Can't control logging levels when using jetty-runner - java

I have a Java 8 Maven webapp project that I am running using jetty-runner.jar. Everything works fine, except I can't control the logging levels (INFO, WARNING, FINE, FINER etc.). Am using java.util.logging and OS is Win7.
I've tried the following:
Created a logging.properties file in src/main/resources folder (ends up in WEB-INF/classes directory of the war).
Renamed logging.properties to jetty-logging.properties
Used -Djava.util.logging.config.file=WEB-INF/classes/logging.properties (when the file was so named) with the command to run jetty-runner
java -Djava.util.logging.config.file=WEB-INF/classes/logging.prop
erties -jar target/dependency/jetty-runner.jar target/xyz.war
Also tried -Djava.util.logging.config.file=/WEB-INF/classes/logging.properties (with a / in front of WEB-INF)
My logging file is simply:
.level = WARNING
I haven't had to mess around with logging much before (except GAE projects), so not sure what I am doing wrong.

Since you are trying to load the logging.properties from inside of the WAR file you have to use the java.util.logging.config.class. Per the documentation:
If the "java.util.logging.config.class" property is set, then the property value is treated as a class name. The given class will be loaded, an object will be instantiated, and that object's constructor is responsible for reading in the initial configuration. (That object may use other system properties to control its configuration.) The alternate configuration class can use readConfiguration(InputStream) to define properties in the LogManager.
Using that property you can use Class.getResourceAsStream to locate the file inside of the WAR file. Here is an example:
package foo.bar.baz;
import java.io.FileNotFoundException;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.InputStream;
import java.util.logging.LogManager;
public class JulConfig {
/**
* Install this as the -Djava.util.logging.config.class=foo.bar.baz.JulConfig
* -Djava.util.logging.config.file=WEB-INF/classes/logging.properties
* #throws Exception if there is a problem.
*/
public JulConfig() throws Exception {
String key = "java.util.logging.config.file";
String file = System.getProperty(key, "logging.properties");
final InputStream in = JulConfig.class.getResourceAsStream(file);
if (in != null) {
try {
LogManager.getLogManager().readConfiguration(in);
//System.clearProperty(key); //Optional.
} finally {
try {
in.close();
} catch (IOException ignore) {
}
}
} else {
throw new FileNotFoundException(file);
}
}
}
The reason you have to do this is because the LogManager uses java.io.File to locate the logging.properties.

Related

How to keep a jar file external but still use its classes in my Android project?

