Develop Reference

How can I query SQL just after transaction open?

Just like in the title. I need to query a specific function on database which will define a few values assigned to the transaction. If it's possible I want to make it a global configuration connected with a specific profile(There are few requests that I do not want to load that function).
Project is build on Java SE 1.7, Spring Boot 1.1.7 and it connects with PostgreSQL database.
Requests are build on 3 layers, SomeClassController(Controller), SomeClassService(Service), SomeClassDB(Repository). On SomeClassDB it connects with database using JdbcTemplate from Spring and performs a CRUD operations. Before any of those operations I want to query a function. And as i mentioned it, I don't want a method that will do the job - I need something like global configuration on TransactionManager?
Maybe I should use TransactionSynchronization with beforeCommit method? But I don't know how to use it globally.
EDIT1: What I can but i don't want to ;):
#Scope(value = "session", proxyMode = ScopedProxyMode.TARGET_CLASS)
#Service
public class SessionService {
Boolean flag;
public SessionService(){
flag=false;
}
#Value("${appVersion}") String appVersion;
#Value("${appArtifactId}") String appArtifactId;
public void addSession(){
if(!flag){
jdbcTemplate.execute("SELECT add_ses('"+appArtifactId+"','"+appVersion+")");
flag=true;
}
}
public void deleteSession(){
jdbcTemplate.execute("SELECT del_ses()");
}
}
And now I can just call those two methods on start and end of 2nd layer class with #Autowired this class. But I really don't want to do it in that way. Someone, someday will forget about it propagating that 2nd layer SomeClassService class and I want to avoid it.
I hope that will get you closer to my problem.

This could be typical use case of aspects. Have you tried to write an aspect for this? Aspect can be configured to execute some code before and after call of a method in specific package or method decorated by specific annotation. Spring has very nice support for aspects.
Another way is to create a proxy (using java.lang.reflect.Proxy) object which will call your initialization code and then delegate to proxied object.

Create Spring #Service instance with #Transactional methods manually from Java

Let's say there are #Service and #Repository interfaces like the following:
#Repository
public interface OrderDao extends JpaRepository<Order, Integer> {
}
public interface OrderService {
void saveOrder(Order order);
}
#Service
public class OrderServiceImpl implements OrderService {
#Autowired
private OrderDao orderDao;
#Override
#Transactional
public void saveOrder(Order order) {
orderDao.save(order);
}
}
This is part of working application, everything is configured to access single database and everything works fine.
Now, I would like to have possibility to create stand-alone working instance of OrderService with auto-wired OrderDao using pure Java with jdbcUrl specified in Java code, something like this:
final int tenantId = 3578;
final String jdbcUrl = "jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/database_" + tenantId;
OrderService orderService = someMethodWithSpringMagic(appContext, jdbcUrl);
As you can see I would like to introduce multi-tenant architecture with tenant per database strategy to existing Spring-based application.
Please note that I was able to achieve that quite easily before with self-implemented jdbcTemplate-like logic also with JDBC transactions correctly working so this is very valid task.
Please also note that I need quite simple transaction logic to start transaction, do several requests in service method in scope of that transaction and then commit it/rollback on exception.
Most solutions on the web regarding multi-tenancy with Spring propose specifying concrete persistence units in xml config AND/OR using annotation-based configuration which is highly inflexible because in order to add new database url whole application should be stopped, xml config/annotation code should be changed and application started.
So, basically I'm looking for a piece of code which is able to create #Service just like Spring creates it internally after properties are read from XML configs / annotations. I'm also looking into using ProxyBeanFactory for that, because Spring uses AOP to create service instances (so I guess simple good-old re-usable OOP is not the way to go here).
Is Spring flexible enough to allow this relatively simple case of code reuse?
Any hints will be greatly appreciated and if I find complete answer to this question I'll post it here for future generations :)

HIbernate has out of the box support for multi tenancy, check that out before trying your own. Hibernate requires a MultiTenantConnectionProvider and CurrentTenantIdentifierResolver for which there are default implementations out of the box but you can always write your own implementation. If it is only a schema change it is actually pretty simple to implement (execute a query before returning the connection). Else hold a map of datasources and get an instance from that, or create a new instance.
About 8 years ago we already wrote a generic solution which was documented here and the code is here. It isn't specific for hibernate and could be used with basically anything you need to switch around. We used it for DataSources and also some web related things (theming amongst others).

