What does exposing my service account credentials expose specifically in Firebase? - java

I'm making a simple java based game and I want to use Google Firebase to store simple variables for the game in real-time.
The only option that Google Cloud supports in Java is to use the Firebase Admin SDK. The one problem with this is that it will leave my service credentials exposed in the client.
I'm honestly fine if somebody gets the credentials and messes up my project, what matters the most is if somebody can get access to my account.
I'm only going to be sending the final project to my teacher and friends. Or maybe I'm just doing this the completely wrong way, if anybody has a better solution that would be great!

Turning over your default service account to anyone grants them the ability to modify pretty much anything within your project, as the permissions granted to it will allow. Since this can vary, you should read the documentation about services accounts:
Service accounts
Understanding service accounts
It is generally a bad idea to turn over a service account to anyone that you don't explicitly trust with your billing.

Related

AWS Cognito Sign-In with Java SDK for desktop application

I searched a lot, but it seems impossible to find a solution from start to finish to this topic. As a premise, I've already implemented Cognito sign-up, sign-in and refresh of credentials in two native apps for both iOS and Android, so I have developed a (at least) basic understanding of the authentication flow.
These mobile apps use the simplest cognito setup possible: a user pool, an identity pool with a IAM role for authenticated users and no unauthenticated usage possible. I'm not using (at least for now) Facebook, Google or Amazon login, nor other authentication methods.
Now I need to make a desktop version of those apps in Java, and it seems to me a completely different beast. What I would like to do is this:
Open the login window in my Java desktop application;
Insert username and password in their fields and press a login button;
Getting some credentials and start using the application connecting to other AWS services, specifically I need to use S3, Lambda and DynamoDB.
The way to achieve this is on paper reasonably simple:
Get a token from a Cognito user pool;
Give this token to a Cognito identity pool in exchange for some credentials;
Use this credentials to access other AWS services.
After reading a lot of documentation, downloading a lot of different projects examples and a lot of despair, I've eventually found the way to implement this in the mobile apps. For example, in Android the authentication flow works like this:
Instantiate a CognitoUserPool, using a UserPoolID, an AppClientID, a PoolRegion and (optionally) a ClientSecret;
Instantiate a credential provider, using an IdentityPoolID and a PoolRegion;
In the app UI, insert a username and password, and press the Login button;
Retrieve a CognitoUser using that username from the UserPool instantiated earlier;
Get a CognitoUserSession for that CognitoUser, using an AuthenticationHandler with various callbacks to pass the password when needed;
Add that CognitoUserSession to the credentials provider instantiated earlier, in form of a TokenKey + the JWT token extracted from the session.
At this point, whenever I need to access S3, Lambda or DynamoDB, I simply pass this credentials provider as a parameter for their clients constructors.
To implement the same functionality with the Java SDK seems to me much more difficult.
I managed to implement users Sign-Up fairly easily. However with users Sign-In I don't know where to start at all.
Every example does this in a different way. On top of that, every example uses particular use cases such as developer authenticated Sign-Ins, or custom urls to connect to some owned backend. Why is so difficult to find an example for a basic use case like the one I need? I'm starting to think my basic use case is not basic at all, but rather atypical. Why would login with a username and a password against the default users/credentials service for AWS be atypical, however, I don't really know.
The best I've done so far is copying the relevant classes from this example project (from which I've also taken the Sign-Up part, that works pretty well) and getting to print the IdToken, AccessToken and RefreshToken in the console. They are printed correctly and are not null.
What I cant't really understand is how to get the credentials and add them to a credentials provider in order to instantiate the clients to access other AWS services. The only way I see in the project to do that is to call the method
Credentials getCredentials(String accessCode)
which I suppose it should accept the access code retrieved with the InitAuth method (that starts an OAuth2.0 authentication flow, please correct me if I am wrong). The problem is that I can't find a way to retrieve that code. I can't find an online example of an access code to see how it looks. I tried to put one of the tokens and the web request responds
{"error":"invalid_grant"}
which suggests its not a valid code, but at least the web request is valid.
To make it more clear, what I can do is this:
String username; //retrieved from UI
String password; //retrieved from UI
//I copied AuthenticationHelper as is from the project
AuthenticationHelper helper = new AuthenticationHelper(POOL_ID, CLIENT_APP_ID, CLIENT_SECRET);
//I then retrieve the tokens with SRP authentication
AuthenticationResultType result = helper.performSRPAuthentication(username, password);
//Now I can successfully print the tokens, for example:
System.out.println(result.getAccessToken());
How can I retrieve the credentials from here? Where I should put the identity pool id? In Android I simply add the JWT token to an HashMap and use it like
credentialsProvider.setLogins(loginsMap).
Furthermore, this project contain classes with hundreds of lines of code, BigInteger variables, hardcoded strings of many lines of random characters (some sort of key or token I suppose) and other black magic like that (especially in the AuthenticationHelper class). Another thing I don't like about this solution is that it retrieves credentials through manually written web requests (with another separated class created ad hoc to make the request). Really isn't there in the Java SDK some handy method that wraps all those things in a bunch of elegant lines of code? Why call it an SDK than? The iOS and Android SDKs handle all that on their own in such a simpler way. Is this due to the fact that they expect a developer of desktop app to be way more able/expert, in contrast to the average guy that some day, getting up from bed, decides to make an iOS/Android app [alludes to himself]? This would explain their effort to make the mobile SDKs so developer-friendly in comparison.
