openapi - regex for not allowing whitespace or hyphen [duplicate] - java

I tried this but it doesn't work :
[^\s-]
Any Ideas?

[^\s-]
should work and so will
[^-\s]
[] : The char class
^ : Inside the char class ^ is the
negator when it appears in the beginning.
\s : short for a white space
- : a literal hyphen. A hyphen is a
meta char inside a char class but not
when it appears in the beginning or
at the end.

It can be done much easier:
\S which equals [^ \t\r\n\v\f]

Which programming language are you using? May be you just need to escape the backslash like "[^\\s-]"

In Java:
String regex = "[^-\\s]";
System.out.println("-".matches(regex)); // prints "false"
System.out.println(" ".matches(regex)); // prints "false"
System.out.println("+".matches(regex)); // prints "true"
The regex [^-\s] works as expected. [^\s-] also works.
See also
Regular expressions and escaping special characters
regular-expressions.info/Character class
Metacharacters Inside Character Classes
The hyphen can be included right after the opening bracket, or right before the closing bracket, or right after the negating caret.

Note that regex is not one standard, and each language implements its own based on what the library designers felt like. Take for instance the regex standard used by bash, documented here: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap09.html#tag_09_03_05.
If you are having problems with regular expressions not working, it might be good to simplify it, for instance using "[^ -]" if this covers all forms of whitespace in your case.

Try [^- ], \s will match 5 other characters beside the space (like tab, newline, formfeed, carriage return).

Related

Regex for finding the text inside parentheses followed by #en : "example"#en [duplicate]

