I am working on a multi module java project and I ended up creating a module for the shared model and services.
I have a problem because one module (using Spring Data REST) uses JPA entities and they need to be shared with other modules in the form of simple POJO (without database sync). At the moment I have duplicated code without any JPA/Hibernate annotations but this is surely not the way to go. Any clue how I can proceed please ?
JPA allows to define the mapping in XML using orm.xml. A real life exmaple can be found at here and here.
For me , though the POJO become more clean when the mapping is defined in orm.xml , it seems to require more effort when compared to annotation and also make the codes look like less readable and maintainable . I would be more pragmatic to just let them annotated with JPA annotations. If a module only need to use them as the plain POJO but not JPA entity , just not include the JPA implementation and the JPA annotation will simply be ignored.
Related
Hi my question is not technical. I want to know if hibernate 5 supports XML based entity mapping or not.
My requirement is like below :
I want a backend on Jersey-Hibernate. My front end is Android application.
I want to keep my Entity POJOs in a common project such that they will be shared by both app and server. Gson will serialize/deserialize both side.
But because android application doesn't support all java library in compilation, I don't want my common(POJO) depending on some library; In this case hibernate annotations. So I am planning to use XML based configuration.
Hibernate 5 supports both the legacy HBM mappings as well as the JPA XML mappings too. However, HBM mappings are no longer the recommended approach to map entities. As illustrated in the new User Guide, all examples make use of annotations.
There are more features provided by Hibernate-specific annotations than it is the case with HBM mappings. In Hibernate 6, it is planned to add an extension mechanism to the JPA XML mappings, therefore HBM mappings are deprecated.
Since you are migrating to Hibernate 5, it's a good idea to migrate from HBM to annotations too.
Yes, according to documentation (where authors recommended using annotations for mapping) is said that xml mapping is still possible: docs
So on - you can still us *.hbm.xml for entity mapping.
EDIT: ofc I mean *.hbm.xml
I have implemented a Data Access Layer by mean of Spring-Data's facilities. At the moment I use the Hibernate Tools (in Eclipse) to generate the annotated EJB3 Entities of the tables of my DB.
Clearly the fetched data should flow through my application layers so I need to implement the Domain (as Spring calls it) part of the application. Theoretically the Domain should be a agnostic-to-the-implementation POJO, meaning it should not contain Entity's annotations.
Keeping in mind that the Entity is unavoidable to make things work, what is the usual behaviour? Should I create a Domain class library which simply mirrors the Entity data and is only a POJO (with the help of Dozer to make the copy part) or should I use the Entity even outside the DAL (thus losing the Domain's agnostic-to-the-implementation attitude)?
Thank you in advance
Giulio
Currently I am working on a project with Spring web-service, hibernate and JAXb.
1) I have generated hibernate beans using IDE 'hibernate code generation,
2) also, I have generated the jaxb beans using maven compiler.
..
Now, my question is,
1) Is this the right approach? (to have so many beans).
2) Shall I use JAXb beans for processing into the service layer? How can I keep layers decoupled?
3) Or, do I need to create another set of beans ie. map (JAXb beans) to (new beans) to (hibernate beans)?
.
Please tell your views?
Thanks,
adi
You know, you cannot have everything fully decoupled. There will be always a layer that will know the other two layers.
Usually when I design 3 layers architecture, like:
Service Layer - the one that probably uses JAXB, exposes web services or other APIs
Business Layer - any real logic
Persistence Layer - hibernate
I allow the Business layer to know about the Service Layer (JAXB) and about the Persistence Layer (hibernate beans). But I don't allow the Service Layer and the Persistence Layer to know about each other.
Note: I'm the EclipseLink JAXB (MOXy) lead and a member of the JAXB 2 (JSR-222) expert group. EclipseLink also provides an excellent JPA implementation (open sourced from TopLink).
There are costs to maintaining multiple models. Each model you add introduces a bean-to-bean conversion that must be written, tested, and maintained.
