I know how to create custom annotation. But i am unable to understand how does it work internally. If i take example of spring annontation.
#PropertySource(value = { "classpath:database.properties" }).
if we see internal details of #PropertySource annotation
#Target({ java.lang.annotation.ElementType.TYPE })
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
#Documented
#Repeatable(PropertySources.class)
public #interface PropertySource {
public abstract String name();
public abstract String[] value();
public abstract boolean ignoreResourceNotFound();
}
We do not have provided any implementation here for loading property file.
Then How is it loading property file from classpath. Who is working behind the scene ?
Really simple: framework. That is. All 'custom' annotations processed by frameworks using reflection. Only small scope of annotations are processed by compiler, such as #Override, #SuppressWarnings, #Retention and so on
Related
I'm creating a java library that can be imported in multiple projects and creates a graphQL schema file with classes and queries annotated with my custom annotations.
I want that when I compile the project, the classes marked by the annotation will be added (with all their fields) into a file that will be the "schema.graphqls" file.
My question is: where I have to insert my logic implementation? Creating a method into the annotation class?
I created two custom annotations, as in the following files:
package annotations;
import java.lang.annotation.*;
#Documented
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.SOURCE)
#Target(ElementType.TYPE) //with TYPE, you can annotate class, interfaces, annotation, types or enum
public #interface GraphQLQuery {
}
GraphQLQuery.java
package annotations;
import java.lang.annotation.*;
#Documented
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.SOURCE)
#Target(ElementType.TYPE) //with TYPE, you can annotate class, interfaces, annotation, types or enum
public #interface GraphQLModel {
}
GraphQLModel.java
I'm using Junit 5 parametrized tests with custom name as follow
#ParameterizedTest(name = PARAMETERIZED_TESTS_NAME_PLACEHOLDER)
where PARAMETERIZED_TESTS_NAME_PLACEHOLDER is defined in its own utility class
public static final String PARAMETERIZED_TESTS_NAME_PLACEHOLDER = "#{index} [{argumentsWithNames}]";
the problem I'm facing is that as I'm using extensively the parametrized tests, my code is cluttered by these #ParameterizedTest(name = PARAMETERIZED_TESTS_NAME_PLACEHOLDER).
so I created a custom annotation to fix this
import java.lang.annotation.*;
import org.junit.jupiter.params.*;
#ParameterizedTest(name = PARAMETERIZED_TESTS_NAME_PLACEHOLDER)
#Inherited
public #interface CustomParametrizedTest {
}
but this annotation is ignored when I use it in the test cases
any help would be appreciated
The #ParamterizedTest annotation appears to have a retention policy of runtime suggesting it's needed and processed at runtime. Try this config
#ParameterizedTest(name = PARAMETERIZED_TESTS_NAME_PLACEHOLDER)
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
#Inherited
public #interface CustomParametrizedTest {
}
It seems odd to me that this is not the default retention policy for custom annotations, see more from this post.
I need to know the annotations of a Java class. I am using Lombok.
Sample is:
#Data
#Builder
public class JavaBean {}
I tried java.lang.annotation.Annotation[] annotation = JavaBean.class.getAnnotations but it doesn't show Data and Builder.
I think you cannot see the annotations in JavaBean.class.getAnnotations because the #Retention is equals to SOURCE.
This kind of annotation is not needed at runtime.
For more details : Annotation SOURCE Retention Policy
Have a good day.
The answer is in source of these annotations:
#Target({TYPE, METHOD, CONSTRUCTOR})
#Retention(SOURCE)
public #interface Builder {
.....
#Target(ElementType.TYPE)
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.SOURCE)
public #interface Data {
.....
Your code to get annotation is correct but it's #Retention(RetentionPolicy.SOURCE) which is playing role here.
Java defined 3 types of retention policies through java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy enumeration. It has SOURCE, CLASS and RUNTIME.
1) Annotation with retention policy SOURCE will be retained only with source code, and discarded during compile time.
2) Annotation with retention policy CLASS will be retained till compiling the code, and discarded during runtime.
3) Annotation with retention policy RUNTIME will be available to the JVM through runtime.
#Data and #Builder are marked with #Retention(SOURCE) which means these annotations are not present at runtime with your class hence you are not able to get these annotations..
Lombok annotations are pre-processed before the actual compilation, thus the compiled classes do not contain them as annotation, but rather as the already generated code.
I'm trying to convert a Java code into Kotlin for custom dagger scope creation.
Here is Java code:
#Documented
#Scope
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
public #interface CustomScope {
}
Once converted into kotlin here is the result
#Scope
#Documented
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME) annotation class CustomScope
I have a type mismatch with #Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME).I have the following error message :Required Type is AnnotationRetention but RetentionPolicy type was found.
Also #interface seems to have been replaced.
The Retention annotation class which you might have used is from the Kotlin's library (from the package kotlin.annotation).
It expects a property of the enum type AnnotationRetention. So, you can do something like this:
#MustBeDocumented
#Scope
#Retention(AnnotationRetention.RUNTIME)
annotation class CustomScope
Btw, if you look at the Annotations.kt file, you will see that that the Retention annotation will take the default property AnnotationRetention.RUNTIME when you don't pass anything to it.
So, just #Retention annotation will do too.
In my project there's a common base class that all client classes extend. This has an #Autowired field that needs to be injected by Hibernate. These are all grouped together in another class that has an #Autowired collection of the base class.
In order to reduce boilerplate for client code I'm trying to get #Component inherited. With #Component not doing this by default (apparently it used to though), I created this workaround annotation
#Target(ElementType.TYPE)
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
#Component
#Inherited
public #interface InheritedComponent {
}
... and annotated the base class with it. Its not pretty but I hoped it would work. Unfortunately it didn't, which really confuses me as #Inherited should make it work
Is there any other way to get #Component inherited? Or do I just have to say that any class that extends the base class needs this boilerplate?
The problem is that the Component annotation type itself needs to be marked with #Inherited.
Your #InheritedComponent annotation type is correctly inherited by any classes that extend a superclass which is marked with #InheritedComponent - but it does not inherit #Component. This is because you have #Component on the annotation, not the parent type.
An example:
public class InheritedAnnotationTest {
#InheritedComponent
public static class BaseComponent {
}
public static class SubClass extends BaseComponent {
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
SubClass s = new SubClass();
for (Annotation a : s.getClass().getAnnotations()) {
System.out.printf("%s has annotation %s\n", s.getClass(), a);
}
}
}
Output:
class brown.annotations.InheritedAnnotationTest$SubClass has annotation #brown.annotations.InheritedComponent()
In other words, when resolving what annotations a class has, the annotations of the annotations are not resolved - they do not apply to the class, only the annotation (if that makes sense).
I've dealt with this issue by creating my own annotation (heritable) and then customizing classpath scanning:
#Target(ElementType.TYPE)
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
#Component
#Inherited
public #interface BusinessService {
}
Spring configuration look likes this:
<context:component-scan base-package="io.bar">
<context:include-filter type="annotation"
expression="io.bar.core.annotations.BusinessService" />
</context:component-scan>
from Spring doc 5.10.3 Using filters to customize scanning