Develop Reference

Regex match optional string greedy inbetween two random strings

I am looking for a way to match an optional ABC in the following strings.
Both strings should be matched either way, if ABC is there or not:
precedingstringwithundefinedlenghtABCsubsequentstringwithundefinedlength
precedingstringwithundefinedlenghtsubsequentstringwithundefinedlength
I've tried
.*(ABC).*
which doesn't work for an optional ABC but making ABC non greedy doesn't work either as the .* will take all the pride:
.*(ABC)?.*
This is NOT a duplicate to e.g. Regex Match all characters between two strings as I am looking for a certain string inbetween two random string, kind of the other way around.

You can use
.*(ABC).*|.*
This works like this:
.*(ABC).* pattern is searched for first, since it is the leftmost part of an alternation (see "Remember That The Regex Engine Is Eager"), it looks for any zero or more chars other than line break chars as many as possible, then captures ABC into Group 1 and then matches the rest of the line with the right-hand .*
| - or
.* - is searched for if the first alternation part does not match.
Another solution without the need to use alternation:
^(?:.*(ABC))?.*
See this regex demo. Details:
^ - start of string
(?:.*(ABC))? - an optional non-capturing group that matches zero or more chars other than line break chars as many as possible and then captures into Group 1 an ABC char sequence
.* - zero or more chars other than line break chars as many as possible.

I’ve come up with an answer myself:
Using the OR operator seems to work:
(?:(?:.*(ABC))|.*).*
If there’s a better way, feel free to answer and I will accept it.

You could use this regex: .*(ABC){0,1}.*. It means any, optional{min,max}, any. It is easier to read. I can' t say if your solution or mine is faster due to the processing speed.
Options:
{value} = n-times
{min,} = min to infinity
{min,max} = min to max

.+([ABC])?.+ should do the job

Regular expression for allowing only 1 of a set of characters

I am trying to use some regex to validate some input inside of Java code. I have been successful in implementing "basic" regex, but this one seems to be out of my scope of knowledge. I am working through RegEgg tutorials to learn more.
Here are the conditions that need to be validated:
Field will always have 8 characters
Can be all spaces
Or
Valid characters: a-zA-Z0-9 -!& or a space
Cannot begin with a space
If one of the special characters is used, it can be the only one used
Legal: "B-123---" "AB&& &" "A!!!!!!!"
Illegal: "B-123!!!" "AB&& -" "A-&! "
Has to have at least one alphanumeric character (Can't be all special characters ie: "!!!!!!!!"
This was my regex before additional validations were added:
^(\s{8}|[A-Za-z\-\!\&][ A-Za-z0-9\-\!\&]{7})$"
Then the additional validations for now allowing multiple of the special characters, and I am a bit stuck. I have been successful in using a positive lookahead, but stuck when trying to use the positive lookbehind. (I think the data before the lookbehind was consumed), but I am speculating as I am a neophyte with this part of regex.