I need to have a jar file located in a main/assets directory within an Android project. It is important the jar file is located there.
With my main Android project is there a way to reference this jar file in my code and to use its classes?
To be clear I don't want to add the jar to the main project once compiled.
EDIT: I have tried the link below and it seems to load the Class file I've stated. But I'm strugging how to define constructor arguments for the dynamically loaded Class.
android-custom-class-loading-sample
EDIT2
Nearly there. I've confirmed the class is loaded from my classes.jar. I'm stuck instantiating it though.
On the licenseValidatorClazz.getConstructor line I get the error below. I'm guessing I'm missing something from my Interface file?
java.lang.NoSuchMethodException: [interface com.google.android.vending.licensing.Policy, interface com.google.android.vending.licensing.DeviceLimiter, interface com.google.android.vending.licensing.LicenseCheckerCallback, int, class java.lang.String, class java.lang.String]
public Class licenseValidatorClazz = null;
public LicenseValidator validator;
...
// Initialize the class loader with the secondary dex file.
DexClassLoader cl = new DexClassLoader(dexInternalStoragePath.getAbsolutePath(),
optimizedDexOutputPath.getAbsolutePath(),
null,
mContext.getClassLoader());
try {
// Load the library class from the class loader.
licenseValidatorClazz = cl.loadClass("com.google.android.vending.licensing.LicenseValidator");
validator = (LicenseValidator) licenseValidatorClazz.getConstructor(Policy.class,DeviceLimiter.class,LicenseCheckerCallback.class,int.class,String.class,String.class).newInstance(ddd, new NullDeviceLimiter(),
callback, generateNonce(), mPackageName, mVersionCode);
} catch (Exception exception) {
// Handle exception gracefully here.
exception.printStackTrace();
}
I have an Interface which contains the functions to pass to the loaded class.
public interface LicenseValidator
{
public LicenseCheckerCallback getCallback();
public int getNonce();
public String getPackageName();
public void verify(PublicKey publicKey, int responseCode, String signedData, String signature);
public void handleResponse(int response, ResponseData rawData);
public void handleApplicationError(int code);
public void handleInvalidResponse();
}
TO use an external jar to be associated with your application and use it during runtime, it needs to be in dalvik format since normal jars cannot work under dalvikVM.
Convert your files using the dx tool
using aapt cmd , add those classes.dex to your jar file.
Now this jar which contains files in dalvik format can be loaded into our project.
Here is a post which explains the procedure to accomplish it.
There are steps to accomplish this.
You have to make a copy of your JAR file into the private internal storage of your aplication.
Using the dx tool inside the android folder, you have to generate a classes.dex file associated with the JAR file. The dx tool will be at the location /android-sdks/build-tools/19.0.1 (this file is needed by the Dalvik VM, simply jar can not be read by the dalvik VM))
Using the aapt tool command which is also inside the same location, you have to add the classes.dex to the JAR file.
This JAR file could be loaded dynamically using DexClassLoader.
If you are making a JAR from any one your own library, you have to do this steps (1-4) every time when there is a change in your library source code. So you can automate this steps by creating a shell script(in Mac/Linux/Ubuntu) or batch scripts(in Windows). You can refere this link to understand how to write shell scripts.
Note : One situation for implementing this method is, when it is impossible to add the JAR files directly to the build path of core project and need to be loaded dynamically at run time. In normal cases the JAR files could be added to the build path.
please check this link for the detailed code and implementation.
How to load a jar file at runtime
Android: How to dynamically load classes from a JAR file?
Hope this helps!!
You should try out the Services API - java.util.ServiceLoader
You define a service interface and its implementations in your jar.
package com.my.project;
public interface MyService { ... }
public class MyServiceBarImpl implements MyService { ... }
public class MyServiceFooImpl implements MyService { ... }
Then you define the services contained within the jar file in the META-INF/services/ directory. For instance, in the file 'META-INF/services/com.my.project.MyService', you list the provider classes.
# Known MyService providers.
com.my.project.MyServiceBarImpl # The original implementation for handling "bar"s.
com.my.project.MyServiceFooImpl # A later implementation for "foo"s.
Then, in your main codebase, you can instantiate a MyService instance with the ServiceLoader:
for (MyService service : ServiceLoader.load(MyService.class)) {
//Perform some test to determine which is the right MyServiceImpl
//and then do something with the MyService instance
}
These examples are taken more-or-less straight from the API, although I've changed the package names to make them slightly less annoying to read.

Why isn't my ResourceBundleControlProvider being loaded?

