Hibernate Mapping
How to implement such a code?
Each company has two properties, they are company name and estimated annual earnings.
There are two types of companies: 1- Main company, 2 - Subsidiary company.
The company can belong only to one company but can have a few child companies.
public class Company {
#Id
#GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.AUTO)
private Integer id;
private String companyName;
private double estimatedAnnualEarnings;
private Company company; // here need to do a #OneToOne
private List<Company> subsidiaryCompany; // here need to do a #OneToMany
}
In your Implementation you should use :
The #Entity annotation in your class level, so the entity can be persisted to database.
The #Column annotation with the companyName and estimatedAnnualEarnings properties, so they can be persisted as columns in the database.
#ManyToOne annotation with the company field, so it can be mapped with a self-reference relationship.
The same goes with the subsidiaryCompany List which needs to be mapped with #OneToMany annotation to have a relationship too.
This is how should be your code:
#Entity
public class Company {
#Id
#GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.AUTO)
private Integer id;
#Column
private String companyName;
#Column
private double estimatedAnnualEarnings;
#ManyToOne(cascade={CascadeType.ALL})
#JoinColumn(name="mainCompanyId")
private Company mainCompany;
#OneToMany(mappedBy="mainCompany")
private List<Company> subsidiaryCompanies;
//getters and setters goes here
}
Note
I changed the name of company field to mainCompany and
subsidiaryCompaniy to subsidiaryCompanies for better readability
and to make it fit the logic better.
If you want to give your entity a different name in the database you
should use #Table(name="differentName") in the class level with
#Entity annotation, the smae thing with the columns you can add
name property to the #Column annotation i.e
#Column(name="company_name") if you want different names.
Related
In my spring data project, there is an entity that looks like:
public class Employee {
#Id
#GeneratedValue(strategy= GenerationType.IDENTITY)
#Column(name="id")
private Integer id;
#Column(name="category")
private Category category;
#ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
#JoinColumn(name="element_id")
private Department department;
#ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
#JoinColumn(name="agency_id")
private Agency agency;
public Employee() {}
// routine getters and setters
}
In my EmployeeRepository, I find that I can derive a method, findEmployeeById() that seems to work in exactly the same way as the usual findById() (but I'm not sure). Can someone explain the difference between these two methods?
Optional<Employee> findEmployeeById (Integer id);
vs
Optional<Employee> findById (Integer id);
I "discovered" this by accident via autocomplete in my side (IntelliJ).
The difference is that while findEmployeeById() searches - as it states - employee by its field named id, findById searches by field annotated as #Id disregarding what is the name of the entity's id field.
In your case - as with many else's - the thing is that the #Id field happens to be named id so the result is the same.
This title is closest I could get to what I am trying to do. :)
Let's start with how it should look in database (tables with columns):
Email
- id : PK
- email : String
CompanyEmail
- email_id : FK
- company_id : FK
PersonEmail
- email_id : FK
- person_id : FK
Company
- id : PK
Person
- id : PK
Now let's look at model:
#Entity
public class Company
{
#Id
#GeneratedValue
private Long id;
#OneToMany
private List<CompanyEmail> emails = new ArrayList<>();
}
#Entity
public class Person
{
#Id
#GeneratedValue
private Long id;
#OneToMany
private List<PersonEmail> emails = new ArrayList<>();
}
// Should this be #Entity? Maybe #MappedSuperclass? What strategy to use to be able to extend it?
public class Email // This is base email class/entity
{
#Id
#GeneratedValue
private Long id;
#javax.validation.constraints.Email
private String email;
}
#Entity
public class PersonEmail // This needs to somehow extend Email, so all Email data is also accessible here.
{
#ManyToOne
private Person person;
}
#Entity
public class ComanyEmail // This needs to somehow extend Email, so all Email data is also accessible here.
{
#ManyToOne
private Company company;
}
Now my question is - is it possible in Hibernate (latest) to achieve such structure?
Key points when designing above (what drove me):
Keep ALL emails in one table, for sanity checks (uniqueness).
Have smallest database footprint - above gives just one table for Email and then 2 join tables with 2 FK.
Still be able to keep the model design Hibernate-friendly (basically don't use any special queries, just JPA annotations). This means that both Company and Person can easily LAZY load their specific emails (subclasses), and also those subclassed emails can correspond to them (PersonEmail to Person, and CompanyEmail to Company) - making model bidirectional.
Note: I've also considered creating something like Contactable base class for Comapny and Person which would have Email list, but that doesn't suit my needs (neither class per table, nor same table designs).
My question is - is it possible? Even if I don't get answer with example based on classes I gave, just the fact will give me hope and I will find it.
Edit 1
Should I maybe use discriminator in Email table and then keep FK there?