using the or construct (a|b) is a large part of this, and you've begun applying it, so that's a good start.
You've made the rule that it can't start with a digit; nothing in the spec says this. also, - inside [] has special meaning, so escape it, or make sure it is first or last, because then you don't have to. That gets us to:
^(\s{8}|[A-Za-z0-9-!& -]{8})$
next up is the rule that it has to be all the same special character if used at all. Given that there are only 3 special characters, could be easier to just explicitly list them all:
^(\s{8}|[A-Za-z0-9 -]{8}|[A-Za-z0-9 !]{8}|[A-Za-z0-9 &]{8})$
Next up: Can't start with a space, and can't be all-special. Confirming the negative (that it ISNT all-special characters) gets complicated; lookahead seems like a better plan here. This:
^ is regexp-ese for: "Start of line". Note that this doesn't 'consume' a character. 1 is regexpese for 'only the exact character '1' will match here, nothinge else', but as it matches, it also 'consumes' that character, whereas ^ doesn't do that. 'start of line' is not a concept that can be consumed.
This notion of 'a match may fail, but if it succeeds, nothing is consumed' isn't limited to ^ and $; you can write your own:
(?=abc) will match if abc would match at this position, but does not consume it. Thus, the regexp ^(=abc)ab.d$ would match the input string abcd and nothing else. This is called positive lookahead. (it 'looks ahead' and matches if it sees the regular expression in the parens, failing if it does not).
(?!abc) is negative lookahead. It matches if it DOESNT see the thing in the parens. (?!abc)a.c will match the input adc but not the input abc.
(?<=abc) is positive lookbehind. It matches if the pattern you provide would match such that the match ends at the position you find yourself.
(?<!abc) is negative lookbehind.
Note that lookahead and lookbehind can be somewhat limited, in that they may not allow variable length patterns. But, fortunately, your requirements make it easy to limit ourselves to fixed size patterns here. Thus, we can introduce: (?![&!-]{8}) as a non-consuming unit in our regexp that will fail the match if we have all-8 special characters.
We can use this trick to fail on starting space too: (?! ) is all we need for that one.
Let's replace \s which is whitespace with just which is the space character (the problem description says 'space', not 'whitespace').
Putting it all together:
^( {8}|(?! )(?![&!-]{8})([A-Za-z0-9 -]{8}|[A-Za-z0-9 !]{8}|[A-Za-z0-9 &]{8}))$
Thats:
8 spaces, or...
not a space, and not all-8 special character, then,
any of the valid chars, any amount of spaces, and any amount of one of the 3 allowed special symbols, as long as we have precisely 8 of them...
.. OR the same thing as #3 but with the second of the three special symbols
.. OR with the third of the three.
Plug em in at regex101 along with your various examples of 'legal' and 'not legal' and you can play around with it some more.
NB: You can also use backreferences to attempt to solve the 'only one special character is allowed' part of this, but attempting to tackle the 'not all special characters' part seems quite unwieldy if you don't get to use (negative) lookahead.

Its a matter of asserting the right conditions at the start of the regex.
^(?=[ ]*$|(?![ ]))(?!.*([!&-]).*(?!\1)[!&-])[a-zA-Z0-9 !&-]{8}$
see -> https://regex101.com/r/tN5y4P/1
Some discussion:
^ # Begin of text
(?= # Assert, cannot start with a space
[ ]* $ # unless it's all spaces
| (?! [ ] )
)
(?! # Assert, not mixed special chars
.*
( [!&-] ) # (1)
.*
(?! \1 )
[!&-]
)
[a-zA-Z0-9 !&-]{8} # Consume 8 valid characters from within this class
$ # End of text

Extract exactly n digits in a sentence using REGEX

Example
The no.s 1234 65
Input: n
For n=4, the output should be 1234
For n=2, the output should be : 65 (not 12)
Tried \d{n} which gives 12 and \d{n,} gives 1234 but i want the exact matching one.
Pattern p = Pattern.compile("//\d{n,}");

you need negative lookaround assertion: (?<!..): negative look behind, and (?!..): negative look ahead : regex101
(?<!\d)\d{4}(?!\d)
however not all regex engine supports them, maybe a work around may match also the preceeding character and following character (contrary to look-around which are 0 width matches), (\D matches all excpet a digit)
(?:^|\D)(\d{4})(?:\D|$)

I think what you meant is the \b character.
Hence, the regex you're looking for would be (for n=2):
\b\d{2}\b

From what I understand, you're looking for a regex that will match a number in a string which has n digits, taking into into account the spacing between the numbers. If that's the case, you're looking for something like this:
\b\d{4}\b
The \b will ensure the match is constrained to the start/end of a 'word' where a word is the boundary between anything matched by \w (which includes digits) and anything matched by the opposite, \W (which includes spaces).

I don't code in java but I can try to answer this using regex in general.
If your number is in the format d1d2d3d4 d5d6 and you want to extract digits d5d6, create 3 groups as r'([0-9]+)("/s")([0-9]+)' – each set of parenthesis () represent one group. Now, extract the third group only in another object which is your required output.

