Read the jar version for a class - java

For a webservice client I'd like to use Implementation-Title and Implementation-Version from the jar file as user-agent string. The question is how to read the jar's manifest.
This question has been asked multiple times, however the answer seems not applicable for me. (e.g. Reading my own Jar's Manifest)
The problem is that simply reading /META-INF/MANIFEST.MF almost always gives wrong results. In my case, it would almost always refer to JBoss.
The solution proposed in https://stackoverflow.com/a/1273196/4222206
is problematic for me as you'd have to hardcode the library name to stop the iteration, and then still it may mean two versions of the same library are on the classpath and you just return the first - not necessarily the right - hit.
The solution in https://stackoverflow.com/a/1273432/4222206
seems to work with jar:// urls only which completely fails within JBoss where the application classloader produces vfs:// urls.
Is there a way for code in a class to find it's own manifest?
I tried the abovementioned items which seem to run well in small applications run from the java command line but then I'd like to have a portable solution as I cannot predict where my library would be used later.
public static Manifest getManifest() {
log.debug("getManifest()");
synchronized(Version.class) {
if(manifest==null) {
try {
// this works wrongly in JBoss
//ClassLoader cl = Version.class.getProtectionDomain().getClassLoader();
//log.debug("found classloader={}", cl);
//URL manifesturl = cl.getResource("/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF");
URL jar = Version.class.getProtectionDomain().getCodeSource().getLocation();
log.debug("Class loaded from {}", jar);
URL manifesturl = null;
switch(jar.getProtocol()) {
case "file":
manifesturl = new URL(jar.toString()+"META-INF/MANIFEST.MF");
break;
default:
manifesturl = new URL(jar.toString()+"!/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF");
}
log.debug("Expecting manifest at {}", manifesturl);
manifest = new Manifest(manifesturl.openStream());
}
catch(Exception e) {
log.info("Could not read version", e);
}
}
}
The code will detect the correct jar path. I assumed by modifying the url to point to the manifest would give the required result however I get this:
Class loaded from vfs:/C:/Users/user/Documents/JavaLibs/wildfly-18.0.0.Final/bin/content/webapp.war/WEB-INF/lib/library-1.0-18.jar
Expecting manifest at vfs:/C:/Users/user/Documents/JavaLibs/wildfly-18.0.0.Final/bin/content/webapp.war/WEB-INF/lib/library-1.0-18.jar!/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
Could not read version: java.io.FileNotFoundException: C:\Users\hiran\Documents\JavaLibs\wildfly-18.0.0.Final\standalone\tmp\vfs\temp\tempfc75b13f07296e98\content-e4d5ca96cbe6b35e\WEB-INF\lib\library-1.0-18.jar!\META-INF\MANIFEST.MF (The system cannot find the path specified)
I checked that path and it seems even the first URL to the jar (obtained via Version.class.getProtectionDomain().getCodeSource().getLocation() ) was wrong already. It should have been C:\Users\user\Documents\JavaLibs\wildfly-18.0.0.Final\standalone\tmp\vfs\temp\tempfc75b13f07296e98\content-e4d5ca96cbe6b35e\WEB-INF\lib\library-1.0.18.jar.
So this could even point to a problem in Wildfly?

It seems I found some suitable solution here:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/37325538/4222206
So in the end this code can display the correct version of the jar (at least) in JBoss:
this.getClass().getPackage().getImplementationTitle();
this.getClass().getPackage().getImplementationVersion();
Hopefully I will find this answer when I search next time...

Related

Getting a specific version of an image with Jib (Maven, Docker, testcontainers)