Email
- id : PK
- email : String
- companyOrPerson : FK
- discriminator : Decides what FK points at
Company
- id : PK
Person
- id : PK
Here I am grabbing straws - I have no idea if such thing is possible, can discriminator decide about parent table (companyOrPerson)? Does bidirectional work here (like I mentioned, maybe I should make some base class Contactable)?
I am open to suggestions on how to do it well.
Favour composition over inheritence. It tends to simplify things.
If you had main entities of
Person
Company
Email
Then a couple of composites
PersonEmail (contains a Person and an Email)
CompanyEmail (contains a Company and an Email)
Would that not fit what you need?
e.g.
#Entity
public class Person {
#Id
#GeneratedValue(strategy=GenerationType.IDENTITY)
private long id;
#OneToMany
#JoinColumn(name="person_id")
private List<PersonEmail> emails = new ArrayList<>();
}
#Entity
public class Company {
#Id
#GeneratedValue(strategy=GenerationType.IDENTITY)
private long id;
#OneToMany()
#JoinColumn(name="company_id")
private List<CompanyEmail> emails = new ArrayList<>();
}
#Entity
public class Email {
#Id
#GeneratedValue(strategy=GenerationType.IDENTITY)
private long id;
#javax.validation.constraints.Email
private String email;
}
#Entity
public class PersonEmail {
#Id
#GeneratedValue(strategy=GenerationType.IDENTITY)
private long id;
#OneToOne(cascade=CascadeType.ALL)
#JoinColumn(name="person_id", referencedColumnName="id")
private Person person;
#OneToOne(cascade=CascadeType.ALL)
#JoinColumn(name="email_id", referencedColumnName="id")
private Email email;
}
#Entity
public class CompanyEmail
{
#Id
#GeneratedValue(strategy=GenerationType.IDENTITY)
private long id;
#OneToOne(cascade=CascadeType.ALL)
#JoinColumn(name="company_id", referencedColumnName="id")
private Company company;
#OneToOne(cascade=CascadeType.ALL)
#JoinColumn(name="email_id", referencedColumnName="id")
private Email email;
}
I have two entities, a Customer and a CustomerTransaction. I want to be able to store two Customer ids within CustomerTransaction as foreign keys (one for the Customer initiating the transaction and one for the Customer receiving). I also want each Customer object to contain a list of all CustomerTransactions they are linked to.
Customer.java
#Entity
public class Customer {
#Id
#GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.AUTO)
private Long id;
private String firstName;
private String lastName;
//#ManyToOne ?
private List<CustomerTransaction> customerTransaction;
//getters and setters
}
CustomerTransaction.java
#Entity
public class CustomerTransaction {
#Id
#GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.AUTO)
private Long id;
//#OneToMany ?
private Customer initiater;
//#OneToMany ?
private Customer receiver;
private String transactionDetails;
//getters and setters
}
How do I set up the jpa annotations so that each transaction contains a foreign key ID of the customer initiating and receiving?
initiater and receiver need to be annotated with ManyToOne (many transactions are initiated by the one initiater).
And you need two OneToMany in Customer: one for the initiated tranactions (OneToMany(mappedBy = "initiater")), and one for the received transactions: (OneToMany(mappedBy = "receiver").
You can't have just one list (and it's probably not desirable anyway).
I'm using JPA Hibernate/Spring boot to build a web server with MySQL database, and I'm trying to extend a POJO Entity that looks like this, with additional OneToMany Lists.
#Entity
#Table(name="user")
public class User {
#Id
#GeneratedValue
private Integer id;
#Column(nullable=false)
private String name;
....Constructors, getters and setters....
}
with this basic user entity, I just wanna make a UserInfo entity with additional information about the user's careers.
#Entity
public class UserInfo extends User {
#OneToMany(cascade= CascadeType.ALL, fetch= FetchType.EAGER)
#JoinColumn(name="user_id", referencedColumnName = "id")
private List<Career> careers;
....Constructors, getters, setters......
}
And I'm quite confused which inheritance strategy I should choose. I don't think its necessary to make another column or table for this.
Or should I just query twice..?
I'm kinda new to JPA so not sure which is considered as the best practice or design..
Edit:
This is how Career entity looks like. Just in case..
#Entity
#Table(name="career")
public class Career {
#Id
#GeneratedValue
private Integer id;
#Column(nullable=false)
private Integer user_id;
#Column(nullable=false)
private String name;
#Column(nullable=false)
private String description;
....Constructors, getters and setters....
}
Since extending User table was meaningless(just in my case), I changed the User class like this.
#Table(name="user")
public class User {
#Id
#GeneratedValue
private Integer id;
#Column(nullable=false)
private String name;
#OneToMany(fetch= FetchType.LAZY)
#JoinColumn(name="user_id", referencedColumnName = "id")
private List<Career> careers;
....Constructors, getters, setters......
