I am using the following regular expression without restricting any character length:
var test = /^(a-z|A-Z|0-9)*[^$%^&*;:,<>?()\""\']*$/ // Works fine
In the above when I am trying to restrict the characters length to 15 as below, it throws an error.
var test = /^(a-z|A-Z|0-9)*[^$%^&*;:,<>?()\""\']*${1,15}/ //**Uncaught SyntaxError: Invalid regular expression**
How can I make the above regular expression work with the characters limit to 15?
You cannot apply quantifiers to anchors. Instead, to restrict the length of the input string, use a lookahead anchored at the beginning:
// ECMAScript (JavaScript, C++)
^(?=.{1,15}$)[a-zA-Z0-9]*[^$%^&*;:,<>?()\"']*$
^^^^^^^^^^^
// Or, in flavors other than ECMAScript and Python
\A(?=.{1,15}\z)[a-zA-Z0-9]*[^$%^&*;:,<>?()\"']*\z
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
// Or, in Python
\A(?=.{1,15}\Z)[a-zA-Z0-9]*[^$%^&*;:,<>?()\"']*\Z
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Also, I assume you wanted to match 0 or more letters or digits with (a-z|A-Z|0-9)*. It should look like [a-zA-Z0-9]* (i.e. use a character class here).
Why not use a limiting quantifier, like {1,15}, at the end?
Quantifiers are only applied to the subpattern to the left, be it a group or a character class, or a literal symbol. Thus, ^[a-zA-Z0-9]*[^$%^&*;:,<>?()\"']{1,15}$ will effectively restrict the length of the second character class [^$%^&*;:,<>?()\"'] to 1 to 15 characters. The ^(?:[a-zA-Z0-9]*[^$%^&*;:,<>?()\"']*){1,15}$ will "restrict" the sequence of 2 subpatterns of unlimited length (as the * (and +, too) can match unlimited number of characters) to 1 to 15 times, and we still do not restrict the length of the whole input string.
How does the lookahead restriction work?
The (?=.{1,15}$) / (?=.{1,15}\z) / (?=.{1,15}\Z) positive lookahead appears right after ^/\A (note in Ruby, \A is the only anchor that matches only start of the whole string) start-of-string anchor. It is a zero-width assertion that only returns true or false after checking if its subpattern matches the subsequent characters. So, this lookahead tries to match any 1 to 15 (due to the limiting quantifier {1,15}) characters but a newline right at the end of the string (due to the $/\z/\Z anchor). If we remove the $ / \z / \Z anchor from the lookahead, the lookahead will only require the string to contain 1 to 15 characters, but the total string length can be any.
If the input string can contain a newline sequence, you should use [\s\S] portable any-character regex construct (it will work in JS and other common regex flavors):
// ECMAScript (JavaScript, C++)
^(?=[\s\S]{1,15}$)[a-zA-Z0-9]*[^$%^&*;:,<>?()\"']*$
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
// Or, in flavors other than ECMAScript and Python
\A(?=[\s\S]{1,15}\z)[a-zA-Z0-9]*[^$%^&*;:,<>?()\"']*\z
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
// Or, in Python
\A(?=[\s\S]{1,15}\Z)[a-zA-Z0-9]*[^$%^&*;:,<>?()\"']*\Z
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Related
I have a string. The end is different, such as index.php?test=1&list=UL or index.php?list=UL&more=1. The one thing I'm looking for is &list=.
How can I match it, whether it's in the middle of the string or it's at the end? So far I've got [&|\?]list=.*?([&|$]), but the ([&|$]) part doesn't actually work; I'm trying to use that to match either & or the end of the string, but the end of the string part doesn't work, so this pattern matches the second example but not the first.
Use:
/(&|\?)list=.*?(&|$)/
Note that when you use a bracket expression, every character within it (with some exceptions) is going to be interpreted literally. In other words, [&|$] matches the characters &, |, and $.
In short
Any zero-width assertions inside [...] lose their meaning of a zero-width assertion. [\b] does not match a word boundary (it matches a backspace, or, in POSIX, \ or b), [$] matches a literal $ char, [^] is either an error or, as in ECMAScript regex flavor, any char. Same with \z, \Z, \A anchors.
