My goal is to convert a JSON string field to the right class using Jackson.
I have the following class:
public class AnimalRecord {
private String id;
private String source;
#JsonTypeInfo(use = JsonTypeInfo.Id.NAME, property = "source", include = JsonTypeInfo.As.EXTERNAL_PROPERTY)
#JsonSubTypes(value = {
#JsonSubTypes.Type(value = CatProbeMetadata.class, name
= "catProbeMetadata"),
#JsonSubTypes.Type(value = DogProbeMetadata.class, name = "dogProbeMetadata"),
})
private AnimalMetadata metadata;
In addition to this class, I have a DB table where I store records of AnimalRecord (AnimalRecord = row). The AnimalMetadata is a different JSON string based on the source of this class. Each source has it's own metadata and class definition. In this example, CatProbeMetadata class will be the output when doing de-serialization from the string when the source is "cat".
The issue is that I'm not sure what to do when reading the rows from the DB. I have the following method:
private class ActiveProbeWrapper implements RowMapper<ActiveProbeRecord> {
#Override
public ActiveProbeRecord mapRow(ResultSet rs, int rowNum) throws SQLException {
String id= rs.getString("id");
String source= rs.getString("source");
Animalmetadata metadata = // NOT SURE WHAT TO DO HERE;
ActiveProbeRecord record = new ActiveProbeRecord(deviceId,segment, source, metadata);
return record;
}
}
I need to convert the string in the DB to the right class instance, but my metadata string will NOT include the source (since it's outside the metadata JSON).
The question: Will I have to add the "source" field to the metadata itself or is there any better way of doing this that I missed?
Updated example:
Example of DB rows:
id | source | metadata
1 | catSource | {"catName": "Mewy"}
2 | dogSource | {"dogName": "Barky"}
When I read the rows from the DB I want to use the source field to de-serialize metadata to the right class - String --> CatMetadata
Jackson 2.12 introduced a
new feature for type deduction :
#JsonTypeInfo(use= JsonTypeInfo.Id.DEDUCTION)
#JsonSubTypes({
#JsonSubTypes.Type(DogMetadata.class),
#JsonSubTypes.Type(CatMetadata.class) })
public abstract class AnimalMetadata {
}
and therefore:
AnimalMetadata metadata = om.readValue("{\"catName\": \"Paws\"}", AnimalMetadata.class);
assertThat(metadata).isInstanceOf(CatMetadata.class);
The downside is that it might break if Jackson can't figure out which subtype to use based solely on properties names.
With this solution, optional json fields (like an absent catName property), or too similar subtypes may rise problems. #Sergei solutions doesn't have these issues (also, his solution makes use of the source field, which was your requirement).
On a side note, if you're working with SpringBoot, upgrading jackson is a matter of adding this property in pom.xml
<jackson-bom.version>2.12.3</jackson-bom.version>
The property attribute of the #JsonTypeInfo annotation marks the property that defines the entity subclass, and include = JsonTypeInfo.As.EXTERNAL_PROPERTY means that this property should be included not inside the metadata value, but on an upper level, as a property of the AnimalRecord class. This will only work if you parse the string as the AnimalRecord class.
This property should contain the value catProbeMetadata for cats and dogProbeMetadata of dogs, otherwise Jackson won't know how to parse the contents of your source field. The property may be also included inside the source string itself, but then you have to use include = JsonTypeInfo.As.PROPERTY.
Approach 1 - type is inside the metadata
#JsonTypeInfo(use = JsonTypeInfo.Id.NAME, property = "type")
#JsonSubTypes({
#JsonSubTypes.Type(value = CatProbeMetadata.class, name = "catProbeMetadata"),
#JsonSubTypes.Type(value = DogProbeMetadata.class, name = "dogProbeMetadata"),
})
class AnimalMetadata {
private String type;
}
class CatProbeMetadata extends AnimalMetadata {
private String catName;
}
class DogProbeMetadata extends AnimalMetadata {
private String dogName;
}
class AnimalRecord {
private AnimalMetadata metadata;
}
Then you could parse it as follows:
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
AnimalRecord catRecord = new AnimalRecord();
catRecord.setMetadata(mapper.readValue("{\"type\":\"catProbeMetadata\",\"catName\": \"Paws\"}", AnimalMetadata.class));
AnimalRecord dogRecord = new AnimalRecord();
dogRecord.setMetadata(mapper.readValue("{\"type\":\"dogProbeMetadata\",\"dogName\": \"Fido\"}", AnimalMetadata.class));
Approach 2 - type is outside of metadata
Just select the class manually, based on the type. You don't need any annotations:
class AnimalMetadata {
}
class CatProbeMetadata extends AnimalMetadata {
private String catName;
}
class DogProbeMetadata extends AnimalMetadata {
private String dogName;
}
class AnimalRecord {
private String type;
private AnimalMetadata metadata;
}
Then you can parse like this. Putting the selection logic inside a separate method has exactly same consequences as putting it into annotations - you just need to update a different piece of code if you want to add a new subclass:
public Class<? extends AnimalMetadata> getMetadataClass(AnimalRecord record) {
switch (record.getType()) {
case "cat":
return CatProbeMetadata.class;
case "dog":
return DogProbeMetadata.class;
default:
throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
}
}
public void parse() {
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
AnimalRecord catRecord = new AnimalRecord();
catRecord.setType("cat");
catRecord.setMetadata(mapper.readValue("{\"catName\": \"Paws\"}", getMetadataClass(catRecord)));
AnimalRecord dogRecord = new AnimalRecord();
dogRecord.setType("dog");
dogRecord.setMetadata(mapper.readValue("{\"dogName\": \"Fido\"}", getMetadataClass(dogRecord)));
}
Related
I have old Pojos inside jar. Example;
public class human implements Serializable {
}
public class Man extend human {
}
public class Woman extend human {
}
I have json like {"type":"man",...}
I want to deserialize proper class using type But I cannot use these annotations because Base class generated automatically from xsd.
