/serviceFolder/"));
pb.redirectErrorStream(true);
Process p = pb.start();
BufferedReader reader = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(p.getInputStream()));
String line;
while ((line = reader.readLine()) != null) {
if (line.toLowerCase().contains("started")) {
return true;
}
}
return false; //I never get there when it fails
} catch (IOException e) {
throw new RuntimeException("Could not start the service.exe process", e);
}
}
}
I have not tested this code but it should work.
You will need to make adjustments to retain whether the service started or not.

It seems that the Future#get approach is preferred. For future reference, I have modified the code in the following way:
public boolean startService() {
Callable<Boolean> start = new Callable<Boolean>() {
#Override
public Boolean call() throws Exception {
ProcessBuilder pb = new ProcessBuilder("service.exe");
pb.directory(new File("C:/serviceFolder/"));
pb.redirectErrorStream(true);
Process p = pb.start();
BufferedReader reader = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(p.getInputStream()));
String line;
while ((line = reader.readLine()) != null) {
if (line.toLowerCase().contains("started")) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
};
ExecutorService executor = Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor();
Future<Boolean> future = executor.submit(start);
try {
return future.get(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
} catch (InterruptedException ignore) {
Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
return false;
} catch (ExecutionException | TimeoutException e) {
logger.error("Could not start service", e);
return false;
} finally {
executor.shutdownNow();
}
}

use java execute shell command

this class is response to execute the command ,the print the result
public class ExecutorTask implements Runnable{
#Override
public void run() {
Process process = null;
try {
process = Runtime.getRuntime().exec("cmd /c dir");
BufferedReader reader = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(process.getInputStream()));
String line="";
while ((line = reader.readLine()) != null) {
System.out.println(line);
}
process.waitFor();
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
return;
}
}
}
the second class is a executor to run the shell use a thread
public final class ShellCommandExecutor{
public void execute(String command){
ExecutorTask task = new ExecutorTask();
Thread executorThread = new Thread(task);
executorThread.start();
/*try {
Thread.sleep(1000);
executorThread.interrupt();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}*/
}
}
the problem is why i must in the class ShellCommandExecutor add code snippet:
try {
Thread.sleep(1000);
executorThread.interrupt();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
then can i see the print result:
2012-08-21 00:32 <DIR> .
2012-08-21 00:32 <DIR> ..
2012-08-21 00:32 1,576 .classpath
2012-08-21 00:26 1,224 .project
2012-08-07 10:58 <DIR> .settings
2012-08-24 15:19 10,965 pom.xml
2012-08-07 10:57 <DIR> src
2012-08-21 00:32 <DIR> target
2012-08-24 10:22 0 velocity.log
why?

You started a thread with
executorThread.start();
if you do nothing else the thread that started it (your main thread) will not wait for your executorThread to finish before returning, so your application will exit before this thread has executed its task.
To wait for your executorThread to finish you should call:
executorThread.join();
later in the code. At this point you will be ensured that it has finished its task.
Currently it works because you wait for 1 second in your main thread, during this second your other thread performs its action. But if your executorThread needed more than one second to perform it it will not work, so you should not sleep() in this case.
See Thread.join javadoc.

First of all why are you using String as a parameter in execute() method when you are not using it...
I tried your program with slight modification and it worked without sleep() and interrupt()
Try the code below.....
public final class ShellCommandExecutor{
public void execute(){
ExecutorTask task = new ExecutorTask();
Thread executorThread = new Thread(task);
executorThread.start();
/*try {
Thread.sleep(1000);
executorThread.interrupt();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}*/
}
public static void main(String[] args){
new ShellCommandExecutor().execute();
}
}
class ExecutorTask implements Runnable{
#Override
public void run() {
Process process = null;
try {
process = Runtime.getRuntime().exec("cmd /c dir");
BufferedReader reader = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(process.getInputStream()));
String line="";
while ((line = reader.readLine()) != null) {
System.out.println(line);
}
process.waitFor();
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
return;
}
}
}