I am trying to send messages to Service bus using AMQP QPID java library
I am getting this error:
"SessionId needs to be set for all brokered messages to a Partitioned
Topic that supports Ordering"
My topic has "Enforce Message ordering" turned on (this is way i get this error i guess)
When using the Azure Service bus java library (and not AMQP) i have this function :
this.entity.setSessionId(...);
When using the AMQP library i do not see an option to set the session ID on the message i want to send
Note that if i un-check the option "Enforce Message ordering" the message will be sent successfully
This is my code
private boolean sendServiceBusMsg(MessageProducer sender,Session sendSession) {
try {
// generate message
BytesMessage createBytesMessage = (BytesMessage)sendSession.createBytesMessage();
createBytesMessage.setStringProperty(CAMPAIGN_ID, campaignKey);
createBytesMessage.setJMSMessageID("ID:" + bm.getMessageId());
createBytesMessage.setContentType(Symbol.getSymbol("application/octet-stream"));
/*message is the actual data i send / not seen here*/
createBytesMessage.writeBytes(message.toByteArray());
sender.send(createBytesMessage);
} catch (JMSException e) {
}
The SessionId property is mapped to AMQP message properties.group-id. The Qpid JMS client should map it to JMSXGroupID property, so try the following,
createBytesMessage.setStringProperty("JMSXGroupID", "session-1");
As you guessed, there is a similar SO thread Azure Service Bus topics partitioning verified that to disable the feature Enforce Message Ordering via set SupportOrdering with false can solve the issue, but it can't be done via Azure Service Bus Java library because the property supportsOrdering is privated now.
And you can try to set property Group as #XinChen said using AMQP, as the content below from here.
Service Bus Sessions, also called 'Groups' in the AMQP 1.0 protocol, are unbounded sequences of related messages. ServiceBus guarantees ordering of messages in a session.
Hope it helps.
Related
I am currently implementing a Java messaging system with Apache Camel and ActiveMQ. My goal is to dynamically set the priority of a message based on a few attributes the message has.
I already configured my ActiveMQ as explained here. Then I created the following method that sends a TextMessage:
public void send(BaseMessage baseMessage, int jmsPriority) throws JsonProcessingException {
Map<String, Object> messageHeaders = new HashMap<>();
messageHeaders.put(MESSAGING_HEADER_JMS_PRIORITY, jmsPriority);
messageHeaders.put(MESSAGING_HEADER_TYPE, baseMessage.getClass().getSimpleName());
String payload = objectMapper.writeValueAsString(baseMessage);
producerTemplate.sendBodyAndHeaders(payload, messageHeaders);
}
Sending the message perfectly works, and the dynamic type of BaseMessage is properly set to the header of each message. The priority is set as well, but is ignored. The order for the outcoming messages is still FIFO, as queues usually do.
Until now I did not achieve to set the priority of the message dynamically. I do not want to use Apache Camel's Resequencer since I would have to create several new queues only for "sorting". From my point of view ActiveMQ must be able to prioritize and reorder the messages itself.
Any tip is appreciated. Ask me for further details if required.
By default, ActiveMQ disables message priority. This is normal. When doing distributed messaging-- sending messages across servers, prioritization does not practically work out, since the broker can only scan so many messages in the queue for messages of a higher priority before it stats to slow down all traffic for that queue.
Prioritized messages can work well when embedding a broker and using it for task dispatch-- where queue depth generally doesn't exceed the low-thousands.
Updated:
Reminder-- the QOS settings in JMS must be set on the MessageProducer object, and not the message per JMS-spec.
Enable Prioritized Messages
I am building a system that will receive messages via a Message broker (Currently, JMS) from different systems. All the messages from all the senders systems have a deviceId and there is no order in the reception of the message.
For instance, system A can send a message with deviceId=1 and system b be can send a message with deviceId=2.
My goal is not to start processing of the messages concerning the same deviceId unless I got all the message from all the senders with the same deviceId.
For example, if I have 3 systems A, B and C sending messages to my system :
System A sends messageA1 with deviceId=1
System B sends messageB1 with deviceId=1
System C sends messageC1 with deviceId=3
System C sends messageC2 with deviceId=1 <--- here I should start processing of messageA1, messageB1 and messageC2 because they are having the same deviceID 1.
Should this problem be resolved by using some sync mechanism in my system , by the message broker or an integration framework like spring-integration/apache camel ?
A similar solution with the Aggregator (what #Artem Bilan mentioned) can also be implemented in Camel with a custom AggregationStrategy and with controlling the Aggregator completion by using the Exchange.AGGREGATION_COMPLETE_CURRENT_GROUP property.
The following might be a good starting point. (You can find the sample project with tests here)
Route:
from("direct:start")
.log(LoggingLevel.INFO, "Received ${headers.system}${headers.deviceId}")
.aggregate(header("deviceId"), new SignalAggregationStrategy(3))
.log(LoggingLevel.INFO, "Signaled body: ${body}")
.to("direct:result");
SignalAggregationStrategy.java
public class SignalAggregationStrategy extends GroupedExchangeAggregationStrategy implements Predicate {
private int numberOfSystems;
public SignalAggregationStrategy(int numberOfSystems) {
this.numberOfSystems = numberOfSystems;
}
#Override
public Exchange aggregate(Exchange oldExchange, Exchange newExchange) {
Exchange exchange = super.aggregate(oldExchange, newExchange);
List<Exchange> aggregatedExchanges = exchange.getProperty("CamelGroupedExchange", List.class);
// Complete aggregation if we have "numberOfSystems" (currently 3) different messages (where "system" headers are different)
// https://github.com/apache/camel/blob/master/camel-core/src/main/docs/eips/aggregate-eip.adoc#completing-current-group-decided-from-the-aggregationstrategy
if (numberOfSystems == aggregatedExchanges.stream().map(e -> e.getIn().getHeader("system", String.class)).distinct().count()) {
exchange.setProperty(Exchange.AGGREGATION_COMPLETE_CURRENT_GROUP, true);
}
return exchange;
}
#Override
public boolean matches(Exchange exchange) {
// make it infinite (4th bullet point # https://github.com/apache/camel/blob/master/camel-core/src/main/docs/eips/aggregate-eip.adoc#about-completion)
return false;
}
}
Hope it helps!
