How to connect from spring boot kafka project to aws MSK - java

I am trying to connect to a aws msk cluster from spring boot kafka app.
i have aws msk arn ,boot strap server config available.
How to integrate in the application?
Any examples
Can i run it from local,i mean connect to AWS MSK from local app instance
msk cluster

Connection to AWS MSK is like connecting to any Kafka cluster.
It depends on how you had setup your MSK ? (VPC - Subnet)
Check whether you can access from your local or need to be on VPN.
Also see how your brokers endpoints are configured and exposed -
Ex:
Plaintext (broker:9092)
TLS (broker:9094)
If its plaintext, its as simple as setting bootstrap.servers.
Otherwise, you need to add below mentioned properties to access your MSK cluster.
security.protocol: SSL
ssl.truststore.location: jks
ssl.truststore.password: pwd
Please let me know if you still have questions.

If you can connect from kafka-console-* commands (or simpler, kafkacat) then you should be able to connect from any other application.
I suggest you debug using those tools before running anything else.

Related

GCP GKE SMTP port 465 connection reset

I've got a Spring Boot Java application that sends emails via SMTP port 465 (non-gmail email). My configuration:
spring:
mail:
host: ssl0.ovh.net
port: 465
username: mailer#external.pl
password: mailerPassword
Locally everything works fine. When I deploy it on GCP Kubernetes cluster I've got a connection reset exception. I've read that GCP recommends some external paid providers but for my solution it's too much of a complication. Additionally I know that port 25 is disabled on GCP -> I've got port 465.
I've tried to simply add a firewall egress rule to enable traffic on every port for my VPC but it also didn't help.
What am I missing? Can anybody help my solve this puzzle?
Additional info:
My Java application is served as a simple deployment in k8s. It is exposed through LoadBalancer service on port 80.
Making a curl from given managed pod works - I receive a correct 2xx responses from various sites.
It turned out that my config map port changed from 456 to 465 but I forgot to restart the app. It works like a charm without any NAT configuration or firewall rules. Thanks for your support.

Configuring server and port for Tomcat Spring Boot application

I am deploying my Spring Boot application via uploading a JAR to Elastic Beanstalk.
I am getting the following error:
*1 connect() failed (111: Connection refused) while connecting to upstream, client: 172.31.43.15, server: , request: "GET / HTTP/1.1", upstream: "http://127.0.0.1:8080/", host: "172.31.42.2"
and
I do not understand which configurations are missing. Here it says:
The Tomcat platform uses nginx (the default) or Apache HTTP Server as the reverse proxy to relay requests from port 80 on the instance to your Tomcat web container listening on port 8080. Elastic Beanstalk provides a default proxy configuration that you can extend or override completely with your own configuration.
I feel like this should give me some hint, but I still don't get what exactly I need to change.
Similar issue: 502 bad gateway Elastic Beanstalk Spring Boot
From the suggestions there I tried:
defining server.port=8080 in my application.properties
adding PORT or SERVER_PORT environment properties directly in EB
changing Java to version 8 in pom.xml
changing load balancers ports here in EB to 8080:
I might be changing things to a wrong port, or maybe in an unfortunate combination - but nothing seems to work for me.
I never had to do such things, so for me it's all super unclear and I would be thankful for all kinds of help.

Not authorized to connect (5) - MQTT google cloud IOT

I tried connecting to Google cloud IOT MQTT Brocker. I am getting Not authorized to connect (5) as Exception in Java client.
The device_id and other details are correct.The public key set for the device in the cloud iot.
using the example code for the below repo.
https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/java-docs-samples/tree/master/iot/api-client/mqtt_example
Another point to look at is the configured GCP IoT Core cloud region.
Had similar problem with this. I configured GCP IoT Core cloud region as "asia-east1" while on the client application side, its default cloud region is "us-central1".
If the cloud region is not configured correctly, the python/NodeJS IoT Core examples (mqtt, http, end2end) would return errors such as
Creating JWT using RS256 from private key file rsa_private.pem
Publishing message 1/100: 'test/test_1-payload-1'
('on_connect', 'Connection Refused: not authorised.')
('on_disconnect', '5: The connection was refused.')
To solve this, just pass the correct cloud region parameter to the command --cloud_region=asia-east1
Example:
python cloudiot_mqtt_example.py --project_id=project_id --registry_id=registry_id --device_id=device_id --private_key_file=rsa_private.pem --algorithm=RS256 --cloud_region=asia-east1
Couple things to check:
1) Are you sure the format of the SSL key matches what you registered? RS256 vs. RS256 with X509, etc?
2) Did you setup the TLS on the mqtt client and grab the Google root certificate?
2a) >=TLS 1.2?
3) Verify the JWT has the correct 'aud' value (project-id, not project-name), and that it's got a proper issue and expiry time?

