Java LinkedList has empty constructor in its source code - java

Is what I write below about LinkedList.java in jdk-8u111 correct?
/**
* Constructs an empty list.
*/
public LinkedList() {
}
We can see there exists no code in the constructor and the purpose of
such a strange constructor is for later subclasses. As we know that
the compiler would automatically provide a no-argument super() to
a subclass constructor if the constructor has no explicit super()
call. The compiler would report an error if the parent class had no such
no-argument constructor.
Error:(x, y) java: no suitable constructor found for parent class(no arguments)
We can conclude that the empty constructor of LinkedList is for subclass use.

No, it's nothing to do with subclasses.
If you don't define any constructors then Java will automatically add a default constructor. However, if you do define other constructors then the default constructor must be written out. Because this constructor exists:
LinkedList(Collection<? extends E> c);
The default constructor must be explicitly defined:
LinkedList();
It works and has no error if I do not write out an explicit empty default constructor. The compiler executes successfully. So it is okay not to write it out? What is the need to write it out if we already have another constructor?
With no constructors, a default one is added and we can successfully call new Thing():
class Thing {
}
Thing t = new Thing();
With a non-default constructor added, Java no longer adds a default constructor on its own. Now new Thing() is an error.
class Thing {
public Thing(int foo) { }
}
Thing t = new Thing();
Result:
Test.java:7: error: constructor Thing in class Thing cannot be applied to given types;
Thing t = new Thing();
^
required: int
found: no arguments
reason: actual and formal argument lists differ in length
1 error
We must write out the default constructor for the code to compile:
class Thing {
public Thing() { }
public Thing(int foo) { }
}
Thing t = new Thing();

Related

Extending a class in Java without initializing

public class LinkedListStructs {
public LinkedList l1 = new LinkedList();
public LinkedListStructs(){
ListNode h1 = new ListNode(4);
ListNode h2 = new ListNode(3);
ListNode h3 = new ListNode(12);
ListNode h4 = new ListNode(9);
ListNode h5 = new ListNode(9);
ListNode h6 = new ListNode(4);
l1.head = h1;
h1.next = h2;
h2.next = h3;
h3.next = h4;
h4.next = h5;
h5.next = h6;
}
}
Then I extend this in my other class:
public class Tester extends LinkedListStructs{
public void removeDupsTest(){
l1.printList();
l1.removeDups();
l1.printList();
}
}
I didn't initialize a new instance of LinkedListStructs. My question is, when I extend a class, is an instance automatically created?
I am confused because I used LinkedList l1 in my tester class, but the object itself needs to be initialized with a constructor as you see with public LinkedListStructs(){}
So, how does it work? If I don't create an instance, initialize properties of linked list then how is it possible to use it?
Thanks
To use your Tester, you have to create an instance of it. When you create it, you are calling its constructor.
Since you haven't specified a constructor, the compiler creates one for you. Your empty constructor will call the superclass constructor.
To test this, add an empty constructor to your Tester class and printLns in both the Tester and LinkedListStructs constructor. You will see the tester constructor called, which in turn will call the superclass constructor.
Note that your empty constructor must call super(), which calls the superclass constructor.
Java figures it out for you: when you extend a class that has a parameterless constructor, and do not define a constructor, your derived class automatically gets a default constructor:
JLS section 8.8.9:
If a class contains no constructor declarations, then a default constructor with no parameters is automatically provided.
If the class being declared is the primordial class Object, then the default constructor has an empty body. Otherwise, the default constructor simply invokes the superclass constructor with no arguments.
When you construct an instance of Tester, the constructor of its base class LinkedListStructs gets called, initializing the list l1.
To answer your doubt:
Since you have extended the LinkedListStructs and created a new class Tester (meaning of 'public class Tester extends LinkedListStructs')
All the behaviour will be available in the derived(or extended) class. This is the fundamental of Inheritance (and hence reusability). You may choose to override it as well. This is for polymorphism (you can have 'implements' to achive this).
Since, there is no explicit constructor in Tester class. The default constructor will be called, which in turn will call all its super classes constructor. Default constructor documentation can be found here.
I guess that's the direct answer to your question.

