Im trying to copy the exrcise about halfway down the page on this link:
https://d2l.ai/chapter_recurrent-neural-networks/sequence.html
The exercise uses a sine function to create 1000 data points between -1 through 1 and use a recurrent network to approximate the function.
Below is the code I used. I'm going back to study more why this isn't working as it doesn't make much sense to me now when I was easily able to use a feed forward network to approximate this function.
//get data
ArrayList<DataSet> list = new ArrayList();
DataSet dss = DataSetFetch.getDataSet(Constants.DataTypes.math, "sine", 20, 500, 0, 0);
DataSet dsMain = dss.copy();
if (!dss.isEmpty()){
list.add(dss);
}
if (list.isEmpty()){
return;
}
//format dataset
list = DataSetFormatter.formatReccurnent(list, 0);
//get network
int history = 10;
ArrayList<LayerDescription> ldlist = new ArrayList<>();
LayerDescription l = new LayerDescription(1,history, Activation.RELU);
ldlist.add(l);
LayerDescription ll = new LayerDescription(history, 1, Activation.IDENTITY, LossFunctions.LossFunction.MSE);
ldlist.add(ll);
ListenerDescription ld = new ListenerDescription(20, true, false);
MultiLayerNetwork network = Reccurent.getLstm(ldlist, 123, WeightInit.XAVIER, new RmsProp(), ld);
//train network
final List<DataSet> lister = list.get(0).asList();
DataSetIterator iter = new ListDataSetIterator<>(lister, 50);
network.fit(iter, 50);
network.rnnClearPreviousState();
//test network
ArrayList<DataSet> resList = new ArrayList<>();
DataSet result = new DataSet();
INDArray arr = Nd4j.zeros(lister.size()+1);
INDArray holder;
if (list.size() > 1){
//test on training data
System.err.println("oops");
}else{
//test on original or scaled data
for (int i = 0; i < lister.size(); i++) {
holder = network.rnnTimeStep(lister.get(i).getFeatures());
arr.putScalar(i,holder.getFloat(0));
}
}
//add originaldata
resList.add(dsMain);
//result
result.setFeatures(dsMain.getFeatures());
result.setLabels(arr);
resList.add(result);
//display
DisplayData.plot2DScatterGraph(resList);
Can you explain the code I would need for a 1 in 10 hidden and 1 out lstm network to approximate a sine function?
Im not using any normalization as function is already -1:1 and Im using the Y input as the feature and the following Y Input as the label to train the network.
You notice i am building a class that allows for easier construction of nets and I have tried throwing many changes at the problem but I am sick of guessing.
Here are some examples of my results. Blue is data red is result
This is one of those times were you go from wondering why was this not working to how in the hell were my original results were as good as they were.
My failing was not understanding the documentation clearly and also not understanding BPTT.
With feed forward networks each iteration is stored as a row and each input as a column. An example is [dataset.size, network inputs.size]
However with recurrent input its reversed with each row being a an input and each column an iteration in time necessary to activate the state of the lstm chain of events. At minimum my input needed to be [0, networkinputs.size, dataset.size] But could also be [dataset.size, networkinputs.size, statelength.size]
In my previous example I was training the network with data in this format [dataset.size, networkinputs.size, 1]. So from my low resolution understanding the lstm network should never have worked at all but somehow produced at least something.
There may have also been some issue with converting the dataset to a list as I also changed how I feed the network but but I think the bulk of the issue was a data structure issue.
Below are my new results
Hard to tell what is going on without seeing the full code. For a start I don't see an RnnOutputLayer specified. You could take a look this which shows you how to build an RNN in DL4J.
If your RNN setup is correct this could be a tuning issue. You can find more on tuning here. Adam is probably a better choice for an updater than RMSProp. And tanh probably is a good choice for the activation for your output layer since it's range is (-1,1). Other things to check/tweak - learning rate, number of epochs, set up of your data (like are you trying to predict to far out?).
