I'm using this library to validate URL within my app but I wanna run the same method for 4 or more URLs instead of one but can't seem to figure out how to.
My code:
validateUrl(this, "https://www.dummy.dummy/");
SharedPreferences sharedPreferences = getSharedPreferences("url", MODE_PRIVATE);
if (sharedPreferences.getBoolean("validated", true)) {
Log.e("WEB", "RUNNING");
doSomething():
} else {
Log.e("WEB", "DOWN");
}
private void validateUrl (Context context, String URL) {
new FarlaGetRequest(context)
.setURL(URL)
.setListener(new FarlaGetRequest.onGetRequestListener() {
#Override
public void onSuccess(String response) {
Log.e("WEB", "Done");
SharedPreferences.Editor editor = getSharedPreferences("url", MODE_PRIVATE).edit();
editor.putBoolean("validated",true);
editor.apply();
}
#Override
public void onFailure(int error) {
Log.e("WEB", "Failed");
}
}).execute();
}
The goal is, if the url is able to connect (server sent response 200) then do something, else don't.
So what I'm stuck at is, how do I do this for multiple URLs?
Example:
Check 1st (log if it's running or down)
Check 2nd (log if its running or down)
Same for the 3rd and 4th as well.
At the end, it should say which are active and which ones aren't so can someone help me please? ease?
you can use a List of url's and execute that validator function for the number of times that the size of list is and if the url connects (got response 200) then just move to the next url otherwise remove that url from list. So , in this way you will end up with all the working URL's.
Solution Code:
List<String> urlList = new ArrayList<>();
// add all url's in the list; for example : urlList.add("https://www.dummy.dummy/");
Now we will use a loop to execute the checker function for all the url's
for(int i =0; i<urlList.size();i++)
{
validateUrl (context, urlList.get(i))();
}
and in the YOUR_URL_CHECKER_FUNCTION just put a condition that if the server sents response as 200 then do nothing otherwise urlList .remove("https://www.dummy.dummy/")
Sample code:
private void validateUrl (Context context, String URL) {
new FarlaGetRequest(context)
.setURL(URL)
.setListener(new FarlaGetRequest.onGetRequestListener() {
#Override
public void onSuccess(String response) {
// HERE YOU CAN CHECK THAT WHAT'S THE RESPONSE**
if(!response.equals("200"))
{
`urlList .remove("https://www.dummy.dummy/")`// link to remove
}
}
#Override
public void onFailure(int error) {
Log.e("WEB", "Failed");
}
}).execute();
}
Hope you get that. Feel free to ask if something is unclear. And kindly mark it as the correct answer if it helps you so that this answer can help any other needy.😀
Related
I am looking at a code that I have to work on. And basically I have to add a validation to a listener of a button.
The code has already multiple validations. They are kind of set in a cascade.
The listener of the buttons calls an asyncCallBack method that if everything is ok, on the onsuccess part of the method calls for the next one, an that one on the next one, until it reaches the end and goes to the next page. I am not a fan of this approach because it is kind of messy. What would the best way to do that using best practices.
An example of the code:
Button btnOK = new Button("Aceptar");
btnOK.addListener(Events.Select, new Listener<ButtonEvent>() {
public void handleEvent(ButtonEvent e) {
myService.getInfo1(1, txt, "N",
new AsyncCallback<List<InfoService>>() {
public void onFailure(Throwable caught) {
// goes back
return
}
public void onSuccess(
List<Object> result) {
// do some validation with the result
validation2();
}
}
}
}
public void validation2(){
myService.getDireccionCanalesElectronicos(id, new AsyncCallback<MyResult>() {
public void onSuccess(MyResult result) {
// do some validation with the result
validation3();
}
...
}
}
public void validation3(){
myService.getDireccionCanalesElectronicos(id, new AsyncCallback<MyResult>() {
public void onSuccess(MyResult result) {
// do some validation with the result
validation4();
}
...
}
}
Is there a better way of doing this, it seems messy and hard to follow. Adding another validation is complicated. It doesnt seem like a good practice.
Create 1 method in the servlet that calls all the validation methods and do just one call in the client ?
public void validation()
{
boolean ok = validation1();
if (ok) ok = validation2();
return validation;
}
Using mirco services is sometimes hard to deal with. As #Knarf mentioned, this is a way to go. But sometime you may want to handle the calls on the client side. Another one will be using this tiny framework: sema4g. It will help you to solve your problem.
