We are currently using EclipseLink as our JPA implementation for the new code. The old code did multitenancy with the solution description as this:
every customer (tenant) must have its own database - separate JDBC resources.
Information about selected tenant is carried across method invocations in ThreadLocal
TENANT variable, declared in com.aaa.Instance.java class.
JDBC resources are handled by com.aaa.TenantDataSource.
During initialization, TenantDataSource looks for DataSources registered
within java:comp/env/jdbc JNDI context and checks, if their names starts with 'abc_'.
References to DataSources are stored in internal map using tenant code from JNDI
resource name (DataSource named 'abc_xx' is registered as DataSource for 'xx' instance).
TenantDataSource examines value of Instance.TENANT variable when 'getConnection'
is invoked, for using appropriate DataSource.
TenantDataSource falls back to default DataSource if Instance.TENANT has null
value. This could be default behavior for single-tenant deployments.
Now we are using EclipseLink, I googled to see if I can implement multitenant as required. It seems EclipseLink can do:
* Single-table multi-tenancy
* table-per-tenant
* (VDP) multi-tenancy
not like Hibernate which supports database per tenant.
Could someone tell if my research is right?
Thanks
Related
I am using a multi tenant spring boot web application which reads some data from a database.
I have built schema per tenant model, implementing MultiTenantConnectionProvider and CurrentTenantIdentifierResolver to set connections based on the tenant. The tenant is resolved using a ThreadLocal variable, set in a Filter (built by extending OncePerRequestFilter).
However, I need to solve for a specific case where I do not get the tenant information at the filter. I can however, get the tenant information later while processing the request in a service, but by this time the entity manager is set (seems to be done by OpenSessionInViewFilter looking at spring sources) to use the default schema and all my queries fail because the default schema do not contain the data I need.
My question is, how do I set the entity manager to point to the tenant specific schema at service level, after the hibernate filter has already set the session? I could do whatever the filter (OpenSessionInViewFilter) is doing, something like the below:
EntityManager entityManager = entityManagerFactory.createEntityManager();
TransactionSynchronizationManager.bindResource(entityManager, new EntityManagerHolder(entityManager));
//unbind once I am done using the repositories
But I was thinking if this is the right way or if there is any other better, easier, documented way.
EntityManager entityManager = entityManagerFactory.createEntityManager();
TransactionSynchronizationManager.bindResource(entityManager, new
EntityManagerHolder(entityManager));
The above didn't work for me. However, I found a workaround - by running my task in a different thread (I just created a fixed thread pool executor and submitted my tasks) and setting the new tenant in a ThreadLocal object, I was able to achieve what I wanted. With the right CurrentTenantIdentifierResolver and MultiTenantConnectionProvider implementations, a connection to the expected tenant schema got established.
I am looking for the right way to set a run-time parameter when a database connection is open. My run-time parameter is actually a time zone, but I think this should work for an arbitrary parameter.
I've found following solutions, but I feel like none of these is the right thing.
JdbcInterceptor
Because Spring Boot has Apache Tomcat connection pool as default I can use org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.pool.JdbcInterceptor to intercept connections.
I don't think this interceptor provides a reliable way to perform a statement when connection is open. Possibility to intercept every statement provided by this interceptor is unnecessary to set a parameter that should be set only once.
initSQL property
Apache's pooled connection has a build-in ability to initialise itself by a statement provided by PoolProperties.initSQL parameter. This is executed in ConnectionPool.createConnection(...) method.
Unfortunately official support for this parameter has been removed from Spring and no equivalent functionality has been introduced since then.
I mean, I can still use a datasource builder like in an example below, and then hack the property into a connection pool, but this is not a good looking solution.
// Thank's to property binders used while creating custom datasource,
// the datasource.initSQL parameter will be passed to an underlying connection pool.
#Bean
#ConfigurationProperties(prefix = "datasource")
public DataSource dataSource() {
return DataSourceBuilder.create().build();
}
Update
I was testing this in a Spring Boot 1.x application. Above statements are no more valid for Spring Boot 2 applications, because:
Default Tomcat datasource was replaced by Hikari which supports spring.datasource.hikari.connection-init-sql property. It's documentation says Get the SQL string that will be executed on all new connections when they are created, before they are added to the pool.
It seems that similar property was reintroduced for Tomcat datasource as spring.datasource.tomcat.init-s-q-l.
ConnectionPreparer & AOP
This is not an actual solution. It is more like an inspiration. The connection preparer was a mechanism used to initialise Oracle connections in Spring Data JDBC Extensions project. This thing has its own problems and is no more maintained but possibly can be used as a base for similar solution.
If your parameter is actually a time zone, why don't you find a way to set this property.
For example if you want to store or read a DateTime with a predefined timestamp the right way to do this is to set property hibernate.jdbc.time_zone in hibernate entityManager or spring.jpa.properties.hibernate.jdbc.time_zone in application.properties
I am having spring webservice application with oracle as a database. Right now i have datasource created using weblogic server. Also using eclipse linkg JPA to do both read and write transactions(insert,Read and update). Now we want to separate dataSources for read(read) and wrtie(insert or update) transactions.
My current dataSource is as followed:
JNDI NAME : jdbc/POI_DS
URL : jdbc:oracle:thin:#localhost:1521:XE
using this, I am doing both read and write transactions.