Regex for matching different float formats

I'm looking for a regex in scala to match several floats:
9,487,346 -> should match
9.487.356,453->should match
38,4 -> match
-38,4 -> should match
-38.5
-9,487,346.76
-38 -> should match
So basically it should match a number that:
Numbered lists are easy
possibly gave thousand separators (either comma or dot)
possibly are decimal again with either comma or dot as separator
Currently I'm stuck with
val pattern="\\d+((\\.\\d{3}+)?(,\\d{1,2}+)?|(,\\d{3}+)?(\\.\\d{1,2}+)?)"
Edit: I'm mostly concered with European Notation.
Example where the current pattern not matches: 1,052,161
I guess it would be close enough to match that the String only contains numbers,sign, comma and dot

If, as your edit suggests, you are willing to accept a string that simply "contains numbers, sign, comma and dot" then the task is trivial.
[+-]?\d[\d.,]*
update
After thinking it over, and considering some options, I realize that your original request is possible if you'll allow for 2 different RE patterns, one for US-style numbers (commas before dot) and one for Euro-style numbers (dots before comma).
def isValidNum(num: String): Boolean =
num.matches("[+-]?\\d{1,3}(,\\d{3})*(\\.\\d+)?") ||
num.matches("[+-]?\\d{1,3}(\\.\\d{3})*(,\\d+)?")
Note that the thousand separators are not optional, so a number like "1234" is not evaluated as valid. That can be changed by adding more RE patterns: || num.matches("[+-]?\\d+")

Based on your rules,
It should match a number that:
Numbered lists are easy
possibly gave thousand separators (either comma or dot)
possibly are decimal again with either comma or dot as separator
Regex:
^[+-]?\d{1,3}(?:[,.]\d{3})*(?:[,.]\d+)?$
[+-]? Allows + or - or nothing at the start
\d{1,3} allows one to 3 digits
([,.]\d{3}) allows . or , as thousands separator followed by 3 digits (* allows unlimited such matches)
(?:[,.]\d+)? allows . or , as decimal separator followed by at least one digit.
This matches all of the OP's example cases. Take a look at the demo below for more:
Regex101 Demo
However one limitation is it allows . or , as thousand separator and as decimal separator and doesn't validate that if , is thousands separator then . should be decimal separator. As a result the below cases incorrectly show up as matches:
201,350,780,88
211.950.266.4
To fix this as well, the previous regex can have 2 alternatives - one to check for a notation that has , as thousands separator and . as decimal, and another one to check vice-versa. Regex:
^[+-]?\d{1,3}(?:(?:(?:\.\d{3})*(?:\,\d+)?)|(?:(?:\,\d{3})*(?:\.\d+)?))$
Regex101 Demo
Hope this helps!

How can I express such requirement using Java regular expression?

I need to check that a file contains some amounts that match a specific format:
between 1 and 15 characters (numbers or ",")
may contains at most one "," separator for decimals
must at least have one number before the separator
this amount is supposed to be in the middle of a string, bounded by alphabetical characters (but we have to exclude the malformed files).
I currently have this:
\d{1,15}(,\d{1,14})?
But it does not match with the requirement as I might catch up to 30 characters here.
Unfortunately, for some reasons that are too long to explain here, I cannot simply pick a substring or use any other java call. The match has to be in a single, java-compatible, regular expression.

^(?=.{1,15}$)\d+(,\d+)?$
^ start of the string
(?=.{1,15}$) positive lookahead to make sure that the total length of string is between 1 and 15
\d+ one or more digit(s)
(,\d+)? optionally followed by a comma and more digits
$ end of the string (not really required as we already checked for it in the lookahead).
You might have to escape backslashes for Java: ^(?=.{1,15}$)\\d+(,\\d+)?$
update: If you're looking for this in the middle of another string, use word boundaries \b instead of string boundaries (^ and $).
\b(?=[\d,]{1,15}\b)\d+(,\d+)?\b
For java:
"\\b(?=[\\d,]{1,15}\\b)\\d+(,\\d+)?\\b"
More readable version:
"\\b(?=[0-9,]{1,15}\\b)[0-9]+(,[0-9]+)?\\b"