Develop Reference

Can you generate code the overrides a method using Java annotations?

Is it possible to write a Java annotation for a class that generates a method that overrides the class's parent method?
In my case I want to do it in android:
#OverrideOnTouch
class Foo extends Activity {
And it will generate an onTouch override method in compile time.
Is it possible?

An annotation cannot generate code.
You could write an annotation processor that added a method at compile time wherever it found your annotation.
Here is a tutorial on this subject:
Annotation Processing 101.
However, beware that writing an annotation processor is a significant amount of Java coding work. Also note that an annotation processor (implemented using the AnnotationProcessor API and called via the Java compiler) cannot modify Java source code. It can only generate new ".java" files.
So, if you want to inject new method into an existing class, you would need to compile the class, and then use a post-compilation annotation processor that used BCEL or equivalent to add the required methods to the ".class" files produced by the compiler. Implementing a BCEL-based processor is ... even harder. And such processors have a tendency to break when you upgrade Java. (It is easy to make assumptions about the JVM / bytecode level implementation that are not supported by the relevant specs ... and no longer "work" when the platform changes.)
This approach is mentioned in some of the answers to this Question:
How to write a Java annotation processor?

Using shared class libraries internally, but not providing access to them in released SDK

After some research I cannot come across the best approach for this. There will be certain color classes that I would like to share amongst multiple projects. Let's call one of them EncryptedColor. Since it is used across multiple projects I don't want multiple copies of it in existence of course. Otherwise I would need to make sure that an update in one location would need to be updated everywhere. However, these classes are needed in some released SDKs that we provide to customers.
How could I design it such that I can use these classes but not provide them with the classes that they don't need access to from their SDK. I don't want useless classes to become visible and flood the smaller subset of classes that they really need to be seeing.
A couple approaches I have thought of so far but aren't quite ideal:
Try and use a doclet structure that hides the calls within the javadoc such as doclava. Javadoc has not fully implemented its own hiding mechanism yet. As I understand this doesn't keep the functions from being visible, but it was mentioned in one spot that you would need reflection to use the calls. I don't see how just the javadoc does that so I must have been missing something.
Android has designed themselves it seems to force reflection from some #hide attributes included in methods that they have in source code. But from the sounds of it, the system hides those and then uses a different jar when it is loading to make those visible at launch time. Probably not useful here.
If I were to keep shared classes in the same package name I could access default and protected members, but...then I am keeping all my classes that use these in the same package name. Not quite ideal either, but it could be done in that manner if I needed to. Might get out of hand with large quantities of shared resources.
What approaches are taken typically in situations such as these? I haven't liked my findings and thought process thus far.

Short answer : you can't hide/remove these classes as they are needed at runtime by your application.
In my opinon, you have 3 alternatives :
Change the classes access to "package private". Yes, doing that doesn't make it impossible to access them, but these classes won't be accessible directly.
Remove the classes and create an API. You want to hide the logic ? Remove it and provide it through a REST API for instance. Depending or your architecture, it could be difficult or impossible.
Create all the instance of these classes in a dynamic way, with Class.forName, using Spring or as in #Steve K answer, with Java's ServiceLoader. As a result, you will be able to remove these classes from the main jar and make them more private, in a way. Again, classes will be here but a little less accessible.

My suggestion that could work would be to implement your color classes as a service using the Java ServiceLoader
You make an interface for your color classes, and implementations can be called using the ServiceLoader class. Then you simply separate your color classes into two packages - a public package you can jar up and distribute with your SDK, and a private package for those classes you want to be internal. The ServiceLoader will find all the color classes available so long as the jar files are in your project's classpath.
For example, if your color classes (as an example) had a common interface like this:
public interface MyAppColor {
public int getRed();
public int getGreen();
public int getBlue();
public int getAlpha();
public void setRed(int red);
public void setGreen(int green);
public void setBlue(int blue);
public void setAlpha(int alpha);
public boolean isValid();
public void doSomething(Object arg);
}
Then you could have a bunch of implementing classes in a jar file, with a service descriptor file included in the jar at the path:
META-INF/services/com.my.app.MyAppColor
The text of that file is simply the list of classes in the jar that implement the interface - one per line:
com.my.app.MyPublicAppColor
com.my.app.MyEncryptedPublicAppColor
com.my.app.MyOtherPublicAppColor
etc. Then all you have to do is make a factory for instantiating the correct type, which could be as simple as this:
public class MyAppColorFactory {
private static ServiceLoader<MyAppColor> serviceLoader = ServiceLoader.load(MyAppColor.class, null);
public static MyAppColor get(String className){
if (className != null){
for (MyAppColor c : serviceLoader){
if (className.equals(c.getClass().getName())){
return c;
}
}
}
return null;
}
}