Creating a transactional proxy for an annotated service is not a difficult task but I'm not sure that you really need it. To choose a database for a tenantId I guess that you only need to concentrate in DataSource interface.
For example, with a simple driver managed datasource:
public class MultitenancyDriverManagerDataSource extends DriverManagerDataSource {
#Override
protected Connection getConnectionFromDriverManager(String url,
Properties props) throws SQLException {
Integer tenant = MultitenancyContext.getTenantId();
if (tenant != null)
url += "_" + tenant;
return super.getConnectionFromDriverManager(url, props);
}
}
public class MultitenancyContext {
private static ThreadLocal<Integer> tenant = new ThreadLocal<Integer>();
public static Integer getTenantId() {
return tenant.get();
}
public static void setTenatId(Integer value) {
tenant.set(value);
}
}
Of course, If you want to use a connection pool, you need to elaborate it a bit, for example using a connection pool per tenant.

Commit transaction immideatly after method finished

I have the following problem:
I'm using Spring MVC 4.0.5 with Hibernate 4.3.5 and I'm trying to create a Restfull Web application. The problem is that I want to exclude some fields from getting serialized as JSON, depending on the method called in the controller using aspects.
My problem now is that Hiberate does not commit the transaction immideatly after it returns from a method but just before serializing.
Controller.java
public class LoginController {
/*
* Autowire all the Services and stuff..
*/
#RemoveAttribues({"fieldA","fieldB"})
#RequestMapping{....}
public ResponseEntity login(#RequestBody user) {
User updatedUser = userService.loginTheUser(user);
return new ResponseEntity<>(updatedUser,HttpStatus.OK);
}
}
Service.java
public class UserService {
#Transactional
public User loginUser(User user) {
user.setLoginToken("some generated token");
return userDao.update(user); //userDao just calls entityManager.merge(..)
}
}
The advice of the aspect does the following:
for every String find the corresponding setter and set the field to null
This is done, like I said, to avoid serialization of data (for which Jackson 2 is used)
The problem now is that only after the advice has finished the transaction is commited. Is there anything I can do to tell hibernate to commit immediatly or do I have to dig deeper and start handling the transactions myself (which I would like to avoid)?
EDIT:
I also have autocommit turned on
<prop key="hibernate.connection.autocommit">true</prop>
I think the problem lies in the fact that I use lazy loading (because each user may have a huge laod of other enities attached to him), so the transaction is not commited until I try to serialze the object.

Don't set auto-commit to true. It's a terrible mistake.
I think you need a UserService interface and a UserServiceImpl for the interface implementation. Whatever you now have in the UserService class must be migrated to UserServiceImpl instead.
This can ensure that the #Transactions are applied even for JDK dynamic proxies and not just for CGLIB runtime proxies.
If you are using Open-Session-in-View anti-patterns, you need to let it go and use session-per-request instead. It's much more scalable and it forces you to handle optimum queries sin your data layer.
Using JDBC Transaction Management and the default session-close-on-request pattern you should be fine with this issue.

