I have class with #JsonIgnore-d field:
public class MyClass {
...
#JsonIgnore
private SomeType myfield;
...
// getters & setters
}
Is it possible to configure ObjectWriter so that it includes myfield during serialization even though being ingored?
Rationale: MyClass is serialized in many places and only in single specific one I want to have myfield.
It is possible to configure ObjectMapper to disable a JsonIgnore function. Following are some possible solution you can try with:
1.
Disable JsonIgnore function for a particular annotated field.
You can create a custom JsonIgnore annotation and a custom JacksonAnnotationIntrospector to remove the annotation from mapper context.
Following are the ideas:
Annotate #MyJsonIgnore to the fields that should be ignored while serialization:
#JsonAutoDetect(fieldVisibility = JsonAutoDetect.Visibility.ANY)
public class MyClass {
#MyJsonIgnore
private SomeType myField;
}
#MyJsonIgnore is a simple custom annotation that wrap #JsonIgnore:
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
#JacksonAnnotationsInside
#JsonIgnore
public #interface MyJsonIgnore {
}
A custom JacksonAnnotationIntrospector is implemented to remove #MyJsonIgnore from mapper context:
public class DisablingMyJsonIgnoreIntrospector extends JacksonAnnotationIntrospector {
#Override
public boolean isAnnotationBundle(final Annotation ann) {
if (ann.annotationType().equals(MyJsonIgnore.class)) {
return false;
} else {
return super.isAnnotationBundle(ann);
}
}
After that, you can set the introspector on a ObjectMapper during configuration:
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.setAnnotationIntrospector(new DisablingMyJsonIgnoreIntrospector());
It results that the fields annotated with #MyJsonIgnore can be marshaled properly.
2.
Disable JsonIgnore function for the mapper
Your can create a custom JacksonAnnotationIntrospector and override hasIgnoreMarker method to always return false:
public static class DisablingJsonIgnoreIntrospector extends JacksonAnnotationIntrospector {
#Override
public boolean hasIgnoreMarker(final AnnotatedMember m) {
return false;
}
}
hasIgnoreMarker is to check whether there is annotation to ignore json property. Return false will disable the JsonIngore function.
3.
Disable all annotations and specify what kinds of properties are auto-detected for a given ObjectMapper:
final ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.disable(MapperFeature.USE_ANNOTATIONS);
mapper.setVisibility(PropertyAccessor.FIELD, JsonAutoDetect.Visibility.ANY);
This simply disable all annotations.
Hope this can help.
One more option is to use the AnnotationIntrospector.nopInstance() if you want to avoid all Jackson's annotations in your pojo including #JsonIgnore e.g.
JsonMapper.builder().annotationIntrospector(AnnotationIntrospector.nopInstance()).build()...
or
new ObjectMapper().setAnnotationIntrospector(AnnotationIntrospector.nopInstance())...
Related
I have a 3rd party Lombok builder POJO, one that I cannot modify, that I want to serialize using jackson. Notably it does not have a NoArgsConstructor.
#Data
#Builder
public class ExternalClass {
private String name;
private String data;
// etc.
}
On the surface this would appear to be simple, but it is incredibly frustrating in practice as each possible option seems to be counteracted by a different complication. In essence, I'm having trouble getting an external Lombok builder to work with a jackson mixin.
Lombok produces fluent setters of the style .name(String name) while Jackson's built-in builder deserializer expects .withName(String name). Lombok documentation, and recipes elsewhere such as here suggest using #JsonDeserialize(builder=ExternalClass.ExternalClassBuilder.class) in conjunction with #JsonPOJOBuilder(withPrefix="") on a predeclared inner stub builder. But this is not possible because the Lombok class is in an external library.
Applying these annotations to a mixin has no effect.
#JsonDeserialize(ExternalClass.ExternalClassBuilder.class)
public abstract class ExternalClassMixin {
#JsonPOJOBuilder(withPrefix="")
public static ExternalClassBuilder {
}
}
The only approach I've found that works is to leverage the package-access AllArgsConstructor created by #Builder and populate the mixin with the following constructor
public abstract class ExternalClassMixin {
#JsonCreator public ExternalClassMixin(
#JsonProperty("name") String name,
#JsonProperty("data") String data,
// etc.
) {}
}
This is obviously not desirable as it requires iterating and hard-coding every class property explicitly, making the mixin fragile to any change in the external POJO.
My question is - is there a robust, maintainable way to serialize this external builder class using Jackson without modifying it, using either a mixin or maybe a full blown deserializer?
Update
I implemented the excellent answer by #jan-rieke, including the suggestion to use reflection to seek out the inner builder class.
