Is it possible? Can i specify it on the connection URL? How to do that?
I know this was answered already, but I just ran into the same issue trying to specify the schema to use for the liquibase command line.
Update
As of JDBC v9.4 you can specify the url with the new currentSchema parameter like so:
jdbc:postgresql://localhost:5432/mydatabase?currentSchema=myschema
Appears based on an earlier patch:
http://web.archive.org/web/20141025044151/http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Patch-to-allow-setting-schema-search-path-in-the-connectionURL-td2174512.html
Which proposed url's like so:
jdbc:postgresql://localhost:5432/mydatabase?searchpath=myschema
As of version 9.4, you can use the currentSchema parameter in your connection string.
For example:
jdbc:postgresql://localhost:5432/mydatabase?currentSchema=myschema
If it is possible in your environment, you could also set the user's default schema to your desired schema:
ALTER USER user_name SET search_path to 'schema'
I don't believe there is a way to specify the schema in the connection string. It appears you have to execute
set search_path to 'schema'
after the connection is made to specify the schema.
DataSource – setCurrentSchema
When instantiating a DataSource implementation, look for a method to set the current/default schema.
For example, on the PGSimpleDataSource class call setCurrentSchema.
org.postgresql.ds.PGSimpleDataSource dataSource = new org.postgresql.ds.PGSimpleDataSource ( );
dataSource.setServerName ( "localhost" );
dataSource.setDatabaseName ( "your_db_here_" );
dataSource.setPortNumber ( 5432 );
dataSource.setUser ( "postgres" );
dataSource.setPassword ( "your_password_here" );
dataSource.setCurrentSchema ( "your_schema_name_here_" ); // <----------
If you leave the schema unspecified, Postgres defaults to a schema named public within the database. See the manual, section 5.9.2 The Public Schema. To quote hat manual:
In the previous sections we created tables without specifying any schema names. By default such tables (and other objects) are automatically put into a schema named “public”. Every new database contains such a schema.
I submitted an updated version of a patch to the PostgreSQL JDBC driver to enable this a few years back. You'll have to build the PostreSQL JDBC driver from source (after adding in the patch) to use it:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-jdbc/2008-07/msg00012.php
http://jdbc.postgresql.org/
In Go with "sql.DB" (note the search_path with underscore):
postgres://user:password#host/dbname?sslmode=disable&search_path=schema
Don't forget SET SCHEMA 'myschema' which you could use in a separate Statement
SET SCHEMA 'value' is an alias for SET search_path TO value. Only one
schema can be specified using this syntax.
And since 9.4 and possibly earlier versions on the JDBC driver, there is support for the setSchema(String schemaName) method.
Related
I've tried
CacheConfiguration<?, ?> cacheCfg = new CacheConfiguration<>(cacheTemplateName).setSqlSchema("PUBLIC"); //create table can only be executed on public schema
cacheCfg.setSqlEscapeAll(false); //otherwise ignite tries to quote after we've quoted and there are cases we have to quote before ignite gets it
cacheCfg.setCacheMode(CacheMode.PARTITIONED);
ignite.addCacheConfiguration(cacheCfg); //required to register cacheTemplateName as a template, see WITH section of https://apacheignite-sql.readme.io/docs/create-table
Unfortunately nothing I try seems to work.
I've debugged through and isSqlEscapeAll() always returned true.
FYI in the CREATE TABLE statement I've set TEMPLATE=MyTPLName.
Is it possible to disable this behaviour? My queries are already appropriately quoted.
This flag doesn't work for dynamic caches since it could cause some unclearness with table names, which were described in this thread on Ignite dev list: http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Remove-deprecate-CacheConfiguration-sqlEscapeAll-property-td17966.html
By the way, what is the problem you want to solve using this flag?
I have been using H2 database in Corda demo application, I would like to know, if we can plug-in some other relatioal database such as Oracle, Sybase etc instead of H2 database.
If yes, please share relevent link to do the same.
Thanks
Yes it is possible to use other databases - for example we have accepted and merged a community contribution to use PostgreSQL: https://github.com/corda/corda/pull/1525 .
However, at this stage, we are only supporting other relational databases in the commercial version of Corda.
As of V2 and V3, Corda allows the use of PostgreSQL 9.6, using PostgreSQL JDBC Driver 42.1.4. Note that this is an experimental community contribution, and is currently untested.
Here is an example node configuration block for PostgreSQL:
dataSourceProperties = {
dataSourceClassName = "org.postgresql.ds.PGSimpleDataSource"
dataSource.url = "jdbc:postgresql://[HOST]:[PORT]/postgres"
dataSource.user = [USER]
dataSource.password = [PASSWORD]
}
database = {
transactionIsolationLevel = READ_COMMITTED
schema = [SCHEMA]
}
You need to add this block to the node's node.conf file, found at the root of the node folder.