#JsonTypeInfo(// use = JsonTypeInfo.Id.NAME, // include =
JsonTypeInfo.As.EXISTING_PROPERTY, // property = "queryType", //
visible = true) #JsonSubTypes({ // #Type(value =
ScenarioByCountryQuery.class, name = "scenarioByCountry"), //
#Type(value = ScenarioByMeasureQuery.class, name =
"scenarioByMeasure") })
I don want to desearlize like if type = '' etc.
I want to deserialize dynamically using this type value.
I am quite new to Java and I am trying to deserialize the JSON using Jackson and I facing some minor issue with regards to declaring the Object/Variable type. I will provide all the codes then explain the issue for easy understanding.
I have an enum that will have the required type values:
public enum IdentifierTypeValues {
Type1,
Type2,
Type3,
//Constructor and Getter of enum values
}
Then for each of these type, I have different classes which will have different input and do a completely different type of process:
public class GenerateType1 {
private String name;
private String age;
//Getter and Setter
//Some required process based on these values
}
public class GenerateType2 {
private String address;
private String city;
private String country;
//Getter and Setter
//Some required process based on these values
}
public class GenerateType3 {
private String firstName;
private String lastName;
private String fullName;
//Getter and Setter
//Some required process based on these values
}
Now I have a wrapper class for these type of classes which will take the type based on enum and typeInfo values. I want the typeInfo values to be any of the class based type something like this:
public class TypeSyntax {
private IdentifierTypeValues indeitiferType;
private GenerateType1 / GenerateType2 / GenerateType3 identifierTypeValues;
//Here the identifierTypeValues can have the values for anytype
//How to declare a variable of any of these class type?
}
This is the class that will be used by my JSON for deserializing. I know I can add a wrapper class of those 3 types and provide that wrapper class as a type class for this. Something like this:
public class WrapperClass{
private GenerateType1 type1;
private GenerateType2 type2;
private GenerateType3 type3;
}
public class TypeSyntax{
private IdentifierTypeValues indeitiferType;
private WrapperClass identifierTypeValues;
//But using this approach will change my JSON structure which I do not want to do.
}
My JSON structure is something like this and I would like to keep it in the same way.
{
"indeitiferType":"Type1",
"identifierTypeValues":{
"name":"Batman",
"age":"2008"
}
}
Is there a way I can declare the variable of multiple type class? or any better approach to handle this by keeping the json format same? I tried searching but I am unable to search what exactly so any help would be really appriciated.
Because the type identifier exists on a different level than the other properties a wrapper class TypeSyntax needed. There are several open feature requests to add wrapping functionality to Jackson e.g. https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/issues/512
Fortunately polymorphism is supported in Jackson with #JsonTypeInfo and #JsonSubTypes annotations.
Wrapper class should look like:
public class TypeSyntax {
#JsonTypeInfo(use = JsonTypeInfo.Id.NAME,
include = JsonTypeInfo.As.EXTERNAL_PROPERTY,
property = "identifierType")
private GenerateTypeBase identifierTypeValues;
// getters and setters (omitted for brevity)
}
GenerateTypeBase is the common parent class
#JsonSubTypes({
#JsonSubTypes.Type(value = GenerateType1.class, name = "Type1"),
#JsonSubTypes.Type(value = GenerateType2.class, name = "Type2"),
})
public abstract class GenerateTypeBase {
private String name;
private String age;
// getters and setters (omitted for brevity)
}
In this different children classes will instantiated based on the identifierType property.