Another approach is to use the same beans for both the JPA and JAXB bindings. For this use case it will be easier to start with domain model and add JAXB & JPA metadata to apply mappings to XML and the database. Below is example of where a single model is leveraged to create a RESTful web service:
http://blog.bdoughan.com/2010/08/creating-restful-web-service-part-35.html
Since EclipseLink provides both JAXB and JPA implementations we provide a number of extensions to make this easier:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseLink/Examples/MOXy/JPA
http://blog.bdoughan.com/2010/07/jpa-entities-to-xml-bidirectional.html
UPDATE
In response to:
Agree to what you are saying. However, using same beans will couple
the code very tightly and will be highly dependent. Change in one
layer will need changes elsewhere as well. What you say?
It all depends how you look at things. My preference for building data access services is to design and build a solid domain model. Then use JPA and JAXB to solve the impedance mismatches between object-relational and object-XML.
One Model Approach
Using one model for both JPA and JAXB means that when you make a change to the model you need to decide at that time how it will be handled for both JPA and JAXB (this can be good or bad). If you don't want every new addition to the model to affect the JAXB mapping you can leverage JAXB concepts like #XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.NONE).
http://blog.bdoughan.com/2011/06/using-jaxbs-xmlaccessortype-to.html
Two (or More) Models Approach
When you want to add a field that is mapped to both relational and XML you need to add it to two models and add the necessary conversion logic. In this case there is a cost to keeping the models de-coupled.
Hibernate can auto-generate schemas from properly annotated POJO classes. And I also know that JIBX can create a data model (set of classes) out of properly structured XML schemas. Is there a way to automaticaly generate annotated-mapped classes from an XML schema? Or is it just possible to run a tool on a set of POJO classes, and expect it to create meaningful annotations on the specified classes? So later on we can create database schemas using these classes. To annotate every class that JIBX produces takes actually more work than manually designing the database schema according to the xml schema.
The Hyperjaxb project will generate JAXB classes from an XML schema that contain JPA annotations that could be used to create a database schema.
http://java.net/projects/hyperjaxb
Nice question! We had the same problem and we ended up developing the POJO generator with Freemarker.
By the way, the requirements to these POJOs may strongly vary, so, if such tool exists, it must have quite bloated configuration.
I would like to know if there are any tools to automatically generate EJB3 Entity Beans(for JPA) from a database schema.
Thanks.
Dali supports top-down, bottom-up (this is what you're looking for), and meet-in-the-middle development approaches.
Some of IDs have such feature, for example NetBeans
OpenJPA has a tool which will generate your Entity definitions.
From the OpenJPA user manual:
OpenJPA includes a reverse mapping tool for generating persistent class definitions, complete with metadata, from an existing database schema. You do not have to use the reverse mapping tool to access an existing schema; you are free to write your classes and mappings yourself, as described in Section 3, “ Meet-in-the-Middle Mapping ”. The reverse mapping tool, however, can give you an excellent starting point from which to grow your persistent classes.
No IDE required!
-Rick
I have a solution for you i.e to create auto generate domain objects with all table relationship properly mapped in class ...Try Dal4j yes you can find it in sourceforge.net/p/dal4j/wiki/ DAL4j is a Command Line and Framework tool that can be used to reverse engineer a MySQL or SQLServer database schema into a set of JPA Entity Beans.
DAL4j can be useful for scenarios where there is an existing database schema but a technology other that JPA is used by applications to interact with the database. DAL4j can provide an easy way to migrate your code base from other technologies such as JDBC or Hibernate to JPA.
The beans generated can be 1 or two types: Simple or Framework. Simple beans are standard pojo classes managed by your application using JPA semantics. Framework generated pojos use the DAL4j framework DAO generic to simplify CRUD operations.
DAL4j provides optional hooks to allow you integrate encryption/decryption of data fields that must be encrypted in the database.
Last, DAL4j provides a set of Generic classes that can be used to simplify creation of Session Beans which perform CRUD operations using generated Entities.
I think you will find this article feasible....