You can do this in Apache Camel using a caching component. I think there is the EHCache component.
Essentially:
You receive a message with a given deviceId say deviceId1.
You look up in your cache to see which messages have been received for deviceId1.
As long as you have not received all three you add the current system/message to the cache.
Once all messages are there you process and clear the cache.
You could then off course route each incoming message to a specific deviceId based queue for temporary storage. This can be JMS, ActiveMQ or something similar.
Spring Integration provides component for exactly this kind of tasks - do not emit until the whole group is collected. And it's name an Aggregator. Your deviceId is definitely a correlationKey. The releaseStrategy really may be based on the number of systems - how much deviceId1 messages you are waiting before proceed to the next step.
I haven't been able to figure this one out from Google alone. I am connecting to a non-durable EMS topic, which publishes updates to a set of data. If I skip a few updates, it doesn't matter, as the following update will overwrite it anyway.
The number of messages being published on the EMS topic is quite high, and occasionally for whatever reason the consumer lags behind. Is there a way, on the client connection side, to determine a 'time to live' for messages? I know there is on other brokers, but specifically on Tibco I have been unable to figure out whether it's possible or not, only that this parameter can definitely be set on the server side for all clients (this is not an option for me).
I am creating my connection factory and then creating an Apache Camel jms endpoint with the following code:
TibjmsConnectionFactory connectionFactory = new TibjmsConnectionFactory();
connectionFactory.setServerUrl(properties.getProperty(endpoints.getServerUrl()));
connectionFactory.setUserName(properties.getProperty(endpoints.getUsername()));
connectionFactory.setUserPassword(properties.getProperty(endpoints.getPassword()));
JmsComponent emsComponent = JmsComponent.jmsComponent(connectionFactory);
emsComponent.setAsyncConsumer(true);
emsComponent.setConcurrentConsumers(Integer.parseInt(properties.getProperty("jms.concurrent.consumers")));
emsComponent.setDeliveryPersistent(false);
emsComponent.setClientId("MyClient." + ManagementFactory.getRuntimeMXBean().getName() + "." + emsConnectionNumber.getAndIncrement());
return emsComponent;
I am using tibjms-6.0.1, tibjmsufo-6.0.1, and various other tib***-6.0.1.
The JMSExpiration property can be set per message or, more globally, at the destination level (in which case the JMSExpiration of all messages received in this destination is overridden). It cannot be set per consumer.
One option would be to create a bridge from the topic to a custom queue that only your consumer application will listen to, and set the "expiration" property of this queue to 0 (unlimited). All messages published on the topic will then be copied to this queue and won't ever expire, whatever their JMSExpiration value.
Is there a way to get notified when a JMS Message is consumed from a JMS queue? Like a listener or notification?
Thanks
I assume you are using ActiveMQ since you tagged the question with it.
You can register for an advisory notification when a message is consumed by a client. See the docs for advisories and the one you're looking for is ActiveMQ.Advisory.MessageConsumed.Queue.
===== Update =====
Oh, errr.. you're using Joram, not ActiveMQ. It's not as simple, but you could use a client side interceptor which will return an acknowledgement message back to a queue or a topic which you would then listen on. The interface looks like this:
public interface MessageInterceptor {
public void handle(javax.jms.Message pMessage, javax.jms.Session pSession);
}
See chapter 3.5. Message interceptors of the latest Joram doc PDF.
You could also use a interceptor_out server side interceptor.
No the JMS API doesnt provide any way to message delivery notification options. This will have to be done at the application level.
Is it possible to send message to particular receiver using JMS Queue(HornetQ)?
Among so many receivers, I want certain message to be received by receiver which
are running on Linux OS.
Every suggestion is appriciated.
Thanks.
You can set a message property using Message.setObjectProperty(String, Object) and then have your consumers select the messages they are interested in using Session.createConsumer(Destination, String)
Sender example:
Message message = session.createMessage();
message.setObjectProperty("OS", "LINUX");
producer.send(message);
Receiver example:
MessageConsumer consumer = session.createConsumer(destination, "OS = 'LINUX'");
//Use consumer to receive messages.
The receiver in the example will ignore (they will go to some other receiver) all messages that do not match the selector. In this case all message where the 'OS' property is not 'LINUX' will be ignored by this consumer.
You can set properties of JMS message: http://download.oracle.com/javaee/1.4/api/javax/jms/TextMessage.html and filter messages at client side.
For example,
message.setStringProperty("TARGET_OS", "LINUX") - at sender
http://www.mkyong.com/java/how-to-detect-os-in-java-systemgetpropertyosname/ - detect OS at receivers and filter messages with correct TARGET_OS property
You can use JMS selectors on the consumer side to look for messages that fit specific criteria.
Not sure if I am missing something, you could keep things simple by having multiple queues - specific to each platform, then the linux based consumers can listen to the linux specific queue alone. Now your challenge probably will be to route the messages to the appropriate queue from the producer side, that should be fairly easy if the routing is based on some attribute of the message?