I know this question has been asked numerous times but the methods I've read just doesn't work for me. I tried this but it still won't work.
I have a subproject(A) that depends on another subproject(B).
Both subprojects are contained in a parent directory with a parent pom.xml (declares A and B as modules) within their respective subdirectories.
Compiling and installing the project works fine with the maven-assembly-plugin but when I try to test A, it doesn't recognize the classes from B.
I have tried installing it first and then testing but it still won't find the classes. What am I missing?
Error:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.1:testCompile
(default-testCompile) on project (A)
[ERROR] TestService.java:[8,17] cannot find symbol
[ERROR] symbol: class **Model** (the class I'm referencing in B)
[ERROR] location: class **TestService**
(test in A that tests the class in ../service/src/main/java/Service.java)
Edit:
/project
--/service (this depends on model;this is also what I want to test)
---/src
----/main
-----/java
------/Service.java
----/test
-----/java
------/TestService.java
--/model (independent)
---/src
----/main
-----/java
------/Model.java
--/entry (this depends on service; entry point of the whole project)
--pom.xml (parent pom)
Each of the three projects have their own pom.xml inside.
/model/pom.xml contains no dependencies and no plugins
here's parent:
parent/pom.xml
...
<modules>
<module>entry</module>
<module>service</module>
<module>model</module>
</modules>
here's entry:
/service/pom.xml
...
<parent>
<groupId>com.some.project</groupId>
<artifactId>project</artifactId>
<version>xx</version>
</parent>
<artifactId>entry</artifactId>
<packaging>jar</packaging>
<version>xx</version>
<name>entry</name>
<build>
...
<!--assembly plugin is declared here-->
</build>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.some.project</groupId>
<artifactId>service</artifactId>
<version>xx</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
here's service:
/service/pom.xml
...
<parent>
<groupId>com.some.project</groupId>
<artifactId>project</artifactId>
<version>xx</version>
</parent>
<artifactId>service</artifactId>
<packaging>jar</packaging>
<version>xx</version>
<name>service</name>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.some.project</groupId>
<artifactId>model</artifactId>
<version>xx</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>junit</groupId>
<artifactId>junit</artifactId>
<version>4.12</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
Maven assembly plugin is used usually when you want to package the already compiled sources, so its kind of not related here.
If you have two projects, A and B and B has to depend on A, you have to define in B's pom.xml a dependency (trivial stuff):
<dependency>
<groupId>YOUR_GROUP_ID</groupId>
<artifactId>A</artifactId>
<version>YOUR_VERSION</version>
</dependency>
This will instruct maven to setup classpath during the build.
Now, Depending on artifact type of A and B maven can decide on some steps after the compilation, for example, if B is a WAR, A will be included in WEB-INF/lib folder of B because of such a dependency.
But in general, if A & B are jars, maven won't use this information only for the compilation/tests and not for packaging.
Now, maven has different classpaths for different phases: in particuler, one for compilation, and one for unit tests.
So if you want to specify that the dependency is required only for tests but should not be considered as a "compile" dependency, then define the scope:
<dependency>
<groupId>YOUR_GROUP_ID</groupId>
<artifactId>A</artifactId>
<version>YOUR_VERSION</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
If you don't specify any scope, maven will conclude that the dependency is required both for compilation and for tests and maybe even for packaging as I've explained earlier.
Related
I created a maven parent project with three modules :
data-layer-module
data-service-module (uses the data-layer-module)
web-module (uses the data-services-module)
Here is a snippet from the parent pom.xml :
<groupId>org.mygroup</groupId>
<artifactId>myArtifact</artifactId>
<packaging>pom</packaging>
<version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
<modules>
<module>data-layer-module</module>
<module>data-service-module</module>
<module>web-module</module>
</modules>
The data-layer-module pom.xml contains no dependencies to the other modules (it contains only its external dependencies).
The data-service-module has a dependency in its pom.xml to the data-layer-module :
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.mygroup</groupId>
<artifactId>data-layer-module</artifactId>
<version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
And the web-module has a dependency to the data-service-module :
<dependency>
<groupId>org.mygroup</groupId>
<artifactId>data-service-module</artifactId>
<version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
</dependency>
Everything is fine but I don't want the web-module to have access to the data-layer-module. I need to enforce the three layer web-service-data model. Which is not the case with this configuration.