}
Now I'm trying this with Spring Data JPA, and when I try to show the list of Users with their Careers, it is now querying more than 40 times taking about a minute to show the result.
Is this the N+1 problem..? how can I solve this?
In my opinion the error lies within the model itself. Why should UserInfo extend User? I cannot imagine which attributes or methods the UserInfo should inherit from a User. Typical inheritances would be "Developer" or "Administrator".
Why don't you add UserInfo as a 1:1 relation in your User entity? Another option is to omit UserInfo and put the Careers as a 1:n relation right into your User.
To prevent possible n+1 issues on a growing number of Careers you might want to change the fetch mode. See below
#OneToMany(fetch=FetchType.LAZY,mappedBy="user")
#Fetch(FetchMode.SUBSELECT)
private Set<Career> careers = new HashSet<>();
I am absolutly new in Hibernate development and I have the following problem.
I have 2 entity classes that maps 2 DB tables:
1) The first entity class (the main one) is named KM_ProjectInfo and map a DB table named KM_PROJECT.
2) The second entity class is named KM_ProjectInfoStatus and map a DB table named KM_PROJECT_INFO_STATUS.
So the second one represent a specific field of the first one (a status of the row representd by an instance of the KM_ProjectInfo class). Infact I have something like this:
1) KM_ProjectInfo class:
#Entity
#Table(name = "KM_PROJECT")
public class KM_ProjectInfo implements Serializable {
#Id
#GeneratedValue
private Long idProjectInfo;
#Column(name = "name")
private String name;
#Column(name = "technology")
private String technology;
#ManyToOne
#JoinColumn(name = "idCountry")
private KMCountry country;
#Column(name = "power")
private long power;
#Column(name = "cod")
private String cod;
#ManyToOne
#JoinColumn(name = "idProjectInfoStatus")
private KM_ProjectInfoStatus status;
// GETTERS & SETTERS
}
2) KM_ProjectInfoStatus:
#Entity
#Table(name = "KM_PROJECT_INFO_STATUS")
public class KM_ProjectInfoStatus implements Serializable {
#Id
#GeneratedValue
private Long idProjectInfoStatus;
#Column(name = "foldertech")
private Long foldertech;
#Column(name = "folderproject")
private Long folderproject;
// GETTERS & SETTERS
}
So, as you can see in the previous snippet, the KM_ProjectInfoStatuss is a field of the KM_ProjectInfo because I want that it contains the primary key of this table as foreign key.
In the logic of my application I want that at one row of the KM_PROJECT table (so at one instance of the KM_ProjectInfo entity class) is associated a single row of the KM_PROJECT_INFO_STATUS (one instance of the KM_ProjectInfoStatus entity class) because it represent a specific status for the KM_PROJECT row.
In my code I have:
#ManyToOne
#JoinColumn(name = "idProjectInfoStatus")
private KM_ProjectInfoStatus status;
but I think that is wrong because at one row of my first table it is associated a specific single row of the second table. But maybe I am missing something about how Hibernate work.
Can you help me to understand what I am missing? What it work? Why I have #ManyToOne instead #OneToOne?
Tnx
It all depends on how you want to model things. In terms of Database structure, OneToOne and ManyToOne are implemented in the same way:
One or more JoinColumns which makes a foreign key pointing to the primary key of the other table.
So both solutions correctly map to your database, but it depends if you want to allow several KM_ProjectInfo to point to the same KM_ProjectInfoStatus, or only allow a single one.
Note that, even though you would declare a OneToOne, you could still end up with multiple KM_ProjectInfo pointing to the same KM_ProjectInfoStatus if you don't manipulate Hibernate properly.
Here you did not declare the reverse relationship, but if you did, the declaration would have to be different:
In case of a OneToOne, you would have a KM_ProjectInfo member
In case of a OneToMany (reverse of ManyToOne), you would have a Collection<KM_ProjectInfo> member
From the description it seems you want to have one-to-one relationship. That is the project entity should have its very own status not shared by any other project. You could achieve this by using #OneToOne as below.
#Entity
#Table(name = "KM_PROJECT")
public class KM_ProjectInfo implements Serializable {
#Id
#GeneratedValue
private Long idProjectInfo;
#OneToOne
#JoinColumn(name = "idProjectInfoStatus")
private KM_ProjectInfoStatus status;
}
#Entity
#Table(name = "KM_PROJECT_INFO_STATUS")
public class KM_ProjectInfoStatus implements Serializable {
#Id
#GeneratedValue
private Long idProjectInfoStatus;
#OneToOne(mappedBy="idProjectInfoStatus")
private KM_ProjectInfo project;
}
This way you can have specific status for the KM_PROJECT.
Coming back to #ManyToOne, you will want to have this if you want to share the same status with multiple projects, but that's not what you want in your case. I have tried to explain mappings in simple way here One-to-One mapping.