I have an entity:
#Entity
#Table(name ="cats")
public class Cat {
#Id
#Column(name="name")
private String name;
#Column(name="age")
private int age;
#Column(name="color")
private String color;
#Column(name="weight")
private int weigth;
..
}
1. I need to delete it from database using EntityManager:
#Override
public void delete(Cat cat) {
entityManager.remove(cat);
}
Problem: I have a Map<String, Cat> which contains all this elements. I get it by name from map IllegalArgumentException -> "Removing a detached instance com.entities.Cat#cats".
Question: How can i do it without getting from database by key?
2. I need to getList with limit and offset.
To get all the elements i can just use:
entityManager.createNativeQuery("SELECT name, age, color, weight FROM cats");
Without entityManager i used prepatedStatement with:
"SELECT name, age, color, weight FROM cats LIMIT ?,?"
Question:
How can i do it using entityManager?
Do entityManager have something like preparedStatement?
With EntityManager you can use Query objects. It provides you with several different methods to build your queries, which you can see in the Docs.
From there, you can use a Query to perform a select or execute an update into the db.
Update example:
//:id is a parameter you can set
Query query = entityManager.createQuery("delete from Entity e where e.id = :id");
query = query.setParameter("id", id);
query.executeUpdate();
Select example (using TypedQuery which implements Query:
String sql = "select e from Entity e";
TypedQuery<Entity> query = entityManager.createQuery(sql, Entity.class);
System.out.println(query.getResultList());
You can determine limit and offset like this:
query = query.setFirstResult(offset);
query = query.setMaxResults(limit);
If you have an entity at hand you can (and should) delete it using your EntityManager with remove(). You're getting that error because your entity is detached - that is, your EntityManager isn't aware of its existence.
To "attach" entities to your manager you can use merge(). However, if said entity doesn't exist in the database it will be inserted, and if it exists but has different fields from your object it will be updated.
public void delete(Cat cat) {
if(!entityManager.contains(cat)) {
entityManager.merge(cat);
}
entityManager.remove(cat);
}
To insert entities for the first time you can also use persist(). For the differences between merge() and persist(), see this.
If you need to use EntityManager, then simply use reference:
entityManager.remove(entityManager.getReference(Cat.class, id));
This way the entity won't be fetched from db, but will be deleted.
Using query is also an option:
Query query = entityManager.createQuery("delete from Entity e where e = :entity");
query = query.setParameter("entity", entity);
query.executeUpdate();
You can create Query using EntityManager#createQuery. Then set parameters: firstResult and maxResults:
query.setFirstResult(10).setMaxResults(20);
This will take 20 entities starting from 10th.
Related
I'm new to ORM interface, and I'm trying to connect to my databases with Hibernate.
What I've figured out so far is:
With a serializable object, I can get a persistent object with
Person p = session.get(Person.class, serializable);
I can get all the objects by a list with
List people = session.createQuery("FROM Person").list();
What I need is to find a row that meets a certain condition, such as SELECT * FROM person WHERE name="Kim" AND age=30;
However, the above two aren't the ways to achieve this.
#Entity
#Table(name = "person")
public class Person {
#Id
private Integer id; // I can use this variable when using session.get(Person.class, serializable) , but I cannot know the id of my target row.
private String name;
private Integer age;
...
Should I iterate all the objects in people, and check whether all the member variables match what I want?
Is there any simple way to achieve this?
First and most importantly, never put user input in a query like this
SELECT * FROM person WHERE name="Kim" AND age=30;
You have to use Prepared Statements. Learn why from Bobby Tables.
Secondly, you should use the JPA interface EntityManager instead of Hibernate's Session as the second one anchors you to a specific implementation, rather than the wider standard.
With the EntityManager you get an object by id like this:
Person p = em.find(Person.class, id);
To get a list of People you can create a JPQL query like this:
TypedQuery<Person> query = em.createQuery("SELECT p FROM Person p WHERE p.name = :name AND p.age = :age", Person.class);
query.setParameter("name", "Kim"); // :param1 defines a parameter named "param1" in the query
query.setParameter("age", 30);
List<Person> results = query.getResultList();
You could also do this in one chain if you don't need to reuse the query with different parameters on a loop.
List<Person> results = em.createQuery(..., Person.class)
.setParameter("name", "Kim")
.setParameter("age", 30)
.getResultList();
The reason to put every call on a new row is in case an exception occurs it will give you the proper row to look for. If they're all in one row, then that's not very useful.
If your query is a SELECT, and it needs to return exactly one result every time, you can use getSingleResult() instead of getResultList(). If you do that and the query did return more than one result, it will throw a NonUniqueResultException. If the query did not return any results it will throw a NoResultException instead of returning null.
