I have a question about how to conceptually create an Observer and link it to another class: I currently have a class called Simulation that is supposed to create TransactionCreated objects and publish them as events. Another class called TransactionReceiver is supposed to be an Observer of every event that is published by the Simulation class and work with them.
The main method is included in the Simulation class and starts by creating an event in a static context and publishing it which works. My question would be how I am supposed to connect the TransactionReceiver as an Observer and let it subscribe to those events by receiving them in a method and work with those received objects? Do I need to create another class that would include the main method and create a Simulation and TransactionReceiver object that are then linked together as Observable and Observer? How would that look like?
And if I would extend that system with several different classes would they all have to be linked together through one class that connects Observers and Observables?
Your app should only have one main method.
Conceptually, this should be where you do the initial setup of Simulation and TransactionReceiver, so perhaps you could move it to a separate class to help you visualise how things should work. You could try something like below:
class Application {
private Simulation simulation;
private TransactionReceiver transactionReceiver;
public Application() {
simulation = new Simulation(/* params here*/);
transactionReceiver = new TransactionReceiver(/*params here*/);
}
public void go() {
simulation.simulate().subscribe(transactionCreated -> transactionReceiver.doSomething(transactionCreated);
}
public static final main(String[] args) {
Application application = new Application();
application.go();
}
}
Eventually as you get more fluent you could think about adding a dependency-injection framework like Guice or Dagger.
This will help you with managing the dependencies of the classes that you need to use throughout your application.
So you would end up with a more simple Application - it would just set up the DI-framework and then you can use the classes how you want to.
UPDATE:
If you want to communicate between two different classes, you will need to use methods:
class Simulation {
public Observable<TransactionCreated> simulate() {
// use PublishSubject or whatever
}
}
Related
Service interface:
public interface UserInterface {
void present();
void onStart();
void onStop();
}
I have two implementations: TextUserInterface and GraphicalUserInterface.
How can I identify the one I want to use when I launch my program? Source
private static void main(String[] args) {
ServiceLoader<UserInterface> uiLoader = ServiceLoader.load(UserInterface.class);
UserInterface ui = uiLoader.? //what to do to identify the one I want to use?
}
I was thinking of introducing an enum with the type of UI, so I could just iterate through all services and pick the one I'd like to, but isn't this approach just a misuse of services? In this case when I want to pick GraphicalUserInterface I could just skip the ServiceLoader part and just instantiate one. The only difference I see is fact that without services, I'd have to require the GraphicalUserInterface module, which "kind of" breaks the encapsulation.
I don't actually think that it would be a misuse of it. As a matter of fact, what you get from ServiceLoader.load(...) method is an Iteratable object, and if you need for a specific service, you will have to iterate through all the available instances.
The idea of the enum is not that bad, but I suggest that you take advantage of the Java stream and filter for the instance you need. For example, you might have something like that:
enum UserInterfaceType {
TEXT_UI, GRAPH_UI;
}
public interface UserInterface {
UserInterfaceType getTypeUI();
...
}
// In your main method
ServiceLoader<UserInterface> uiLoader = ServiceLoader.load(UserInterface.class);
UserInterface ui = uiLoader.steam()
.filter(p -> p->getTypeUI() == <TypeUIyouNeed> )
.findFirst()
.get();
That is open to a number of possibilities, for example you can put this is a separated method, which receives in input a UserInterfaceType value, and it can retrieve the service implementation based on the type enum value you passed.
As I said, that is just the main idea, but definitely you are not doing any misuse of the ServiceLoader.
I am new to Spring Boot and just implemented a normal Spring Boot application with HTTP where endpoints receive data and put in a database. Now I want some data to put in both databases and a class with data structure. Since there will be continuous operations with this data I need to operate with it as a separate process.
#Service
public class RulesManager {
private HashMap<Integer, Rule> rules = new HashMap<Integer, Rule>();
public void addRule(Rule rule) {
// Add rule to the database
}
// should be running in the background
public void updateRules(){
// Continuous check of rules and update of this.rules HashMap
}
}
#SpringBootApplication
public class RulesApplication {
public static void main(String... args) {
SpringApplication.run(RulesApplication.class, args);
// How do I call RulesManager.updateRules() to run in the background and make changes to rules hashmap???