Deploying only needed code:
- Use Only The Needed Source In Development (1) (2)
Since you have an entire library and many deployments which each use different components, the easiest way to do what you suggest is to use only the sources that you need; not a single library. You can ignore the unused sources. This will only ship the needed code.
- Make The Library "Package Private"
This will allow the access only for the public components of the library and everything else will not be callable. But, it will still ship all the code.
- Create an API as a REST SDK
This will require web access, not desirable for performance code {any code really}. You will ship no sdk code with this method.
- Obfuscate the code
Easy with the correct tools. Obfuscation will change the class and method names in production code to gibberish. This will make the library basically unusable to anyone but you. This will ship all the code but it will be obfuscated
- Native API
You can compile java to machine code and use it in production or as the api. You can also create the api in a native language {not desirable}.

How to generate code dynamically with annotations at build time in Java?

I'm looking for a solution for generating code. I have googled, searched on SO and some blogs but I didn't find a good solution.
I'd like to put an annotation on my class and at compilation time, some methods and properties would be automatically added to the class.
Key points of the solution I'm looking for :
Generated code customizable (MANDATORY)
No external tool like apt have to be called (MANDATORY)
JDK only, no third-party framework (MANDATORY OPTIONAL)
Annotation name customizable (OPTIONAL)
For example :
#Aliasable
public class MyClass {
//Some properties
// Contructor ...
// Some methods
}
My class would look like this after compilation :
public class MyClass {
//Some properties
private String alias;
// Contructor ...
// Some methods
public String getAlias() {
return alias;
}
public void setAlias(String alias) {
this.alias=alias;
}
}
EDIT:
Finally, I turned my third requirement from MANDATORY to OPTIONAL and choosed project Lombok (easy integration with Maven and Eclipse, virtually no work to do
for using it).

The annotation processing tool has been integrated in javac since version 1.6 and is part of the JDK. So there is no need for external tools when using the Pluggable Annotation API. You can generate any code by analysing custom annotations or method/parameter/field/class declarations using the Mirror API.
The annotation processor API says you shouldn't change existing classes. Instead you should generate subclasses of existing classes and create extension methods on those subclasses.
It seems to be possible to change classes anyway (e.g. by using bytecode manipulation libraries) though that would in contrast to the specification and could lead to issues with other annotation processors and may not work with all compilers in the same way.

Have a look at Project Lombok. It generates code as you ask when you write:
public class MyClass {
#Getter #Setter private String alias;
}
It also does a lot more if you need it. I know you asked for no external tools, but you would basically be recreating this.

I use XML and XSLT to generate code. It is used for EJB, Logic and the CRUD part of the views. It isnt gerated at runtime but instead on the buildserver. Developers can generate the code manually for well development purposes. This is done with the same command ANT uses on the buildserver.
Because the generation is with XML and XSLT it is highly customizable.
If you google Java code generation with XSLT you will run into alot of examples. Please note that this technique dates from ~2000 and thus probably has been preceded by now by easier solutions.

How do you use Java 1.6 Annotation Processing to perform compile time weaving?