The children must extend this base class:
public class GenerateType2 extends GenerateTypeBase {
// additional properties
}
In a short test it will be:
#Test
void wrapperTest() throws IOException {
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
GenerateType2 a = new GenerateType2();
a.setName("Foo");
a.setAge("13");
TypeSyntax w = new TypeSyntax();
w.setIdentifierTypeValues(a);
String json = mapper.writeValueAsString(w);
System.out.println(json);
}
and the output:
{
"identifierTypeValues":
{
"name":"Foo",
"age":"13"
},
"identifierType":"Type2"
}
Deserialization
#Test
void wrapperTest() throws IOException {
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
String input = "{\"identifierTypeValues\": \"name\":\"Foo\",\"age\":\"13\"},\"identifierType\":\"Type2\"}";
TypeSyntax w = mapper.readValue(new StringReader(input), TypeSyntax.class);
assertAll(
() -> assertEquals(GenerateType2.class, o.getIdentifierTypeValues().getClass()),
() -> assertEquals("13", o.getIdentifierTypeValues().getAge())
);
}
If you want more flexibility you can write custom (de)serializer and / or custom resolver. Using custom TypeIdResolver that will possible to convert identifiers to types programmatically instead of using "key-value pairs" in #JsonSubTypes
I'm trying to deserialize this json data into list of objects:
[{
"a": {
"commonField": 1,
"aField": "AAA"
}
}, {
"b": {
"commonField": 2,
"bField": "BBB"
}
}]
Each object may be one of several types having both common and unique fields. Information about exact shape of an object is stored in json as key in the wrapper object.
I created corresponding classes for every known shape (set of unique fields) extending class containing all common fields. Also, I added Jackson annotations to the classes to enable polymorphic deserialization. Simplified, resulting classes look like this:
#JsonTypeInfo(use = Id.NAME, include = As.WRAPPER_OBJECT, property = "type")
#JsonSubTypes({
#JsonSubTypes.Type(KeyBasedSubTypeA.class),
#JsonSubTypes.Type(KeyBasedSubTypeB.class)
})
public abstract class KeyBasedSuperType {
public String type;
public int commonField;
}
#JsonTypeName("a")
public class KeyBasedSubTypeA extends KeyBasedSuperType {
public String aField;
}
#JsonTypeName("b")
public class KeyBasedSubTypeB extends KeyBasedSuperType {
public String bField;
}
With this setup Jackson works almost perfectly. It is able to choose correct subtype during deserialization and populate all the fields including common and unique. However, the type field is not updated by Jackson, the key value used for selecting subtype is not stored anywhere. In other words, the data is deserialized into following structure:
[KeyBasedSubTypeA { type=null; commonField=1; aField=AAA },
KeyBasedSubTypeB { type=null; commonField=2; bField=BBB }]
Note type field having null value. So, the question is - How can I make Jackson to store wrapper's key used for selecting subtype somewhere in resulting object?
Here is my JUnit test for the process
public class PolymorphicTest {
private static ObjectMapper mapper;
#BeforeClass
public static void init() {
mapper = new ObjectMapper();
}
#Test
public void testKeyDenominator() throws IOException {
TypeReference<List<KeyBasedSuperType>> dataShape =
new TypeReference<List<KeyBasedSuperType>>() {};
List<KeyBasedSuperType> result = mapper.readValue(
PolymorphicTest.class.getResourceAsStream("polymorphic-key.json"), dataShape);
assertEquals(2, result.size());
assertEquals(KeyBasedSubTypeA.class, result.get(0).getClass());
assertEquals(KeyBasedSubTypeB.class, result.get(1).getClass());
assertEquals(1, result.get(0).commonField);
assertEquals(2, result.get(1).commonField);
assertEquals("a", result.get(0).type); // <---- this line fails
assertEquals("b", result.get(1).type); // <---- this line fails
assertEquals("AAA", ((KeyBasedSubTypeA) result.get(0)).aField);
assertEquals("BBB", ((KeyBasedSubTypeB) result.get(1)).bField);
}
}
The solution actually was very close, just missed a tiny step forward. It is #JsonTypeInfo(visible=true) required to make Jackson handle type info as normal property.
#JsonTypeInfo(use = Id.NAME, include = As.WRAPPER_OBJECT, property = "type", visible = true)
#JsonSubTypes({
#JsonSubTypes.Type(KeyBasedSubTypeA.class),
#JsonSubTypes.Type(KeyBasedSubTypeB.class)
})
public abstract class KeyBasedSuperType {
public String type;
public int commonField;
}
I have the given situtation:
This is the interface I am implementing:
#JsonTypeInfo(
use = JsonTypeInfo.Id.NAME
property = "type")
#JsonSubTypes({
#JsonSubTypes.Type(value = MasterDevice.class, name = "COMPUTER"),
#JsonSubTypes.Type(value = SlaveDevice.class, name = "FLASH_DRIVE"),
})
interface DeviceType{
String getName();
}
The interface is used by two enums:
public enum MasterDevice implements DeviceType{
COMPUTER("Computer");
private String name;
public MasterDevice(String name){
this.name=name;
}
#Override public String getName(){return this.name;}
}
The second one is for devices you can attach to the MasterDevice.