I'm trying to understand a comment that a colleague made. We're using testcontainers to create a fixture:
import org.testcontainers.containers.GenericContainer;
import org.testcontainers.utility.DockerImageName;
public class SalesforceFixture extends GenericContainer<SalesforceFixture> {
private static final String APPLICATION_NAME = "salesforce-emulator";
public SalesforceFixture() {
// super(ImageResolver.resolve(APPLICATION_NAME));
super(DockerImageName.parse("gcr.io/ad-selfserve/salesforce-emulator:latest"));
...
}
...
The commented code is what it used to be. The next line is my colleague's suggestion. And on that line he commented:
This is the part I don't know. The [ImageResolver] gets the specific version of the emulator, rather than the latest. You need a docker-info file for that though, which jib doesn't automatically generate (but I think it can).
This is what I know or have figured so far:
SalesforceFixture is a class that will be used by other projects to write tests. It spins up a container in Docker, running a service that emulates the real service's API. It's like a local version of the service that behaves enough like the real thing that if one writes code and tests using the fixture, it should work the same in production. (This is where my knowledge ends.)
I looked into ImageResolver—it seems to be a class we wrote that searches a filesystem for something:
public static String resolve(String applicationName, File... roots) {
Stream<File> searchPaths = Arrays.stream(roots).flatMap((value) -> {
return Stream.of(new File(value, "../" + applicationName), new File(value, applicationName));
});
Optional<File> buildFile = searchPaths.flatMap((searchFile) -> {
if (searchFile.exists()) {
File imageFile = new File(searchFile + File.separator + "/target/docker/image-name");
if (imageFile.exists()) {
return Stream.of(imageFile);
}
}
return Stream.empty();
}).findAny();
InputStream build = (InputStream)buildFile.map(ImageResolver::fileStream).orElseGet(() -> {
return searchClasspath(applicationName);
});
if (build != null) {
try {
return IOUtils.toString(build, Charset.defaultCharset()).trim();
} catch (IOException var6) {
throw new RuntimeException("An exception has occurred while reading build file", var6);
}
} else {
throw new RuntimeException("Could not resolve target image for application: " + applicationName);
}
}
But I'm confused. What filesystem? Like, what is the present working directory? My local computer, wherever I ran the Java program from? Or is this from within some container? (I don't think so.) Or maybe the directory structure inside a .jar file? Or somewhere in gcr.io?
What does he mean about a "specific version number" vs. "latest"? I mean, when I build this project, whatever it built is all I have. Isn't that equivalent to "latest"? In what case would an older version of an image be present? (That's what made me think of gcr.io.)
Or, does he mean, that in the project using this project's image, one will not be able to specify a version via Maven/pom.xml—it will always spin up the latest.
Sorry this is long, just trying to "show my work." Any hints welcome. I'll keep looking.
I can't comment on specifics of your own internal implementations, but ImageResolver seems to work on your local filesystem, e.g. it looks into your target/ directory and also touches the classpath. I can imagine this code was just written for resolving an actual image name (not an image), since it also returns a String.
Regarding latest, using a latest tag for a Docker image is generally considered an anti-pattern, so likely your colleague is commenting about this. Here is a random article from the web explaining some of the issues with latest tag:
https://vsupalov.com/docker-latest-tag/
Besides, I don't understand why you ask these questions which are very specific to your project here on SO rather than asking your colleague.