Does a subclass in Java need a constructor if there is one for the superclass? [duplicate]

What exactly is a default constructor — can you tell me which one of the following is a default constructor and what differentiates it from any other constructor?
public Module() {
this.name = "";
this.credits = 0;
this.hours = 0;
}
public Module(String name, int credits, int hours) {
this.name = name;
this.credits = credits;
this.hours = hours;
}
Neither of them. If you define it, it's not the default.
The default constructor is the no-argument constructor automatically generated unless you define another constructor. Any uninitialised fields will be set to their default values. For your example, it would look like this assuming that the types are String, int and int, and that the class itself is public:
public Module()
{
super();
this.name = null;
this.credits = 0;
this.hours = 0;
}
This is exactly the same as
public Module()
{}
And exactly the same as having no constructors at all. However, if you define at least one constructor, the default constructor is not generated.
Reference: Java Language Specification
If a class contains no constructor declarations, then a default constructor with no formal parameters and no throws clause is implicitly declared.
Clarification
Technically it is not the constructor (default or otherwise) that default-initialises the fields. However, I am leaving it the answer because
the question got the defaults wrong, and
the constructor has exactly the same effect whether they are included or not.
A default constructor is created if you don't define any constructors in your class. It simply is a no argument constructor which does nothing. Edit: Except call super()
public Module(){
}
A default constructor is automatically generated by the compiler if you do not explicitly define at least one constructor in your class. You've defined two, so your class does not have a default constructor.
Per The Java Language Specification Third Edition:
8.8.9 Default Constructor
If a class contains no constructor
declarations, then a default
constructor that takes no parameters
is automatically provided...
Hi. As per my knowledge let me clear the concept of default constructor:
The compiler automatically provides a no-argument, default constructor
for any class without constructors. This default constructor will call
the no-argument constructor of the superclass. In this situation, the
compiler will complain if the superclass doesn't have a no-argument
constructor so you must verify that it does. If your class has no
explicit superclass, then it has an implicit superclass of Object,
which does have a no-argument constructor.
I read this information from the Java Tutorials.
Java provides a default constructor which takes no arguments and performs no special actions or initializations, when no explicit constructors are provided.
The only action taken by the implicit default constructor is to call the superclass constructor using the super() call. Constructor arguments provide you with a way to provide parameters for the initialization of an object.
Below is an example of a cube class containing 2 constructors. (one default and one parameterized constructor).
public class Cube1 {
int length;
int breadth;
int height;
public int getVolume() {
return (length * breadth * height);
}
Cube1() {
length = 10;
breadth = 10;
height = 10;
}
Cube1(int l, int b, int h) {
length = l;
breadth = b;
height = h;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
Cube1 cubeObj1, cubeObj2;
cubeObj1 = new Cube1();
cubeObj2 = new Cube1(10, 20, 30);
System.out.println("Volume of Cube1 is : " + cubeObj1.getVolume());
System.out.println("Volume of Cube1 is : " + cubeObj2.getVolume());
}
}
General terminology is that if you don't provide any constructor in your object a no argument constructor is automatically placed which is called default constructor.
If you do define a constructor same as the one which would be placed if you don't provide any it is generally termed as no arguments constructor.Just a convention though as some programmer prefer to call this explicitly defined no arguments constructor as default constructor. But if we go by naming if we are explicitly defining one than it does not make it default.
As per the docs
If a class contains no constructor declarations, then a default constructor with no formal parameters and no throws clause is implicitly declared.
Example
public class Dog
{
}
will automatically be modified(by adding default constructor) as follows
public class Dog{
public Dog() {
}
}
and when you create it's object
Dog myDog = new Dog();
this default constructor is invoked.
default constructor refers to a constructor that is automatically generated by the compiler in the absence of any programmer-defined constructors.
If there's no constructor provided by programmer, the compiler implicitly declares a default constructor which calls super(), has no throws clause as well no formal parameters.
E.g.
class Klass {
// Default Constructor gets generated
}
new Klass(); // Correct
-------------------------------------
class KlassParameterized {
KlassParameterized ( String str ) { //// Parameterized Constructor
// do Something
}
}
new KlassParameterized(); //// Wrong - you need to explicitly provide no-arg constructor. The compiler now never declares default one.
--------------------------------
class KlassCorrected {
KlassCorrected (){ // No-arg Constructor
/// Safe to Invoke
}
KlassCorrected ( String str ) { //// Parameterized Constructor
// do Something
}
}
new KlassCorrected(); /// RIGHT -- you can instantiate
If a class doesn't have any constructor provided by programmer, then java compiler will add a default constructor with out parameters which will call super class constructor internally with super() call. This is called as default constructor.
In your case, there is no default constructor as you are adding them programmatically.
If there are no constructors added by you, then compiler generated default constructor will look like this.
public Module()
{
super();
}
Note: In side default constructor, it will add super() call also, to call super class constructor.
Purpose of adding default constructor:
Constructor's duty is to initialize instance variables, if there are no instance variables you could choose to remove constructor from your class. But when you are inheriting some class it is your class responsibility to call super class constructor to make sure that super class initializes all its instance variables properly.
That's why if there are no constructors, java compiler will add a default constructor and calls super class constructor.
When we do not explicitly define a constructor for a class, then java creates a default constructor for the class. It is essentially a non-parameterized constructor, i.e. it doesn't accept any arguments.
The default constructor's job is to call the super class constructor and initialize all instance variables. If the super class constructor is not present then it automatically initializes the instance variables to zero. So, that serves the purpose of using constructor, which is to initialize the internal state of an object so that the code creating an instance will have a fully initialized, usable object.
Once we define our own constructor for the class, the default constructor is no longer used. So, neither of them is actually a default constructor.
When you don’t define any constructor in your class, compiler defines default one for you, however when you declare any constructor (in your example you have already defined a parameterized constructor), compiler doesn’t do it for you.
Since you have defined a constructor in class code, compiler didn’t create default one. While creating object you are invoking default one, which doesn’t exist in class code. Then the code gives an compilation error.
When you create a new Module object, java compiler add a default constructor for you because there is no constructor at all.
class Module{} // you will never see the default constructor
If you add any kind of constructor even and non-arg one, than java thing you have your own and don't add a default constructor anymore.
This is an non-arg constructor that internelly call the super() constructor from his parent class even you don't have one. (if your class don't have a parent class than Object.Class constructor will be call)
class Module{
Module() {} // this look like a default constructor but in not.
}
A default constructor does not take any arguments:
public class Student {
// default constructor
public Student() {
}
}
I hope you got your answer regarding which is default constructor.
But I am giving below statements to correct the comments given.
Java does not initialize any local variable to any default value. So
if you are creating an Object of a class it will call default
constructor and provide default values to Object.
Default constructor provides the default values to the object like 0,
null etc. depending on the type.
Please refer below link for more details.
https://www.javatpoint.com/constructor