Configuring Spring Cloud Config Server and Spring Cloud Vault for production

I am attempting to setup a Spring Cloud Config Server backed by Spring Cloud Vault secret management. I'm relatively new to Spring but I have tried following instructions and examples here:-
http://cloud.spring.io/spring-cloud-vault-config/
Everything works fine provided you follow the default settings like http, localhost and 8200 for the vault endpoint and tls_disable = 1 to switch off SSL. However these are not practical settings for any real environment and there are few examples anywhere that help with this. Can anyone help with a working example?
I have Successfully set up vault with TLS enable. I have successfully set up a config server that connects using a self signed cert. I can even inject a secret value into the config server and expose it via #Value and #PostConstruct.
All of this is working. However when I try to leverage Spring Conig endpoints to access vault, I get the following:-
{
"timestamp": 1486413850574,
"status": 500,
"error": "Internal Server Error",
"exception": "org.springframework.web.client.ResourceAccessException",
"message": "I/O error on GET request for \"http://127.0.0.1:8200/v1/secret/myapp\": Connection refused: connect; nested exception is java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect",
"path": "/myapp/default"
}
Config server is using default values even though I have set overrides in the bootstrap.yml.:-
server:
port: 8888
spring:
profiles:
active: vault
spring.cloud.vault:
host: myhost.mydomain.com
port: 8200
scheme: https
authentication: TOKEN
token: 0f1887c3-d8a8-befd-a5a2-01e4e066c50
ssl:
trust-store: configTrustStore.jks
trust-store-password: changeit
As you can see it should be pointing to myhost.mydomain.com not
127.0.0.1 and it should be using https, not http as the protocol scheme.
I'm not sure why it uses these defaults for config server endpoints but uses correct settings during spring cloud vault startup. I'm using all the latest stable builds of Spring Dalsten.M1 and Spring Cloud Vault 1.0.0.M1. I realize these are milestone releases. I've also tried Camden and Brixton combos with no luck. I can supply code if required.
Any help greatly appreciated.
As I mention in my response to spensergibb, I have had some success in resolving this myself. Based on his comments I will clarify my intent as it will help with a common understanding of the issue. I am attempting to do two things:-
Stand up a configuration server that uses Vault as a backend, (as opposed to the default GIT backend) and expose the Vault API to client applications (over TLS) so that they can retrieve their own secrets. I do not want all my client applications to connect to Vault directly. I want them to get their configuration from a config server by having the config server connect to Vault. Until last night I was unable to achieve this goal, unless I set everything up as default with TLS disabled and using loopback address, port 8200 for the Vault software etc. Obviously defaults are not practical for any of our deployed environments. I will mention that the link posted by spencergibb does help me understand why this was not working but the subtlety of the reason is why I missed it before. Read on for my explanation.
I want the config server to configure itself from Vault directly. That is, connect to Vault via Spring Cloud Vault Config. This worked right away for me as described in the documentation. However this goal is somewhat trivial as I do not have a real use case at this time. But I wanted to understand if it could be done since I saw no real reason why not and it seemed like good first steps in integrating Vault.
The distinction between these two capabilities helped me understand that the problem derives from the fact that Spring Cloud Config Server and Spring Cloud Vault appear to be using two different beans to inject the Vault configuration properties. Spring Cloud Config Server uses VaultEnvironmentRepository annotated with #ConfigurationProperties("spring.cloud.config.server.vault") and Spring Cloud Vault uses VaultProperties annotated with #ConfigurationProperties("spring.cloud.vault").
This caused me to add two different configs to my bootstrap yml.
server:
port: 8888
spring:
profiles:
active: local, vault
application:
name: quoting-domain-configuration-server
cloud:
vault:
host: VDDP03P-49A26EF.lm.lmig.com
port: 8200
scheme: https
authentication: TOKEN
token: 0f1997c3-d8a8-befd-a5a2-01e4e066c50a
ssl:
trust-store: configTrustStore.jks
trust-store-password: changeit
config:
server:
vault:
host: VDDP03P-49A26EF.lm.lmig.com
port: 8200
scheme: https
authentication: TOKEN
token: 0f1997c3-d8a8-befd-a5a2-01e4e066c50a
Note the same config details. Just different yml paths. This is the subtle point I missed given that I started by getting goal number 1 to work first and assuming the same config would work for both goals. (Note: Token and password are contrived).
This almost worked except for an SSL handshake error. As you can see there are no SSL attributes set on the spring.cloud.config.server.vault path. The VaultProperties bean does not support them. I was not sure how to deal with this (perhaps another non-vault specific bean that I could not find). My solution was to simply force the cert configuration myself like this:-
#SpringBootApplication
#EnableConfigServer
public class Application
{
public static void main(String[] args)
{
System.setProperty("javax.net.ssl.trustStore",
Application.class.getResource("/configTrustStore.jks").getFile());
System.setProperty("javax.net.ssl.trustStorePassword", "changeit");
SpringApplication.run(Application.class, args);
}
}
This SSL solution is pretty ugly. I'm sure there must be a better way to do this part. So I am open to other suggestions. However once I completed all above steps everything now works.
Thanks for your write up. I was struggling to get this working. I was able to get a client service to connect to a Spring Cloud Config server and a Vault server but I was not able to get a Spring Cloud Config server to connect to a Vault server.
I even struggled after copying your configuration into my Spring Cloud Config server. While I eventually got it working with your configuration I was able to pare it down quite a bit. The key was that the token does not belong in the Spring Cloud Config server. It belongs in the client.
I was trying http://localhost:8888/{application}/default in the browser but got the following:
Whitelabel Error Page
This application has no explicit mapping for /error, so you are seeing this as a fallback.
Thu May 11 14:21:31 EDT 2017
There was an unexpected error (type=Bad Request, status=400).
Missing required header: X-Config-Token
I used PostMan to send the request with a X-Config-Token header containing the Vault token and it worked.
Here is my final config.
server:
port: ${PORT:8888}
management:
context-path: /manage
security:
enabled: true
spring:
profiles:
active: git,vault
application:
name: config-server
cloud:
config:
server:
git:
order: 1
uri: file:///temp/config-server/config
vault:
order: 0
host: localhost
port: 8200
scheme: http
So it looks like you need to add the token to the client. Maybe using spring.cloud.config.token.
instead
#SpringBootApplication
#EnableConfigServer
public class Application
{
public static void main(String[] args)
{
System.setProperty("javax.net.ssl.trustStore",
Application.class.getResource("/configTrustStore.jks").getFile());
System.setProperty("javax.net.ssl.trustStorePassword", "changeit");
SpringApplication.run(Application.class, args);
}
}
write
bootstrap yml ->
javax.net.ssl.trustStore: /configTrustStore.jks
javax.net.ssl.trustStorePassword: changeit
Although I am answering late. But I was able to configure spring cloud config server to use Vault as backend with CERT authentication via certificates. And moreover you do not require to send X-Config-Token in GET request. So your config-server GET requests will work in the same way it works with GITHUB as backend.As my implementation will get the token on the fly and change the incoming request by appending header. I would recommend to check all the steps in my tutorial and github repo.
Here is my tutorial : https://medium.com/#java.developer.raman/enable-spring-config-server-to-use-cert-authentication-with-vault-as-back-end-ff84e1ef2de7?sk=45a26d7f1277437d91a5cff3d5997287
And GitHub repository: https://github.com/java-developer-raman/config-server-vault-backend