If your query is NOT a SELECT, then you have to use executeUpdate() to invoke it after setting the parameters.
There are many resources to get you started, but generally if its for a Hibernate version before 5.2 you should consider it outdated, and it will likely be more difficult.
The purpose is to select columns from joined tables (Many-to-Many).
The problem i have is to select two columns from a joined Many-to-Many table.
I'am using Springboot 2.3 and Spring data Jpa.
I have this data model, and what i want to fetch are the blue boxed fields
So the native query could look like this (if i am right ...)
SELECT bg.id, bg.name, p.name, c.name, c.short_desc FROM boardgame as bg
JOIN boardgame_category bgc on bg.id = bgc.fk_game
JOIN publisher p on bg.fk_publisher = p.id
JOIN category c on bgc.fk_category = c.id
WHERE bg.id = :id
I first tried to work with dto in JPQL statment
public class BoardgameDto {
private long id;
private String name;
private String publisherName;
private Set<CatregoryDto> categoryDto;
// setter, getter etc...
}
public class CategoryDto {
private String name;
private String shortDesc;
// setter, getter etc...
}
The JQPL query could look like this , but it doesn't work (IDE shows errors on CategoryDto)
/* THIS DOESN'T WORK */
SELECT new org.moto.tryingstuff.dto.BoardgameDto(bg.id, bg.name, p.name,
new org.moto.tryingstuff.dto.CategoryDto(c.name, c.short_desc)) FROM Boardgame as bg, Publisher as p, Category as c
Well, I think the problem I have with this way of doing is that the dto's contructor can't receive a collection as written here, and i think neither another contructor in parameter.
Then i started looking at Criteria Queries, especialy multiselect, Tuple, Dto, but it look like i had same kind of problems so i didn't dive deeper into it.
Finally i used a JpaRepository and it's findById() method like this
public interface BoardgameRepository extends JpaRepository<Boardgame, Long> {
}
// In a test or service method
Boardgame game = repository.findById(long id);
Then i filter the fields i need to keep through mappings in Service or Controller layer. So the front only received need datas.
But it feel a bit overkill,
Am I missing something, any part of the framework that would allow me to select only specific columns?
As you wrote, you can't use a collection as the parameter of a constructor expression. That's because the expression gets applied to each record in the result set. These records are a flat data structure. They don't contain any collections. Your database returns a new record for each element in that collection instead.
But your constructor expression fails for a different reason. You're trying to combine 2 constructor expressions, and that's not supported. You need to remove the 2nd expression and perform that operation within the constructor of your DTO.
So, your query should look like this:
SELECT new org.moto.tryingstuff.dto.BoardgameDto(bg.id, bg.name, p.name, c.name, c.short_desc) FROM Boardgame as bg <Your JOIN CLAUSES HERE>
And the constructor of your BoardgameDto like this:
public class BoardgameDto {
public BoardgameDto(Long id, String gameName, String publisherName, String categoryName, String description) {
this.id = id;
this.name = gameName;
this.publisherName = publisherName;
this.category = new Category(categoryName, description);
}
...
}
This should be straight-forward though can't get my Hibernate entities to play nice for the following scenario with a simple two table structure:
I'm attempting to get all config names and matching config values for a given currency code (and null's where not matching).. so have written a native query to retrieve the following like so:
SELECT * FROM CONFIG_NAME LEFT JOIN CONFIG_VALUE ON CONFIG_NAME.ID =
CONFIG_VALUE.CONFIG_ID AND CONFIG_VALUE.CURRENCY_CODE = '<CURRENCY_CODE>'
ORDER BY CONFIG_NAME.ID
This query doesn't seem to play nice with my Hibernate mapping as it appears to be essentially ignoring the CURRENCY_CODE clause in the join.
Essentially, for the following subset of data:
CONFIG_NAME:
CONFIG_VALUE:
There is no value defined for 'FREE_SHIPPING_ENABLED' for 'USD' so running the query above for both currency code returns as expected:
QUERY RESULTS FOR 'CAD':
QUERY RESULTS FOR 'USD':
I'm running the above query as a native query in a JpaRepository for the ConfigName entity. But what I appear to be getting is that it seems to ignore the currency_code clause in the JOIN condition. As the list of config values defined has both values for USD and CAD where they're populated. Is there an Hibernate annotation to factor this in that I'm unaware of?