public enum SlaveDevice implements DeviceType{
FLASH_DRIVE("USB Drive");
private String name;
public SlaveDevice(String name){
this.name=name;
}
#Override public String getName(){return this.name;}
}
The POJO that I want to deserialize is:
public class DeviceInformation{
private DeviceType type;
}
And the json String I want to deserialize look like this:
String info = "{\"type\":\"COMPUTER\"}";
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
DeviceInformation deviceInfo = mapper.readValue(info, DeviceInformation.class);
All research was proposing implementing a custom deserializer for the DeviceType which I am not keen to do since it seems so bad to maintain.
Exception in thread "main" com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.exc.InvalidTypeIdException: Missing type id when trying to resolve subtype of [simple type, class DeviceType]: missing type id property '#type' (for POJO property 'type')`
It seems like Jackson searches for an type property on the DeviceType which of course it does not have. How do I tell Jackson that the Enum selection is based on the enum value (COMPUTER, FLASH_DRIVE)?
I think you're expecting too many levels to be collapsed for you simply by giving a bunch of things the same field and property names.
The JSON required for your current setup would be:
String info = "{\"type\": {\"type\": \"COMPUTER\", \"COMPUTER\": null}}";
Here, the outer "type" is for DeviceInformation, the inner "type:COMPUTER" pair are for DeviceType polymorphism of MasterDevice. And the final "COMPUTER" is to instantiate MasterDevice.COMPUTER (this last bit of weirdness feels like a bug with the Jackson implementation).
To make it more obvious what's going on, here's a simplified version with some renaming:
#JsonTypeInfo(
use = JsonTypeInfo.Id.NAME,
property = "type"
)
#JsonSubTypes({
#JsonSubTypes.Type(value = MasterDevice.class, name = "MASTER"),
#JsonSubTypes.Type(value = SlaveDevice.class, name = "SLAVE"),
})
interface DeviceType {
}
public enum MasterDevice implements DeviceType {
LAPTOP, SERVER;
}
public enum SlaveDevice implements DeviceType {
FLASH_DRIVE, WEBCAM;
}
public class DeviceInformation {
public DeviceType deviceType;
}
Then:
String info = "{\"deviceType\": {\"type\": \"MASTER\", \"SERVER\": null}}";
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
DeviceInformation deviceInfo = mapper.readValue(info, DeviceInformation.class));
If you want something more elegant, then you'll likely need a custom serializer.
I'm familiar with the normal polymorphic deserialization stuff where you deserialize an object based on the string value of a certain field. For instance:
#JsonSubTypes(
{
#JsonSubTypes.Type(value = LionCage.class, name = "LION"),
#JsonSubTypes.Type(value = TigerCage.class, name = "TIGER"),
}
)
#JsonTypeInfo(use = JsonTypeInfo.Id.NAME, include = JsonTypeInfo.As.PROPERTY, property = "type")
Is there any way to do basically the same thing if the "type" field of the incoming object is an integer instead of a string? So in the example above, "LION" and "TIGER" would be 1 and 2. For whatever reason, I haven't been able to figure this out.
Also, how should I have been able to figure this out? Seems like it should be something obvious.
Jackson automatically converts string to numbers and vice versa. Just use string values for numbers. Like "1" for 1 value. Just try this yourself (jackson version is 2.5.1):
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonSubTypes;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonTypeInfo;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper;
public class HelloWorldJacksonNumber {
public static class A extends Base {
String a;
}
public static class B extends Base {
String b;
}
#JsonTypeInfo(use = JsonTypeInfo.Id.NAME, property = "type")
#JsonSubTypes({
#JsonSubTypes.Type(value = A.class, name = "1"),
#JsonSubTypes.Type(value = B.class, name = "2")})
public static class Base {
int type;
}
public static void main (String[] args) throws Exception {
final ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
System.out.println(objectMapper.version());
System.out.println(objectMapper.writeValueAsString(new A()));
System.out.println(objectMapper.writeValueAsString(new B()));
System.out.println(objectMapper.readValue("{\"type\":\"1\"}", Base.class).getClass());
System.out.println(objectMapper.readValue("{\"type\":\"2\"}", Base.class).getClass());
}
}
Output is:
2.5.1
{"type":"1"}
{"type":"2"}
class HelloWorldJacksonNumber$A
class HelloWorldJacksonNumber$B
No, that's not an option via the annotations. The TypeIdResolver interface takes and returns strings. You could do it with a custom parser/serializer using Jackson's stream API, but that seems like a lot of work to switch it to numeric field. I would only do it if someone else's system required it. If I owned the whole thing, I would just use the setup you posted in the question.