Related
I need to make a graph with data which come from arduino.
Data is sended as String and I want to draw graph with parts of the data
For example,
Arduino sents "1234567890", Graph will be drawn by "12345"
Here is my codes
ArrayList<Integer> colors = new ArrayList<>();
ArrayList<String> test1 = new ArrayList<>();
ArrayList<Entry> value1 = new ArrayList<>();
test1.add("123456909090");
test1.add("234567909090");
test1.add("334567909090");
test1.add("434567909090");
for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++){
String a = test1.get(i);
a.substring(0,6);
float b = Float.parseFloat(a);
value1.add(new Entry(i,b));
}
ScatterDataSet set1 = new ScatterDataSet(value1);
and there is an exception raised
FATAL EXCEPTION:java.lang.ArithmeticException: divide by zero
I have never used devide.
How can i solve it?
And If there is a better way, let me know.
Thanks for reading.
As far as I see, when you resive data, before use data you should check them with any control mechanism like if ... etc. it will help you. In my limited programming knowledge zero division makes problem ( any number / 0 == is problem) if you have to do this operations I prefer change the value like 0.0001 or 0.000001 or you can't use the data which was sended and wait , while you waiting you can use old data. It depens you and your project....
For the past week or so, I have been trying to get a neural network to function using RGB images, but no matter what I do it seems to only be predicting one class.
I have read all the links I could find with people encountering this problem and experimented with a lot of different things, but it always ends up predicting only one out of the two output classes. I have checked the batches going in to the model, I have increased the size of the dataset, I have increased the original pixel size(28*28) to 56*56, increased epochs, done a lot of model tuning and I have even tried a simple non-convolutional neural network as well as dumbing down my own CNN model, yet it changes nothing.
I have also checked into the structure of how the data is passed in for the training set(specifically imageRecordReader), but this input structure(in terms of folder structure and how the data is passed into the training set) works perfectly when given gray-scale images(as it originally was created with a 99% accuracy on the MNIST dataset).
Some context: I use the following folder names as my labels, i.e folder(0), folder(1) for both training and testing data as there will only be two output classes. The training set contains 320 images of class 0 and 240 images of class 1, whereas the testing set is made up of 79 and 80 images respectively.
Code below:
private static final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(MnistClassifier.class);
private static final String basePath = System.getProperty("java.io.tmpdir") + "/ISIC-Images";
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
int height = 56;
int width = 56;
int channels = 3; // RGB Images
int outputNum = 2; // 2 digit classification
int batchSize = 1;
int nEpochs = 1;
int iterations = 1;
int seed = 1234;
Random randNumGen = new Random(seed);
// vectorization of training data
File trainData = new File(basePath + "/Training");
FileSplit trainSplit = new FileSplit(trainData, NativeImageLoader.ALLOWED_FORMATS, randNumGen);
ParentPathLabelGenerator labelMaker = new ParentPathLabelGenerator(); // parent path as the image label
ImageRecordReader trainRR = new ImageRecordReader(height, width, channels, labelMaker);
trainRR.initialize(trainSplit);
DataSetIterator trainIter = new RecordReaderDataSetIterator(trainRR, batchSize, 1, outputNum);
// vectorization of testing data
File testData = new File(basePath + "/Testing");
FileSplit testSplit = new FileSplit(testData, NativeImageLoader.ALLOWED_FORMATS, randNumGen);