It's worth bearing in mind there will only ever be ONE value defined for each config for a given currency - there's a unique constraint across CONFIG_VALUE.CONFIG_ID/CONFIG_VALUE.CURRENCY_CODE so potentially ConfigValue on the ConfigName entity would not need to be a map.
Mappings as are follows:
ConfigName - Entity
#OneToMany(mappedBy = "config")
private Set<ConfigValue> configValue;
ConfigValue - Entity
#ManyToOne(optional = false)
#JoinColumn(name="CONFIG_ID")
#Property(policy=PojomaticPolicy.NONE)
private ConfigName config;
Doesn't need to be strictly unidirectional either.. as I'm only concerned with the values from the ConfigName entity either being populated or null.
Think I'm missing something simple, so hope someone can help.
EDIT: Am querying using JpaRepository:
Am using JpaRepository to query:
#Repository
public interface ConfigNameRepository extends JpaRepository<ConfigName, Long>
{
static final String SQL_QUERY = "SELECT * FROM CONFIG_NAME "
+ "LEFT JOIN CONFIG_VALUE ON CONFIG_NAME.ID = CONFIG_VALUE.CONFIG_ID "
+ "AND CONFIG_VALUE.CURRENCY_CODE = ?1 ORDER BY CONFIG_NAME.ID";
#Query(value = SQL_QUERY, nativeQuery = true)
List<ConfigName> findConfigValuesByCurrencyCode(final String currencyCode);
}
As mentioned by #Ouney, your JPA relations are not taken in account if you use a native query.
You declared a SELECT * and List<ConfigName> (the real sql result contains ConfigName+ConfigValue). So with this query, Hibernate fetchs all the ConfigName. Then, when you try to access to the set of configValue, it fetchs all the related ConfigValue.
I think this should be better/easier to use a JPQL query instead (but you need Hibernate 5.1+) :
SELECT n, v
FROM ConfigName n
LEFT JOIN ConfigValue v
ON v.config = n AND v.currencyCode = :currencyCode
ORDER BY n.id
With this method signature :
List<Object[]> findConfigValuesByCurrencyCode(#Param("currencyCode") String currencyCode);
Where the result will be :
o[0] // ConfigName
o[1] // ConfigValue (nullable)
You may want to do this prettier with a wrapper :
SELECT new my.package.MyWrapper(n, v)
...
MyWrapper constructor :
public MyWrapper(ConfigName configName, ConfigValue configValue) {
...
}
Method signature with the wrapper :
List<MyWrapper> findConfigValuesByCurrencyCode(#Param("currencyCode") String currencyCode);
(update)
I think in this case, your query can be :
SELECT n, v // or new my.package.MyWrapper(n, v)
FROM ConfigName n
LEFT JOIN n.configValue v
WITH v.currencyCode = :currencyCode
ORDER BY n.id
Using Spring Roo (but manually creating these methods so that may be of no relevance) I am trying to display two tables in one list. I have the below method to get all people with their usernames in the class people.java. I believe this method works correctly.
public static TypedQuery<Person> findAllPeople() {
String queryStr = "SELECT o.name, b.username FROM Person o INNER JOIN o.users b";
TypedQuery<Person> query = entityManager().createQuery(queryStr, Person.class);
return query;
}
Here is the code for the controller
#RequestMapping(produces = "text/html")
public String list(#RequestParam(value = "page", required = false) Model uiModel) {
uiModel.addAttribute("people", Person.findAllPeople());
return "people/list";
}
When I try to run this through a list.jspx I get the error "Cannot create TypedQuery for query with more than one return using requested result type [com.test.peopletest.Person]; "
Does anyone know how I can return this query with all the results output properly?
You are not querying for a Person object, you're query appears to return two strings
SELECT o.name, b.username...
In order to return a Person, you should have
SELECT o FROM Person o
Just from looking at your query, it looks like you can drill down to the users/usernames once you have your person object.
It seems like you can use something like ...
SELECT o FROM Person o FETCH JOIN o.users b
when you walk the person.users all the users are loaded from memory (no DB round trip) will be done.
Or, theoretically (read untested!!), you could
SELECT o.name, b.username FROM Person o FETCH JOIN o.users b
TypedQuery<String[]> query = entityManager().createQuery(queryStr, String[]);
I'm having a problem with an HQL query
Three classes
ClassOne is my BusinessObject
public class ClassOne {
private int id;
private int status;
private Set<ClassTwo> classTwos;
+ other fields/getters/setters/constructor etc
}
ClassTwo is referenced in a set of ClassOne and is kind of the history of an object of ClassOne
public class ClassTwo {
private int id;
private int oldStatus;
private int newStatus;
private String message;
//+ getters/setters/constructor etc
}
ClassThree is my DTO/VO with just one classTwo (not the whole history)
public class ClassThree {
private int id;
private int status;
private ClassTwo classTwo;
public ClassThree(int pId, int pStatus, ClassTwo pClassTwo) {
id=pId;
status=pStatus;
classTwo=pClassTwo;
}
//+ getters/setters etc
}
Now I'd like to create an HQL query like this:
I'd like to get all objects of ClassThree with a certain status and if it exists the newest ClassTwo with a certain newStatus.