I thought I would use the new ResourceBundleControlProvider framework in Java 8 to fix something which Oracle themselves will never fix - the default encoding used when reading resource bundles.
So I made a control:
package com.acme.resources;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.util.Locale;
import java.util.ResourceBundle;
public class AcmeResourceBundleControl extends ResourceBundle.Control
{
#Override
public ResourceBundle newBundle(String baseName, Locale locale, String format,
ClassLoader loader, boolean reload)
throws IllegalAccessException, InstantiationException, IOException
{
throw new UnsupportedOperationException("TODO");
}
}
Then I made a provider:
package com.acme.resources;
import java.util.ResourceBundle;
import java.util.spi.ResourceBundleControlProvider;
public class AcmeResourceBundleControlProvider implements ResourceBundleControlProvider
{
private static final ResourceBundle.Control CONTROL = new AcmeResourceBundleControl();
#Override
public ResourceBundle.Control getControl(String baseName)
{
if (baseName.startsWith("com.acme."))
{
return CONTROL;
}
else
{
return null;
}
}
}
Then in META-INF/services/java.util.spi.ResourceBundleControlProvider:
com.acme.resources.AcmeResourceBundleControlProvider
Then I just tried to run our application from IDEA and I find that it never loads my provider (otherwise the exception would be raised.)
I have checked the names and they all seem to match up. I have checked the compiler output directory IDEA is using and it does contain the service file. I wrote a simple test program which just tries to look up the service:
public static void main(String[] args)
{
for (ResourceBundleControlProvider provider :
ServiceLoader.load(ResourceBundleControlProvider.class))
{
System.out.println(provider.getClass());
}
}
This does print out one entry which is the name of my implementation class. So the issue is not in the service file.
If I breakpoint inside ResourceBundle, I seem to be able to access the custom provider class. Initial forays into the debugger show that ServiceLoader isn't finding any implementations, but I can't figure out why. I'm sure there is some dodgy class loader magic going on which results in not loading my class. :(
Some scary documentation on the Javadoc makes it sound like it might have to be installed as a global extension. If that really is the case, it's a bit of a shame, because it seemed like a useful way to override the default (and in my opinion broken) behaviour. But I also read the tutorial on the matter and it didn't seem to be describing anything like that (unless the good behaviour was pulled out of Java 8 at the very last minute and the docs are out of date!)
The tutorial does state that the JAR containing the ResourceBundleControlProvider must be in the JVM's system extension directory. Section 6 of the tutorial describes the requirement:
java -Djava.ext.dirs=lib -cp build RBCPTest
When you install a Java extension, you typically put the JAR file of the extension in the lib/ext directory of your JRE. However, this command specifies the directory that contains Java extensions with the system property java.ext.dirs.