How to create a custom ClassLoader for nested JAR files

I am working with a Java library that has some nested JAR files in lib package.
I have 2 issues:
I cannot see referenced types in my IDE (I am using JetBrains IntelliJ)
Of course I get class not defined at runtime
I understand that I have to create and use a custom ClassLoader, will it solve both problems?
Is this the recommended way of achieving this result?
The JAR file is an Italian government provided library and I cannot modify it as it will be periodically updated as the regulation changes.
Yes, as far as I know, the standard ClassLoaders do not support nested JARs. Which is sad, since it would be a really nice idea, but Oracle just doesn't give a damn about it. Here is a 18-year old ticket:
https://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4735639
If you are getting those JARs from somebody else, the best thing would be to contact the vendor and ask them for a delivery in standards-compatible format. From your answer I realize that this might be difficult to achieve, but I would still try to talk to them, because it's the right thing to do. I'm pretty sure that everybody else in your position has the same issue. According to industry standards, such situation would usually hint your vendor into using Maven repository for their deliverables.
If talking to your vendor fails, you can re-pack the JARs as you get them. I would recommend writing an automated script for that and making sure it gets run on each delivery. You can either put all .class files into one uber-JAR, or just move the nested JARs outside the enclosing JAR. Caveat 1: there can be more than one class with the same name, so you need to make sure to take the correct one. Caveat 2: if the JARs were signed, you will lose the signature (unless you sign them with your own).
Option 3: you can always implement your own ClassLoader to load the classes from anywhere, even from the kitchen sink.
This guy did exactly this: https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/j-onejar/index.html
The short summary is that such a ClassLoader has to perform recursive unzipping, which is a bit of a pain-in-the-ass because archives are essentially made for stream access and not for random access, but apart from that it's perfectly doable.
You can use his solution as a "wrapper loader" which will replace your main class.
As far as IntelliJ IDEA goes, I don't believe it supports this functionality out-of-the box. The best thing would be either to re-package JARs as described above and add them as separate classpath entries, or to search if anybody has written a plugin for nested JAR support.
I don't know what you want to do after load jars.
In my case, use jar dynamic loading for Servlet samples.
try{
final URLClassLoader loader = (URLClassLoader)ClassLoader.getSystemClassLoader();
final Method method = URLClassLoader.class.getDeclaredMethod("addURL", URL.class);
method.setAccessible(true);
new File(dir).listFiles(new FileFilter() {
#Override
public boolean accept(File jar) {
// load file if it is 'jar' type
if( jar.toString().toLowerCase().contains(".jar") ){
try {
method.invoke(loader, new Object[]{jar.toURI().toURL()});
XMLog.info_arr(logger, jar, " is loaded.");
JarInputStream jarFile = new JarInputStream(new FileInputStream(jar));
JarEntry jarEntry;
while (true) {
// load jar file
jarEntry = jarFile.getNextJarEntry();
if (jarEntry == null) {
break;
}
// load .class file in loaded jar file
if (jarEntry.getName().endsWith(".class")) {
Class loadedClass = Class.forName(jarEntry.getName().replaceAll("/", "\\.").replace(".class",""));
/*
* In my case, I load jar file for Servlet.
* If you want to use it for other case, then change below codes
*/
WebServlet annotaions = (WebServlet) loadedClass.getAnnotation(WebServlet.class);
// load annotation and mapping if it is Servlet
if (annotaions.urlPatterns().length > 0) {
ServletRegistration.Dynamic registration = servletContextEvent.getServletContext().addServlet(annotaions.urlPatterns().toString(), loadedClass);
registration.addMapping(annotaions.urlPatterns());
}
}
}
} catch (Exception e) {
System.err.println("Can't load classes in jar");
}
}
return false;
}
});
} catch(Exception e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e);
}
Interestingly I just solved a version of this problem for JesterJ, though I had the additional requirement of loading dependencies for the code in the jar file as well. JesterJ (as of this evening's commits!) runs from a fat jar and accepts an argument denoting a second fat jar containing the classes, dependencies and configuration for a document ingestion plan (the user's code that I need to run).
The way my solution works is I borrow the knowledge of how to load jars inside of jars from Uno-Jar (the library that produces the fat jar), and stuff my own classloader in above it to control the evaluation order of the class loaders.
The key bit from https://github.com/nsoft/jesterj/blob/jdk11/code/ingest/src/main/java/org/jesterj/ingest/Main.java looks like this:
JesterJLoader jesterJLoader;
File jarfile = new File(javaConfig);
URL planConfigJarURL;
try {
planConfigJarURL = jarfile.toURI().toURL();
} catch (MalformedURLException e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e); // boom
}
jesterJLoader = (JesterJLoader) ClassLoader.getSystemClassLoader();
ClassLoader loader;
if (isUnoJar) {
JarClassLoader jarClassLoader = new JarClassLoader(jesterJLoader, planConfigJarURL.toString());
jarClassLoader.load(null);
loader = jarClassLoader;
} else {
loader = new URLClassLoader(new URL[]{planConfigJarURL}, jesterJLoader);
}
jesterJLoader.addExtLoader(loader);
My JesterJLoader is here:
https://github.com/nsoft/jesterj/blob/jdk11/code/ingest/src/main/java/org/jesterj/ingest/utils/JesterJLoader.java
Though if you are happy to simply delegate up and rely on existing classes on the main class path (rather than loading additional dependencies from the sub-fat-jar like I'm doing) yours could be much simpler. I go to a lot of effort to allow it to check the sub-jar first rather than delegating up to the parent immediately, and then have to keep track of what's been sent to the sub-jar to avoid loops and subsequent StackOverflowError...
Also note that the line where I get the system class loader is going to NOT be what you want, I'm also monkeying with the system loader to work around impolite things that some of my dependencies are doing with class loading.
If you decide to try to check out Uno-Jar pls note that resource loading for this nested scenario may yet be wonky and things definitely won't work before https://github.com/nsoft/uno-jar/commit/cf5af42c447c22edb9bbc6bd08293f0c23db86c2
Also: recently committed thinly tested code warning :)
Disclosure: I maintain both JesterJ and Uno-Jar (a fork of One-JAR the library featured in the link supplied by jurez) and welcome any bug reports or comments or even contributions!

