I desire a code output that looks like this:
6 5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
4 3 2 1
3 2 1
2 1
1
Keep in mind that my code takes in the size of the pyramid through input before
My code now looks like:
for(int numRows=sizePyr;numRows>=1;numRows--){
for(int i=sizePyr;i>=numRows;i--){
System.out.print(i + " ");
}
System.out.println();
}
Changing the nested for loop to for (int i = numRows; i >= 1; i--) fixed the issue
You want to start printing i with the current numRows value, then work the way down to 1.
Your current code start printing i with sizePyr (which is a constant 6 throughout the function), then work the way down to numRows.
for(int numRows=sizePyr;numRows>=1;numRows--){
for(int i=numRows; i >= 1; i--){
System.out.print(i + " ");
}
System.out.println();
}
For the first line, you want to start with sizePyr (as your inner loop does), but want to end with 1 (which your loop decidedly does not). In fact, every line should end with 1. Change your loop to reflect this.
I am supposed to print the following output by using loops:
1
2 1
3 2 1
4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
6 5 4 3 2 1
7 6 5 4 3 2 1
The highest number in this pattern (in this example, 7) is determined by user input. Here is the applicable code for the pattern:
index=patternLength+1; n=1; //These values are all previously intitialized
while (index!=1) {
index--;
printSpaces((index*2)-2); //A static method that prints a certain number of spaces
while(n!=1) {
n--;
System.out.print(n + " ");
}
System.out.print("\n");
n=patternLength+1-index;
}
And here is the incorrect output for the user input "7":
1
2 1
3 2 1
4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
There are two blank lines preceding the incorrect output; these lines have the correct number of spaces necessary for the complete/correct pattern, but for some reason, the actual numbers start printing too "late" in the loop. In other words, the spaces that appear before the "1, 2 1" in the correct example are in the incorrect output. It's some of the numbers that are missing and make the incorrect example incorrect.
OK, I got it.
index=patternLength+1; n=1;int nSetter=1;
//Loop C
System.out.println("Pattern C:");
while (index!=1) {
index--;
printSpaces((index*2)-2);
while(n!=0) {
System.out.print(n + " ");
n--;
}
System.out.print("\n");
nSetter++;
n = nSetter;
}
My problem was that my "n" needed to go both up and down, so the extra variable "nSetter" seems to have solved that, although this may be a round-about solution. Whatever. Thanks to #Andreas for pointing me in the correct direction and #JohnKugelman for the helpful edit.
Please try this code your second while loop is not correct.
int index = patternLength + 1;
int n = 2; //These values are all previously intitialized
int i = 1;
while (index != 1) {
index--;
printSpaces((index * 2) - 2); //A static method that prints a certain number of spaces
while (n != 1) {
n--;
System.out.print(n + " ");
}
System.out.print("\n");
i++;
n = i+1;
}
Im trying to take a number and print it's odd number like this:
if i take 5 as a number it should give this:
1 3 5
3 5
5
and if i take 9 it should do the same thing:
1 3 5 7 9
3 5 7 9
5 7 9
7 9
9
This is what i have so far and i am stuck. i can't get the 5 to print after the 3 and to end it with 5 for the triangle:
public class first{
static void afficher(int a){
for(int i=1;i<=a;i++){
if(i%2!=0){
System.out.printf("%d",i);
}
}
System.out.println();
for(int j=3;j<=a-2;j++){
if(j%2!=0){
System.out.printf("%d",j);
}
}
}
public static void main(String[]args){
afficher(5);
}
}
This prints:
1 3 5
3
If you print a surface (2d thus), one expects that the algorithm runs in O(n^2) time complexity. Thus two nested fors:
public class first{
static void afficher(int a){
for(int i = 1; i <= a; i += 2) {
for(int j = i; j <= a; j += 2){
System.out.print(j);
System.out.print(' ');
}
System.out.println();
}
}
}
One can optimize the algorithm a bit by not checking if the number is odd, but taking steps of 2.
See demo.