The JavaDoc for ServiceLoader.loadInstalled() also states that providers on the application's class path are ignored.
Your problem is that the java.util.ResourceBundle that comes with the JVM does a ServiceLoader.loadInstalled(ResourceBundleControlProvider.class) to obtain a list of providers in the static initializer, and uses the thus obtained list ever after.

apache common configuration library: corrupted property file

I have got a corrupted property file from customer. The file is modified by application to update version number. The code uses apache commons configuration. When I tested, the library always seems to write files in iso-8859-1 format.
Code is simplified to below. What is the possibility of following code write bad file?
import org.apache.commons.configuration.ConfigurationException;
import org.apache.commons.configuration.PropertiesConfiguration;
import java.io.FileWriter;
import java.io.IOException;
public class TestConfig {
public void editVersionInfo() throws ConfigurationException, IOException {
String filename = "C:\\temp\\VersionProperties\\Version.properties";
PropertiesConfiguration config = new PropertiesConfiguration(filename);
config.setProperty("application.version", "2011");
config.save(new FileWriter(filename));
}
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException, ConfigurationException {
TestConfig tc = new TestConfig();
tc.editVersionInfo();
}
}
Just in case - the bad file looks like below. It does not look like in any encoding. The file originally was normal property file with keys and values all in English(ascii chars).
F????Co?aR??m??E?3#?? =
h\u00BD5j\u00B3\u00E0\u0096\u001D\u0081fe\u00BEo\b\u00A3\u0001\u00FE\u00A4\u00DE\u0000\u00FBi\"\u009C{\u00FC\u00D9\u00E2?c\u00F6\u00FF%B\u00A47\u00195\u001EXv\u0097/\u00D7x\u0099\u000E\u00A2gIX\u0014\u0097]k\u00882\u0003\u0014\u0097\u00BC\u00C3\u00AE\u00B4\u001E\u00B3R\u00E4\u00DE&\u0000\u0016\u009B\"7\u0085'\"\u00DCT*v'\u0092\u0007\u0091A\u00BD\u00ACl6~\u0097\u00C0\u00B1\u00D1\u00EB\u00FF\u00A8\u00F3\u0001'\u00BF\u0006\u001F\u009C\fk\u009F\u00C2\u00D9L^_\u0004J4\u00AF\u00D8\u00DAW\u00C4\u00CDj\u00E3\u0095\u00D1+\u00CE?\u0004>Z]\u00D7\u000B\u0098\u0016\u0095\u00AC\u00F7\u00E7\u009ATF\u0019\f)\u00A3\u00A9\u00DC\u00AD\u00ACtq5\u0085\u008E-\u00A3oH\u0000\u00C2\u0092\u00B5\u00F2\u008AG\u008F&\u00F5\u0017H\u0003!\u0083\u00B4\u008AV=\u00E0\u00EDj\u00F0\u00D0J\u00DB\u00CC\u00F2O\u00CE\u00BE\u00F0*4\u0006y~\u00C3\u00B7\"\u000B\u00E4\u00C0$>\u00F3\u00F2~\u00CE\u0097#\u00BAc\u00EC#\u00B4\u00AD\u009A\u00BAX\fF\u0083]\u00C2\u00D4\u00AB\u00F3\u009DQ\u0092\u00854z\u0097\u00FDG\t\u0095\u00E3}ty\u0082I\u00C3`\u009E
??
Edit: The customer environment is japanese. How ever the application is always run with
-Dfile.encoding=UTF8
I suspect your customer has a different default character encoding to what you have. Check their setting of the property file.encoding (counterintuitively named, I know).
An alternative possibility is that you have two threads writing that property file. I don't know, but I suspect the Apache library won't be thread-safe by default.

