Develop Reference

What is a better way to change variable in runtime server?

We maintain our server once a week.
Sometimes, the customer wishes that we change some settings which is already cached in server.
My colleague always write some JSP code to change these settings which are stored in the memory.
Is it a good method to use this kind of methodology?
If our project is not a Web container, which tools can help me?

Usually, in my experience, the server configuration is not stored only in memory of server:
What happens that after a configuration change, the server has been restarted / just went down for some system reason?
What happens if you have more than one instance of the same server to work on (a cluster of servers in other words)?
So, usually, people opt for various "externalized configuration" options that can range from "file-based" configuration + redeploy the whole cluster upon each configuration change, to configuration management servers (like Consul, etc.d, etc). There are also some solutions that came from (and used in) a java world: Apache Zookeeper, Spring cloud config server to name a few, there are others. In addition, sometimes, it's convenient to store the configurations in a database.
Now to your question: If your project is not a web container and you don't care that configuration will "disappear" after a server restart and you're not running a distributed cluster of servers, then, using JSP indeed doesn't seem appropriate in this case.
Maybe you should take a look at JMX - Java management extensions, that have a built-in solution so that you probably will be able to get rid of a web container (which seems to be not used by your team anyway other than for JSP modifications that you've described).

You basically need in memory cache, there are multiple solutions found in answers which include creating your own implementation or using existing java library. You can also get data from database and add cache over the database layer.

Efficiently deploy multiple instances of same WAR ( different contexts, same container )

I have one WAR ( app.war ) and one container ( Tomcat, Jetty, Glassfish, whatever ).
My goal is to deploy, on demand, hundreds of instances of this same web application on the container.
http://foo/app1 --> app.war
http://foo/app2 --> app.war
http://foo/app3 --> app.war
...
http://foo/appN --> app.war
Some obvious ways of achieving this:
In Tomcat, create one context.xml file for each app ( named appN.xml ), all pointing to the same WAR. Other containers have similar methods
Problem with this approach: It will explode the WAR N times, taking up a lot of disk space
Use symbolic links to create webapp/{app1,app2,appN} folders pointing to an exploded version of app.war. This prevents the disk space explosion, but the JVM is still loading many duplicate JARs to memory
Use some shared lib folder to contain most jars ( and a combination of the previous two options ).
I wonder if there is a better method to do this. Ideally, creating a new instance should not take up ANY more disk space ( other than marginal configuration files ) and only take up memory related to thread execution stacks and other runtime allocations.
Any ideas?

Jetty added support for what you looking for a while back with what are called overlays.
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Jetty/Tutorial/Configuring_the_Jetty_Overlay_Deployer
Copying a bit from the wiki page:
You can keep the WAR file immutable, even signed, so that it is clear which version you have deployed.
All modifications you make to customise/configure the web application are separate WARs, and thus are easily identifiable for review and migration to new versions.
You can create a parameterised template overlay that contains common customisations and configuration that apply to many instances of the web application (for example, for multi-tenant deployment).
Because the layered deployment clearly identifies the common and instance specific components, Jetty is able to share classloaders and static resource caches for the template, greatly reducing the memory footprint of multiple instances.

Apologies for being a little bit off-topic, but in my view, your scenario shouts "multi-tenancy" application, so that you've got a single application which will service multiple "tenants" (customers).
With regard to multi-tenancy setups, the following considerations would have to be considered:
Customers cannot access each other's data (if they the data is stored in the same database, same schema and using "discriminator" fields to separate the data). This could be achieved by using Spring Security with Access Control Lists
Hibernate has built-in support for multitenancy apps from version 4.0.
These two SO questions may be useful as well
Multiple Entity Manager issue in Spring when using more than one datasource (for using different data sources (different databases or just different schemas on the same database per customer).
Multi tenancy support in Java EE 6
Benefits of multitenancy:
Shared code means that a bug fixed for one customer is fixed for all (this can be a disadvantage as well if different customers have different views on what constitutes a bug and what constitutes a feature).
Clustered deployment can share the load between customers (however, need to ensure that peak capacity is available for all customerS).
Downsides:
Code is going to be a bit more complex as queries need to ensure that the "discrimination" between customers works without accidentially exposing customers to each others data.