You have to use nested for-loops to resolve this problem. Go through the following code
public class OddNumberLoop {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Scanner inpupt = new Scanner(System.in);
System.out.print("Input the starting number : ");
int start = inpupt.nextInt();
for(int i = 1 ; i <= start; i += 2){
for(int x = i; x <= start; x += 2) System.out.print(x+ " ");
System.out.println();
}
}
}
The reason it is printing as follows because:
1 3 5 -> your i loop runs here (from 1 to 5)
3 -> your j loop runs here (from 3 to (less than OR equal to 5))
So I suggest the following:
Use 2 nested loops (for universal values):
i running from 1 to the input number increasing by 2
j running from i to the input number increasing by 2 also ending with line change'/n'
Keep a check whether the input number is odd or not.
Hello i am having a tough time trying to write a function that can create an array that holds integers, that equal my simple math problem.
my problem is not adding integers into the array but finding the correct integers that could add up to a math problem.
for example i have a simple math problem like: 10 + 10 = ? we know it equals 20
so i want my array to hold up to ten integers, that when added all together equal 20.
this is what i have been trying in code but not getting the results i want.
while (totalCount != answer
&& count < setCount) {
randomNumber = rand.nextInt((int) answer / 2) + 1;
if(count < setCount) {
sumOfBalloons.add(randomNumber);
totalCount += randomNumber;
count++;
}
if(totalCount > answer) {
count = 0;
totalCount = 0;
sumOfBalloons.clear();
}
}
i am trying to find random numbers that add up to the math problems answer so i can draw them on balloons. problem is i can never get ten numbers to equal the answer in my while loop.
does anyone know some way of doing something like this?
need array to hold 3 - 10 integers that equals my math problems answer.
** update on code thanks to the advice i received i managed to fix my while loop now it looks like this
had to post like this cause my rep is very low. sorry.
while (totalCount != answer) {
randomNumber = rand.nextInt((int) answer / 2) + 1;
if(totalCount + randomNumber > answer) {
randomNumber = rand.nextInt((int) answer - totalCount) + 1;
}
if(count + 1 == setCount) {
randomNumber = answer - totalCount;
}
if(count < setCount) {
sumOfBalloons.add(randomNumber);
totalCount += randomNumber;
count++;
}
if(totalCount > answer
|| totalCount == answer
&& count < setCount
|| totalCount != answer
&& count == setCount) {
count = 0;
totalCount = 0;
sumOfBalloons.clear();
}
}
this is what i got in my console from this code
Total count = 10
Total totalCount = 20
sumOfBalloons 0 = 2
sumOfBalloons 1 = 3
sumOfBalloons 2 = 3
sumOfBalloons 3 = 2
sumOfBalloons 4 = 1
sumOfBalloons 5 = 4
sumOfBalloons 6 = 2
sumOfBalloons 7 = 1
sumOfBalloons 8 = 1
sumOfBalloons 9 = 1
I think there are a few options here re: generating random numbers that sum to 20.
Here's one possible solution:
Create an array of length 4, for example.
Generate random number between 1 and 6 for each of the first 3 indices of your array.
At this point you'll have an array of the form: { 4, 5, 2, _ } (where our 4th element hasn't been chosen yet).
Sum our first 3 elements: 4 + 5 + 2 = 11. Determine 4th element by calculating 20 - current_total (11) = 9.
Set myArray[3] = 9;
A few things to note:
You may need to modify the range of possible random numbers ( 1-6 ) I've given. Consider what happens if the array we generate turns out to be { 2, 1, 2, _ }...then there's no digit that will ensure the elements sum to 20.
Another option is to use an arrayList instead of an array. The benefit to this is that you can keep adding elements to your arrayList until you either hit 20 (then you're done) or go over (in which case you delete the most recent element and begin adding again). You also won't need (or be able) to know the length of your arrayList in advance.
For example, say we have a Sudoku board like this:
0 0 6 5 8 9 7 4 3
0 5 0 0 0 0 0 6 0
7 0 9 0 6 0 1 0 0
0 3 0 0 0 2 0 8 7
0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0
8 9 0 6 0 0 0 5 0
0 0 2 0 5 0 3 0 6
0 7 0 0 0 0 0 9 0
3 1 8 4 9 6 5 0 0
I want to store it into one array such that the first 9 elements of the array are the first sub block, i.e. the values {0 0 6 0 5 0 7 0 9} and followed by {5 8 9 0 0 0 0 6 0}.