I obviously tried manually excluding it from the web-module pom.xml :
<dependency>
<groupId>org.mygroup</groupId>
<artifactId>data-service-layer</artifactId>
<version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
<exclusions>
<exclusion>
<groupId>org.mygroup</groupId>
<artifactId>data-layer-module</artifactId>
</exclusion>
</exclusions>
</dependency>
But this causes compilation error since the data-service-module can't find its data-layer-module dependency.
How could this configuration be done ?
If the web module is going to run in the same jvm as the data-service-layer, then a transient dependency to the data-layer-module is necessary - this is why the exclusion you added casuses the application to fail.
You could consider making a simple api, for example data-service-layer-api, which obviously does not depend on data-layer-module, and is implemented correctly by data-service-layer.
You can still use a multi-module maven project, but now you will have 2 artifacts - a web module, and a data-service, which must be deployed separated.
It's basically a tradeoff between strict dependency analysis and project complexity.
I am migrating my project from Java 8 to Java 9. My project is mavenised. Now for migrating to Java 9, I am planning on creating a separate module directory where all the required dependency of a module will go.
For doing this through maven the only way I know is to use the copy plugin of maven to copy all the required dependency in the module directory. So after running maven installs for a module, the dependent jars will be copied in repository folder(which is by default) and also copied to this module directory folder.
So there will be a copy of the jars and also hard coding in pom.xml for copying specific dependency in the module directory.
This approach doesn't seem to be clean, is there any way out were automatically maven can read my module-info.java file and copy the required dependency not in the classpath but in the specified directory
Here is my pom.xml
<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd">
<modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
<parent>
<groupId>com.aa.bb</groupId>
<artifactId>cc</artifactId>
<version>0.0.1</version>
<relativePath>../../pom.xml</relativePath>
</parent>
<artifactId>dd</artifactId>
<name>dd</name>
<groupId>com.aa.cc</groupId>
<version>1.0.0</version>
<properties>
<maven.compiler.source>10</maven.compiler.source>
<maven.compiler.target>10</maven.compiler.target>
</properties>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>commons-codec</groupId>
<artifactId>commons-codec</artifactId>
<version>1.11</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.fasterxml.jackson.core</groupId>
<artifactId>jackson-core</artifactId>
<version>${jackson.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.fasterxml.jackson.core</groupId>
<artifactId>jackson-databind</artifactId>
<version>${jackson.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.fasterxml.jackson.core</groupId>
<artifactId>jackson-annotations</artifactId>
<version>${jackson.version}</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
<version>3.7.0</version>
<configuration>
<release>10</release>
<compilerArgs>
<arg>--module-path</arg>
<arg>./moduledir</arg>
</compilerArgs>
</configuration>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.ow2.asm</groupId>
<artifactId>asm</artifactId>
<version>6.2</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
</project>
module-info.java
module com.some_module_name {
requires com.fasterxml.jackson.core;
requires com.fasterxml.jackson.databind;
requires org.apache.commons.codec;
requires spring.beans;
requires spring.context;
}
After adding module-info.java to an existing java 10 module and running maven i am getting issue like "package exist is used in module a and module b".
What i believe is while running maven it is looking for module dependency in the .m2/repository and there are loads of jar there as the m2./repository is common for my multiple modules.
So what i was planning to do is create a separate module directory for each module and place the required jar for that module in it which way it even works.
I assume you're making this effort to make sure Maven "does the right thing" regarding the module and class path, i.e. placing direct dependencies of your module on the former and all other dependencies on the latter. If that's so, there's nothing you need to do - from version 3.7 on, the Maven Compiler Plugin does it for you as soon as you add a module-info.java to your src/main/java directory.
You can verify that by running Maven in debug mode with mvn clean compile -X. When you carefully analyze the output, you will see which JARs end up on which path.
Given a Maven project A producing a jar:
<groupId>myprojects</groupId>
<artifactId>A</artifactId>
<version>1.0</version>
<packaging>jar</packaging>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>some.needed.group</groupId>
<artifactId>some.needed.artifact1</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>some.needed.group</groupId>
<artifactId>some.needed.artifact2</artifactId>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
and a project B depending on A and producing an enterprise archive:
<groupId>myprojects</groupId>
<artifactId>B</artifactId>
<version>1.0</version>
<packaging>ear</packaging>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<artifactId>A</artifactId>
<version>1.0</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
how can I achieve to have the project B ear artifact to include not only the project B's jar artifact but also its dependent artifacts some.needed.artifact1 and some.needed.artifact2?