Confusion with explicit constructor invocation

In the code that I have provided the overloaded constructor with argument which makes a call to the no-args constructor, which inturn should call the constructor of the object class in this case. So how does using the this() keyword execute the program correctly but not a direct call to the constructor.
public class S {
S() {
System.out.println("S()");
}
S(int i) {
this();
S();// The method S is undefined for type S
System.out.println("S(int i)");
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
S obj1 = new S();
System.out.println("----------");
S obj2 = new S(10);
System.out.println("----------");
}
}
Syntactically, S() is a method invocation, but you do not have a method called S.
this(); is special syntax for using another constructor in the same class.
To illustrate this point, I added:
void S() {
System.out.println("Method S()");
}
It now compiles, and the output is:
S()
----------
S()
Method S()
S(int i)
----------
A constructor is defined to initialize (construct) objects, therefore you can't call it.
S s = new S();//Correct
S(); //Incorrect, you are calling a method not a constructor.
new S();//Correct
this() is used to to pass arguments to constructor of the same class.
super() is used to pass arguments to parent constructor.
This is called explicit constructor invocation.
Note that when invoking a constructor from another constructor, it must be the first statement of the constructor else it won't compile.
How to invoke other constructors of the same class is defined by The Java Language Specification, section 8.8.7.1 Explicit Constructor Invocations:
• Alternate constructor invocations begin with the keyword this
(possibly prefaced with explicit type arguments). They are used to
invoke an alternate constructor of the same class.
• Superclass constructor invocations begin with either the keyword
super (possibly prefaced with explicit type arguments) or a Primary
expression. They are used to invoke a constructor of the direct
superclass.