ImageRecordReader testRR = new ImageRecordReader(height, width, channels, labelMaker);
testRR.initialize(testSplit);
DataSetIterator testIter = new RecordReaderDataSetIterator(testRR, batchSize, 1, outputNum);
log.info("Network configuration and training...");
Map<Integer, Double> lrSchedule = new HashMap<>();
lrSchedule.put(0, 0.06); // iteration #, learning rate
lrSchedule.put(200, 0.05);
lrSchedule.put(600, 0.028);
lrSchedule.put(800, 0.0060);
lrSchedule.put(1000, 0.001);
MultiLayerConfiguration conf = new NeuralNetConfiguration.Builder()
.seed(seed)
.l2(0.0008)
.updater(new Nesterovs(new MapSchedule(ScheduleType.ITERATION, lrSchedule)))
.optimizationAlgo(OptimizationAlgorithm.STOCHASTIC_GRADIENT_DESCENT)
.weightInit(WeightInit.XAVIER)
.list()
.layer(0, new ConvolutionLayer.Builder(5, 5)
.nIn(channels)
.stride(1, 1)
.nOut(20)
.activation(Activation.IDENTITY)
.build())
.layer(1, new SubsamplingLayer.Builder(SubsamplingLayer.PoolingType.MAX)
.kernelSize(2, 2)
.stride(2, 2)
.build())
.layer(2, new ConvolutionLayer.Builder(5, 5)
.stride(1, 1)
.nOut(50)
.activation(Activation.IDENTITY)
.build())
.layer(3, new SubsamplingLayer.Builder(SubsamplingLayer.PoolingType.MAX)
.kernelSize(2, 2)
.stride(2, 2)
.build())
.layer(4, new DenseLayer.Builder().activation(Activation.RELU)
.nOut(500).build())
.layer(5, new OutputLayer.Builder(LossFunctions.LossFunction.SQUARED_LOSS)
.nOut(outputNum)
.activation(Activation.SOFTMAX)
.build())
.setInputType(InputType.convolutionalFlat(56, 56, 3)) // InputType.convolutional for normal image
.backprop(true).pretrain(false).build();
MultiLayerNetwork net = new MultiLayerNetwork(conf);
net.init();
net.setListeners(new ScoreIterationListener(10));
log.debug("Total num of params: {}", net.numParams());
// evaluation while training (the score should go down)
for (int i = 0; i < nEpochs; i++) {
net.fit(trainIter);
log.info("Completed epoch {}", i);
Evaluation eval = net.evaluate(testIter);
log.info(eval.stats());
trainIter.reset();
testIter.reset();
}
ModelSerializer.writeModel(net, new File(basePath + "/Isic.model.zip"), true);
}
Output from running the model:
Odd iteration scores
Evaluation metrics
Any insight would be much appreciated.
I would suggest changing the activation functions in Layer 1 and 2 to a non-linear function. You may try with Relu and Tanh functions.
You may refer to this Documentaion for a list of available activation functions.
Identity on CNNs almost never makes sense 99% of the time. Stick to RELU if you can.
I would instead shift your efforts towards gradient normalization or interspersing drop out layers. Almost every time a CNN doesn't learn, it's usually due to lack of reguarlization.
Also: Never use squared loss with softmax. It never works. Stick to negative log likelihood.
I've never seen squared loss used with softmax in practice.
You can try l2 and l1 regularization (or both: This is called elastic net regularization)
It seems using an ADAM optimizer gave some promising results as well as increasing the batch size(I now have thousands of images) otherwise the net requires an absurd amount of epochs(at least 50+) in order to begin learning.
Thank you for all responses regardless.
I have a bunch of sensors and I really just want to reconstruct the input.
So what I want is this:
after I have trained my model I will pass in my feature matrix
get the reconstructed feature matrix back
I want to investigate which sensor values are completely different from the reconstructed value
Therefore I thought a RBM will be the right choice and since I am used to Java, I have tried to use deeplearning4j. But I got stuck very early. If you run the following code, I am facing 2 problems.
The result is far away from a correct prediction, most of them are simply [1.00,1.00,1.00].