...
public Class<?> findPOJOBuilder(AnnotatedClass ac) {
Class<?> innerBuilder;
try {
innerBuilder = Class.forName(ac.getName()+"$"+ac.getRawType().getSimpleName()+"Builder");
log.info("Builder found: {}", ac.getName());
return innerBuilder;
} catch( ClassNotFoundException e ) {
return super.findPOJOBuilder(ac);
}
}
You can customize your ObjectMapper as follows:
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.setAnnotationIntrospector(new JacksonAnnotationIntrospector() {
#Override
public Class<?> findPOJOBuilder(AnnotatedClass ac) {
if (ExternalClass.class.equals(ac.getRawType())) {
return ExternalClass.ExternalClassBuilder.class;
}
return super.findPOJOBuilder(ac);
}
#Override
public Value findPOJOBuilderConfig(AnnotatedClass ac) {
if (ac.hasAnnotation(JsonPOJOBuilder.class)) {
return super.findPOJOBuilderConfig(ac);
}
return new JsonPOJOBuilder.Value("build", "");
}
});
This will
explicitly configure that deserialization for ExternalClass uses its builder, and
set the default prefix for builder setter methods to "" (except when the #JsonPOJOBuilder annotation is present).
If you do not want to list all external classes explicitly in findPOJOBuilder(), you can of course programmatically look into the class to check whether it has a inner class that looks like a builder.
This can be accomplished by creating two mixins: one for ExternalClass (specifying the builder to use) and one for ExternalClass.ExternalClassBuilder (specifying the lack of a prefix in the builder methods).
#JsonDeserialize(builder = ExternalClass.ExternalClassBuilder.class)
public interface ExternalClassMixin {
}
#JsonPOJOBuilder(withPrefix="")
public interface ExternalClassBuilderMixin {
}
This serializes and deserializes the JSON in the desired manner:
String json = "{\"name\": \"The Name\", \"data\": \"The Data\"}";
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper()
.addMixIn(ExternalClass.class, ExternalClassMixin.class)
.addMixIn(ExternalClass.ExternalClassBuilder.class, ExternalClassBuilderMixin.class);
System.out.println(mapper.readValue(json, ExternalClass.class));
System.out.println(mapper.writeValueAsString(mapper.readValue(json, ExternalClass.class)));
Output:
ExternalClass(name=The Name, data=The Data)
{"name":"The Name","data":"The Data"}
I am converting a JSON into a java object. Several fields in my java object class use a custom serializer that I have defined. For example:
#JsonProperty("table_name")
#JsonSerialize(using = MyCustomSerializer.class)
private String tableName;
I only want to use my custom serializer in certain instances. Is there a way to set using = in the #JsonSerialize annotation?
I have the following JacksonAnnotationIntrospector in my ObjectMapper:
private static final JacksonAnnotationIntrospector ignoreCustomSerializer = new JacksonAnnotationIntrospector() {
#Override
protected <A extends Annotation> A _findAnnotation(final Annotated annotated, final Class<A> annoClass) {
if (!annotated.hasAnnotation(JsonSerialize.class)) {
return super._findAnnotation(annotated, annoClass);
}
return null;
}
};
objectMapper.setAnnotationIntrospector(ignoreCustomSerializer);
This introspector causes my object mapper to ignore all fields wit the #JsonSerialize annotation. I don't want to ignore the field, just the custom serializer I have set. Can the introspector be modified to change using = in the #JsonSerialize annotation?
I have a Spring MVC application which uses Jackson and the #RequestBody annotation.
I have a field in the POJO that I do not want Jackson to map, so I have lombok set the setter access level to NONE.
#NotNull
#Setter(AccessLevel.NONE)
private boolean enabled = false;
I have tried to force Spring's ObjectMapper bean to only use setters by configuring as:
#Bean
#Primary
public ObjectMapper getObjectMapper() {
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.setVisibility(PropertyAccessor.FIELD, JsonAutoDetect.Visibility.NONE);
return mapper;
}
I would assume that with no setter and no visability of the field Jackson would not map up the "enabled" field... but if I send a body with enabled set to true it maps it,
Can anyone advise what else I need to do?
Thanks
Just annotate the field with #JsonProperty and set access to read only.
#JsonProperty(access = Access.READ_ONLY)
private boolean enabled;
PS. You don't need to annotate with #NotNull or initialise to false since you're using a primitive type.
Suppose you have this entity:
class Foo{
String propA;
String propB;
}
and you want to serialize for one API like :
{propA: "ola",
propB: "Holla"}
and for another API like :
{fooPropA: "ola",
fooPropB: "Holla"}
How can this be achieved using jackson and using the same entity. Creating 2 different entities is not an option :)
There are several ways in which you can achieve this. You can enable a custom serializer (already covered by #se_vedem), register an annotation introspector which changes the property names for the corresponding class and so on.