Spring dynamically choosing between data sources (alternative to ThreadLocal)

I've read about AbstractRoutingDataSource and the standard ways to bind a datasource dynamically in this article:
public class CustomerRoutingDataSource extends AbstractRoutingDataSource {
#Override
protected Object determineCurrentLookupKey() {
return CustomerContextHolder.getCustomerType();
}
}
It uses a ThreadLocal context holder to "set" the DataSource:
public class CustomerContextHolder {
private static final ThreadLocal<CustomerType> contextHolder =
new ThreadLocal<CustomerType>();
public static void setCustomerType(CustomerType customerType) {
Assert.notNull(customerType, "customerType cannot be null");
contextHolder.set(customerType);
}
public static CustomerType getCustomerType() {
return (CustomerType) contextHolder.get();
}
// ...
}
I have a quite complex system where threads are not necessarily in my control, say:
Scheduled EJB reads a job list from the database
For each Job it fires a Spring (or Java EE) batch job.
Each job have its origin and destination databases (read from a central database).
Multiple jobs will run in parallel
Jobs may be multithreaded.
ItemReader will use the origin data source that was set for that specific job (origin data source must be bound to some repositories)
ItemWriter will use the destination data source that was set for that specific job (destination data source must also be bound to some repositories).
So I'm feeling somewhat anxious about ThreadLocal, specially, I'm not sure if the same thread will be used to handle multiple jobs. If that happens origin and destination databases may get mixed.
How can I "store" and bind a data source dynamically in a safe way when dealing with multiple threads?

I could not find a way to setup Spring to play nice with my setup and inject the desired DataSource, so I've decided to handle that manually.
Detailed solution:
I changed my repositories to be prototypes so that a new instance is constructed every time that I wire it:
#Repository
#Scope(BeanDefinition.SCOPE_PROTOTYPE)
I've introduced new setDataSource and setSchema methods in top level interfaces / implementations that are supposed to work with multiple instances / schemas.
Since I'm using spring-data-jdbc-repository my setDataSource method simple wraps the DataSource with a new JdbcTemplate and propagate the change.
setJdbcOperations(new JdbcTemplate(dataSource));
My implementation is obtaining the DataSources directly from the application server:
final Context context = new InitialContext();
final DataSource dataSource = (DataSource) context.lookup("jdbc/" + dsName);
Finally, for multiples schemas under the same database instance, I'm logging in with a special user (with the correct permissions) and using a Oracle command to switch to the desired schema:
getJdbcOperations().execute("ALTER SESSION SET CURRENT_SCHEMA = " + schema);
While this goes against the Dependency inversion principle it works and is handling my concurrency requirements very well.

Spring: separate datasource for read-only transactions

Thanks for reading this.
I have 2 MySQL databases - master for writes, slave for reads. The perfect scenario I imagine is that my app uses connection to master for readOnly=false transactions, slave for readOnly=true transactions.
In order to implement this I need to provide a valid connection depending on the type of current transaction. My data service layer should not know about what type of connection it uses and just use the injected SqlMapClient (I use iBatis) directly. This means that (if I get it right) the injected SqlMapClients should be proxied and the delegate should be chosen at runtime.
public class MyDataService {
private SqlMapClient sqlMap;
#Autowired
public MyDataService (SqlMapClient sqlMap) {
this.sqlMap = sqlMap;
}
#Transactional(readOnly = true)
public MyData getSomeData() {
// an instance of sqlMap connected to slave should be used
}
#Transactional(readOnly = false)
public void saveMyData(MyData myData) {
// an instance of sqlMap connected to master should be used
}
}
So the question is - how can I do this?
Thanks a lot

It's an interesting idea, but you'd have a tough job on your hands. The readOnly attribute is intended as a hint to the transaction manager, and isn't really consulted anywhere meaningful. You'd have to rewrite or extend multiple Spring infrastructure classes.
So unless you're hell-bent on getting this working a you want, your best option is almost certainly to inject two separate SqlMapClient objects into your DAO, and for the methods to pick the appropriate one. The #Transactional annotations would also need to indicate which transaction manager to use (assuming you're using DataSourceTransactionManager rather than JpaTransactionManager), taking care to match the transaction manager to the DataSource used by the SqlMapClient.