I edited and added this because it seems that the behaviour occurs only when running mvn from Bamboo:
The strange thing is that it is working when I'm running mvn locally from Eclipse but not when it's being ran by the Bamboo continuous integration server. On a local run I have the application.xml generated correctly with references to all the transitive dependencies the corresponding jar files copied to the lib folder. On Bamboo plan the generated application.xml does not include the references and the jar files are not in the lib folder.
First as a correction I think dependency should be on A, not on B , like this :
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<artifactId>A</artifactId>
<version>1.0</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
And about the original question of having the dependent jars , i think they should be available in your EAR file , as you have dependency on A project and which in turn depends on some.needed.artifact1 and some.needed.artifact2(transitive dependencies) as the scope you provided is default so maven will take it as compile and all the jars will be bundled in your ear file.
Thanks
In project B which produces the ear, you can include a dependency to A like this
<modules>
<module>project A</module>
</modules>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>some.needed.group</groupId>
<artifactId>A</artifactId>
<version>1.0</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
In project A, define the parent project to be project B like the following
<parent>
<groupId>myprojects</groupId>
<artifactId>B</artifactId>
<version>1.0</version>
<name>project B</name>
</parent>
<name>project A</name>
I have the following setup:
Master: has modules A and B
A: declares a dependency on B, Master as its parent
B: Master as its parent
So basically Master has a parent pom which builds A and B where A has a dependency on B.
My problem is that I want to put all of the 3rd party dependencies in B (things like JUnit etc.). But when I do this, A does have access to the dependencies declared by B. Why is this happening? I thought maven handles transitive dependencies.
Here are snippets of my poms just in case:
Master:
<modules>
<module>../A</module>
<module>../B</module>
</modules>
A:
<parent>
<groupId>com.project</groupId>
<artifactId>Master</artifactId>
<version>1</version>
<relativePath>../Master/pom.xml</relativePath>
</parent>
...
<dependency>
...
<artifactId>B</artifactId>
...
</dependency>
B:
<parent>
<groupId>com.project</groupId>
<artifactId>Master</artifactId>
<version>1</version>
<relativePath>../Master/pom.xml</relativePath>
</parent>
...
<dependency>
...
<artifactId>JUnit</artifactId>
...
</dependency>
Why doesn't A have access to JUnit?
If the JUnit dependency in Project B has scope 'test' then I don't believe it will be visibile as a transitive dependency in Project A. See the table in Maven Introduction to the Dependency Mechanism: Dependency Scope.
My goal is pretty simple actually but since there are multiple (and seemingly complex ways to do this) I wonder what I need to do... So I have certain runtime libraries (ADF libraries in particular) that are needed to be added to every project. This parent pom file will just have JAR dependencies in it. How can I use this pom file from a child pom file?
I don't think that using inheritance is a good solution here. Even if every project uses ADF artifacts, you don't want all poms to get these dependencies so declaring them in a corporate parent pom is not really an option.
So, instead, my recommendation would be to create a project with pom packaging to group the ADF dependencies together:
<project>
<groupId>com.mycompany</groupId>
<artifactId>adf-deps</artifactId>
<version>1.0</version>
<packaging>pom</packaging>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>some.groupId</groupId>
<artifactId>adf-artifact-1</artifactId>
<version>${jdev.version}</version>
</dependency>
...
<dependency>
<groupId>some.groupId</groupId>
<artifactId>adf-artifact-n</artifactId>
<version>${jdev.version}</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
<properties>
<jdev.version>10.1.3</jdev.version>
</properties>
</project>
Then, install/deploy this project and declare it as dependency in any project that needs the ADF artifacts:
<project>
...
<dependencies>
...
<dependency>
<groupId>com.mycompany</groupId>
<artifactId>adf-deps</artifactId>
<version>1.0</version>
<type>pom</type>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
</project>
If the child POM file is actually a child (i.e. declares its parent), then it will inherit the dependencies and there is nothing left for you to do.