java util logging.properties: How to log to two different files

I am placing a logging.properties in the WEB-INF/classes dir of tomcat
I would like to log to two different files. For example: org.pkg1 goes to one file and org.pkg2 goes to a separate file.
I can get one file configured, but not two. Is that possible?
I finally figured this out. In tomcat they extend java util logging ("JULI") to enable this functionality. Here's a logging.properties file that I put in the WEB-INF directory that finally accomplished what I was after......:
handlers=1console.java.util.logging.ConsoleHandler, 2jsp.org.apache.juli.FileHandler, 3financials.org.apache.juli.FileHandler
.handlers=1a.java.util.logging.ConsoleHandler
jsp.level=ALL
jsp.handlers=2jsp.org.apache.juli.FileHandler
org.apache.jasper.level = FINE
org.apache.jasper.handlers=2jsp.org.apache.juli.FileHandler
org.apache.jsp.level = FINE
org.apache.jsp.handlers=2jsp.org.apache.juli.FileHandler
com.paypal.level=ALL
com.paypal.handlers=3financials.org.apache.juli.FileHandler
3financials.org.apache.juli.FileHandler.level=ALL
3financials.org.apache.juli.FileHandler.directory=${catalina.base}/logs
3financials.org.apache.juli.FileHandler.prefix=financials.
2jsp.org.apache.juli.FileHandler.level=ALL
2jsp.org.apache.juli.FileHandler.directory=${catalina.base}/logs
2jsp.org.apache.juli.FileHandler.prefix=jsp.
1console.java.util.logging.ConsoleHandler.level=FINE
1console.java.util.logging.ConsoleHandler.formatter = java.util.logging.SimpleFormatter
Speaking of logging.properties configuration, I did not found any mechanism to use more that one appender. I made simple workaround that works for me.
public class CustomAFileHandler extends FileHandler {
public DebugFileHandler() throws IOException, SecurityException {
super();
}
}
public class CustomBFileHandler extends FileHandler {
public DebugFileHandler() throws IOException, SecurityException {
super();
}
}
And my logging.properties
...
handlers=<pkg_name>.CustomAFileHandler, <pkg_name>.CustomBFileHandler, java.util.logging.ConsoleHandler
<pkg_name>.CustomAFileHandler.level=ALL
<pkg_name>.CustomAFileHandler.pattern=%h/A%u.log
<pkg_name>.CustomAFileHandler.limit=50000
<pkg_name>.CustomAFileHandler.count=1
<pkg_name>.CustomAFileHandler.formatter=java.util.logging.SimpleFormatter
<pkg_name>.CustomBFileHandler.level=ALL
<pkg_name>.CustomBFileHandler.pattern=%h/B%u.log
<pkg_name>.CustomBFileHandler.limit=50000
<pkg_name>.CustomBFileHandler.count=1
<pkg_name>.CustomBFileHandler.formatter=java.util.logging.SimpleFormatter
...
There's no easy way to get two handlers of the same type with java.util.logging classes that have different arguments. Probably the simplest way to do this is to create a FileHandler subclass in your logging.properties that passes the appropriate arguments to enable your logging to take place, such as:
org.pkg1.handlers=java.util.logging.FileHandler
org.pkg2.handlers=org.pkg2.FileHandler
java.util.logging.FileHandler.pattern="org_pkg1_%u.%g.log"
org.pkg2.FileHandler.pattern="org_pkg2_%u.%g.log"
org/pkg2/FileHandler.java:
package org.pkg2;
import java.util.logging.*;
public class FileHandler extends java.util.logging.FileHandler {
public FileHandler() {
super(LogManager.getLogManager().getProperty("org.pkg2.FileHandler.pattern"));
}
}
It is possible using pure jdk also (try with jdk 7 or jdk 8).
Just create custom file handler; use that similar to "java.util.logging.FileHandler".
public class JULTestingFileHandler extends FileHandler {
public JULTestingFileHandler() throws IOException, SecurityException
{
super();
}
}
user properties file;
com.xxx.handlers = com.xxx.JULXXXFileHandler
com.xxx.JULXXXFileHandler.pattern = ./logs/test1_test2.%u.%g.log
Having the same problem myself with java.util.logging and not quite satisfied with the given answers, I just found in the documentation:
2.2 Changing the Configuration
Here's a small program that dynamically adjusts the logging
configuration to send output to a specific file and to get lots of
information on wombats. The pattern "%t" means the system temporary
directory.
public static void main(String[] args) {
Handler fh = new FileHandler("%t/wombat.log");
Logger.getLogger("").addHandler(fh);
Logger.getLogger("com.wombat").setLevel(Level.FINEST);
...
}
So, it seems you can't do it just from the .properties file as can't instantiate several appenders, but you can do it programmatically. Also it should be possible using the LoggerManager