}
}
So while listening to HTTP requests I want my application to run background process which will never stop and repeat itself. I am not sure how to call that class from the main RulesApplication class so that both http requests and background process were able to make changes to this.rules HashMap. Will be grateful for any tip or advice.
If you are just looking to start a always on process when app starts ( even better when RuleManager gets initialized ), then you should simply create a new thread in the constructor of RuleManager :
methodCalledByConstructor()
{
new Thread(()->{
// loop start
// access and check the hashmap
// do what is necessary
// sleep for a sometime
// loop end
}).start();
}
But if the work is only required when some event occurs, then use observer pattern for more elegant solution.
Try to define a new Thread for example "LocalRulesHandling" and annotate it with #Component and inside this thread add your implementations regarding the rules hashmap.
In the RulesApplication class try to get the spring context and the get the execution thread bean and then start this thread.
ApplicationContext conttext = SpringApplication.run(RulesApplication.class, args);
LocalRulesHandling handling = context.getBean(LocalRulesHandling.class);
handling.start();
I am trying to build my first android app. I have multiple Activities and I am using a Handler and an AssetFileDescriptor in order to play a sound file.
My problem is, how can I pass these objects around? I have one Activity that starts a timer via the handler, and another which stops the timer via the handler. Should I pass these objects around between Activities, or is there another way?
I am not used to Java, but I was wondering if I could make a config static class or something that creates all of these objects, and then each one of my Activities would just access these objects from this static config class. However, this has its own problems, since in order to call the method getAssets(), I cannot use a static class ("Cannot make a static reference to a non-static method.")
Any ideas?
This simplest solution would be to store objects in the Application class, here is a SO answer on the topic Using the Android Application class to persist data
Another more advanced option would be to use Dagger. It is a Dependency Injection framework that can do a lot of cool stuff but is somewhat difficult to get running (atleast took me some time to get working).
Dagger enables defining a Singleton class like this:
#Singleton
public class MySingletonObject {
#Inject
MySingletonObject() {
...
}
}
And whenever you need it in your app:
public class SomeActivityOrFragment {
#Inject MySingletonObject mySingletonObject;
...
mySingletonObject.start();
}
public class SomeOtherActivityOrFragment {
#Inject MySingletonObject mySingletonObject;
...
mySingletonObject.stop();
}
I'm managing the History in my project via Places.
What I do is this:
implement PlaceRequestHandler on top level (for example AppController),
register it -> eventBus.addHandler(PlaceRequestEvent.getType(), this);
implement method "onPlaceRequest" ,where i do project navigation.
I'm using GWT presenter and every presenter in my project overrides the onPlaceRequest method.
Why do I need this, when every request is handled from the top level "onPlaceRequest" method?
I will give an example:
public class AppController implements Presenter, PlaceRequestHandler
...........
public void bind()
{
eventBus.addHandler(PlaceRequestEvent.getType(), this);
...
}
public void onPlaceRequest(PlaceRequestEvent event)
{
// here is the project navigation tree
}
and let's take one presenter
public class SomePresenter extends Presenter<SomePresenter.Display>
{
... here some methods are overriden and
#Override
protected void onPlaceRequest(PlaceRequest request)
{
// what should I do here?
}
}
What is the idea, and how I'm supposed to use it?
Instead of making all of your presenters extend PlaceRequestHandler and managing those events yourself, you can attach a PlaceHistoryHandler and a PlaceController to your event bus. Together, they manage the browser's history and your places for you. When you ask your PlaceController to goTo() a different place, it will stop your current activity and use a mapping of places to activities (your presenters) to choose which one to start next.
To use this technique, you need to have your presenters extend AbstractActivity. Try following through Google's tutorial about it in GWT's documentation called GWT Development with Activities and Places.
I am thinking about implementing a user interface according to the MVP pattern using GWT, but have doubts about how to proceed.