Java Urlclass loader cast exception [duplicate]

We learned from the release notes of Java 9 that
The application class loader is no longer an instance of java.net.URLClassLoader (an implementation detail that was never specified in previous releases). Code that assumes that ClassLoader::getSytemClassLoader returns a URLClassLoader object will need to be updated.
This breaks old code, which scans the classpath as follows:
Java <= 8
URL[] ressources = ((URLClassLoader) classLoader).getURLs();
which runs into a
java.lang.ClassCastException:
java.base/jdk.internal.loader.ClassLoaders$AppClassLoader cannot be cast to
java.base/java.net.URLClassLoader
So for Java 9+ the following workaround was proposed as a PR at the Apache Ignite Project, which works as intended given adjustments in the JVM runtime options: --add-opens java.base/jdk.internal.loader=ALL-UNNAMED. However, as mentioned in the comments below, this PR was never merged into their Master branch.
/*
* Java 9 + Bridge to obtain URLs from classpath...
*/
private static URL[] getURLs(ClassLoader classLoader) {
URL[] urls = new URL[0];
try {
//see https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/2970
Class builtinClazzLoader = Class.forName("jdk.internal.loader.BuiltinClassLoader");
if (builtinClazzLoader != null) {
Field ucpField = builtinClazzLoader.getDeclaredField("ucp");
ucpField.setAccessible(true);
Object ucpObject = ucpField.get(classLoader);
Class clazz = Class.forName("jdk.internal.loader.URLClassPath");
if (clazz != null && ucpObject != null) {
Method getURLs = clazz.getMethod("getURLs");
if (getURLs != null) {
urls = (URL[]) getURLs.invoke(ucpObject);
}
}
}
} catch (NoSuchMethodException | InvocationTargetException | NoSuchFieldException | IllegalAccessException | ClassNotFoundException e) {
logger.error("Could not obtain classpath URLs in Java 9+ - Exception was:");
logger.error(e.getLocalizedMessage(), e);
}
return urls;
}
However, this causes some severe headache due to the use of Reflection here. This is kind of an anti-pattern and is strictly criticized by the forbidden-apis maven plugin:
Forbidden method invocation: java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject#setAccessible(boolean) [Reflection usage to work around access flags fails with SecurityManagers and likely will not work anymore on runtime classes in Java 9]
Question
Is there a safe way to access the list of all resource URLs in the class- / module path, which can be accessed by the given classloader, in OpenJDK 9/10 without using sun.misc.* imports (e.g. by using Unsafe)?
UPDATE (related to the comments)
I know, that I can do
String[] pathElements = System.getProperty("java.class.path").split(System.getProperty("path.separator"));
to obtain the elements in the classpath and then parse them to URLs. However - as far as I know - this property only returns the classpath given at the time of the application launch. However, in a container environment this will be the one of the application server and might not be sufficient, e.g. then using EAR bundles.
UPDATE 2
Thank your for all your comments. I will test, if System.getProperty("java.class.path") will work for our purposes and update the question, if this fullfills our needs.
However, it seems that other projects (maybe for other reasons, e.g Apache TomEE 8) suffer the same pain related to the URLClassLoader- for this reason, I think it is a valueable question.
UPDATE 3
Finally, we did switch to classgraph and migrated our code to this library to resolve our use-case to load ML resources bundled as JARs from the classpath.
I think this is an XY problem. Accessing the URLs of all resources on the classpath is not a supported operation in Java and is not a good thing to try to do. As you have already seen in this question, you will be fighting against the framework all the way if you try to do this. There will be a million edge cases that will break your solution (custom classloaders, EE containers, etc. etc.).
Please could you expand on why you want to do this?
If you have some kind of plugin system and are looking for modules that interface with your code which may have been provided at runtime, then you should use the ServiceLoader API, i.e.:
A service provider that is packaged as a JAR file for the class path is identified by placing a provider-configuration file in the resource directory META-INF/services. The name of the provider-configuration file is the fully qualified binary name of the service. The provider-configuration file contains a list of fully qualified binary names of service providers, one per line.
For example, suppose the service provider com.example.impl.StandardCodecs is packaged in a JAR file for the class path. The JAR file will contain a provider-configuration file named:
META-INF/services/com.example.CodecFactory
that contains the line:
com.example.impl.StandardCodecs # Standard codecs
AFAIK you can parse the java.class.path system property to get the urls:
String classpath = System.getProperty("java.class.path");
String[] entries = classpath.split(File.pathSeparator);
URL[] result = new URL[entries.length];
for(int i = 0; i < entries.length; i++) {
result[i] = Paths.get(entries[i]).toAbsolutePath().toUri().toURL();
}
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(result)); // e.g. [file:/J:/WS/Oxygen-Stable/jdk10/bin/]