You could configure Apache on the front end (mod_proxy/mod_proxy_ajp) to point named virtual hosts to a single WAR deployed on Tomcat. Your application should be designed/written in a way to service all request -- per website name specific configuration could be stored in a database or as a configuration file within your application -- your app would just need to probe the user's requesting domain name to ensure the correct settings are applied (once per session). Generally speaking, you should be able to solve this with one application. Great developers are LAZY.

If you're using Jetty, you can add contexts programmatically.
WebAppContext webapp = new WebAppContext();
webapp.setBaseResource(myBaseDirectory);
webapp.setContextPath(myContextPath);
Just do this in a loop for all your contexts. It should have close to zero diskspace overhead.
There's probably a similar way to do it in Tomcat.

Well if this is for an experiment then any of the methods you listed can work.
If this is for production then I would recommend against this. While I have not tested ALL containers, the containers i have used lead me to be believe it is much more resilient to simply provision headless VMs with containers. Linux VMs can be very small and with VM technology you can add or subtract as many instances as needed.
If you truly want to have a dynamically growing solution then you should look to eliminate single points of failure rather then try to lump your entire world into one.
If you truly need "up to the second" load expansion/contraction then you should look at AWS or CloundFoundry.

Single virtual tomcat application which serves multiple contexts

I have multiple clients:
client 1 - 40 users
client 2 - 50 users
client 3 - 60 users
And I have a web application that is supposed to serve all the clients.
The application is deployed into Tomcat. Each client has it's own database.
What I want to implement is the single web application instance which servers all the clients. The client (and the database to connect to) is identified by the context path from the URL.
I.e. I imply the following scenario:
Some user requests the http://mydomain.com/client1/
Tomcat invokes a single instance of my application (no matter which context is requested)
My application processes the rest of the request thinking that it's deployed to /client1 context path, i.e. all redirect or relative URLs should be resolved against http://mydomain.com/client1/
When the client 2 requests the http://mydomain.com/client2/, I want my application (the same instance) now process it just like if it was deployed to /client2 context path.
Is this possible with Tomcat?

Your application has to do this not tomcat. Now you could deploy your application in three new contexts (client1, client2, client3) with slightly different configuration for the database, and if you are careful to use relative URLs (ie don't do things like /images) then you can do this without changes. This is the transparent way of making your application reusable in that your application is unaware of the global picture that you have 3 different instances of itself running. That means you can easily deploy more or more without having to change your application. You just configure a new instance and go. This only requires you don't use absolute URLs to resources. Using ServletContext.getContextPath() and using .. in your CSS, scripts, etc is helpful as well here.
Probably one of the biggest advantages working this way is that your app doesn't care about global concerns. Because its not involved in those decisions you can run 3 instances on one tomcat server, or if one client needs more scaling they can be moved to their own tomcat server easily. By making your app portable it has forced you to deal with how to install your app in any environment. This is a pillar of horizontal scaling which your situation could very much take advantage being you can split your DB data without having to rejoin them (huge advantage). The option you asked about doesn't force you to deal with this so when the time comes to deal with it it will be painful.
The other option is more involved and requires significant changes to your application to handle this. This is by parsing the incoming URL and pulling out the name of the client then using that name to look up in a configuration file for the database that should be used for that client. SpringMVC can handle things like extracting variables from URL paths. Then making sure you render everything back to them so it points to their portion of the URL. This probably would require a lot of the same requirements as the first. You can use absolute URLs for things like javascript, CSS, and images, but URLs to your app would have to be rewritten at runtime so that it is relative to the requesting client. The benefit is that your only load your application once.
Just as an aside, if you host your CSS, Javascript, images on a CDN in production then both of these options must be relative URL aware. Upsides and downsides to using CDNs as well.
While that sounds good it might not be a good thing because all clients use the same version of the app. Also if you bring down a the app to fix client1 to do maintenance it affects all clients. If you think you'll have to do customization per client then this option will get messy quick. Upgrading a single client means all clients must upgrade and depending on your business model this might not be compatible. Furthermore, I'm not entirely sure you'll save a lot of memory either running only a single version of the application because most apps only take up 10MB of code loaded. A vast majority of the memory is in the VM and processing requests, and using a single Tomcat instance means you share the VM. And with 1 or 3 instances running you still have the same number of requests. You might see a difference of 30-100MBs which in todays world is chump change, and all of those other concerns aren't addresses if you choose to save only a couple of MB.
Essentially there are facilities in Tomcat to aid you in doing this (multiple contexts), but its mostly up to your application to handle this especially if its a single instance.