A solution might look like that:
First create the sem4g commands:
private SeMa4gCommand createGetInfoCommand() {
return new AsyncCommand() {
// create callback
MethodCallbackProxy<List<InfoService>> proxy = new MethodCallbackProxy<List<InfoService>>(this) {
#Override
protected void onProxyFailure(Method method,
Throwable caught) {
// Enter here the code, that will
// be executed in case of failure
}
#Override
protected void onProxySuccess(Method method,
List<InfoService> response) {
// Enter here the code, that will
// be executed in case of success
}
};
#Override
public void execute() {
// That's the place for the server call ...
myService.getInfo1(1, txt, "N", proxy);
}
};
}
do that for all your calls;
private SeMa4gCommand createCommandGetDireccionCanalesElectronicos() {
return new AsyncCommand() {
// create callback
MethodCallbackProxy<MyResult> proxy = new MethodCallbackProxy<MyResult>(this) {
#Override
protected void onProxyFailure(Method method,
Throwable caught) {
// Enter here the code, that will
// be executed in case of failure
}
#Override
protected void onProxySuccess(Method method,
List<MyResult> response) {
// Enter here the code, that will
// be executed in case of success
}
};
#Override
public void execute() {
// That's the place for the server call ...
myService. getDireccionCanalesElectronicos(id, proxy);
}
};
}
Once you have done this for all your calls, create a sema4g context and run it:
try {
SeMa4g.builder()
.addInitCommand(new InitCommand() {
#Override
public void onStart() {
// Enter here your code, that
// should be executed when
// the context is started
})
.addFinalCommand(new FinalCommand() {
#Override
public void onSuccess() {
// Enter here the code, that will
// be executed in case the context
// ended without error
}
#Override
public void onFailure() {
// Enter here the code, that will
// be executed in case the context
// ended with an error
})
.add(createGetInfoCommand())
.add(createCommandGetDireccionCanalesElectronicos())
.build()
.run();
} catch (SeMa4gException e) {
// Ups, something wrong with the context ...
}
For more informations, read the documentation. If you have questions, feel free to ask: SeMa4g Gitter room.
Hope that helps.
In my Android app, I'd like to implement success and error callbacks for when I get reading passages from my backend. In iOS, it would look like this:
In my Passage.h:
-(void)getPassagesWithSuccessCallback:(void (^)(NSArray<Passage *> *))success errorCallback:(void (^)(NSString *))errorString;
In my Passage.m:
-(void)getPassagesWithSuccessCallback:(void (^)(NSArray<Passage *> *))success errorCallback:(void (^)(NSString *))errorString {
MyApiInterface* api = [MyApiInterface sharedInstance];
[api sendGetRequestTo:#"passages" successCallback:[Passage modelListCallback:success] errorCallback:error];
}
In my Android app, I'm using Volley to handle my API requests, but I want to further encapsulate this API interfacing by having a Passage.java class with a public static void method that gets the passages. Something like this:
public static void getPassagesForFirebaseUser(FirebaseUser user, Context context) {
final String url = URL_BASE + "/passages.json" + "?auth=" + user.getToken(false);
final JsonObjectRequest request = new JsonObjectRequest(Request.Method.GET, url, null, new Response.Listener<JSONObject>() {
#Override
public void onResponse(JSONObject response) {
// convert JSON into ArrayList<Passage> object
// pass on this array of Passages in the success completion listener of the method that called this
// just like iOS does success(passages)
}
}, new Response.ErrorListener() {
#Override
public void onErrorResponse(VolleyError error) {
// convert error to string
// pass on this errorString in the error completion listener of the method that called this
// just like iOS does error(errorString)
}
});
Volley.newRequestQueue(context).add(request);
}
Is there any way to get this kind of implementation flow?
You can use an Interface
public interface ICallbacks {
public void onResponse(JSONObject response);
public void onError(VolleyError error);
}
Then in your routine code just put a new instance of Callbacks (depending on ide that you work could autogenerate the methods)
public static void getPassagesForFirebaseUser(FirebaseUser user,
Context context, ICallbacks events) {
//here code and call ICallbacks methods
if(result){ events.onResponse(response); }
if(error){ events.onError(err); }
}
ultimately you can call the method with :
getPassagesForFirebaseUser(user, context, new ICallbacks(){
#Override
public void onResponse(JSONObject response){
//Success !!!
}
#Override
public void onError(VolleyError response){
//Error !!!
}
});
Sorry for my English, hope this help !
My app crashes because the images ArrayList is empty when I set the adapter, I figured that out by putting a toast message right after I parse my JSON request, and a Toast message after I initialize my adapter, "second" gets printed first on screen and the app crashes right after, does it have to do with my internet? Or am I missing something, here's my code, thanks!