How to safely access the URLs of all resource files in the classpath in Java 9+?

We learned from the release notes of Java 9 that
The application class loader is no longer an instance of java.net.URLClassLoader (an implementation detail that was never specified in previous releases). Code that assumes that ClassLoader::getSytemClassLoader returns a URLClassLoader object will need to be updated.
This breaks old code, which scans the classpath as follows:
Java <= 8
URL[] ressources = ((URLClassLoader) classLoader).getURLs();
which runs into a
java.lang.ClassCastException:
java.base/jdk.internal.loader.ClassLoaders$AppClassLoader cannot be cast to
java.base/java.net.URLClassLoader
So for Java 9+ the following workaround was proposed as a PR at the Apache Ignite Project, which works as intended given adjustments in the JVM runtime options: --add-opens java.base/jdk.internal.loader=ALL-UNNAMED. However, as mentioned in the comments below, this PR was never merged into their Master branch.
/*
* Java 9 + Bridge to obtain URLs from classpath...
*/
private static URL[] getURLs(ClassLoader classLoader) {
URL[] urls = new URL[0];
try {
//see https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/2970
Class builtinClazzLoader = Class.forName("jdk.internal.loader.BuiltinClassLoader");
if (builtinClazzLoader != null) {
Field ucpField = builtinClazzLoader.getDeclaredField("ucp");
ucpField.setAccessible(true);
Object ucpObject = ucpField.get(classLoader);
Class clazz = Class.forName("jdk.internal.loader.URLClassPath");
if (clazz != null && ucpObject != null) {
Method getURLs = clazz.getMethod("getURLs");
if (getURLs != null) {
urls = (URL[]) getURLs.invoke(ucpObject);
}
}
}
} catch (NoSuchMethodException | InvocationTargetException | NoSuchFieldException | IllegalAccessException | ClassNotFoundException e) {
logger.error("Could not obtain classpath URLs in Java 9+ - Exception was:");
logger.error(e.getLocalizedMessage(), e);
}
return urls;
}
However, this causes some severe headache due to the use of Reflection here. This is kind of an anti-pattern and is strictly criticized by the forbidden-apis maven plugin:
Forbidden method invocation: java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject#setAccessible(boolean) [Reflection usage to work around access flags fails with SecurityManagers and likely will not work anymore on runtime classes in Java 9]
Question
Is there a safe way to access the list of all resource URLs in the class- / module path, which can be accessed by the given classloader, in OpenJDK 9/10 without using sun.misc.* imports (e.g. by using Unsafe)?
UPDATE (related to the comments)
I know, that I can do
String[] pathElements = System.getProperty("java.class.path").split(System.getProperty("path.separator"));
to obtain the elements in the classpath and then parse them to URLs. However - as far as I know - this property only returns the classpath given at the time of the application launch. However, in a container environment this will be the one of the application server and might not be sufficient, e.g. then using EAR bundles.
UPDATE 2
Thank your for all your comments. I will test, if System.getProperty("java.class.path") will work for our purposes and update the question, if this fullfills our needs.
However, it seems that other projects (maybe for other reasons, e.g Apache TomEE 8) suffer the same pain related to the URLClassLoader- for this reason, I think it is a valueable question.
UPDATE 3
Finally, we did switch to classgraph and migrated our code to this library to resolve our use-case to load ML resources bundled as JARs from the classpath.
I think this is an XY problem. Accessing the URLs of all resources on the classpath is not a supported operation in Java and is not a good thing to try to do. As you have already seen in this question, you will be fighting against the framework all the way if you try to do this. There will be a million edge cases that will break your solution (custom classloaders, EE containers, etc. etc.).
Please could you expand on why you want to do this?
If you have some kind of plugin system and are looking for modules that interface with your code which may have been provided at runtime, then you should use the ServiceLoader API, i.e.:
A service provider that is packaged as a JAR file for the class path is identified by placing a provider-configuration file in the resource directory META-INF/services. The name of the provider-configuration file is the fully qualified binary name of the service. The provider-configuration file contains a list of fully qualified binary names of service providers, one per line.
For example, suppose the service provider com.example.impl.StandardCodecs is packaged in a JAR file for the class path. The JAR file will contain a provider-configuration file named:
META-INF/services/com.example.CodecFactory
that contains the line:
com.example.impl.StandardCodecs # Standard codecs
AFAIK you can parse the java.class.path system property to get the urls:
String classpath = System.getProperty("java.class.path");
String[] entries = classpath.split(File.pathSeparator);
URL[] result = new URL[entries.length];
for(int i = 0; i < entries.length; i++) {
result[i] = Paths.get(entries[i]).toAbsolutePath().toUri().toURL();
}
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(result)); // e.g. [file:/J:/WS/Oxygen-Stable/jdk10/bin/]