These are (some of) my goals:
the presenter knows nothing about the UI technology (i.e. uses nothing from com.google.*)
the view knows nothing about the presenter (not sure yet if I'd like it to be model-agnostic, yet)
the model knows nothing of the view or the presenter (...obviously)
I would place an interface between the view and the presenter and use the Observer pattern to decouple the two: the view generates events and the presenter gets notified.
What confuses me is that java.util.Observer and java.util.Observable are not supported in GWT. This suggests that what I'm doing is not the recommended way to do it, as far as GWT is concerned, which leads me to my questions: what is the recommended way to implement MVP using GWT, specifically with the above goals in mind? How would you do it?
Program Structure
This is how I did it. The Eventbus lets presenters (extending the abstract class Subscriber) subscribe to events belonging to different modules in my app. Each module corresponds to a component in my system, and each module has an event type, a presenter, a handler, a view and a model.
A presenter subscribing to all the events of type CONSOLE will receive all the events triggered from that module. For a more fine-grained approach you can always let presenters subscribe to specific events, such as NewLineAddedEvent or something like that, but for me I found that dealing with it on a module level was good enough.
If you want you could make the call to the presenter's rescue methods asynchronous, but so far I've found little need to do so myself. I suppose it depends on what your exact needs are. This is my EventBus:
public class EventBus implements EventHandler
{
private final static EventBus INSTANCE = new EventBus();
private HashMap<Module, ArrayList<Subscriber>> subscribers;
private EventBus()
{
subscribers = new HashMap<Module, ArrayList<Subscriber>>();
}
public static EventBus get() { return INSTANCE; }
public void fire(ScEvent event)
{
if (subscribers.containsKey(event.getKey()))
for (Subscriber s : subscribers.get(event.getKey()))
s.rescue(event);
}
public void subscribe(Subscriber subscriber, Module[] keys)
{
for (Module m : keys)
subscribe(subscriber, m);
}
public void subscribe(Subscriber subscriber, Module key)
{
if (subscribers.containsKey(key))
subscribers.get(key).add(subscriber);
else
{
ArrayList<Subscriber> subs = new ArrayList<Subscriber>();
subs.add(subscriber);
subscribers.put(key, subs);
}
}
public void unsubscribe(Subscriber subscriber, Module key)
{
if (subscribers.containsKey(key))
subscribers.get(key).remove(subscriber);
}
}
Handlers are attached to components, and are responsible for transforming native GWT events into events specialised for my system. The handler below deals with ClickEvents simply by wrapping them in a customised event and firing them on the EventBus for the subscribers to deal with. In some cases it makes sense for the handlers to perform extra checks before firing the event, or sometimes even before deciding weather or not to send the event. The action in the handler is given when the handler is added to the graphical component.
public class AppHandler extends ScHandler
{
public AppHandler(Action action) { super(action); }
#Override
public void onClick(ClickEvent event)
{
EventBus.get().fire(new AppEvent(action));
}
Action is an enumeration expressing possible ways of data manipulation in my system. Each event is initialised with an Action. The action is used by presenters to determine how to update their view. An event with the action ADD might make a presenter add a new button to a menu, or a new row to a grid.
public enum Action
{
ADD,
REMOVE,
OPEN,
CLOSE,
SAVE,
DISPLAY,
UPDATE
}
The event that's get fired by the handler looks a bit like this. Notice how the event defines an interface for it's consumers, which will assure that you don't forget to implement the correct rescue methods.
public class AppEvent extends ScEvent {
public interface AppEventConsumer
{
void rescue(AppEvent e);
}
private static final Module KEY = Module.APP;
private Action action;
public AppEvent(Action action) { this.action = action; }
The presenter subscribes to events belonging to diffrent modules, and then rescues them when they're fired. I also let each presenter define an interface for it's view, which means that the presenter won't ever have to know anything about the actual graphcal components.