I have created an annotation, applied it to a DTO and written a Java 1.6 style annotationProcessor. I can see how to have the annotationProcessor write a new source file, which isn't what I want to do, I cannot see or find out how to have it modify the existing class (ideally just modify the byte code). The modification is actually fairly trivial, all I want the processor to do is to insert a new getter and setter where the name comes from the value of the annotation being processed.
My annotation processor looks like this;
#SupportedSourceVersion(SourceVersion.RELEASE_6)
#SupportedAnnotationTypes({ "com.kn.salog.annotation.AggregateField" })
public class SalogDTOAnnotationProcessor extends AbstractProcessor {
#Override
public boolean process(final Set<? extends TypeElement> annotations, final RoundEnvironment roundEnv) {
//do some stuff
}
}

You are looking for "Instrumentation", which is what frameworks like AspectJ do. In this case you have to specify a jar in the command line with the "-agent" option, and then have the possibility to filter all loaded classes. During this filter step you can check for annotations, and modify the bytecode before it gets loaded in the virtual machine. Libraries for doing the actual bytecode modification include "asm", and maybe the highlevel wrappers "cglib" and "javassist". You could even precompile your classes to generate a list of classes which have to be instrumented by you, to make filtering in the beginning a bit faster.
See java.lang.instrumentation for more info.

By design, the annotation processing facility does not allow direct modification of the source code being processed. However, one can generate subclasses of the type being processed or the superclass of the type being processed. With some planning, this does allow some of the effect of modifying the type in question. I've written up an example of how this can fit together; see this blog entry for a more detailed explanation and some sample code.

You have to use internal compiler's classes – some inspiration:
AOP or APT for overriding methods from super classes
RomanNumeralProcessor.java
Java Multiline String
But it is brinkmanship. Your program will compile only on Sun/OpenJDK and there can be problems in future versions (internal API can change). Although once compiled, it is standard bytecode and will run everywhere.
BTW: if you want use it in Eclipse, you should add some special support for it because Eclipse uses non-standard compiler. Your design should be more complex and you should add a level of abstraction to your processor – like Lombok does.

You have to extend the javac compiler for this, which means building your program won't be as portable as a regular application. See http://weblogs.java.net/blog/cayhorstmann/archive/2006/06/say_no_to_prope.html for more details on how someone achieved this.

Find Java classes implementing an interface [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
How can I get a list of all the implementations of an interface programmatically in Java?
(11 answers)
Closed 9 years ago.
Some time ago, I came across a piece of code, that used some piece of standard Java functionality to locate the classes that implemented a given interface. I know the functions were hidden in some non-logical place, but they could be used for other classes as the package name implied. Back then I did not need it, so I forgot about it, but now I do, and I can't seem to find the functions again. Where can these functions be found?
Edit: I'm not looking for any IDE functions or anything, but rather something that can be executed within the Java application.

Awhile ago, I put together a package for doing what you want, and more. (I needed it for a utility I was writing). It uses the ASM library. You can use reflection, but ASM turned out to perform better.
I put my package in an open source library I have on my web site. The library is here: http://software.clapper.org/javautil/. You want to start with the with ClassFinder class.
The utility I wrote it for is an RSS reader that I still use every day, so the code does tend to get exercised. I use ClassFinder to support a plug-in API in the RSS reader; on startup, it looks in a couple directory trees for jars and class files containing classes that implement a certain interface. It's a lot faster than you might expect.
The library is BSD-licensed, so you can safely bundle it with your code. Source is available.
If that's useful to you, help yourself.
Update: If you're using Scala, you might find this library to be more Scala-friendly.

Spring can do this for you...
BeanDefinitionRegistry bdr = new SimpleBeanDefinitionRegistry();
ClassPathBeanDefinitionScanner s = new ClassPathBeanDefinitionScanner(bdr);
TypeFilter tf = new AssignableTypeFilter(CLASS_YOU_WANT.class);
s.addIncludeFilter(tf);
s.scan("package.you.want1", "package.you.want2");
String[] beans = bdr.getBeanDefinitionNames();
N.B. The TypeFilter is important if you want the correct results!
You can also use exclusion filters here instead.
The Scanner can be found in the spring-context jar, the registry in spring-beans, the type filter is in spring-core.