Using JNDI for distributed configuration

We're looking at how to do distributed configuration within our primarily Java based deployment. We have a number of applications and it makes sense to centralise the configuration of the applications. JNDI appears to be the standard choice, probably backing off to something like ApacheDS (that way we can store non Java config in there as well). Here are some of the things that I've considered. Has anyone tried something similar? Any recommendations?:
Distributed
This would be for multiple applications on multiple machines, some of the applications would be clustered. The Directory Server should also ideally be clustered.
Lightweight
JNDI has a bit of a J2EE feel to it. Anyone use an alternative distributed configuration mechanism. The applications themselves tend to be relatively lightweight rather than full Java EE applications (ok controversial whether Java EE is still considered heavyweight and requirements are certainly heavyweight).
Supports fallbacks
Often the same configuration applies to multiple applications (e.g. multiple applications may connect to the same database). One the other hand, some applications may need specific configuration. Sometimes it is difficult to know in advance whether an application will use a 'global' configuration or something specific, so being able to first search for application / host specific configuration and then falling back would be good. I'm thinking of a structure something like this:
/global/host/application/instance or /global/application/host/instance:
so, start by checking to see if there is any configuration specific to this instance of the application on this host, then check if there is any configuration specific to this application for this host, then check to see if there is anything specific for this application, then try the global setting. Are there any best practices for this kind of thing?
Live configuration changes
Spring allows configuration with a jee:jndi-lookup and you can choose not to cache the value which means it is looked up each request. I'm not sure that makes sense for "String" type configuration values. It also doesn't appear to use the NamingListener way of detecting changes in the DS. It would be good to be able to update a value on the Directory Server and have that change broadcast to all of the applications that use it.
Other considerations
Managing different environments
Adding the configuration to source control so that it can have change management applied to it
Managing different versions
Rolling back

Have you considered using a database to store the application configuration?
Apache Commons has a DatabaseConfiguration class that exposes your table as a java.util.Properties instance (see http://commons.apache.org/configuration/apidocs/org/apache/commons/configuration/DatabaseConfiguration.html).

What's the best way to share business object instances between Java web apps using JBoss and Spring?

We currently have a web application loading a Spring application context which instantiates a stack of business objects, DAO objects and Hibernate. We would like to share this stack with another web application, to avoid having multiple instances of the same objects.
We have looked into several approaches; exposing the objects using JMX or JNDI, or using EJB3.
The different approaches all have their issues, and we are looking for a lightweight method.
Any suggestions on how to solve this?
Edit: I have received comments requesting me to elaborate a bit, so here goes:
The main problem we want to solve is that we want to have only one instance of Hibernate. This is due to problems with invalidation of Hibernate's 2nd level cache when running several client applications working with the same datasource. Also, the business/DAO/Hibernate stack is growing rather large, so not duplicating it just makes more sense.
First, we tried to look at how the business layer alone could be exposed to other web apps, and Spring offers JMX wrapping at the price of a tiny amount of XML. However, we were unable to bind the JMX entities to the JNDI tree, so we couldn't lookup the objects from the web apps.
Then we tried binding the business layer directly to JNDI. Although Spring didn't offer any method for this, using JNDITemplate to bind them was also trivial. But this led to several new problems: 1) Security manager denies access to RMI classloader, so the client failed once we tried to invoke methods on the JNDI resource. 2) Once the security issues were resolved, JBoss threw IllegalArgumentException: object is not an instance of declaring class. A bit of reading reveals that we need stub implementations for the JNDI resources, but this seems like a lot of hassle (perhaps Spring can help us?)
We haven't looked too much into EJB yet, but after the first two tries I'm wondering if what we're trying to achieve is at all possible.
To sum up what we're trying to achieve: One JBoss instance, several web apps utilizing one stack of business objects on top of DAO layer and Hibernate.
Best regards,
Nils