#Override
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
setContentView(R.layout.activity_page);
mViewPager = (ViewPager) findViewById(R.id.view_pager);
mVolleySingleton = VolleySingleton.getInstance();
mRequestQueue = mVolleySingleton.getRequestQueue();
//First Toast message inside this method
sendAPIRequest();
//after you get the images
mCustomSwipeAdapter = new CustomSwipeAdapter(this, images);
//SECOND TOAST
Toast.makeText(getApplicationContext(), "Second", Toast.LENGTH_LONG).show();
mViewPager.setAdapter(mCustomSwipeAdapter);
mCustomSwipeAdapter.notifyDataSetChanged();
}
public void sendAPIRequest(){
String requestURL = "";
JsonObjectRequest jsonObjectRequest = new JsonObjectRequest(Request.Method.GET, requestURL, (String) null, new Response.Listener<JSONObject>() {
#Override
public void onResponse(JSONObject response) {
parseJSONResponse(response);
//FIRST TOAST : SHOULD BE CALLED FIRST
Toast.makeText(getApplicationContext(), "First", Toast.LENGTH_LONG).show();
}
}, new Response.ErrorListener() {
#Override
public void onErrorResponse(VolleyError error) {
}
});
mRequestQueue.add(jsonObjectRequest);
}
public void parseJSONResponse(JSONObject response) {
if (response != null || response.length() != 0) {
try {
JSONObject GObject = response.getJSONObject("game");
String name = "N/A";
if (GObject.has("name") && !GObject.isNull("name")) { name = GObject.getString("name"); }
if (GObject.has("screenshots") && !GObject.isNull("screenshots")) {
JSONArray screenShotsArray = GObject.getJSONArray("screenshots");
for (int i = 0; i < screenShotsArray.length(); i++){
JSONObject screenshot = screenShotsArray.getJSONObject(i);
String screenshotURL = screenshot.getString("url");
images.add(screenshotURL);
}
}
} catch (JSONException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
Does it have to do with my internet? Or am I missing something ...
Both. It happens because you have a race condition.
From what I can make out, your images list is being populated asynchronously by the onResponse callback. Basically, that happens when your app gets the responses to the API requests that it is making. That is going to take at least milliseconds, and possibly seconds (or longer).
But your app is (so you say) crashing soon after the swipe adapter is registered, and the evidence is that the images list has not been populated.
There are three possibilities:
There is something wrong with the requests you are sending which is causing the API requests to not give you any response. (Hypothetically, you could have authentication wrong or something.)
The API requests are taking a long time because of internet connection speed, congestion, or the remote server being slow.
The API requests are taking a short time ... but the adapter registration is even quicker.
If (hypothetically) there is a problem with your requests you will need to fix that. But both of the other scenarios have to be fixed by:
modifying the code that uses the images to work properly if there are no images (yet), or
modifying the code to wait until the image loading has completed before registering the adapter.
Please use this code in your onResponse callback :
//after you get the images
mCustomSwipeAdapter = new CustomSwipeAdapter(this, images);
//SECOND TOAST
Toast.makeText(getApplicationContext(), "Second", Toast.LENGTH_LONG).show();
mViewPager.setAdapter(mCustomSwipeAdapter);
mCustomSwipeAdapter.notifyDataSetChanged();
Volley adds your requests in queue , so better do all the dependent tasks in Response or Error callback only.
I have a single incident where a complete duplicate of a entry was made into the database (the same user comment appeared twice). They had different object IDs but were otherwise the exact same. It was slower than usual to finish the posting and only happened once out of dozens of comments, so I want to say it was a Parse issue during the saveInBackground call. Even so, I expect a service like Parse to be a little more robust. As my first time working with Android though, I also can't be sure nothing is wrong on my end. Any help? Also just any criticisms? This is the method called when the user hits a comment submission button:
private void submitComment() {
String text = commentText.getText().toString().trim();
Intent intent = getIntent();
String ID = intent.getStringExtra("imageID");
String parentID = intent.getStringExtra("parent");
// Set up a progress dialog
final ProgressDialog loadingDialog = new ProgressDialog(CommentSubmitActivity.this);
loadingDialog.setMessage(getString(R.string.publishing_comment));
loadingDialog.show();
Comment comment = new Comment();
comment.setText(text);
comment.setUser((ParseUser.getCurrentUser()));
if (ID.equals("#child")) {
comment.setParent(parentID);
comment.setImage("#child");
ParseQuery<ParseObject> query = ParseQuery.getQuery("Comment");
query.getInBackground(parentID, new GetCallback<ParseObject>() {
public void done(ParseObject parentComment, ParseException e) {
if (e == null) {
int numChild = parentComment.getInt("numChild");
parentComment.put("numChild", ++numChild);
parentComment.saveInBackground();
} else {
Log.d("numChild: ", "error");
}
}
});
} else {
comment.setImage(ID);
comment.put("numChild", 0);
ParseQuery<ParseObject> query = ParseQuery.getQuery("ImageUpload");
query.getInBackground(ID, new GetCallback<ParseObject>() {
public void done(ParseObject image, ParseException e) {
if (e == null) {
int numComments = image.getInt("numComments");
image.put("numComments", ++numComments);
image.saveInBackground();
} else {
Log.d("numComments: ", "error");
}
}
});
}
comment.saveInBackground(new SaveCallback() {
#Override
public void done(ParseException e) {
if (e == null) {
loadingDialog.dismiss();
finish();
}
}
});
}
I encountered similar problem like yours.