Why can't System.setProperty() change the classpath at runtime?

I am refering to the question on changing the classpath programmatically.
I read and found out that there is some function under System class as getproperties where we can retrieve the properties and then also can set it using setProperties().
The answers however I got was that It Wont work. I have not tried this myself, however, i am taking the call.
Just to clarify, then why these setProperty() and getProperty() methods are there if they cannot alter it at run time. Or is this specific to the classpath property only ?
I will appreciate if someone can present a scenario where they are really helpful?
You can certainly set any system properties you want at any point of time. The question is, will it have any effect? In the case of classpath, the answer is NO. The system class loader is initialized at a very early point in the startup sequence. It copies the classpath into its own data structures, and the classpath property is not read again. Changing it affect nothing in the system.
The reason for this may be two-fold. The lesser reason is performance. You may need to have some sort of data structure built for quick lookup of resources, and re-parsing classpath every time may be inefficient. The more important reason is security. You don't want a rogue class change the classpath under you and load compromised version of another class.
Modify Classpath
Even though you cannot set the classpath using the system properties (because the JVM reads system properties once: at startup), you can still change the classpath by forcibly invoking the addURL method of the classloader. Note that the solution below does not take into consideration the current thread. Consequently, it might not be accurate in all situations.
Example Solution
The original source on Sun's website for the following code has been removed:
import java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException;
import java.lang.reflect.Method;
import java.io.File;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.net.URL;
import java.net.URLClassLoader;
/**
* Allows programs to modify the classpath during runtime.
*/
public class ClassPathUpdater {
/** Used to find the method signature. */
private static final Class[] PARAMETERS = new Class[]{ URL.class };
/** Class containing the private addURL method. */
private static final Class<?> CLASS_LOADER = URLClassLoader.class;
/**
* Adds a new path to the classloader. If the given string points to a file,
* then that file's parent file (i.e., directory) is used as the
* directory to add to the classpath. If the given string represents a
* directory, then the directory is directly added to the classpath.
*
* #param s The directory to add to the classpath (or a file, which
* will relegate to its directory).
*/
public static void add( String s )
throws IOException, NoSuchMethodException, IllegalAccessException,
InvocationTargetException {
add( new File( s ) );
}
/**
* Adds a new path to the classloader. If the given file object is
* a file, then its parent file (i.e., directory) is used as the directory
* to add to the classpath. If the given string represents a directory,
* then the directory it represents is added.
*
* #param f The directory (or enclosing directory if a file) to add to the
* classpath.
*/
public static void add( File f )
throws IOException, NoSuchMethodException, IllegalAccessException,
InvocationTargetException {
f = f.isDirectory() ? f : f.getParentFile();
add( f.toURI().toURL() );
}
/**
* Adds a new path to the classloader. The class must point to a directory,
* not a file.
*
* #param url The path to include when searching the classpath.
*/
public static void add( URL url )
throws IOException, NoSuchMethodException, IllegalAccessException,
InvocationTargetException {
Method method = CLASS_LOADER.getDeclaredMethod( "addURL", PARAMETERS );
method.setAccessible( true );
method.invoke( getClassLoader(), new Object[]{ url } );
}
private static URLClassLoader getClassLoader() {
return (URLClassLoader)ClassLoader.getSystemClassLoader();
}
}
The link no longer works: http://forums.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=300557
Example Usage
The following example will add /home/user/dev/java/app/build/com/package to the classpath at runtime:
try {
ClassPathUpdater.add( "/home/user/dev/java/app/build/com/package/Filename.class" );
}
catch( Exception e ) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
System.setProperty can be used to set some security or protocol handler at the beginning of a program. Like:
/*
Add the URL handler to the handler property. This informs
IBMJSSE what URL handler to use to handle the safkeyring
support. In this case IBMJCE.
*/
System.setProperty("java.protocol.handler.pkgs", "com.ibm.crypto.provider");
or for using SSL:
System.setProperty("javax.net.ssl.keyStore", context.getRealPath(KEYSTORE));
System.setProperty("javax.net.ssl.keyStorePassword", "password");
System.setProperty("javax.net.ssl.trustStore", context.getRealPath(TRUSTSTORE));
System.setProperty("javax.net.debug", "ssl");
HttpClient httpClient = new HttpClient();
GetMethod httpGet = new GetMethod("https://something.com");
httpClient.executeMethod(httpGet);
return new String(httpGet.getResponseBody());
But beware, because it changes the environment at runtime for ALL applications running in the same jvm.
If for example one application needs to run with saxon and the other with xalan and both make use of System.setProperty to set the transformerFactory, then you will run into trouble
As said in Monitored System.setProperty article,
System.setProperty() can be an evil call.
It is 100% thread-hostile
It contains super-global variables
It is extremely difficult to debug when these variables mysteriously change at runtime
Regarding the classpath property, as I said in a previous question, it can not be easily changed as runtime.
In particular, java System property java.class.path is used to build a linked link when the JRE is instantiated, then is not re-read. Therefore, changes you make to the property don't really do anything to the existing virtual machine.
There is also a way to change java.library.path in runtime, to do that, just do:
System.setProperty( "java.library.path", newPath);
Field fieldSysPath = ClassLoader.class.getDeclaredField("sys_paths");
fieldSysPath.setAccessible(true);
fieldSysPath.set(null, null); // that's the key.
When this private static field in ClassLoader class is set to null, on next attempt to load native library ClassLoader will be initialized again using the new value in java.library.path.
The basic idea of getProperty() is that programs/code can be configured from outside of the JVM, passing properties on the command line using the java -Dfoo=bar syntax.
As you may want to configure certain behaviour in other software components (such as a logging component) in situations where you don't have control over the command line - think being deployed in a Servlet container - setProperty() comes in as a handy way to programmatically alter settings, e.g., before instantiating your logging utility.
The problem that is exhibited by the classpath issue is that programs will typically only read such system properties exactly once, when they are first initialized. So changing the classpath after JVM startup doesn't change anything for you app itself, because the JVM is already initialized, and changing some logging configuration after you have already obtained a Logger instance (or whatever), typically won't have any effect either.

Categories

Resources