Haproxy config for bitbucket server

I am using haproxy for port forwarding to Bitbucket server ssh. Here's haproxy config:
frontend sshd
bind *:7999
default_backend ssh
timeout client 1h
backend ssh
mode tcp
server localhost-bitbucket-ssh 127.0.0.1:7999 check port 7999
However if i do:
sudo haproxy -f haproxy.cfg
i am getting the following error:
[ALERT] 305/201411 (4168) : http frontend 'sshd' (haproxy.cfg:38) tries to use incompatible tcp backend 'ssh' (haproxy.cfg:43) as its default backend (see 'mode').
[ALERT] 305/201411 (4168) : Fatal errors found in configuration.
But i was referring to an official atlassian guide: https://confluence.atlassian.com/bitbucketserver/setting-up-ssh-port-forwarding-776640364.html are they wrong?
Also if i start haproxy before bitbucket server, bitbucket server cannot start on port 7999. I am totally confused. I have paid for that software and now i need to figure it out myself how to configure it for more than 2 days...
UPDATE
It was UFW as Thomj mentioned. But for what purposes do i need haproxy? If i can't bind Bitbucket's ssh to 22 port? I don't like to set port number.
The frontend configuration is defaulting to a mode of http which can't use a backend that's configured for tcp. Try adding 'mode tcp' to the frontend:
frontend sshd
bind *:7999
default_backend ssh
timeout client 1h
mode tcp

Categories

Resources