I created an app where user can create account and add photo to it and list of objects (friends in my case).
Once when I was testing it user was created twice.
I went through my code and my my suspicions are connected with async calls.
I see that you use asynchronous parse api in you application so no fragment of code is waiting for response and blocking the rest of operations.
You cannot control when parse server will response.
What I did I just put all synchronous requests in my custom async code (AsyncTask in Android).
Hope that my answer somehow meeets your expectations.
I am a junior android developer and I almost finished the alpha version of my first big project. I think that I have good knowledge of java but I am not sure if I organized my app right.
Short description: I use in my app the volley library to send and receive data from server. Because of that I created a class to manage server methods. In that class I created a lot of static methods for every connection to server I need(like this example):
public static void sendDataToServer(final Context context, final String data) {
StringRequest mStringRequest = new StringRequest(Request.Method.POST, URL_VERIFY, new Response.Listener<String>() {
#Override
public void onResponse(String response) {
// get response
}
}, new Response.ErrorListener() {
#Override
public void onErrorResponse(VolleyError error) {
// get error response
}
}) {
#Override
protected Map<String, String> getParams() {
Map<String, String> params = new HashMap<>();
// the POST parameters:
params.put(API_KEY, API_KEY_VALUE);
params.put(API_KEY_DATA, data);
return params;
}
};
Volley.newRequestQueue(context).add(mStringRequest);
}
So in my activities I call this like MyServerClass.sendDataToServer(...)
My question is: Is it ok to call my server methods like that? Or should I make them instance methods and instantiate MyServerClass when activity is started? I must mention that I have about 5 methods in that class.
I have another class like that with methods to check data accuracy. Should I also make them instance methods and instantiate it in the activities I need?
Any reference or advice is welcome. Thanks in advance!
No, in your case, both ways will have the same result...
The only thing to mention is, that if you need to receive the response to your request too (may be in the future), you will need to add a Delegate / Callback / Interface to your class, to get the result right back to your calling activity instance... In that case it would be better to create a "non-static instance method" way... But you can add a non-static Method to your Class too so I don't see anything against it.
UPDATE TO COMMENT
Well for example, if you want to provide a ListView with Images... In most cases you first request an JSONArray with your ListView entries, which contains the links to Bitmaps located on the remote Server...
If you download Images Async and put them into the ImageViews in the rows of a ListView (while the user scrolls), it could be possible that images are loaded longer and the ListView will show images in wrong places... For something like that you will need a Singleton Pattern, which will manage the downloads for you... This will not be possible with your class/static Method
Although this question has already had an accepted answer, however, I'd like to share my code that looks like your issue. Hope this helps!
I also use Interface like #Neo answer, as the following:
public interface VolleyResponseListener {
void onError(String message);
void onResponse(Object response);
}
Then in my VolleyUtils class:
public static void makeJsonObjectRequest(Context context, String url, final VolleyResponseListener listener) {
JsonObjectRequest jsonObjectRequest = new JsonObjectRequest
(url, null, new Response.Listener<JSONObject>() {
#Override
public void onResponse(JSONObject response) {
listener.onResponse(response);
}
}, new Response.ErrorListener() {
#Override
public void onErrorResponse(VolleyError error) {
listener.onError(error.toString());
}
}) {
#Override
protected Response<JSONObject> parseNetworkResponse(NetworkResponse response) {
try {
String jsonString = new String(response.data,
HttpHeaderParser.parseCharset(response.headers, PROTOCOL_CHARSET));
return Response.success(new JSONObject(jsonString),
HttpHeaderParser.parseCacheHeaders(response));
} catch (UnsupportedEncodingException e) {
return Response.error(new ParseError(e));
} catch (JSONException je) {
return Response.error(new ParseError(je));
}
}
};
// Access the RequestQueue through singleton class.
VolleySingleton.getInstance(context).addToRequestQueue(jsonObjectRequest);
}
Then in Activity:
VolleyUtils.makeJsonObjectRequest(mContext, url, new VolleyResponseListener() {
#Override
public void onError(String message) {
}
#Override
public void onResponse(Object response) {
}
});
P/S: my project uses Google's official Volley library, instead of using compile 'com.mcxiaoke.volley:library:1.0.17' in build.gradle. As a result, JsonObjectRequest(...) will have a difference at its definition.