Onestly I find really hard to believe that I have to do that, reading who knows what on a doc page who knows where, to Sign-In a user, which makes me think that I'm really missing something. I literally read every stack exchange question and documentation I was able to find. The fact is that there is almost always an AWS documentation page for what I need, but to actually find it is not so simple sometimes, at least for Cognito documentation.
I read that I can put a file with the needed credentials in the PC filesystem and the Java SDK will use those credentials to access all the resources, however from my understanding this method is reserved to Java applications running on a server as a backend (servlets), where the end user can't access them through his browser. My application is a desktop app for end-users, so I can't even consider to leave AWS credentials on the user PC (please correct me if I'm wrong, I would really love to make something so simple).
What really scares me is that Sign-In with a user pool and identity pool might not be possible at all. I know that Cognito related stuff was added to the Java SDK much later it was available for iOS, Android and JavaScript. But if they added it, I suppose It should support an authentication flow at least similar to those of the mobile counterparts.
What worsen the problem even more is that I initially made all the functionalities of my application to work offline. I thought that I would have eventually integrated AWS in the app. In this way the application is a bit more modular, and the AWS related stuff in concentrated in a package, detatched from the rest of the application logic and UI. In my sea of ignorance this seems a good practice to me, but now, if I cannot manage to resolve this problem, I've thrown months of work in the trash, only to realize that I have to build a web app beacuse JavaScript is much more supported.
Even on MobileHub the only options to create a ClientApp on Cognito is for iOS, Android, JavaScript and React-something.
When documentation or examples are provided for other languages/SDKs, Java is often omitted and the most frequent I see among the options is .NET.
To make my frustration even bigger, everytime I search something on a search engine, the fact that the word "Java" is contained in the word "JavaScript" obfuscates the few results that could be useful, because all the JavaScript SDK related stuff is generally higher ranked in the search engines than Java's (this could explain in part why .NET related stuff seems more easy to find, at least on StackOverflow or others Q&A sites).
To conclude, all of this created some questions in my head:
Why so few people seem to need this authentication method (with username and password)? It seems to me a pretty common and reasonable use case for a desktop application. I know that web apps growth is through the roof, but given that Java is one of the most used languages today, how is it possible that nobody needs to do a simple login from a desktop application? Which leads to the next question:
Is there something inherently bad/wrong/risky/stupid in using the Java SDK for a desktop application? Is it intended only for usage on a server as backend or for a web app? What should be the solution than, to make a desktop application that connects to AWS services? It is wrong to do an AWS connected desktop app at all? Should a web app the only option to consider? Why? I opted for Java to implement an application that would run on Widows, macOS and Linux. I also chose Java because i thought it would be mostly similar to the Android SDK in its usage, given its code should be indipendent from the platform UI, making simple to reuse code. I was wrong.
If there's nothing wrong in using the Java SDK like this, could some
good soul please help me find an example that goes from putting a
username and a password in two fields, and instantiate a client to
access other AWS services (such as an S3 client) in a Java desktop
application?
Tell me everything you need to know and I'll edit the question.
Please someone help me, I'm loosing my mind.
Probably too late for the OP but here is the process I used to get credentials from Cognito after obtaining the JWT identity token. Once the JWT is obtained through SRP Authentication I got the Identity Id using the Federated Pool Id and passing a login map of the Cognito Idp Url and the JWT. The url is completed with your aws region and your Cognito User Pool Id.
//create a Cognito provider with anonymous creds
AnonymousAWSCredentials awsCreds = new AnonymousAWSCredentials();
AmazonCognitoIdentity provider = AmazonCognitoIdentityClientBuilder
.standard()
.withCredentials(new AWSStaticCredentialsProvider(awsCreds))
.withRegion(REGION)
.build();
//get the identity id using the login map
String idpUrl = String.format("cognito-idp.%s.amazonaws.com/%s", REGION, cognitoUserPoolId);
GetIdRequest idrequest = new GetIdRequest();
idrequest.setIdentityPoolId(FED_POOL_ID);
idrequest.addLoginsEntry(idpUrl, jwt);
//use the provider to make the id request
GetIdResult idResult = provider.getId(idrequest);
return idResult.getIdentityId();
If you're using a different login provider then that url needs to change, but this should get the Identity Id. Next its a similar request to get the IAM credentials by passing the Identity Id and that same login map.
//create a Cognito provider with anonymous creds
AnonymousAWSCredentials awsCreds = new AnonymousAWSCredentials();
AmazonCognitoIdentity provider = AmazonCognitoIdentityClientBuilder
.standard()
.withCredentials(new AWSStaticCredentialsProvider(awsCreds))
.withRegion(REGION)
.build();
//request authenticated credentials using the identity id and login map for authentication
String idpUrl = String.format("cognito-idp.%s.amazonaws.com/%s", REGION, cognitoUserPoolId);
GetCredentialsForIdentityRequest request = new GetCredentialsForIdentityRequest();
request.setIdentityId(identityId);
request.addLoginsEntry(idpUrl, jwt);
//use Cognito provider to perform credentials request
GetCredentialsForIdentityResult result = provider.getCredentialsForIdentity(request);
return result.getCredentials();
This took me a full week to figure out. AWS Java documentation is pretty terrible in my opinion. Hopefully this helps someone out.