Are the web applications deployed on the same server?
I can't speak for Spring, but it is straightforward to move your business logic in to the EJB tier using Session Beans.
The application organization is straight forward. The Logic goes in to Session Beans, and these Session Beans are bundled within a single jar as an Java EE artifact with a ejb-jar.xml file (in EJB3, this will likely be practically empty).
Then bundle you Entity classes in to a seperate jar file.
Next, you will build each web app in to their own WAR file.
Finally, all of the jars and the wars are bundled in to a Java EE EAR, with the associated application.xml file (again, this will likely be quite minimal, simply enumerating the jars in the EAR).
This EAR is deployed wholesale to the app server.
Each WAR is effectively independent -- their own sessions, there own context paths, etc. But they share the common EJB back end, so you have only a single 2nd level cache.
You also use local references and calling semantic to talk to the EJBs since they're in the same server. No need for remote calls here.
I think this solves quite well the issue you're having, and its is quite straightforward in Java EE 5 with EJB 3.
Also, you can still use Spring for much of your work, as I understand, but I'm not a Spring person so I can not speak to the details.

What about spring parentContext?
Check out this article:
http://springtips.blogspot.com/2007/06/using-shared-parent-application-context.html

Terracotta might be a good fit here (disclosure: I am a developer for Terracotta). Terracotta transparently clusters Java objects at the JVM level, and integrates with both Spring and Hibernate. It is free and open source.
As you said, the problem of more than one client web app using an L2 cache is keeping those caches in synch. With Terracotta you can cluster a single Hibernate L2 cache. Each client node works with it's copy of that clustered cache, and Terracotta keeps it in synch. This link explains more.
As for your business objects, you can use Terracotta's Spring integration to cluster your beans - each web app can share clustered bean instances, and Terracotta keeps the clustered state in synch transparently.

Actually, if you want a lightweight solution and don't need transactions or clustering just use Spring support for RMI. It allows to expose Spring beans remotely using simple annotations in the latest versions. See http://static.springframework.org/spring/docs/2.0.x/reference/remoting.html.

You should take a look at the Terracotta Reference Web Application - Examinator. It has most of the components you are looking for - it's got Hibernate, JPA, and Spring with a MySQL backend.
It's been pre-tuned to scale up to 16 nodes, 20k concurrent users.
Check it out here: http://reference.terracotta.org/examinator

Thank you for your answers so far. We're still not quite there, but we have tried a few things now and see things more clearly. Here's a short update:
The solution which appears to be the most viable is EJB. However, this will require some amount of changes in our code, so we're not going to fully implement that solution right now. I'm almost surprised that we haven't been able to find some Spring feature to help us out here.
We have also tried the JNDI route, which ends with the need for stubs for all shared interfaces. This feels like a lot of hassle, considering that everything is on the same server anyway.
Yesterday, we had a small break through with JMX. Although JMX is definately not meant for this kind of use, we have proven that it can be done - with no code changes and a minimal amount of XML (a big Thank You to Spring for MBeanExporter and MBeanProxyFactoryBean). The major drawbacks to this method are performance and the fact that our domain classes must be shared through JBoss' server/lib folder. I.e., we have to remove some dependencies from our WARs and move them to server/lib, else we get ClassCastException when the business layer returns objects from our own domain model. I fully understand why this happens, but it is not ideal for what we're trying to achieve.
I thought it was time for a little update, because what appears to be the best solution will take some time to implement. I'll post our findings here once we've done that job.

Spring does have an integration point that might be of interest to you: EJB 3 injection nterceptor. This enables you to access spring beans from EJBs.

I'm not really sure what you are trying to solve; at the end of the day each jvm will either have replicated instances of the objects, or stubs representing objects existing on another (logical) server.
You could, setup a third 'business logic' server that has a remote api which your two web apps could call. The typical solution is to use EJB, but I think spring has remoting options built into its stack.
The other option is to use some form of shared cache architecture... which will synchronize object changes between the servers, but you still have two sets of instances.

Take a look at JBossCache. It allows you to easily share/replicate maps of data between mulitple JVM instances (same box or different). It is easy to use and has lots of wire level protocol options (TCP, UDP Multicast, etc.).