Why does constructor with arg undefine the default constructor?

Consider -
public class Class_A {
public void func() {...}
public void func(int a){...}
All three -
Class_A a = new Class_A(); // legal
a.func(); // legal
a.func(1); // legal
But After constructor with arg like public Class_A (int a){...} is added to Class_A , the default constructor become to be -
Class_A a = new Class_A(); // The constructor Class_A() is undefined
Thats force me to add public Class_A() {/*Do Nothing*/} into Class_A .
Since each class has default constructor , why doesn't both default constructor and constructor with arg can exist together just same func() and func(int a) are ?
it has default constructor unless you define your own constructor, in this case you need to re define default constructor
Because If you write a constructor, compiler wouldn't write a default constructor for you. you have to write one explicitly.
From JLS:
If a class contains no constructor declarations, then a default
constructor with no formal parameters and no throws clause is
implicitly declared.
It's the other way around.
If you don't have any constructor you get the no-arg one by default.
The name "default constructor" implies that it is provided when you don't provide one yourself. As soon as you provide your own constructor, the compiler will not generate a default constructor for you.
Be careful not to confuse the default constructor with the no-arg constructor. These are two entirely different things.

Java default constructor

What exactly is a default constructor — can you tell me which one of the following is a default constructor and what differentiates it from any other constructor?
public Module() {
this.name = "";
this.credits = 0;
this.hours = 0;
}
public Module(String name, int credits, int hours) {
this.name = name;
this.credits = credits;
this.hours = hours;
}
Neither of them. If you define it, it's not the default.
The default constructor is the no-argument constructor automatically generated unless you define another constructor. Any uninitialised fields will be set to their default values. For your example, it would look like this assuming that the types are String, int and int, and that the class itself is public:
public Module()
{
super();
this.name = null;
this.credits = 0;
this.hours = 0;
}
This is exactly the same as
public Module()
{}
And exactly the same as having no constructors at all. However, if you define at least one constructor, the default constructor is not generated.
Reference: Java Language Specification
If a class contains no constructor declarations, then a default constructor with no formal parameters and no throws clause is implicitly declared.
Clarification
Technically it is not the constructor (default or otherwise) that default-initialises the fields. However, I am leaving it the answer because
the question got the defaults wrong, and
the constructor has exactly the same effect whether they are included or not.
A default constructor is created if you don't define any constructors in your class. It simply is a no argument constructor which does nothing. Edit: Except call super()
public Module(){
}
A default constructor is automatically generated by the compiler if you do not explicitly define at least one constructor in your class. You've defined two, so your class does not have a default constructor.
Per The Java Language Specification Third Edition:
8.8.9 Default Constructor
If a class contains no constructor
declarations, then a default
constructor that takes no parameters
is automatically provided...
Hi. As per my knowledge let me clear the concept of default constructor:
The compiler automatically provides a no-argument, default constructor
for any class without constructors. This default constructor will call
the no-argument constructor of the superclass. In this situation, the
compiler will complain if the superclass doesn't have a no-argument
constructor so you must verify that it does. If your class has no
explicit superclass, then it has an implicit superclass of Object,
which does have a no-argument constructor.
I read this information from the Java Tutorials.
Java provides a default constructor which takes no arguments and performs no special actions or initializations, when no explicit constructors are provided.
The only action taken by the implicit default constructor is to call the superclass constructor using the super() call. Constructor arguments provide you with a way to provide parameters for the initialization of an object.
Below is an example of a cube class containing 2 constructors. (one default and one parameterized constructor).
public class Cube1 {
int length;
int breadth;
int height;
public int getVolume() {
return (length * breadth * height);
}
Cube1() {
length = 10;
breadth = 10;
height = 10;
}
Cube1(int l, int b, int h) {
length = l;
breadth = b;
height = h;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
Cube1 cubeObj1, cubeObj2;
cubeObj1 = new Cube1();
cubeObj2 = new Cube1(10, 20, 30);
System.out.println("Volume of Cube1 is : " + cubeObj1.getVolume());
System.out.println("Volume of Cube1 is : " + cubeObj2.getVolume());
}
}
General terminology is that if you don't provide any constructor in your object a no argument constructor is automatically placed which is called default constructor.