Note that:
The database.schema property is optional
The value of database.schema is not wrapped in double quotes and Postgres always treats it as a lower-case value (e.g. AliceCorp becomes alicecorp)
I am using flyway version 2.3, I have an sql patch which inserts a varchar into a table having character sequence that Flyway treats as placeholders. I want to flyway to ignore placeholders and run the script as is.
The script file is
insert into test_data (value) values ("${Email}");
And the Java code is
package foobar;
import com.googlecode.flyway.core.Flyway;
public class App
{
public static void main( String[] args )
{
// Create the Flyway instance
Flyway flyway = new Flyway();
// Point it to the database
flyway.setDataSource("jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/flywaytest", "alpha", "beta");
// Start the migration
flyway.migrate();
}
}
This can be done by splitting $ and { in the expression:
insert into test_data (value) values ('$' || '{Email}')
You can change the value of the placeholder suffix or prefix to a different value and you should be OK.
try this properties:
final var flyway = Flyway.configure()
.dataSource(DataSourceProvider.getInstanceDataSource())
.locations("path")
.outOfOrder(true)
.validateOnMigrate(false)
.placeholderReplacement(false)
.load();
In my MySQL migration script this worked:
I just escaped the first { characters, like this:
'...<p>\nProgram name: $\{programName}<br />\nStart of studies: $\{startOfStudies}<br />\n($\{semesterNote})\n</p>...'
This way flyway didn't recognize them as placeholders, and the string finally stored doesn't contain the escape character.
...<p>
Program name: ${programName}<br />
Start of studies: ${startOfStudies}<br />
(${semesterNote})
</p>...
I had exactly the same problem, but the accepted answer didn't fit my requirements. So I solved the problem in another way and post this answer hoping that it'll be useful to other people coming here from Google search.
If you cannot change the placeholder suffix and prefix, you can trick Flyway into believing there are no placeholders by using an expression. E.g.:
INSERT INTO test_data(value) VALUES (REPLACE("#{Email}", "#{", "${"));
This is useful if you've already used placeholders in lots of previous migrations. (If you just change placeholder suffix and prefix, you'll have to change them in previous migration scripts, too. But then the migration script checksums won't match, Flyway will rightfully complain, and you'll have to change checksums in the schema_version table by calling Flyway#repair() or manually altering the table.)
Just add a property to your bootstrap.properties (or whatever you use)
flyway.placeholder-replacement = false
In 2021, the simple answer is to set the placeholderReplacement boolean to false:
flyway -placeholderReplacement="false"
The configuration parameter placeholderReplacement determines whether placeholders should be replaced.
Reference: https://flywaydb.org/documentation/configuration/parameters/placeholderReplacement
I am currently using Schemacrawler to gather information about various databases.
The issue I am having is that the user which the application runs under doesn't have access to every database. If I attempt to retrieve the list of schemas:
SchemaCrawlerOptions schemaCrawlerOptions = new SchemaCrawlerOptions();
schemaCrawlerOptions.setSchemaInfoLevel(SchemaInfoLevel.minimum());
schemaCrawlerOptions.setTableTypes(new TableType[] { TableType.table });
Database database = SchemaCrawlerUtility.getDatabase(connection, schemaCrawlerOptions);
database.getSchemas()
... a SchemaCrawlerException is thrown (The server principal "..." is not able to access the database "..." under the current security context.). Is there a way to get only the databases that are accessible (without having to explicitly declare each schema name)?
From the exception you are getting, I am going to assume that you are using SQL Server. You need to set a schema inclusion rule. You can add this to your code snippet above:
schemaCrawlerOptions.setSchemaInclusionRule(new InclusionRule("schema_name.dbo.*", ""));
I use sybase database and am trying to update some values into the database.
While trying to run this it throws an exception as :
com.sybase.jdbc2.jdbc.SybSQLException: The identifier that starts with 'WeeklyStudentEventClassArchiv' is too long. Maximum length is 30.
This table is in another database and thus i have to use the database name along with the table name as dhown below:
StudActive..WeeklyStudentEventClassArchiv which apparently exceeds 30 characters.
I have to use the databasename..tablename in the stored procudure but its throwing an exception.
This happens even if i physically embed the sql in the java code.
How can this be solved.
The Stored Procedue is as shown:
create proc dbo.sp_getStudentList(
#stDate int,
#endDate int
)
as
begin
set nocount on
select distinct studCode
StudActive..WeeklyStudentEventClassArchive
where studCode > 0
and courseStartDate between #stDate and #endDate
end
StudActive..WeeklyStudentEventClassArchiv which apparently exceeds 30
characters.
Yes - I count 41.
Rename the table and/or the stored proc and you should be fine. It wounds like a limitation of either the JDBC driver or the database.
Your JDBC driver is out of date. Updating to a later version might help solve your problem.
First download a more recent jConnect driver from the Sybase website. Then update your code to use the new driver package. You will also need to change your code, as the package name of the driver changes for each new version of the specification. (The current package is com.sybase.jdbcx...)
Take a look at the programmers reference for more information.