I've tried finding a solution but I always get an array index out of bounds error and it is too brute force. Something similar to this:
while(st.hasMoreTokens()) {
if(ctr == 27) {
c.addSubBlock(sb1);
c.addSubBlock(sb2);
c.addSubBlock(sb3);
sb1 = new SubBlock();
sb2 = new SubBlock();
sb3 = new SubBlock();
ctr = 0;
}
sb1.addElement(Integer.parseInt(st.nextToken()));
sb1.addElement(Integer.parseInt(st.nextToken()));
sb1.addElement(Integer.parseInt(st.nextToken()));
sb2.addElement(Integer.parseInt(st.nextToken()));
sb2.addElement(Integer.parseInt(st.nextToken()));
sb2.addElement(Integer.parseInt(st.nextToken()));
sb3.addElement(Integer.parseInt(st.nextToken()));
sb3.addElement(Integer.parseInt(st.nextToken()));
sb3.addElement(Integer.parseInt(st.nextToken()));
ctr+=9;
}
Please give me some tips. Code snippets would also be a great help.
EDIT: This thread somehow helped me figured it out. And yes, this is part of the Sudoku where I'm trying to encode the board into an array.
What I did was to transform first the input String into a 2d array (9x9) and use int block = (row/3)*3 + (col/3); to compute exactly which sub block each element belongs.
Create a 3x3 array of sub blocks
Use 2 counters (x & y) for tracking the position in the full board of each element read
Add the values at (x,y) into sub block (x/3,y/3)
Something like this:
SubBlock board[][] = new SubBlock[3][3];
int x, y;
for ( y=0; y<9; y++ )
for ( x=0; x<9; x++ )
board[y/3][x/3].addElement(Integer.parseInt(st.nextToken()));
board[0][0] will be the top-left SubBlock, board[2][2] the bottom-right one.
Store everything in a two dimension array. E.g.
int[] board = {
{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9}
{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9}
{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9}
{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9}
{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9}
{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9}
{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9}
{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9}
{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9}};
//looping
public static void Main(string[] args){
for(int i = 0; i < 9; i++)
{
System.out.println("SubBlock number"+i);
for(int j = 0; j < 9; j++){
System.out.println(board[i][j]);
}
}
}
Assuming that you are reading input left to right, top to bottom, try a set of 4 nested loops like this:
int board[] = new int[81];
for (int outY = 0; outY < 3; outY++)
{
for (int outX = 0; outX < 3; outX++)
{
for (int inY = 0; inY < 3; inY++)
{
for (int inX = 0; inX < 3; inX++)
{
board[27*outY + 9*outX + 3 * inY + inX] = //parse an int from your input here
}
}
}
}
It would be great if we knew why you are trying to loop through the board.
If you want to check if you can enter a number, I recommend you use maps for each of the 3x3 squares.
Then check if the item is in the map already or not. For the rows and columns, you can either loop over the 2D array and check each element, or -again- use a map for each column and a map for each row.
I'm not entirely sure if you want an answer for a single-dimension array or if you're willing to make it a two-dimensional array (as you mention each nine element set with curly braces), but if two-dimensional is OK...
The OP in this Code Review posting used a 'fancy' way of sifting through the subgrids by using the math (i % 3) + rowStart inside one of the square brackets and (i / 3) + colStart inside the other. One commenter noted this modulo method to be a bit obscure, and I'm prone to agree, but for how clean it is and the fact that it works, I think it's a solid solution. So, paired with the iteration of the for loop, we can sift through each 'subgrid' cell, as well as each element of row + col.
for(i=0; i<9; ++i)
{
if (puzzle[row][i] == num) return 0;
if (puzzle[i][col] == num) return 0;
if (puzzle[rowStart + (i%3)][colStart + (i/3)] == num) return 0;
}
If we find a number in one of the cells that matches, it's a duplicate, and we exit the function as 'false', or, 0.
EDIT:
Now that I think of it, you could use this same trick for a single-dimension array by using i % 9 instead of 3. You could then determine which 'row' we're on by doing i / 9 and trusting that, since we're dealing with type ints, we'll truncate the unnecessary decimals.
This does verify that this trick is a bit prone towards N-1 indexed data, as someone would assume 'go to the 81st element' would mean go to the 9th column of the 9th row, but using 81 % 9 would yield 0, and 81 / 9 would yield 9, so we'd go to the 0th place at row 9.