I really like the reflections library for doing this.
It provides a lot of different types of scanners (getTypesAnnotatedWith, getSubTypesOf, etc), and it is dead simple to write or extend your own.

The code you are talking about sounds like ServiceLoader, which was introduced in Java 6 to support a feature that has been defined since Java 1.3 or earlier. For performance reasons, this is the recommended approach to find interface implementations at runtime; if you need support for this in an older version of Java, I hope that you'll find my implementation helpful.
There are a couple of implementations of this in earlier versions of Java, but in the Sun packages, not in the core API (I think there are some classes internal to ImageIO that do this). As the code is simple, I'd recommend providing your own implementation rather than relying on non-standard Sun code which is subject to change.

Package Level Annotations
I know this question has already been answered a long time ago but another solution to this problem is to use Package Level Annotations.
While its pretty hard to go find all the classes in the JVM its actually pretty easy to browse the package hierarchy.
Package[] ps = Package.getPackages();
for (Package p : ps) {
MyAno a = p.getAnnotation(MyAno.class)
// Recursively descend
}
Then just make your annotation have an argument of an array of Class.
Then in your package-info.java for a particular package put the MyAno.
I'll add more details (code) if people are interested but most probably get the idea.
MetaInf Service Loader
To add to #erickson answer you can also use the service loader approach. Kohsuke has an awesome way of generating the the required META-INF stuff you need for the service loader approach:
http://weblogs.java.net/blog/kohsuke/archive/2009/03/my_project_of_t.html

You could also use the Extensible Component Scanner (extcos: http://sf.net/projects/extcos) and search all classes implementing an interface like so:
Set<Class<? extends MyInterface>> classes = new HashSet<Class<? extends MyInterface>>();
ComponentScanner scanner = new ComponentScanner();
scanner.getClasses(new ComponentQuery() {
#Override
protected void query() {
select().
from("my.package1", "my.package2").
andStore(thoseImplementing(MyInterface.class).into(classes)).
returning(none());
}
});
This works for classes on the file system, within jars and even for those on the JBoss virtual file system. It's further designed to work within standalone applications as well as within any web or application container.

In full generality, this functionality is impossible. The Java ClassLoader mechanism guarantees only the ability to ask for a class with a specific name (including package), and the ClassLoader can supply a class, or it can state that it does not know that class.
Classes can be (and frequently are) loaded from remote servers, and they can even be constructed on the fly; it is not difficult at all to write a ClassLoader that returns a valid class that implements a given interface for any name you ask from it; a List of the classes that implement that interface would then be infinite in length.
In practice, the most common case is an URLClassLoader that looks for classes in a list of filesystem directories and JAR files. So what you need is to get the URLClassLoader, then iterate through those directories and archives, and for each class file you find in them, request the corresponding Class object and look through the return of its getInterfaces() method.

Obviously, Class.isAssignableFrom() tells you whether an individual class implements the given interface. So then the problem is getting the list of classes to test.
As far as I'm aware, there's no direct way from Java to ask the class loader for "the list of classes that you could potentially load". So you'll have to do this yourself by iterating through the visible jars, calling Class.forName() to load the class, then testing it.
However, it's a little easier if you just want to know classes implementing the given interface from those that have actually been loaded:
via the Java Instrumentation framework, you can call Instrumentation.getAllLoadedClasses()
via reflection, you can query the ClassLoader.classes field of a given ClassLoader.
If you use the instrumentation technique, then (as explained in the link) what happens is that your "agent" class is called essentially when the JVM starts up, and passed an Instrumentation object. At that point, you probably want to "save it for later" in a static field, and then have your main application code call it later on to get the list of loaded classes.

If you were asking from the perspective of working this out with a running program then you need to look to the java.lang.* package. If you get a Class object, you can use the isAssignableFrom method to check if it is an interface of another Class.
There isn't a simple built in way of searching for these, tools like Eclipse build an index of this information.
If you don't have a specific list of Class objects to test you can look to the ClassLoader object, use the getPackages() method and build your own package hierarchy iterator.
Just a warning though that these methods and classes can be quite slow.