public class AppPresenter extends Subscriber implements AppEventConsumer,
ConsoleEventConsumer
{
public interface Display
{
public void openDrawer(String text);
public void closeDrawer();
}
private Display display;
public AppPresenter(Display display)
{
this.display = display;
EventBus.get().subscribe(this, new Module[]{Module.APP, Module.CONSOLE});
}
#Override
public void rescue(ScEvent e)
{
if (e instanceof AppEvent)
rescue((AppEvent) e);
else if (e instanceof ConsoleEvent)
rescue((ConsoleEvent) e);
}
}
Each view is given an instance of a HandlerFactory that is responsible for creating the correct type of handler for each view. Each factory is instantiated with a Module, that it uses to create handlers of the correct type.
public ScHandler create(Action action)
{
switch (module)
{
case CONSOLE :
return new ConsoleHandler(action);
The view is now free to add handlers of different kind to it's components without having to know about the exact implementation details. In this example, all the view needs to know is that the addButton button should be linked to some behaviour corresponding to the action ADD. What this behaviour is will be decided by the presenters that catch the event.
public class AppView implements Display
public AppView(HandlerFactory factory)
{
ToolStripButton addButton = new ToolStripButton();
addButton.addClickHandler(factory.create(Action.ADD));
/* More interfacy stuff */
}
public void openDrawer(String text) { /*Some implementation*/ }
public void closeDrawer() { /*Some implementation*/ }
Example
Consider a simplified Eclipse where you have a class hierarchy to the left, a text area for code on the right, and a menu bar on top. These three would be three different views with three different presenters and therefore they'd make up three different modules. Now, it's entirely possible that the text area will need to change in accordance to changes in the class hierarchy, and therefore it makes sense for the text area presenter to subscribe not only to events being fired from within the text area, but also to events being fired from the class hierarchy. I can imagine something like this (for each module there will be a set of classes - one handler, one event type, one presenter, one model and one view):
public enum Module
{
MENU,
TEXT_AREA,
CLASS_HIERARCHY
}
Now consider we want our views to update properly upon deletion of a class file from the hierarchy view. This should result in the following changes to the gui:
The class file should be removed from the class hierarchy
If the class file is opened, and therefore visible in the text area, it should be closed.
Two presenters, the one controlling the tree view and the one controlling the text view, would both subscribe to events fired from the CLASS_HIERARCHY module. If the action of the event is REMOVE, both preseneters could take the appropriate action, as described above. The presenter controlling the hierarchy would presumably also send a message to the server, making sure that the deleted file was actually deleted. This set-up allows modules to react to events in other modules simply by listening to events fired from the event bus. There is very little coupling going on, and swapping out views, presenters or handlers is completely painless.
I achieved something on these lines for our project. I wanted a event-driven mechanism (think of PropertyChangeSupport and PropertyChangeListener of standard jdk lib) which were missing. I believe there is an extension module and decided to go ahead with my own. You can google it for propertychangesupport gwt and use it or go with my approach.
My approach involved logic centred around MessageHandler and GWTEvent. These serve the same purpose as that of PropertyChangeListener and PropertyChangeEvent respectively. I had to customize them for reasons explained later. My design involved a MessageExchange, MessageSender and MessageListener. The exchange acts as a broadcast service dispatching all events to all listeners. Each sender fires events that are listened by the Exchange and the exchange the fires the events again. Each listener listens to the exchange and can decide for themselves (to process or not to process) based on the event.
Unfortunately MessageHandlers in GWT suffer from a problem: "While a event is being consumed, no new handlers can be hooked". Reason given in the GWT form: The backing iterator holding the handlers cannot be concurrently modified by another thread. I had to rewrite custom implementation of the GWT classes. That is the basic idea.
I would've posted the code, but I am on my way to airport right now, will try to post the code as soon as I can make time.
Edit1:
Not yet able to get the actual code, got hold of some power-point slides I was working on for design documentation and created a blog entry.
Posting a link to my blog article: GXT-GWT App
Edit2:
Finally some code soup.
Posting 1
Posting 2
Posting 3
have a look at: http://www.gwtproject.org/javadoc/latest/com/google/gwt/event/shared/EventBus.html
(which outdates http://www.gwtproject.org/javadoc/latest/com/google/web/bindery/event/shared/EventBus.html)
It should run fine with GWT as I'll try right now myself.