You may solve the problem using any of the below patterns:
[&?]list=([^&]*)
[&?]list=(.*?)(?=&|$)
[&?]list=(.*?)(?![^&])
If you need to check for the "absolute", unambiguous string end anchor, you need to remember that is various regex flavors, it is expressed with different constructs:
[&?]list=(.*?)(?=&|$) - OK for ECMA regex (JavaScript, default C++ `std::regex`)
[&?]list=(.*?)(?=&|\z) - OK for .NET, Go, Onigmo (Ruby), Perl, PCRE (PHP, base R), Boost, ICU (R `stringr`), Java/Andorid
[&?]list=(.*?)(?=&|\Z) - OK for Python
Matching between a char sequence and a single char or end of string (current scenario)
The .*?([YOUR_SINGLE_CHAR_DELIMITER(S)]|$) pattern (suggested by João Silva) is rather inefficient since the regex engine checks for the patterns that appear to the right of the lazy dot pattern first, and only if they do not match does it "expand" the lazy dot pattern.
In these cases it is recommended to use negated character class (or bracket expression in the POSIX talk):
[&?]list=([^&]*)
See demo. Details
[&?] - a positive character class matching either & or ? (note the relationships between chars/char ranges in a character class are OR relationships)
list= - a substring, char sequence
([^&]*) - Capturing group #1: zero or more (*) chars other than & ([^&]), as many as possible
Checking for the trailing single char delimiter presence without returning it or end of string
Most regex flavors (including JavaScript beginning with ECMAScript 2018) support lookarounds, constructs that only return true or false if there patterns match or not. They are crucial in case consecutive matches that may start and end with the same char are expected (see the original pattern, it may match a string starting and ending with &). Although it is not expected in a query string, it is a common scenario.
In that case, you can use two approaches:
A positive lookahead with an alternation containing positive character class: (?=[SINGLE_CHAR_DELIMITER(S)]|$)
A negative lookahead with just a negative character class: (?![^SINGLE_CHAR_DELIMITER(S)])
The negative lookahead solution is a bit more efficient because it does not contain an alternation group that adds complexity to matching procedure. The OP solution would look like
[&?]list=(.*?)(?=&|$)
or
[&?]list=(.*?)(?![^&])
See this regex demo and another one here.
Certainly, in case the trailing delimiters are multichar sequences, only a positive lookahead solution will work since [^yes] does not negate a sequence of chars, but the chars inside the class (i.e. [^yes] matches any char but y, e and s).
I am trying to use some regex to validate some input inside of Java code. I have been successful in implementing "basic" regex, but this one seems to be out of my scope of knowledge. I am working through RegEgg tutorials to learn more.
Here are the conditions that need to be validated:
Field will always have 8 characters
Can be all spaces
Or
Valid characters: a-zA-Z0-9 -!& or a space
Cannot begin with a space
If one of the special characters is used, it can be the only one used
Legal: "B-123---" "AB&& &" "A!!!!!!!"
Illegal: "B-123!!!" "AB&& -" "A-&! "
Has to have at least one alphanumeric character (Can't be all special characters ie: "!!!!!!!!"
This was my regex before additional validations were added:
^(\s{8}|[A-Za-z\-\!\&][ A-Za-z0-9\-\!\&]{7})$"
Then the additional validations for now allowing multiple of the special characters, and I am a bit stuck. I have been successful in using a positive lookahead, but stuck when trying to use the positive lookbehind. (I think the data before the lookbehind was consumed), but I am speculating as I am a neophyte with this part of regex.
using the or construct (a|b) is a large part of this, and you've begun applying it, so that's a good start.
You've made the rule that it can't start with a digit; nothing in the spec says this. also, - inside [] has special meaning, so escape it, or make sure it is first or last, because then you don't have to. That gets us to:
^(\s{8}|[A-Za-z0-9-!& -]{8})$
next up is the rule that it has to be all the same special character if used at all. Given that there are only 3 special characters, could be easier to just explicitly list them all:
^(\s{8}|[A-Za-z0-9 -]{8}|[A-Za-z0-9 !]{8}|[A-Za-z0-9 &]{8})$
Next up: Can't start with a space, and can't be all-special. Confirming the negative (that it ISNT all-special characters) gets complicated; lookahead seems like a better plan here. This:
^ is regexp-ese for: "Start of line". Note that this doesn't 'consume' a character. 1 is regexpese for 'only the exact character '1' will match here, nothinge else', but as it matches, it also 'consumes' that character, whereas ^ doesn't do that. 'start of line' is not a concept that can be consumed.