I have a value like this:
"Foo Bar" "Another Value" something else
What regex will return the values enclosed in the quotation marks (e.g. Foo Bar and Another Value)?
In general, the following regular expression fragment is what you are looking for:
"(.*?)"
This uses the non-greedy *? operator to capture everything up to but not including the next double quote. Then, you use a language-specific mechanism to extract the matched text.
In Python, you could do:
>>> import re
>>> string = '"Foo Bar" "Another Value"'
>>> print re.findall(r'"(.*?)"', string)
['Foo Bar', 'Another Value']
I've been using the following with great success:
(["'])(?:(?=(\\?))\2.)*?\1
It supports nested quotes as well.
For those who want a deeper explanation of how this works, here's an explanation from user ephemient:
([""']) match a quote; ((?=(\\?))\2.) if backslash exists, gobble it, and whether or not that happens, match a character; *? match many times (non-greedily, as to not eat the closing quote); \1 match the same quote that was use for opening.
I would go for:
"([^"]*)"
The [^"] is regex for any character except '"'
The reason I use this over the non greedy many operator is that I have to keep looking that up just to make sure I get it correct.
Lets see two efficient ways that deal with escaped quotes. These patterns are not designed to be concise nor aesthetic, but to be efficient.
These ways use the first character discrimination to quickly find quotes in the string without the cost of an alternation. (The idea is to discard quickly characters that are not quotes without to test the two branches of the alternation.)
Content between quotes is described with an unrolled loop (instead of a repeated alternation) to be more efficient too: [^"\\]*(?:\\.[^"\\]*)*
Obviously to deal with strings that haven't balanced quotes, you can use possessive quantifiers instead: [^"\\]*+(?:\\.[^"\\]*)*+ or a workaround to emulate them, to prevent too much backtracking. You can choose too that a quoted part can be an opening quote until the next (non-escaped) quote or the end of the string. In this case there is no need to use possessive quantifiers, you only need to make the last quote optional.
Notice: sometimes quotes are not escaped with a backslash but by repeating the quote. In this case the content subpattern looks like this: [^"]*(?:""[^"]*)*
The patterns avoid the use of a capture group and a backreference (I mean something like (["']).....\1) and use a simple alternation but with ["'] at the beginning, in factor.
Perl like:
["'](?:(?<=")[^"\\]*(?s:\\.[^"\\]*)*"|(?<=')[^'\\]*(?s:\\.[^'\\]*)*')
(note that (?s:...) is a syntactic sugar to switch on the dotall/singleline mode inside the non-capturing group. If this syntax is not supported you can easily switch this mode on for all the pattern or replace the dot with [\s\S])
(The way this pattern is written is totally "hand-driven" and doesn't take account of eventual engine internal optimizations)
ECMA script:
(?=["'])(?:"[^"\\]*(?:\\[\s\S][^"\\]*)*"|'[^'\\]*(?:\\[\s\S][^'\\]*)*')
POSIX extended:
"[^"\\]*(\\(.|\n)[^"\\]*)*"|'[^'\\]*(\\(.|\n)[^'\\]*)*'
or simply:
"([^"\\]|\\.|\\\n)*"|'([^'\\]|\\.|\\\n)*'
Peculiarly, none of these answers produce a regex where the returned match is the text inside the quotes, which is what is asked for. MA-Madden tries but only gets the inside match as a captured group rather than the whole match. One way to actually do it would be :
(?<=(["']\b))(?:(?=(\\?))\2.)*?(?=\1)
Examples for this can be seen in this demo https://regex101.com/r/Hbj8aP/1
The key here is the the positive lookbehind at the start (the ?<= ) and the positive lookahead at the end (the ?=). The lookbehind is looking behind the current character to check for a quote, if found then start from there and then the lookahead is checking the character ahead for a quote and if found stop on that character. The lookbehind group (the ["']) is wrapped in brackets to create a group for whichever quote was found at the start, this is then used at the end lookahead (?=\1) to make sure it only stops when it finds the corresponding quote.
The only other complication is that because the lookahead doesn't actually consume the end quote, it will be found again by the starting lookbehind which causes text between ending and starting quotes on the same line to be matched. Putting a word boundary on the opening quote (["']\b) helps with this, though ideally I'd like to move past the lookahead but I don't think that is possible. The bit allowing escaped characters in the middle I've taken directly from Adam's answer.
The RegEx of accepted answer returns the values including their sourrounding quotation marks: "Foo Bar" and "Another Value" as matches.
Here are RegEx which return only the values between quotation marks (as the questioner was asking for):
Double quotes only (use value of capture group #1):
"(.*?[^\\])"
Single quotes only (use value of capture group #1):
'(.*?[^\\])'
Both (use value of capture group #2):
(["'])(.*?[^\\])\1
-
All support escaped and nested quotes.
I liked Eugen Mihailescu's solution to match the content between quotes whilst allowing to escape quotes. However, I discovered some problems with escaping and came up with the following regex to fix them:
(['"])(?:(?!\1|\\).|\\.)*\1
It does the trick and is still pretty simple and easy to maintain.
Demo (with some more test-cases; feel free to use it and expand on it).
PS: If you just want the content between quotes in the full match ($0), and are not afraid of the performance penalty use:
(?<=(['"])\b)(?:(?!\1|\\).|\\.)*(?=\1)