However, if you are willing to only add a string prefix to all the property names, then the Jackson property name strategy is probably the best fit. The naming strategy class has the access to the serialized object type information, so you can make a decision whether to change the property name or not.
Here is an example using a custom annotation that defines the prefix:
public class JacksonNameStrategy {
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
public static #interface PropertyPrefix {
String value();
}
#PropertyPrefix("foo_")
public static class Foo {
public String propA;
public String propB;
public Foo(String propA, String propB) {
this.propA = propA;
this.propB = propB;
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) throws JsonProcessingException {
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.setPropertyNamingStrategy(new MyPropertyNamingStrategyBase());
System.out.println(mapper.writeValueAsString(new Foo("old", "Holla")));
}
private static class MyPropertyNamingStrategyBase extends PropertyNamingStrategy {
#Override
public String nameForField(MapperConfig<?> config,
AnnotatedField field,
String defaultName) {
PropertyPrefix ann = field.getDeclaringClass().getAnnotation(PropertyPrefix.class);
if (ann != null) {
return ann.value() + defaultName;
}
return super.nameForField(config, field, defaultName);
}
}
}
Output:
{"foo_propA":"old","foo_propB":"Holla"}
In your API method you choose between two ObjectMapper instances one with the default naming naming strategy and one with the custom one.
You can achieve this by using modules feature from Jackson.
Basically, each API would have it's own ObjectMapper and they will be configured with different modules. This way you can create 2 serializers for the same class and register them on the appropriate module. More read can be found here http://wiki.fasterxml.com/JacksonFeatureModules
However, be aware that serializers are loaded in a particular order. First it tries to get the annotated ones, if none is found it will try to get those registered from modules. So, for example if you have your class annotated with serializer, then that serializer(FooSerializer) would be chosen instead of the one configured in module(MySecondFooSerializer).
#JsonSerialize(using = FooSerializer.class)
class Foo{
String propA;
String propB;
}
module.addSerializer(Foo.class, new MySecondFooSerializer());
I'm using Jackson as a tool to declare some objects whose classes I can't annotate (or modify at all). One of the classes has a setter and getter for an untyped list. Here's a sanitized version:
public class Family {
private List members;
public List getMembers() { return members; }
public void setMembers(List members) { this.members = members; }
//...many, many other properties
}
public class Member {
private String name;
public String getName() { return name; }
public void setName(String name) { this.name = name; }
}
Here's the JSON I'm trying to deserialize:
{ "members" : [ { "name" : "Mark" } ] }
The naive code I would use is this:
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
Family family = mapper.readValue(json, Family.class);
Member member = (Member) family.getMembers().get(0);
System.out.println(member.getName());
But of course this fails, as Jackson did not know to create a list of Members instead of its fallback, a list of LinkedHashMaps.
What's the easiest way to instruct Jackson to treat members as a List<Member>? I don't think I want to use a fully custom deserializer for the class, since there are many other properties that Jackson handles fine.
Here's the best I could come up with, using BeanDeserializerModifier:
mapper.setDeserializerProvider(new StdDeserializerProvider()
.withDeserializerModifier(new BeanDeserializerModifier() {
#Override
public BeanDeserializerBuilder updateBuilder(DeserializationConfig config, BasicBeanDescription beanDesc, BeanDeserializerBuilder builder) {
if (beanDesc.getBeanClass() == Family.class) {
CollectionType type = CollectionType.construct(ArrayList.class, SimpleType.construct(Member.class));
TypeDeserializer typeDeserializer = type.getTypeHandler();
SettableBeanProperty.MethodProperty membersProperty = (SettableBeanProperty.MethodProperty) builder.removeProperty("members");
builder.addProperty(new SettableBeanProperty.MethodProperty(
"members",
type,
typeDeserializer,
beanDesc.getClassAnnotations(),
(AnnotatedMethod) membersProperty.getMember()
));
}
return builder;
}}));
It works, but seems really low level (and verbose!) for what I'm trying to do. What am I missing here?
Edit
I should note, I'm using Jackson 1.8.2, but could update if there's a compelling reason to.
Mix-in annotations were the critical piece of the puzzle I was missing. Here's a much cleaner way of solving this problem:
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.getDeserializationConfig().addMixInAnnotations(Family.class, FamilyMixin.class);
Family family = mapper.readValue(json, Family.class);
Member member = (Member) family.getMembers().get(0);
//...
interface FamilyMixin {
#JsonDeserialize(contentAs = Member.class)
void setMembers(List members);
}
What mix-in annotations let you do is annotate a proxy that is under your control. When that mix-in class is applied to the real class, Jackson behaves as if those annotations annotated the real class's members.
In my case, I use JsonDeserialize.contentAs() to specify the container's content type. But I believe most annotations should be available using this method.