I would expect to get back 4 values (which is the number of inputs expected to be reconstructed)
So what do I have to tune to get a) a better result and b) get the reconstructed inputs back?
public static void main(String[] args) {
// Customizing params
Nd4j.MAX_SLICES_TO_PRINT = -1;
Nd4j.MAX_ELEMENTS_PER_SLICE = -1;
Nd4j.ENFORCE_NUMERICAL_STABILITY = true;
final int numRows = 4;
final int numColumns = 1;
int outputNum = 3;
int numSamples = 150;
int batchSize = 150;
int iterations = 100;
int seed = 123;
int listenerFreq = iterations/5;
DataSetIterator iter = new IrisDataSetIterator(batchSize, numSamples);
// Loads data into generator and format consumable for NN
DataSet iris = iter.next();
iris.normalize();
//iris.scale();
System.out.println(iris.getFeatureMatrix());
NeuralNetConfiguration conf = new NeuralNetConfiguration.Builder()
// Gaussian for visible; Rectified for hidden
// Set contrastive divergence to 1
.layer(new RBM.Builder()
.nIn(numRows * numColumns) // Input nodes
.nOut(outputNum) // Output nodes
.activation("tanh") // Activation function type
.weightInit(WeightInit.XAVIER) // Weight initialization
.lossFunction(LossFunctions.LossFunction.XENT)
.updater(Updater.NESTEROVS)
.build())
.seed(seed) // Locks in weight initialization for tuning
.iterations(iterations)
.learningRate(1e-1f) // Backprop step size
.momentum(0.5) // Speed of modifying learning rate
.optimizationAlgo(OptimizationAlgorithm.STOCHASTIC_GRADIENT_DESCENT) // ^^ Calculates gradients
.build();
Layer model = LayerFactories.getFactory(conf.getLayer()).create(conf);
model.setListeners(Arrays.asList((IterationListener) new ScoreIterationListener(listenerFreq)));
model.fit(iris.getFeatureMatrix());
System.out.println(model.activate(iris.getFeatureMatrix(), false));
}
For b), when you call activate(), you get a list of "nlayers" arrays. Every array in the list is the activation for one layer. The array itself is composed of rows: 1 row per input vector; each column contains the activation for every neuron in this layer and this observation (input).
Once all layers have been activated with some input, you can get the reconstruction with the RBM.propDown() method.
As for a), I'm afraid it's very tricky to train correctly an RBM.
So you really want to play with every parameter, and more importantly,
monitor during training various metrics that will give you some hint about whether it's training correctly or not. Personally, I like to plot:
The score() on the training corpus, which is the reconstruction error after every gradient update; check that it decreases.
The score() on another development corpus: useful to be warned when overfitting occurs;
The norm of the parameter vector: it has a large impact on the score
Both activation maps (= XY rectangular plot of the activated neurons of one layer over the corpus), just after initialization and after N steps: this helps detecting unreliable training (e.g.: when all is black/white, when a large part of all neurons are never activated, etc.)
I've searched all over stackoverflow and google for these kind predicitons but found nothing for IBk or KStar or LWL. I would need one instance predictions from any of these three clasifiers.I am doing this in Android studio.
I've found ways of getting predictions from other classifiers like these:
for J48: from Here
double[] prediction=j48.distributionForInstance(test.get(s1));
//output predictions
for(int i=0; i<prediction.length; i=i+1)
{
System.out.println("Probability of class "+
test.classAttribute().value(i)+
" : "+Double.toString(prediction[i]));
}
For Bayesnet: from Here
Evaluation eTest = new Evaluation(trainingInstance);
eTest.evaluateModelOnce(bayes_Classifier, testInstance);
For NaiveBayes: from Here
NaiveBayes naiveBayes = new NaiveBayes();
naiveBayes.buildClassifier(train);
// this does the trick
double label = naiveBayes.classifyInstance(test.instance(0));
test.instance(0).setClassValue(label);
System.out.println(test.instance(0).stringValue(4));
but I couldn't use them because my classifiers don't have the same methods...or I can't find a way
My code:
//I skipped code till here because its too much,
//but Data is definetly inside *instances* (I checked with debuger)
instances.setClassIndex(instances.numAttributes()-1);
//was trying the sam with KStar, LWL, AdditiveRegression, RandomCommittee)
IBk ibk = new IBk();
//I want predicitons for this instance. For the third attribute3
Instance testInst = new DenseInstance(3);
testInst.setValue(attribute1, 3);
testInst.setValue(attribute2, 16);
testInst.setValue(attribute3, 0);
//I was hopping for some simple way like this: (but this returns nothing)
double rez =0;
String var="";
try{
ibk.buildClassifier(instances);
rez = ibk.classifyInstance(testInst);
}
catch(Exception ex)
{
Log.e("Error","ex.getMessage()");
}
}
Log.w("GIMME RESULTS:",rez);
Even other classifiers would be okay like AdditiveRegression, Bagging, RandomCommitte and DecisionTable they make good prediction in Weka GUI, but I need predictions in Java.... :)
found it by testing all its methods..