If you do define a constructor same as the one which would be placed if you don't provide any it is generally termed as no arguments constructor.Just a convention though as some programmer prefer to call this explicitly defined no arguments constructor as default constructor. But if we go by naming if we are explicitly defining one than it does not make it default.
As per the docs
If a class contains no constructor declarations, then a default constructor with no formal parameters and no throws clause is implicitly declared.
Example
public class Dog
{
}
will automatically be modified(by adding default constructor) as follows
public class Dog{
public Dog() {
}
}
and when you create it's object
Dog myDog = new Dog();
this default constructor is invoked.
default constructor refers to a constructor that is automatically generated by the compiler in the absence of any programmer-defined constructors.
If there's no constructor provided by programmer, the compiler implicitly declares a default constructor which calls super(), has no throws clause as well no formal parameters.
E.g.
class Klass {
// Default Constructor gets generated
}
new Klass(); // Correct
-------------------------------------
class KlassParameterized {
KlassParameterized ( String str ) { //// Parameterized Constructor
// do Something
}
}
new KlassParameterized(); //// Wrong - you need to explicitly provide no-arg constructor. The compiler now never declares default one.
--------------------------------
class KlassCorrected {
KlassCorrected (){ // No-arg Constructor
/// Safe to Invoke
}
KlassCorrected ( String str ) { //// Parameterized Constructor
// do Something
}
}
new KlassCorrected(); /// RIGHT -- you can instantiate
If a class doesn't have any constructor provided by programmer, then java compiler will add a default constructor with out parameters which will call super class constructor internally with super() call. This is called as default constructor.
In your case, there is no default constructor as you are adding them programmatically.
If there are no constructors added by you, then compiler generated default constructor will look like this.
public Module()
{
super();
}
Note: In side default constructor, it will add super() call also, to call super class constructor.
Purpose of adding default constructor:
Constructor's duty is to initialize instance variables, if there are no instance variables you could choose to remove constructor from your class. But when you are inheriting some class it is your class responsibility to call super class constructor to make sure that super class initializes all its instance variables properly.
That's why if there are no constructors, java compiler will add a default constructor and calls super class constructor.
When we do not explicitly define a constructor for a class, then java creates a default constructor for the class. It is essentially a non-parameterized constructor, i.e. it doesn't accept any arguments.
The default constructor's job is to call the super class constructor and initialize all instance variables. If the super class constructor is not present then it automatically initializes the instance variables to zero. So, that serves the purpose of using constructor, which is to initialize the internal state of an object so that the code creating an instance will have a fully initialized, usable object.
Once we define our own constructor for the class, the default constructor is no longer used. So, neither of them is actually a default constructor.
When you don’t define any constructor in your class, compiler defines default one for you, however when you declare any constructor (in your example you have already defined a parameterized constructor), compiler doesn’t do it for you.
Since you have defined a constructor in class code, compiler didn’t create default one. While creating object you are invoking default one, which doesn’t exist in class code. Then the code gives an compilation error.
When you create a new Module object, java compiler add a default constructor for you because there is no constructor at all.
class Module{} // you will never see the default constructor
If you add any kind of constructor even and non-arg one, than java thing you have your own and don't add a default constructor anymore.
This is an non-arg constructor that internelly call the super() constructor from his parent class even you don't have one. (if your class don't have a parent class than Object.Class constructor will be call)
class Module{
Module() {} // this look like a default constructor but in not.
}
A default constructor does not take any arguments:
public class Student {
// default constructor
public Student() {
}
}
I hope you got your answer regarding which is default constructor.
But I am giving below statements to correct the comments given.
Java does not initialize any local variable to any default value. So
if you are creating an Object of a class it will call default
constructor and provide default values to Object.
Default constructor provides the default values to the object like 0,
null etc. depending on the type.
Please refer below link for more details.
https://www.javatpoint.com/constructor

Categories

Resources