This notion of 'a match may fail, but if it succeeds, nothing is consumed' isn't limited to ^ and $; you can write your own:
(?=abc) will match if abc would match at this position, but does not consume it. Thus, the regexp ^(=abc)ab.d$ would match the input string abcd and nothing else. This is called positive lookahead. (it 'looks ahead' and matches if it sees the regular expression in the parens, failing if it does not).
(?!abc) is negative lookahead. It matches if it DOESNT see the thing in the parens. (?!abc)a.c will match the input adc but not the input abc.
(?<=abc) is positive lookbehind. It matches if the pattern you provide would match such that the match ends at the position you find yourself.
(?<!abc) is negative lookbehind.
Note that lookahead and lookbehind can be somewhat limited, in that they may not allow variable length patterns. But, fortunately, your requirements make it easy to limit ourselves to fixed size patterns here. Thus, we can introduce: (?![&!-]{8}) as a non-consuming unit in our regexp that will fail the match if we have all-8 special characters.
We can use this trick to fail on starting space too: (?! ) is all we need for that one.
Let's replace \s which is whitespace with just which is the space character (the problem description says 'space', not 'whitespace').
Putting it all together:
^( {8}|(?! )(?![&!-]{8})([A-Za-z0-9 -]{8}|[A-Za-z0-9 !]{8}|[A-Za-z0-9 &]{8}))$
Thats:
8 spaces, or...
not a space, and not all-8 special character, then,
any of the valid chars, any amount of spaces, and any amount of one of the 3 allowed special symbols, as long as we have precisely 8 of them...
.. OR the same thing as #3 but with the second of the three special symbols
.. OR with the third of the three.
Plug em in at regex101 along with your various examples of 'legal' and 'not legal' and you can play around with it some more.
NB: You can also use backreferences to attempt to solve the 'only one special character is allowed' part of this, but attempting to tackle the 'not all special characters' part seems quite unwieldy if you don't get to use (negative) lookahead.
Its a matter of asserting the right conditions at the start of the regex.
^(?=[ ]*$|(?![ ]))(?!.*([!&-]).*(?!\1)[!&-])[a-zA-Z0-9 !&-]{8}$
see -> https://regex101.com/r/tN5y4P/1
Some discussion:
^ # Begin of text
(?= # Assert, cannot start with a space
[ ]* $ # unless it's all spaces
| (?! [ ] )
)
(?! # Assert, not mixed special chars
.*
( [!&-] ) # (1)
.*
(?! \1 )
[!&-]
)
[a-zA-Z0-9 !&-]{8} # Consume 8 valid characters from within this class
$ # End of text
This question already has answers here:
Java RegEx meta character (.) and ordinary dot?
(9 answers)
Closed 2 years ago.
Upon validation using regular expression in Java, I need to return true for height having values :
80cm
80.2cm
80.25cm
My regular expression is as follows :
(\d)(\d?)(.?)(\d?)(\d?)(c)(m)
However if I pass in height as 71-80cm , the regular expression returns true too.
What change should I make to the regular expression to return false when height is 71-80cm ?
. matches any character, so you need to have \\. or just \. depending on the source. Check out: Java RegEx meta character (.) and ordinary dot?
Furthermore, additional changes need to be made such that e.g. 8025cm is not accepted if that is what you want.
I assume that the OP wishes to match substrings of the form
abcm
where:
"cm" is a literal;
"cm" is not followed by a letter;
"b" is the string representation of a non-negative float or integer (e.g., "80" or "80.25", but not "08" or ".25"); and
"a" is a character other than "-", "+" and ".", unless "b" is at the beginning of the string, in which case "a" is an empty string.
If my assumptions are correct you could use the following regex to match b in abcm:
(?<![-+.\d])[1-9]\d*(?:\.\d+)?cm(?![a-zA-Z])
Demo
The regex engine performs the following operations:
(?<! # begin negative lookbehind
[-+.\d] # match '-', '+', '.' or a digit
) # end negative lookbehind
[1-9] # match digit other than zero
\d* # match 0+ digits
(?:\.\d+) # match '.' followed by 1+ digits in a non-cap grp
? # optionally match non-cap grp
cm # match 'cm'
(?![a-zA-Z]) # match a letter in a negative lookahead
If my assumptions about what is required are not correct it may be evident how my answer could be adjusted appropriately.