ibk.buildClassifier(dataSet);
rez2 = ibk.distributionForInstance(i2); //distrib
int result = (int)rez3[0];
//it goes tha same with Kstar
Came to realize that classifiers in weka normaly run with discrete data (equal steps from min to max). And my data is not all discrete. Ibk and Kstar are able to use distributed data thats why I can use only these two with my data.
I am new to machine learning and Encog overall, but I would have expected Encog to at least give consistent results from the examples to help me learn about Encog more easily. For me Encoge will give different directional results each time it is run.
Can anyone help me better understand why this is? Below is some modified sample code that's being used.
Direction correct:10/25
Direction correct:8/25
Direction correct:6/25
...
public class MainPredict {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Co.println("--> Main Predict");
final MarketLoader marketLoader = new YahooFinanceLoader();
final MarketMLDataSet marketDataSet = new MarketMLDataSet(marketLoader, Config.INPUT_WINDOW, Config.PREDICT_WINDOW);
final MarketDataDescription marketDataDescription = new MarketDataDescription(Config.TICKER, MarketDataType.adjusted_close, true, true);
marketDataSet.addDescription(marketDataDescription);
Calendar end = new GregorianCalendar();// end today
Calendar begin = (Calendar) end.clone();// begin 30 days ago
begin.add(Calendar.DATE, -60);
end.add(Calendar.DATE, -60);
begin.add(Calendar.YEAR, -2);
marketDataSet.load(begin.getTime(), end.getTime());
marketDataSet.generate();
BasicNetwork basicNetwork = EncogUtility.simpleFeedForward(marketDataSet.getInputSize(), Config.HIDDEN1_COUNT, Config.HIDDEN2_COUNT, marketDataSet.getIdealSize(), true);
ResilientPropagation resilientPropagation = new ResilientPropagation(basicNetwork, marketDataSet);
resilientPropagation.setRPROPType(RPROPType.iRPROPp);
// EncogUtility.trainToError(resilientPropagation, 0.00008);
EncogUtility.trainConsole(basicNetwork, marketDataSet, 3);
System.out.println("Final Error: " + basicNetwork.calculateError(marketDataSet));
MarketEvaluate.evaluate(basicNetwork);
Encog.getInstance().shutdown();
}
}
It's pretty common for neural network weights to be initialized to random values, which pretty much trashes determinacy right up front. So to have repeatable results, you'd need to save a particular instance of your network whose random initial weights you liked, and then load that into other runs as a starting point.
In this case, basicNetwork would be the one to save (perhaps with createPersistor() to serialize to XML), then reload each time you later wanted to reset it, rather than constructing a fresh one from scratch.
Another test you could try is use basicNetwork.clone(), and then run your experiment on both of them and see how the results turn out.
Links:
http://www.heatonresearch.com/javadoc/encog-2.3/org/encog/neural/networks/BasicNetwork.html#clone%28%29
http://www.heatonresearch.com/javadoc/encog-2.3/org/encog/persist/Persistor.html