Unfortunately, without the quotes as anchors, I had to add a boundary \b which does not play well with spaces and non-word boundary characters after the starting quote.
Alternatively, modify the initial version by simply adding a group and extract the string form $2:
(['"])((?:(?!\1|\\).|\\.)*)\1
PPS: If your focus is solely on efficiency, go with Casimir et Hippolyte's solution; it's a good one.
A very late answer, but like to answer
(\"[\w\s]+\")
http://regex101.com/r/cB0kB8/1
The pattern (["'])(?:(?=(\\?))\2.)*?\1 above does the job but I am concerned of its performances (it's not bad but could be better). Mine below it's ~20% faster.
The pattern "(.*?)" is just incomplete. My advice for everyone reading this is just DON'T USE IT!!!
For instance it cannot capture many strings (if needed I can provide an exhaustive test-case) like the one below:
$string = 'How are you? I\'m fine, thank you';
The rest of them are just as "good" as the one above.
If you really care both about performance and precision then start with the one below:
/(['"])((\\\1|.)*?)\1/gm
In my tests it covered every string I met but if you find something that doesn't work I would gladly update it for you.
Check my pattern in an online regex tester.
This version
accounts for escaped quotes
controls backtracking
/(["'])((?:(?!\1)[^\\]|(?:\\\\)*\\[^\\])*)\1/
MORE ANSWERS! Here is the solution i used
\"([^\"]*?icon[^\"]*?)\"
TLDR;
replace the word icon with what your looking for in said quotes and voila!
The way this works is it looks for the keyword and doesn't care what else in between the quotes.
EG:
id="fb-icon"
id="icon-close"
id="large-icon-close"
the regex looks for a quote mark "
then it looks for any possible group of letters thats not "
until it finds icon
and any possible group of letters that is not "
it then looks for a closing "
I liked Axeman's more expansive version, but had some trouble with it (it didn't match for example
foo "string \\ string" bar
or
foo "string1" bar "string2"
correctly, so I tried to fix it:
# opening quote
(["'])
(
# repeat (non-greedy, so we don't span multiple strings)
(?:
# anything, except not the opening quote, and not
# a backslash, which are handled separately.
(?!\1)[^\\]
|
# consume any double backslash (unnecessary?)
(?:\\\\)*
|
# Allow backslash to escape characters
\\.
)*?
)
# same character as opening quote
\1
string = "\" foo bar\" \"loloo\""
print re.findall(r'"(.*?)"',string)
just try this out , works like a charm !!!
\ indicates skip character
Unlike Adam's answer, I have a simple but worked one:
(["'])(?:\\\1|.)*?\1
And just add parenthesis if you want to get content in quotes like this:
(["'])((?:\\\1|.)*?)\1
Then $1 matches quote char and $2 matches content string.
All the answer above are good.... except they DOES NOT support all the unicode characters! at ECMA Script (Javascript)
If you are a Node users, you might want the the modified version of accepted answer that support all unicode characters :
/(?<=((?<=[\s,.:;"']|^)["']))(?:(?=(\\?))\2.)*?(?=\1)/gmu
Try here.
My solution to this is below
(["']).*\1(?![^\s])
Demo link : https://regex101.com/r/jlhQhV/1
Explanation:
(["'])-> Matches to either ' or " and store it in the backreference \1 once the match found
.* -> Greedy approach to continue matching everything zero or more times until it encounters ' or " at end of the string. After encountering such state, regex engine backtrack to previous matching character and here regex is over and will move to next regex.
\1 -> Matches to the character or string that have been matched earlier with the first capture group.
(?![^\s]) -> Negative lookahead to ensure there should not any non space character after the previous match
echo 'junk "Foo Bar" not empty one "" this "but this" and this neither' | sed 's/[^\"]*\"\([^\"]*\)\"[^\"]*/>\1</g'
This will result in: >Foo Bar<><>but this<
Here I showed the result string between ><'s for clarity, also using the non-greedy version with this sed command we first throw out the junk before and after that ""'s and then replace this with the part between the ""'s and surround this by ><'s.
From Greg H. I was able to create this regex to suit my needs.
I needed to match a specific value that was qualified by being inside quotes. It must be a full match, no partial matching could should trigger a hit
e.g. "test" could not match for "test2".
reg = r"""(['"])(%s)\1"""
if re.search(reg%(needle), haystack, re.IGNORECASE):
print "winning..."
Hunter
If you're trying to find strings that only have a certain suffix, such as dot syntax, you can try this:
\"([^\"]*?[^\"]*?)\".localized
Where .localized is the suffix.
Example:
print("this is something I need to return".localized + "so is this".localized + "but this is not")
It will capture "this is something I need to return".localized and "so is this".localized but not "but this is not".
A supplementary answer for the subset of Microsoft VBA coders only one uses the library Microsoft VBScript Regular Expressions 5.5 and this gives the following code
Sub TestRegularExpression()
Dim oRE As VBScript_RegExp_55.RegExp '* Tools->References: Microsoft VBScript Regular Expressions 5.5
Set oRE = New VBScript_RegExp_55.RegExp
oRE.Pattern = """([^""]*)"""
oRE.Global = True
Dim sTest As String
sTest = """Foo Bar"" ""Another Value"" something else"
Debug.Assert oRE.test(sTest)
Dim oMatchCol As VBScript_RegExp_55.MatchCollection
Set oMatchCol = oRE.Execute(sTest)
Debug.Assert oMatchCol.Count = 2
Dim oMatch As Match
For Each oMatch In oMatchCol
Debug.Print oMatch.SubMatches(0)
Next oMatch
End Sub