For example:
I'd like to get all the DTOs (ClassThree) of ClassOne whose status is now 1, but earlier in their history it has been 2 and I'd like to have the latest ClassTwo object which has 2 as newStatus.
SELECT new ClassThree(c1.id, c1.status, c2)
FROM ClassOne c1
LEFT JOIN c1.classtwos c2 (...)
and (...) is where I don't know what to do, I'm not even sure if it's a join / join fetch
Looked around and tried quite a lot already, but no clue. Especially with the join fetch I get some Hibernate errors like org.hibernate.QueryException: query specified join fetching, but the owner of the fetched association was not present in the select list.
Fetching the BusinessObject like that is no problem
SELECT distinct(c1)
FROM ClassOne c1
LEFT OUTER JOIN FETCH c1.classtwos c2
and I get the ClassTwos as my field.
Thanks in advance,
Jacob
P.S.: One thing might be important, ClassTwo has no reference to ClassOne!!
P.P.S : The simple SQL query which resolves my problem looks more or less like that:
select * from classone as c1 left join (select * from classtwo where newstatus = 2) c2 on c1.id=c2.id_classone whete c1.status = 1
This query works and gets all the information needed on my PostGreSQL DB, but I'd really like to have an HQL to continue to work with, especially for maintenance reasons and so on...
Update with workaround solution:
Getting the ids of all the ClassOnes with a status 1
Collection<Integer> ids = null;
ids = (Collection<Integer>) getHibernateTemplate().execute(
new HibernateCallback() {
public Object doInHibernate(Session pSession) throws HibernateException, SQLException {
return getDocumentIds(pSession, pStatus);
}
}
);
Now I get all the DTOs which have been in status 2 (thanks to Ivan) with:
Named query Document.dto.with.transfer
SELECT new DocumentDTO(d.id, d.status, histo)
FROM Document d
LEFT JOIN d.histories histo
WHERE
d.id in (:ids)
AND
(histo.id =
SELECT MAX(innerhisto.id)
FROM Document innerd
JOIN innerd.histories innerhisto
WHERE d.id = innerd.id AND innerhisto.newStatus = 21)
(in my code I use some named queries)
List<DocumentDTO> lRes = new ArrayList<DocumentDTO>();
Query lQuery = getSession(false).getNamedQuery("Document.dto.with.transfer");
lQuery.setParameterList("ids", ids);
lResultList.addAll(lQuery.list());
afterwards I remove all the IDs already found from my list ids
for (DocumentDTO dto : lResultList) {
ids.remove(dto .getId());
}
I do a third query using a second constructor for the DTO, initializing my history with a dummy-object.
Named query Document.dto.simple
SELECT new DocumentDTO(d.id, d.status)
FROM Document d
WHERE
d.id in (:ids)
(another named query)
lQuery = getSession(false).getNamedQuery("Document.dto.simple");
lQuery.setParameterList("ids", ids);
lResultList.addAll(lQuery.list());
and it's done.
To include Documents with no history we should use LEFT JOIN and test for empty collection, then we use subquery (SELECT COUNT(...)) to detect all documents that have never been in status 2. The last OR-clause is for fetching the last history with the specified status.
Here is the HQL query:
SELECT new DocumentDto(doc.id, doc.status, hist)
FROM Document doc
LEFT JOIN doc.histories hist
WHERE doc.status = :docStatus
AND (size(doc.histories) = 0
OR (SELECT COUNT(innerhist)
FROM Document innerdoc JOIN innerdoc.histories innerhist
WHERE innerdoc.id=doc.id AND innerhist.newStatus = :historyStatus) = 0
OR (hist.newStatus = :historyStatus AND hist.id =
(SELECT max(innerhist.id)
FROM Document innerdoc
JOIN innerdoc.histories innerhist
WHERE innerdoc.status = :docStatus AND innerhist.newStatus = :historyStatus))
Then call setParameter("historyStatus", 2) and setParameter("docStatus", 1) on your query to get the correct result.
That's it!
Please note, I've made an assumption, that we can use a value of id attribute of History as an indicator of the order in which objects were put in your database.