Ok, let's take your expression and clean it up a little. You don't need all the capturing groups (..), since all you're interested in is validating the complete string. For that reason you should also enclose the expression in line beginning ^ and line end $ anchors, so your expression can't match inside a larger string. Lastly, you can group the period and trailing digits together (?:), since you won't get one without the other as per your example data. Which gets us:
^\d\d?(?:\.\d\d?)?cm$
See regex demo.
Then in Java, that check could look like this:
boolean foundMatch = subjectString.matches("^\\d\\d?(?:\\.\\d\\d?)?cm$");
I need to allow alphanumeric characters , "?","." , "/" and "-" in the given string. But I need to restrict consecutive - only.
For example:
www.google.com/flights-usa should be valid
www.google.com/flights--usa should be invalid
currently I'm using ^[a-zA-Z0-9\\/\\.\\?\\_\\-]+$.
Please suggest me how to restrict consecutive - only.
You may use grouping with quantifiers:
^[a-zA-Z0-9/.?_]+(?:-[a-zA-Z0-9/.?_]+)*$
See the regex demo
Details:
^ - start of string
[a-zA-Z0-9/.?_]+ - 1 or more characters from the set defined in the character class (can be replaced with [\w/.?]+)
(?:-[a-zA-Z0-9/.?_]+)* - zero or more sequences ((?:...)*) of:
- - hyphen
[a-zA-Z0-9/.?_]+ - see above
$ - end of string.
Or use a negative lookahead:
^(?!.*--)[a-zA-Z0-9/.?_-]+$
^^^^^^^^^
See the demo here
Details:
^ - start of string
(?!.*--) - a negative lookahead that will fail the match once the regex engine finds a -- substring after any 0+ chars other than a newline
[a-zA-Z0-9/.?_-]+ - 1 or more chars from the set defined in the character class
$ - end of string.
Note that [a-zA-Z0-9_] = \w if you do not use the Pattern.UNICODE_CHARACTER_CLASS flag. So, the first would look like "^[\\w/.?]+(?:-[\\w/.?]+)*$" and the second as "^(?!.*--)[\\w/.?-]+$".
One approach is to restrict multiple dashes with negative look-behind on a dash, like this:
^(?:[a-zA-Z0-9\/\.\?\_]|(?<!-)-)+$
The right side of the |, i.e. (?<!-)-, means "a dash, unless preceded by another dash".
Demo.
I'm not sure of the efficiency of this, but I believe this should work.
^([a-zA-Z0-9\/\.\?\_]|\-([^\-]|$))+$
For each character, this regex checks if it can match [a-zA-Z0-9\/\.\?\_], which is everything you included in your regex except the hyphen. If that does not match, it instead tries to match \-([^\-]|$), which matches a hyphen not followed by another hyphen, or a hyphen at the end of the string.
Here's a demo.
I need to check that a file contains some amounts that match a specific format:
between 1 and 15 characters (numbers or ",")
may contains at most one "," separator for decimals
must at least have one number before the separator
this amount is supposed to be in the middle of a string, bounded by alphabetical characters (but we have to exclude the malformed files).
I currently have this:
\d{1,15}(,\d{1,14})?
But it does not match with the requirement as I might catch up to 30 characters here.
Unfortunately, for some reasons that are too long to explain here, I cannot simply pick a substring or use any other java call. The match has to be in a single, java-compatible, regular expression.
^(?=.{1,15}$)\d+(,\d+)?$
^ start of the string
(?=.{1,15}$) positive lookahead to make sure that the total length of string is between 1 and 15
\d+ one or more digit(s)
(,\d+)? optionally followed by a comma and more digits
$ end of the string (not really required as we already checked for it in the lookahead).
You might have to escape backslashes for Java: ^(?=.{1,15}$)\\d+(,\\d+)?$
update: If you're looking for this in the middle of another string, use word boundaries \b instead of string boundaries (^ and $).
\b(?=[\d,]{1,15}\b)\d+(,\d+)?\b
For java:
"\\b(?=[\\d,]{1,15}\\b)\\d+(,\\d+)?\\b"
More readable version:
"\\b(?=[0-9,]{1,15}\\b)[0-9]+(,[0-9]+)?\\b"