Hadoop setting fsPermission recursively to dir using Java

Hi I have test program which loads files into hdfs at this path user/user1/data/app/type/file.gz Now this test program runs multiple times by multiple users. So I want to set file permission to rwx so that anyone can delete this file. I have the following code
fs.setPermission(new Path("user/user1/data"),new FsPermission(FsAction.ALL,FsAction.ALL,FsAction.ALL))
Above line gives drwxrwxrwx to all dirs but for the file.gz it gives permission as -rw-r--r-- why so? Because of this reason another user apart from me not able to delete this file through test program. I can delete file through test program because I have full permssion.
Please guide. I am new to Hadoop. Thanks in advance.
Using FsShell APIs solved my dir permission problem. It may be not be optimal way but since I am solving it for test code it should be fine.
FsShell shell=new FsShell(conf);
try {
shell.run(new String[]{"-chmod","-R","777","user/usr1/data"});
}
catch ( Exception e) {
LOG.error("Couldnt change the file permissions ",e);
throw new IOException(e);
}
I think Hadoop doesn't provide a java API to provide permission recursively in the version you are using. The code is actually giving permission to the dir user/user1/data and nothing else. You should better use FileSystem.listStatus(Path f) method to list down all files in the directory and use Filsystem.setPermission to them individually. It's working currently on my 2.0.5-alpha-gphd-2.1.0.0 cluster.
However from Hadoop 2.2.0 onward a new constructor
FsPermission(FsAction u, FsAction g, FsAction o, boolean sb)
is being provided. The boolean field may be the recursive flag you wanted. But the documentation(including param name) is too poor to infer something concrete.
Also have a look at Why does "hadoop fs -mkdir" fail with Permission Denied? although your sitaution may be different. (in my case dfs.permissions.enabled is still true).
I wrote this in scala but I think you could easily adapt it:
def changeUserGroup(user:String,fs:FileSystem, path: Path): Boolean ={
val changedPermission = new FsPermission(FsAction.ALL,FsAction.ALL,FsAction.ALL, true)
val fileList = fs.listFiles(path, true)
while (fileList.hasNext()) {
fs.setPermission(fileList.next().getPath(),changedPermission)
}
return true
}
You will also have to add a logic for the error handling, I am always returning true.

Categories

Resources