What if i do the following:
JNDI NAME : jdbc/POI_DS_READ
URL : jdbc:oracle:thin:#localhost:1521:XE
JNDI NAME : jdbc/POI_DS_WRITE
URL : jdbc:oracle:thin:#localhost:1521:XE
I knew that using XA datasource we can define multiple dataSources. Can I do same thing without XA dataSource. Does any one tried this kind of approach.
::UPDATE::
Thank you all for your responses I have implemented following solution.
I have taken the multiple database approach. where you will define multiple transactionManagers and managerFactory. I have taken only single non xa dataSource(JNDI) that is refereed in EntityManagerFactory Bean.
you can reefer following links here which are for multiple dataSources
Multiple DataSource Approach
defining #transactional value
Also explored on transaction managers org.springframework.transaction.jta.WebLogicJtaTransactionManager and org.springframework.orm.jpa.JpaTransactionManager as well.
There is an interesting article about this in Spring docs - Dynamic DataSource Routing. There is an example there, that allows you to basically switch data sources at runtime. It should help you. I'd gladly help you more, if you have any more specific questions.
EDIT: It tells, that the actual use is to have connection to multiple databases via one configuration, but you could manage to create different configs to one database with different params, as you'd need to.
I would suggest using Database "services". Each workload, read-only and read-write, would be using its own service to access the database. That way you can use AWR reports to get statistics for each service. You can also turn off read-write when you keep read-only up and running.
Here is a pointer to the Oracle Database documentation that talks about Services:
https://docs.oracle.com/database/121/ADMIN/create.htm#CIABBCAI
If you're using spring, you should be able to accomplish this without using 2 Datasources via spring #Transactional with the readonly property set to true. The reason why I suggest this is that you seem to be concerned about the transactionality only and this seems to be catered for in the spring framework?
I'd suggest something like this for your case:
#Transactional(readOnly = true)
public class DefaultFooService implements FooService {
public Foo getFoo(String fooName) {
// do something
}
// these settings have precedence for this method
#Transactional(readOnly = false, propagation = Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW)
public void updateFoo(Foo foo) {
// do something
}
}
Using this style, you should be able to split read only services from their write counterparts, or even have read and write service methods combined. But both of these do not use 2 datasources.
Code is from the Spring Reference
I am pretty sure that you need to address the problem on the database / connection url + properties layer.
I would google around for something like read write replication.
Related to your question with JPA and transaction. You are doomed when you are using multiple Datasources. Also XA datasources are not really a solution for that. The only thing they do for you is to ensure consistency over multi data source operations. XA Transaction do only span some sort of logical transaction over two transactions (one for each datasource). From the transaction isolation point of view (as long as your not using READ_UNCOMMITED) both datasources use their own transaction. This means the read data source would not see the changes made by the write transaction.
I am planning to take my some of my values from db like.
The value will be stored like key value pair in DB(same like properties file).
Could you please let me whether spring has any support for storing key value pair in db like spring property holder?
You can implement your own by extending org.springframework.context.support.AbstractMessageSource and injecting your DAO or using your Hibernate domain class(es) to resolve the messages and then registering it as your messageSource bean in your application context.
Similar topics have been covered in other threads, but I couldn't find a definitive solution to my problem.
What we're trying to achieve is to design a web app which is able to:
read a datasource configuration at startup (an XML file containing multiple datasource definitions, which is placed outside the WAR file and it's not the application-context or hibernate configuration file)
create a session factory for each one of them (considering that each datasource is a database with a different schema)
switch at runtime to different datasources based on user input (users can select which datasource they want to use)
provide the correct dao object to manage user requests.
At the moment we have a DAO Manager object which is able to read the datasource configuration file and instantiate multiple session factories, saving them in a map. Each session factory is created with a configuration containing the proper hibernate mapping classes (different for each database schema). Moreover we have multiple DAO interfaces with their implementations, used to access "their database".
At this point we would need a way to get from the DAO Manager a specific DAO object, containing the right session factory attached, all based on the user request (basically a call from the above service containing the datasource id or a custom datasource object).
Ideally the service layer should use the DAO Manager to get a DAO object based on the datasource id (for instance), without worrying about it's actual implementation: the DAO Manager would take care of it, by creating the correct DAO object and injecting in it the right session factory, based on the datasource id.
My questions are:
Is this a good approach to follow?
How can I use Spring to dynamically inject in the DAO Manager multiple DAO implementations for each DAO interface?
Once the session factories are created, is there a way to let Spring handle them, as I would normally do with dependency injection inside the application-context.xml?
Would the 2nd Level Cache still work for each Session Factory?
Is this a good approach to follow?
It's probably the only possible approach. So, yes.
How can I use Spring to dynamically
inject in the DAO Manager multiple DAO
implementations for each DAO
interface?
Dynamically? I thought you wanted to do it at startup time. If so, just provide an accessor with a list or array:
public void setMyDaos(List<Mydao> daos){
this.daos = daos;
}
Once the session factories are
created, is there a way to let Spring
handle them, as I would normally do
with dependency injection inside the
application-context.xml?
This one's tough. I'd say you will probably have to store your sessionFactory bean in scope=session