String contains any but one character

I want to check if a String contains a } with any character in front of it except \.
As far as I know I can use . as a metacharacter in aString.contains(...) to allow any character at that position but I don’t know how to create something like a blacklist: aString.contains(“.(except ‘\‘)}“Is that possible without creating an own method?
You need regex (well technically you don't need regex, but it's the best way):
if (aString.matches(".*(?<!\\\\)}.*"))
This regex says the string should be made up as follows
.* zero or more of any character
(?<!\\\\) the previous char is not a backslash
} a curly right bracket
.* zero or more of any character
This also works for the edge case of the first char being the curly bracket.
See live demo.

Unclosed Character Class (Regex)

So, I have this semi-complex regex that is searching for all text in between two strings, then replacing it.
My search regex for this is:
(jump *[A-Z].*)(?:[^])*?([A-Z].*:)
This gives an Unclosed Character Class on the final closing bracket, which I have been struggling to solve. The regex seems to work as intended on RegexR (http://regexr.com/?38k63)
Could anyone provide some help or insight?
Thanks in advance.
The error is at here:
(jump *[A-Z].*)(?:[^])*?([A-Z].*:)
^
In character class ^ is still a special character. It usually negates other characters when you place there. So escape it with \\ in Java.
Different regex engines will treat [^] differently. Some will assume that it's the beginning of a negative character class excluding ] and any characters up to the next ] in the pattern, (e.g. [^][] will match anything except ] and [). Other engines will treat as a empty negative character class (which will match anything). This is why some regex engines will work, and others report it as an error.
If you meant for it to match a literal ^ character, you'll have to escape it like this:
(jump *[A-Z].*)(?:[\^])*?([A-Z].*:)
Or better yet, just remove it from the character class (you'll still have to escape it because ^ has special meaning outside of a character class, too):
(jump *[A-Z].*)(?:\^)*?([A-Z].*:)
Or if you meant for it to match everything up to the next [A-Z].*:, try a character class like this:
(jump *[A-Z].*)(?:[\s\S])*?([A-Z].*:)
And of course, because this is Java, don't forget that you'll need to escape the all the \ characters in any string literals.
Problem seems here in use of [^]:
(jump *[A-Z].*)(?:[^])*?([A-Z].*:)
^
-------------------|
Try this regex instead:
(jump *[A-Z].*)[\\s\\S]*?([A-Z].*:)
OR this:
(?s)(jump *[A-Z].*).*?([A-Z].*:)

What will be the Regex for my required pattern

I have a pattern like -
public static void myMethod(int Val , String Val){}
so public\static\void\myMethod(int\sVal\s,\sString\sVal)
but if my method have more space than one like public static it fails.
So how to make a concrete pattern .
Moreover the part inside the bracket is not working, suggest me the way to resolve.
Use \s+ to match one or more occurrence, and \s* to match zero or more occurrences. Escape the parentheses so that they are not interpreted as grouping operators.
public\s+static\s+void\s+myMethod\s*\(\s*int\s+Val\s*,\s*String\s+Val\s*\)
That said, it looks like you are trying to parse Java code with a regular expression. This is not possible since Java (like the infamous [X]HTML) is not a regular language.
use \s+ instead
A few things, but you are on the right track. Replace your \s with \s+ to indicate 1 or more whitespace characters.
Also, your parens are not working because they are reserved regex characters. You must escape them to have them be literally interpreted
/public\s+static\s+void\s+myMethod\s*\(\s*int\s+Val\s*,\s*String\s+Val\s*\)/
Try using the "one or more" modifier (+) to match multiple occurrences:
public\s+static\s+void\s+myMethod...

Removing all whitespace characters except for " "

I consider myself pretty good with Regular Expressions, but this one is appearing to be surprisingly tricky: I want to trim all whitespace, except the space character: ' '.
In Java, the RegEx I have tried is: [\s-[ ]], but this one also strips out ' '.
UPDATE:
Here is the particular string that I am attempting to strip spaces from:
project team manage key
Note: it would be the characters between "team" and "manage". They appear as a long space when editing this post but view as a single space in view mode.
Try using this regular expression:
[^\S ]+
It's a bit confusing to read because of the double negative. The regular expression [\S ] matches the characters you want to keep, i.e. either a space or anything that isn't a whitespace. The negated character class [^\S ] therefore must match all the characters you want to remove.
Using a Guava CharMatcher:
String text = ...
String stripped = CharMatcher.WHITESPACE.and(CharMatcher.isNot(' '))
.removeFrom(text);
If you actually just want that trimmed from the start and end of the string (like String.trim()) you'd use trimFrom rather than removeFrom.
There's no subtraction of character classes in Java, otherwise you could use [\s--[ ]], note the double dash. You can always simulate set subtraction using intersection with the complement, so
[\s&&[^ ]]
should work. It's no better than [^\S ]+ from the first answer, but the principle is different and it's good to know both.
I solved it with this:
anyString.replace(/[\f\t\n\v\r]*/g, '');
It is just a collection of all possible white space characters excluding blank (so actually
\s without blanks). It includes tab, carriage return, new line, vertical tab and form feed characters.

Categories

Resources