Authenticate mobile application with WeChat

I have an app that provides initial login (authentication) with facebook or twitter.
I would like to add WeChat authentication.
App isn't on the stores yet.
Does anyone have any experience on this kind of authentication?
What are the steps to achieve it?
I'm so confused by wechat documentation because seems have two versions:
one used to send messages;
another one, seems, that grants authenticated API (chinese documentation only?);
I think that a guide on SO is missing and can help a lot of people considering that documentation is not too clear.
Problem is that I cannot register my app:
if I use 'developers.wechat.com' I can't create app because of this bug.
if I use 'https://open.weixin.qq.com/' I can't create my account because a chinese phone number is required.
So?

How to access Google API's from Android, using "Public API access", not user authentication

Background
I believe the recommended way to access Google services from Android is to use the Google APIs Client Library for Java (for some services play services is recommeneded too).
If you want to access your user's account, you use oauth2 to authenticate the user, but things seem less clear if you want to access your own services (eg. I want to access Google Cloud Storage belonging to my app engine project).
The problem with service accounts
What I see a lot of here is using service accounts, and I've used them server-side and found them to be a comparatively simple solution, but this requires you to deploy your private key so I don't think this could be right for public Android apps.
The solution: Public API access
If you go to the 'credentials' page of the cloud console:
https://console.developers.google.com/project/[your_project]/apiui/credential
it seems pretty clear that they expect you to use a 'public API access key' for the situation I'm describing. It appears that this is not OAUTH based.
I assume that I will still use the type 'GoogleCredential' for this, but in the documentation for the credential builder I don't see how to do this. The set client functions appear to relate to the oauth2 access (which uses client ID/secret).
The Question
How do I use the 'public API access' key to access Google services from an Android app.
Or, if I'm wrong about service accounts - and they really are the recommended solution, then please show me some evidence of this because it certainly apppears to me that they are not the right solution for publicly distributed apps.
The good news is that it's very much easier. You can either use a Service Account (ie. a brand new account dedicated to your app) or a regular account.
For a service account you embed the key in your app, for a regular account you embed a refresh token in your app. In both cases, be aware of the security risk and use the minimal scope necessary.
You can get a refresh token without writing any code by following the steps in How do I authorise an app (web or installed) without user intervention? (canonical ?)

How to keep secure info out of App Engine logs?

I've written a simple login system with Google App Engine, and I want to make sure that an admin (with access to the whole admin dashboard) can't see the passwords that users are submitting. Specifically, my concern is with the logs. Is using POST's (as opposed to GET's, which are bad for obvious reasons) enough to keep parameters like passwords out of the logs? If not, how do I do that?
Thanks
First of all, you have to make sure that this not very trustworthy individual has a role of a "viewer" in your app. A user with a role of developer or owner can see anything he wants. For example, he can upload a new version of the app (which may not be even related to your app) that will load all passwords from the Datastore and email them somewhere. Or this app will ask users for a password and send it somewhere.
Second, unless you add code specifically for logging passwords (or any other POST parameters), App Engine logs will not contain this information.
You may find this article interesting: Demystifying the App Engine request logs

Authentication on Android

Hi I am developing an Android App where I require a user to authenticate his session before using the app. One way is to store a user name and password by asking him to register on the app and then use that to authenticate him. But i was looking to do something else, maybe use an OpenId account to authenticate or Opensoial or something like Facebook Connect. Any Suggestions and comments? thanks for you help.
First, please do not whine about not getting answers after only an hour, particularly when it's Sunday in much of the world. If you want responses in less than an hour on a weekend, hire an expensive consultant.
Hi I am developing an Android App
where I require a user to authenticate
his session before using the app.
Why?
Any Suggestions and comments?
Most Android applications do not require authentication for local use. They may require authentication for access to online content (e.g., Web service), in which case the authentication is handled by the Web service and uses technology dictated by the Web service.
Bear in mind that any online authentication process (e.g., OAuth, Facebook Connect) means your application cannot be used in offline mode.
If your goal is to use authentication as some means of helping to combat piracy, you might consider using the new LVL system that Google released this week.

Categories

Resources